jrodmc wrote:F500ONE wrote:Uptown wrote:Condescending Much?As far as the Spurs are concerned, it ain't that deep. Tim Duncan is an alltime great. You win 'chips in this league with all time greats. The spurs knew this and tanked to get him in the draft.
Over the last twenty years, with the exception of the Pistons in '04, all time great have won 'Chips
LeBron
Duncan
Wade
Shaq
KG
Dirk
Kobe
MJ
Hakeem
You ain't got an all time great, odds are against you ever winning a 'chip. That's reality. But FANatic and Reality do not mix. With the exception of a few teams, most NBA teams do not have an alltimers but FANatics still show up, root and hope. In the end, you hope for great memories and enjoyable rides ala '99 Knicks, '89 Knicks, '84 Knicks. None of those teams had a shot in hell to win it all, but those teams still remain near and dear to my heart. Best shot we had was '94, but Hakeem is/was a better player than Ewing...It was that simple.
Am I any more FANatical[rebuild philosophy] compared to fans still believing Lebron is angling to play in New York? It's not reality to think he is nor Kevin Love for the matter, I get your point though
All I'm saying is trying to use Philly as a model is pathetic. No one wants to rebuild perpetually in the lottery
You should only compare to greatness not failure. So anytime Philly is mentioned I'm drawing up Spurs
Most teams in the playoffs currently have a Lottery Core it can't be denied or scoffed at. Most of them drafted their core
When I say core, I'm referring to players who are high usage contributors to their success
Hypothetically speaking if you will/// give consideration to humoring me. What do you think Carmeloans trade value is/was if he were put out there prior to new deal?
As a side note Philly is going to be good in 2yrs. They are in year 2 of full blown rebuild
F500NE - You state we need to suhhuck or be surprisingly good.
You state tanking should only be mentioned when it works (San Tone), but not when it doesn't (Philly) That's a great strategy for discussion, only examples that work need apply.
And then you point out that Philly is going to be good in 2 years.
Lebron, Shaq, KG. These examples don't count, either, right?
Last year was their true first year to rebuilding.
You're using a team who just started the process last year come on
A better example would have been the Timberwolves to state your case, but let's be fair they play in an incredibly tougher conference we don't.
Then let's look at what's on their horizon a potential Kevin Love[lottery pick] for Wiggins[ lottery pick kid is for real] swap
Not necessarily a bad thing and exactly what could change the course for the Wolves
Going back to Philly they haven't been perpetually in the lottery. Remember this is the same team who beat the Bulls in the playoffs a couple yrs ago.
Year 1 - They drafted MCW, traded Jrue Holiday for Noel[who was injured] and a 2014 pick
Year 2 - Following year they drafted Joel Embid and Dario Saric[comes over next year]
Year 3 - If in lottery again they draft the best 2 guard in a year with crazy cap space///more in comparison
In 2015 They have all 5 positions locked up
PG-MCW - 20
G-2015 lottery pick - 18/19
SF-Saric - 21
F-Noel - 20
C-Embid - 20
All of them high upside young talent, cheap, whole career and best yrs ahead of themselves with no short windows to be good.
The fact they have 5 all on 1 team says at least 40% will prove to be cornerstone type talent, maybe more
Didn't-Doesn't take long does it
Now which year of Phil's 5 do you absolutely see us competing at a high level? Is it when we sign Durant in 2yrs?
Okay count the yrs that have passed since trading for Melo and where does this place us, yr 7