[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Phil Jackson speaks!
Author Thread
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/3/2014  10:53 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:We overpaid for Melo. We absolutely were retarded on Amare.

Did Melo hurt what Amare could have done here? Amare could never have been a piece of a winner. He was a deterrent due to his ridiculous contract.

Did getting Amare hurt what Melo could have done. It certainly did.

What if instead of Amare, we got West or Milsap + a Lowry type of player? Then we added pieces around that?

I can understand if people don't like melo and question parts of his game. His shot selection, his defense, etc ... but we could have put a pretty good team around him. Its probably what Phil is hoping to redo. Build a better team around Melo (for the right price).

Great post. The Amare signing, with what the docs in Phoenix were saying was really stupid and played out that way.

How were we stupid, did their doctors warn us about Amare's habit of slapping metal objects, did they warn us about his trick shots during warm ups the messes up his back, did they warn us about a lock out, did they warn us that he was going to lead the league in minutes played (before meloe got here)and HOW MDA would run him into the ground until he eventually broke down (also see Kobe under MDA and the mins he played, and how that turned out).

Did they warn us about melo coming over and literally taking 10 to 15 touches away from Amare, did they warn us that Tyson and Amare was not a good fit from jump.

Maybe you guys would have prefered Bosh or josh smith, for about 2 mill less, or joe johnson for 5 mill more.

Anybody who says Amare hampered this team because of his knee woes(4 total months out of 22.. he miss because of his knees) , is just a flat out hater, know very little about basketball and how a team succeeds, and their mind is just to narrow

Well if you can't insure a guys contract because of past surgeries and the team that he wants to play for won't sign him to a long term deal because their medical staff says there is a time limit on his knees I guess you ignore that and sign him anyway? Making knucklehead mistakes like throwing down so hard in warm ups that you hurt your back or punching out a fire extinguisher were just extras. Three knee surgeries in 12 months when you are owed 66 mil over three years is a mistake in my opinion. Especially if everyone else was aware that there was a pretty good chance that that was how things would eventually work out.

But he only miss 4 total months because of knee issues. Even is he was insured, he didn't miss enough time for the franchise to take out a claim on him..

If you have a $500 deductible and the damage to your car is $300 would you put in a claim. Tyson chandler miss close to the same amount of games amare miss, K love has miss twice the amount of games amare miss, and what about rose and rondo.

Even if Amare was making 5 mill less per, were still over the cap..

Amare has played 2100 minutes in the last two seasons and has had a cap hold of over 20 million both of those seasons. And he is due 22 mil next year. Some of Amare's problems were self inflicted but Amare's knees broke down three years before the end of his contract. Maybe the Knicks can nurse him along again next year and get 50+ games and 1000 minutes but they are paying a kings ransom for it and Amare's potential to have very serious problem with his knees was known when the only team that would offer him a max deal was the knicks.

So the fact that he change the culture and attracted some pretty good players to join him in the process, not to mention the team has had more success (since he jumped on bored), then they have had in 13 yrs. Lets talk about all the national televise games, sold out MSG.

Whatever the case maybe, he did more good than bad, The team was getting better every year until this bull sht yr, and he was actually a bright spot down the stretch. This dude literally strapped the franchise on his back, took us out the grave made us respectable..fck the 20 million, the franchise is attractive, it's got a decent future ahead, and he can be a solid role player for us.

I's not like amre is a bad influence, lazy and doesn't give sht, cmon the dude spent like a $1000 a min trying to learn new post moves, while JR was riding bikes in the city, and felton was in every club in the city

You think phil is coming here with out melo, you think melo is coming here with out Amare..It's a wise investment from so many prospectives..Thinking outside the box.

ES
AUTOADVERT
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/3/2014  11:12 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:We overpaid for Melo. We absolutely were retarded on Amare.

Did Melo hurt what Amare could have done here? Amare could never have been a piece of a winner. He was a deterrent due to his ridiculous contract.

Did getting Amare hurt what Melo could have done. It certainly did.

What if instead of Amare, we got West or Milsap + a Lowry type of player? Then we added pieces around that?

I can understand if people don't like melo and question parts of his game. His shot selection, his defense, etc ... but we could have put a pretty good team around him. Its probably what Phil is hoping to redo. Build a better team around Melo (for the right price).

Great post. The Amare signing, with what the docs in Phoenix were saying was really stupid and played out that way.

How were we stupid, did their doctors warn us about Amare's habit of slapping metal objects, did they warn us about his trick shots during warm ups the messes up his back, did they warn us about a lock out, did they warn us that he was going to lead the league in minutes played (before meloe got here)and HOW MDA would run him into the ground until he eventually broke down (also see Kobe under MDA and the mins he played, and how that turned out).

Did they warn us about melo coming over and literally taking 10 to 15 touches away from Amare, did they warn us that Tyson and Amare was not a good fit from jump.

Maybe you guys would have prefered Bosh or josh smith, for about 2 mill less, or joe johnson for 5 mill more.

Anybody who says Amare hampered this team because of his knee woes(4 total months out of 22.. he miss because of his knees) , is just a flat out hater, know very little about basketball and how a team succeeds, and their mind is just to narrow

Well if you can't insure a guys contract because of past surgeries and the team that he wants to play for won't sign him to a long term deal because their medical staff says there is a time limit on his knees I guess you ignore that and sign him anyway? Making knucklehead mistakes like throwing down so hard in warm ups that you hurt your back or punching out a fire extinguisher were just extras. Three knee surgeries in 12 months when you are owed 66 mil over three years is a mistake in my opinion. Especially if everyone else was aware that there was a pretty good chance that that was how things would eventually work out.

But he only miss 4 total months because of knee issues. Even is he was insured, he didn't miss enough time for the franchise to take out a claim on him..

If you have a $500 deductible and the damage to your car is $300 would you put in a claim. Tyson chandler miss close to the same amount of games amare miss, K love has miss twice the amount of games amare miss, and what about rose and rondo.

Even if Amare was making 5 mill less per, were still over the cap..

Amare has played 2100 minutes in the last two seasons and has had a cap hold of over 20 million both of those seasons. And he is due 22 mil next year. Some of Amare's problems were self inflicted but Amare's knees broke down three years before the end of his contract. Maybe the Knicks can nurse him along again next year and get 50+ games and 1000 minutes but they are paying a kings ransom for it and Amare's potential to have very serious problem with his knees was known when the only team that would offer him a max deal was the knicks.

So the fact that he change the culture and attracted some pretty good players to join him in the process, not to mention the team has had more success (since he jumped on bored), then they have had in 13 yrs. Lets talk about all the national televise games, sold out MSG.

Whatever the case maybe, he did more good than bad, The team was getting better every year until this bull sht yr, and he was actually a bright spot down the stretch. This dude literally strapped the franchise on his back, took us out the grave made us respectable..fck the 20 million, the franchise is attractive, it's got a decent future ahead, and he can be a solid role player for us.

I's not like amre is a bad influence, lazy and doesn't give sht, cmon the dude spent like a $1000 a min trying to learn new post moves, while JR was riding bikes in the city, and felton was in every club in the city

You think phil is coming here with out melo, you think melo is coming here with out Amare..It's a wise investment from so many prospectives..Thinking outside the box.

Amare's work ethic and character can't be questioned. But he was signed to a superstar contract for the max salary and the max length despite the deal not being able to be insured and doctors advising the suns not to sign him for the length of the Knicks deal because his knees wouldn't hold up. So did the McGrady trade for cap space hurt the Knicks? Did the lee sign and trade for cap space hurt the Knicks? Does getting a healthy amare for 2/3 of a season out weigh all of the players and assets moved to get the player that ended up to be amare? How about the inability to make trades because they have max money invested in a guy that averages a thousand minutes a year?

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

6/4/2014  12:27 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Did D'antoni demand that the Knicks get Amare? I want aware of it. He may have endorsed it bit I doubt he had anything to do with the decision. Coaches don't hire players GMs do. This board seems oddly split between those who worship Melo and those who don't.

It maybe split, but reality is what it is. MDA and walsh were both on the same page with bringing in Amare.
Allan Houston got a 100 mill 12 yrs prior(avg gas price was $1.63)..Go check the list of the worst NBA contracts in the history of the league, the Knicks had 5 players in the top 10( Baker, Jerome james, eddy curry, allan houston and 2 more i forgot) Amare was no where on that list, not even top 50.

And I disagree with you, if the Coach/gm/pres are not on the same page about a player the want to bring in, it's never going to work, ever

I wasn't suggesting they would be on different pages. Just seemed odd that someone was suggesting D'antoni forced the Amare hire. The final decision is the GMs not the coaches. The GMS make way to much money for the coach to take blame for idiotic contacts.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/4/2014  12:57 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:We overpaid for Melo. We absolutely were retarded on Amare.

Did Melo hurt what Amare could have done here? Amare could never have been a piece of a winner. He was a deterrent due to his ridiculous contract.

Did getting Amare hurt what Melo could have done. It certainly did.

What if instead of Amare, we got West or Milsap + a Lowry type of player? Then we added pieces around that?

I can understand if people don't like melo and question parts of his game. His shot selection, his defense, etc ... but we could have put a pretty good team around him. Its probably what Phil is hoping to redo. Build a better team around Melo (for the right price).

Great post. The Amare signing, with what the docs in Phoenix were saying was really stupid and played out that way.

How were we stupid, did their doctors warn us about Amare's habit of slapping metal objects, did they warn us about his trick shots during warm ups the messes up his back, did they warn us about a lock out, did they warn us that he was going to lead the league in minutes played (before meloe got here)and HOW MDA would run him into the ground until he eventually broke down (also see Kobe under MDA and the mins he played, and how that turned out).

Did they warn us about melo coming over and literally taking 10 to 15 touches away from Amare, did they warn us that Tyson and Amare was not a good fit from jump.

Maybe you guys would have prefered Bosh or josh smith, for about 2 mill less, or joe johnson for 5 mill more.

Anybody who says Amare hampered this team because of his knee woes(4 total months out of 22.. he miss because of his knees) , is just a flat out hater, know very little about basketball and how a team succeeds, and their mind is just to narrow

Well if you can't insure a guys contract because of past surgeries and the team that he wants to play for won't sign him to a long term deal because their medical staff says there is a time limit on his knees I guess you ignore that and sign him anyway? Making knucklehead mistakes like throwing down so hard in warm ups that you hurt your back or punching out a fire extinguisher were just extras. Three knee surgeries in 12 months when you are owed 66 mil over three years is a mistake in my opinion. Especially if everyone else was aware that there was a pretty good chance that that was how things would eventually work out.

But he only miss 4 total months because of knee issues. Even is he was insured, he didn't miss enough time for the franchise to take out a claim on him..

If you have a $500 deductible and the damage to your car is $300 would you put in a claim. Tyson chandler miss close to the same amount of games amare miss, K love has miss twice the amount of games amare miss, and what about rose and rondo.

Even if Amare was making 5 mill less per, were still over the cap..

Amare has played 2100 minutes in the last two seasons and has had a cap hold of over 20 million both of those seasons. And he is due 22 mil next year. Some of Amare's problems were self inflicted but Amare's knees broke down three years before the end of his contract. Maybe the Knicks can nurse him along again next year and get 50+ games and 1000 minutes but they are paying a kings ransom for it and Amare's potential to have very serious problem with his knees was known when the only team that would offer him a max deal was the knicks.

So the fact that he change the culture and attracted some pretty good players to join him in the process, not to mention the team has had more success (since he jumped on bored), then they have had in 13 yrs. Lets talk about all the national televise games, sold out MSG.

Whatever the case maybe, he did more good than bad, The team was getting better every year until this bull sht yr, and he was actually a bright spot down the stretch. This dude literally strapped the franchise on his back, took us out the grave made us respectable..fck the 20 million, the franchise is attractive, it's got a decent future ahead, and he can be a solid role player for us.

I's not like amre is a bad influence, lazy and doesn't give sht, cmon the dude spent like a $1000 a min trying to learn new post moves, while JR was riding bikes in the city, and felton was in every club in the city

You think phil is coming here with out melo, you think melo is coming here with out Amare..It's a wise investment from so many prospectives..Thinking outside the box.

Amare's work ethic and character can't be questioned. But he was signed to a superstar contract for the max salary and the max length despite the deal not being able to be insured and doctors advising the suns not to sign him for the length of the Knicks deal because his knees wouldn't hold up. So did the McGrady trade for cap space hurt the Knicks? Did the lee sign and trade for cap space hurt the Knicks? Does getting a healthy amare for 2/3 of a season out weigh all of the players and assets moved to get the player that ended up to be amare? How about the inability to make trades because they have max money invested in a guy that averages a thousand minutes a year?

Your saying nobody was going to give him that money, well my friend, nobody was coming to the knicks either, we had a bad track record..

When you have bad credit, you pay higher interest and thats what we had to pay in order to become a better team. We had to over pay Amare to become relevant.

How healthy has gallo and chandler been, what about lee..Even we gave amare the 86 mill the suns had on the table, if his knees are bad, no ones going to add him on their roster regardless..

But if phil is smart he will keep amare

ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/4/2014  12:59 AM
meloshouldgo wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Did D'antoni demand that the Knicks get Amare? I want aware of it. He may have endorsed it bit I doubt he had anything to do with the decision. Coaches don't hire players GMs do. This board seems oddly split between those who worship Melo and those who don't.

It maybe split, but reality is what it is. MDA and walsh were both on the same page with bringing in Amare.
Allan Houston got a 100 mill 12 yrs prior(avg gas price was $1.63)..Go check the list of the worst NBA contracts in the history of the league, the Knicks had 5 players in the top 10( Baker, Jerome james, eddy curry, allan houston and 2 more i forgot) Amare was no where on that list, not even top 50.

And I disagree with you, if the Coach/gm/pres are not on the same page about a player the want to bring in, it's never going to work, ever

I wasn't suggesting they would be on different pages. Just seemed odd that someone was suggesting D'antoni forced the Amare hire. The final decision is the GMs not the coaches. The GMS make way to much money for the coach to take blame for idiotic contacts.

Its exactly why phil wants a young coach he can mold

ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/5/2014  1:31 PM
Thats right phil, Fck the NBA and their stupid rules, it's all about letting our fan base know what path were on

[/Phil Jackson sent out a cryptic tweet in response to the $25,000 fine he received from the NBA for tampering with Derek Fisher, indicating he was “chagrined.’’ Jackson was fined Monday for making comments last Friday about Fisher being on his coaching candidate list.
Fisher is still under contract with the Thunder, who would like to have him back as a player and unofficial assistant coach. The Post reported Oklahoma City filed a complaint with the NBA over Jackson’s overtures.
Jackson’s tweet:

Undaunted by "stuff" we will continue to have a relationship with the press, which informs our fan base#chagrined

Jackson’s message is he will continue to reach the fan base through the media despite a fine that seemed petty. In his meeting with the team beat writers last Friday, Jackson at first was reluctant to talk about Fisher.
“I’m not allowed to say boo, I think,’’ Jackson said. “I said B-O and I didn’t get the other ‘O’ out and the league already called me up.’’
When pressed, Jackson relented.
“I have no idea if he wants to come here and move his family,’’ Jackson said. “These are things he has to express. There’s so many unknowns and I’m not talking to him. But he’s definitely a person on my list of guys who could be very good candidates for this job.’’
Jackson needs to get permission from the Thunder to speak with Fisher, who said late Saturday night he would only need a few days before addressing his future. Fisher and Jackson were expected to speak by week’s end.
Nets general manager Billy King, during a press conference Wednesday at their free-agent mini-camp, didn’t want to make the same mistake as Jackson when asked if Fisher could make the transition from player to coach like Jason Kidd did smoothly.
“I can’t comment on Derek,’’ King said. “He’s [going to be] a free agent.’’quote]

ES
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/5/2014  1:43 PM
Next year Amare will play 75 games and average 30+ minutes. It's contract year and players tend to play through their injuries and push through. Amare has been pretty much been resting it up for his final year of contract.
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
6/5/2014  3:59 PM
From your keyboard to God's ears. Do those 75 games include the playoffs?
Nalod
Posts: 71352
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/6/2014  3:23 PM
Friday, June 6, 2014
Only Phil's inner circle need apply?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Ian Begley

As the Knicks coaching search nears the two-month mark, many wonder why team president Phil Jackson hasn't reached out to ex-Knick point guard Mark Jackson or ex-Knicks coach Jeff Van Gundy to interview for the opening.



Jackson
Instead of talking to coaches with experience on the bench, Jackson has focused his search on those with whom he has a previous relationship: Steve Kerr and Derek Fisher.

Earlier this month, Jackson explained the rationale behind talking only to those in his "circle."

"I have a big circle," Jackson said with a grin.

He added, "I'd like to have a prior relationship with a coach so that we know that we’ve gone through some kind of issues together. We’ve dealt with some kind of battle situations. We’ve had conflicts, we’ve had disagreements and we know how to work things out. Those, I think, are part and parcel I think to having a relationship with people that can work together that can still disagree and come to terms."

Given that statement, it's fair to assume that unless things fall through with Jackson's pursuit of Fisher, he won't be scheduling any interviews with Van Gundy or Mark Jackson.

Sources told ESPN.com that Jackson also hasn't entirely ruled out talking with Mark Jackson, who has rejoined ESPN as a broadcaster after his dismissal by the Warriors. But sources insist that Jackson's preference is to hire a young coach who he can mold.

Other candidates on Jackson's short list include Kurt Rambis, who worked as an assistant to the ousted Mike D'Antoni with the Lakers last season, and current D-League developmental coach Luke Walton of the L.A. D-Fenders. Sources told ESPN.com earlier this week that Rambis and Walton are more likely regarded as potential assistants for the eventual coach.

Jackson was asked last week if he thought hiring a younger coach without much experience was an advantage in the New York market.

"I'm thinking about Don Nelson coming in here, and Lenny Wilkens coming in here, Hall of Fame coaches that were unsuccessful coming in and coaching the Knicks ... I think the fan core deserves kind of an unbiased [coach]. You [reporters] will do your research and find the nooks and crannies about all these guys that are proposed, but they will come in without a bias that will have an open, clean slate to kind of work with. I think there is something in that that appeals to me," Jackson said.

The Zen Master added that his search isn't limited to coaches with little to no experience.

"There are other guys out there that have coached that are busy, that have jobs, also [who] I would welcome as coaches but they have jobs. and ... there's some college guys I'm even interested in. I shouldn't even say even, but I'm interested in could come in and do this and have experience. So it's not limited in that way."

He also made it clear that he's not looking for a coach to come in for one or two seasons while the Knicks look to rebuild.

"I want to assure you that whoever the coach is and is the choice, will be a person that understands the direction I'm trying to create for this basketball team. And will have the attributes that are really necessary to bring this franchise along and not just for a stop-gap measure but for a duration of time."

Question: Do you agree with Jackson's approach of interviewing only those with whom he has a previous relationship?

You can follow Ian Begley on Twitter.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Phil Jackson speaks!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy