Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:I didnt want Moz traded either but having a big game years removed from the trade is like coming up with a great comeback long after someone disses you.

But many people also say that it takes a few years to see if a trade worked out (not saying you specifically but many people say that).

But some people (not mentioning names) have said that a small sample size is never the way to go!

Additionally, they (not too sure who they are) say advanced stats are the way to evaluate many things!

GustavBahler wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:I didnt want Moz traded either but having a big game years removed from the trade is like coming up with a great comeback long after someone disses you.

But many people also say that it takes a few years to see if a trade worked out (not saying you specifically but many people say that).

The difference here is that we are talking about one game.

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:I didnt want Moz traded either but having a big game years removed from the trade is like coming up with a great comeback long after someone disses you.

But many people also say that it takes a few years to see if a trade worked out (not saying you specifically but many people say that).

The difference here is that we are talking about one game.

Yeah, with Moz I would focus more on the fact that he's produced at a very good rate all season rather than any one game.

9 and 6 in 21 minutes isnt bad, if Moz can put up 18 and 10 with starters minutes, consistently, then it will be a different conversation. Not all players cant do tbat with increased PT. Time will tell

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:I didnt want Moz traded either but having a big game years removed from the trade is like coming up with a great comeback long after someone disses you.

But many people also say that it takes a few years to see if a trade worked out (not saying you specifically but many people say that).

The difference here is that we are talking about one game.

Yeah, with Moz I would focus more on the fact that he's produced at a very good rate all season rather than any one game.

9 and 6 in 21 minutes isnt bad, if Moz can put up 18 and 10 with starters minutes, consistently, then it will be a different conversation. Not all players cant do tbat with increased PT. Time will tell

18 and 10 would be magnificent. Most all-star centers don't even put that up.

Fair enough. Have to see more than 9 and 6 for me to have any regrets about trading him 3 years later.

CrushAlot wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:I didnt want Moz traded either but having a big game years removed from the trade is like coming up with a great comeback long after someone disses you.

But many people also say that it takes a few years to see if a trade worked out (not saying you specifically but many people say that).

The difference here is that we are talking about one game.

Yeah, with Moz I would focus more on the fact that he's produced at a very good rate all season rather than any one game.

9 and 6 in 21 minutes isnt bad, if Moz can put up 18 and 10 with starters minutes, consistently, then it will be a different conversation. Not all players cant do tbat with increased PT. Time will tell

18 and 10 would be magnificent. Most all-star centers don't even put that up.

Fair enough. Have to see more than 9 and 6 for me to have any regrets about trading him 3 years later.

Also Moz got more minutes because mcGee and later hicks on were out with injuries. The Denver owner seems very committed to making the McGee signing look good.

Let's hear about someone on the Knicks getting chatted up for meaningless statistics during the meaningless portion of the jv season. Where's that Cole Aldrich Appreciation thread...