gunsnewing wrote:fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Better than teague
depends on cost. I like Teague in a salary dump... I would love him in a Jamal Crawford role, first guard off the bench. Can play point. Really good scorer. Really quick. Good tempo setter.We need a lot more.
I would rather spend and get a piece we can build around like Lowry. Guys like Teague and to a lesser degree Collison are ok but arent changing the dynamic of the team. A legit floor general could. Is that Collison? Hmmmm....
My question as well. Long term?
Long term probably a better option than Lowry price wise (Lowry is gonna cost us a ransom to get in a trade then we have to pay him. Plus Lowry is 28/29 years old. It seems Collison has been in the league forever but he is only 25. He put up good numbers when Paul was out and he has sone upside.
I am a huge Lowry fan. I love the guy and his game and his leadership. He is a real floor general. But I think they had 2 chances to get him. Once when Houston off loaded him to Toronto and they resigned Felton. The next was earlier this year. Now he is such a huge commitment to someone who isn't a proven centerpiece.
I would love to get him for a package of Shumpert, Felton, and I will throw in a pick because I don't trust this management (Mills) with picks. No multiple picks. No cash.
Collison isn't that bad a PG. It means they probably (hopefully) roll with Collison and Hardaway in the backcourt. Let's be honest. They had to choose between Hardaway and Shumpert and some point.
Getting Bullock would be a bonus. He is a very young player with size and upside and athleticism that was highly regarded coming out of college. I think he just got caught on a team in the midst of transitioning to a win now team.