[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Woj: Knicks, Clippers talking Shump for Darren Collison
Author Thread
Nalod
Posts: 71335
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/19/2014  2:29 PM
Collison is a better Duhon, an upgrade on Felton.

We'll hate on Collison by the end of the season. Felton is getting moved so he can rebound with Kloe Kardashion.

If Shump will be a FA soon enough and I doubt we resign him so he is off to seek a better opportunity.

As long as we don't give up quality Yoot or picks maybe its a good deal. Better to make a small deal then a big mistake.

Toronto is not getting value for Lowrey and can make the playoffs so they should just hold on.

AUTOADVERT
joec32033
Posts: 30613
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/19/2014  2:37 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Better than teague
depends on cost. I like Teague in a salary dump... I would love him in a Jamal Crawford role, first guard off the bench. Can play point. Really good scorer. Really quick. Good tempo setter.

We need a lot more.

I would rather spend and get a piece we can build around like Lowry. Guys like Teague and to a lesser degree Collison are ok but arent changing the dynamic of the team. A legit floor general could. Is that Collison? Hmmmm....

My question as well. Long term?

Long term probably a better option than Lowry price wise (Lowry is gonna cost us a ransom to get in a trade then we have to pay him. Plus Lowry is 28/29 years old. It seems Collison has been in the league forever but he is only 25. He put up good numbers when Paul was out and he has sone upside.

I am a huge Lowry fan. I love the guy and his game and his leadership. He is a real floor general. But I think they had 2 chances to get him. Once when Houston off loaded him to Toronto and they resigned Felton. The next was earlier this year. Now he is such a huge commitment to someone who isn't a proven centerpiece.

I would love to get him for a package of Shumpert, Felton, and I will throw in a pick because I don't trust this management (Mills) with picks. No multiple picks. No cash.

Collison isn't that bad a PG. It means they probably (hopefully) roll with Collison and Hardaway in the backcourt. Let's be honest. They had to choose between Hardaway and Shumpert and some point.

Getting Bullock would be a bonus. He is a very young player with size and upside and athleticism that was highly regarded coming out of college. I think he just got caught on a team in the midst of transitioning to a win now team.

~You can't run from who you are.~
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39937
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

2/19/2014  2:37 PM
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Better than teague
depends on cost. I like Teague in a salary dump... I would love him in a Jamal Crawford role, first guard off the bench. Can play point. Really good scorer. Really quick. Good tempo setter.

We need a lot more.

I would rather spend and get a piece we can build around like Lowry. Guys like Teague and to a lesser degree Collison are ok but arent changing the dynamic of the team. A legit floor general could. Is that Collison? Hmmmm....

When you say you'd rather spend more for a guy like Lowry, do you mean money, assets or both? I'm not as high on Lowry as you, but I agree that he's better than Teague and Collison. The thing is, Lowry is probably looking at a deal of $12 million a year. That's about what Ty Lawson makes and Lowry is playing at a similar level. I'd have no problem paying Lowry $4 million a year more than Teague if I were convinced he'd keep this level of play up. But if you're asking me if I'd rather Collison at his current deal (about $2 million) or Lowry at $12 million, I'd rather have Collison. Even if Collison opts out next year gets a deal at $4 million per, I'd still rather have Collison.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/19/2014  2:38 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:If true though the real question is would or could they get a three team deal and bring in lowry with Collinson and Bullock going to Toronto and a protected 2018 1st.
great call... route Collison, Bullock and a #1 to the Raps for Lowry.

Knicks now look like this:
PG Lowry
SG THjr
SF Artest (dont laugh, its his time!!!)
PF Melo
C Chandler
Bench: Prigs, JR, Amare

We can work in KMart and move Melo to the 3 as well. Thats not an issue with a real PG in place

That looks like a solid squad to me.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/19/2014  2:46 PM
Nalod nailed it. In a yr everyone is be crying that collision stinks. Fortunately he expires
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
2/19/2014  2:47 PM
Collinson seems to excel as CP3s back up- he looked great when CP3 went down with the meniscus a few years ago, and a lot of people on this board wanted us to trade for him that offseason. But then, when he got a starting gig with... The Pacers I think, and then the Mavs he was really disappointing. So I guess I wonder what Collinson we'd be getting- seems to have resurrected his career a bit, but again that's from playing as CP 3s back up.

I think he's a FA this offseason too? Didn't he just sign a one year deal with the Clips, in which case we wouldn't have his bird rights would we?

Not sure where Shump would fit with the Clips once Reddick is back- they also have Crawford at the 2 spot.

Hmmm...

Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

2/19/2014  2:49 PM
smackeddog wrote:Collinson seems to excel as CP3s back up- he looked great when CP3 went down with the meniscus a few years ago, and a lot of people on this board wanted us to trade for him that offseason. But then, when he got a starting gig with... The Pacers I think, and then the Mavs he was really disappointing. So I guess I wonder what Collinson we'd be getting- seems to have resurrected his career a bit, but again that's from playing as CP 3s back up.

I think he's a FA this offseason too? Didn't he just sign a one year deal with the Clips, in which case we wouldn't have his bird rights would we?

Not sure where Shump would fit with the Clips once Reddick is back- they also have Crawford at the 2 spot.

Hmmm...

well you are not going to have anyone take fatton on and give us a sure fire hit. Think JR Smith potential but without the attitude and bone headedness. All the potential but as much work to see if he becomes THAT PG for us or not.

Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/19/2014  3:08 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Better than teague
depends on cost. I like Teague in a salary dump... I would love him in a Jamal Crawford role, first guard off the bench. Can play point. Really good scorer. Really quick. Good tempo setter.

We need a lot more.

I would rather spend and get a piece we can build around like Lowry. Guys like Teague and to a lesser degree Collison are ok but arent changing the dynamic of the team. A legit floor general could. Is that Collison? Hmmmm....

When you say you'd rather spend more for a guy like Lowry, do you mean money, assets or both? I'm not as high on Lowry as you, but I agree that he's better than Teague and Collison. The thing is, Lowry is probably looking at a deal of $12 million a year. That's about what Ty Lawson makes and Lowry is playing at a similar level. I'd have no problem paying Lowry $4 million a year more than Teague if I were convinced he'd keep this level of play up. But if you're asking me if I'd rather Collison at his current deal (about $2 million) or Lowry at $12 million, I'd rather have Collison. Even if Collison opts out next year gets a deal at $4 million per, I'd still rather have Collison.

assets... but it depends on fit. I would pay Lowry that.. or close to it. I see him in the category of Rondo or Ty Lawson. I think in NY he makes a couple all star games and QBs a wining team. DJ (who is an idiot but DOES watch every Raps game) called him the next Billups. I think thats about right. Bulldog. Great defender.

yellow had a good suggesting... use Shump and fillers for Collison from LA, and route him and a pick for Lowry. I love that. Give my my franchise QB to run this ship, and I set up my backcourt with Lowry/THjr/JR/Prigs

I would jump at that...

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/19/2014  3:29 PM
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
2/19/2014  3:33 PM
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Shump would thrive on that team with CP3 and Doc Rivers coaching him.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/19/2014  3:37 PM
smackeddog wrote:
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Shump would thrive on that team with CP3 and Doc Rivers coaching him.

he should... but CP3 is not going to be shooting for shumpert and playing with him is no magic elixir.... I don't think shumperts problem is getting good looks or shots.. but actually making them.. but we will see..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/19/2014  3:42 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/19/2014  3:42 PM
tkf wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Shump would thrive on that team with CP3 and Doc Rivers coaching him.

he should... but CP3 is not going to be shooting for shumpert and playing with him is no magic elixir.... I don't think shumperts problem is getting good looks or shots.. but actually making them.. but we will see..

All I know is that Shump will not do anything for the Knicks. He may become a star in LA but here in NY he refuses to become a star or a good player. This guy has been underperforming by choice and that doesn't sit well with me and shouldn't sit well with any fan.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/19/2014  3:45 PM
Vmart wrote:
tkf wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Shump would thrive on that team with CP3 and Doc Rivers coaching him.

he should... but CP3 is not going to be shooting for shumpert and playing with him is no magic elixir.... I don't think shumperts problem is getting good looks or shots.. but actually making them.. but we will see..

All I know is that Shump will not do anything for the Knicks. He may become a star in LA but here in NY he refuses to become a star or a good player. This guy has been underperforming by choice and that doesn't sit well with me and shouldn't sit well with any fan.

How do you know that? and how can you saye, HE refuses to become a star?

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
chewy
Posts: 20185
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/4/2011
Member: #3689

2/19/2014  3:46 PM
Marc Stein said deals are not happening for the Knicks bc no one will take Felton. Hawks and now Clippers. He even hurts us on his day off.
John Starks is the greatest
ATrain
Posts: 21487
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2010
Member: #3192

2/19/2014  3:57 PM
chewy wrote:Marc Stein said deals are not happening for the Knicks bc no one will take Felton. Hawks and now Clippers. He even hurts us on his day off.

But I thought the Clips were interested in Beno. Why not just give them Beno then

playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

2/19/2014  4:06 PM
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Doc Rivers would be drooling to get Shumpert after he saw what Shump did to Pierce and Wade in the playoffs.

He has no defensive SG except the guy who stuck up for Griffin in a fight and got suspended.

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
sealy
Posts: 20683
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/1/2010
Member: #3291
USA
2/19/2014  4:08 PM
I realize everyone wants some patchwork or something to happen just because this team is so infuriating, but wouldn't dealing Shump next year w/ Amare, Bargs, Tyson for a more impactful player make more sense?
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

2/19/2014  4:08 PM
Vmart wrote:
tkf wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Shump would thrive on that team with CP3 and Doc Rivers coaching him.

he should... but CP3 is not going to be shooting for shumpert and playing with him is no magic elixir.... I don't think shumperts problem is getting good looks or shots.. but actually making them.. but we will see..

All I know is that Shump will not do anything for the Knicks. He may become a star in LA but here in NY he refuses to become a star or a good player. This guy has been underperforming by choice and that doesn't sit well with me and shouldn't sit well with any fan.

I don't knock Shump, he's young and he's looking to get paid, just not under the whacked out politics at MSG

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/19/2014  4:14 PM
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

He was impressed with that Shumpert did to Boston last year. More than the Knicks were

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/19/2014  4:36 PM
tkf wrote:
Vmart wrote:
tkf wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
tkf wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:Reddick is out for awhile with a bulging did in his back. They need shump. Also wouldn't be surprised if they brought brown back.

rivers has always talked about getting more athetic on the wings and a change of scenery may be good for shumpert..

collison is a no brainer as a starter here..

Shump would thrive on that team with CP3 and Doc Rivers coaching him.

he should... but CP3 is not going to be shooting for shumpert and playing with him is no magic elixir.... I don't think shumperts problem is getting good looks or shots.. but actually making them.. but we will see..

All I know is that Shump will not do anything for the Knicks. He may become a star in LA but here in NY he refuses to become a star or a good player. This guy has been underperforming by choice and that doesn't sit well with me and shouldn't sit well with any fan.

How do you know that? and how can you saye, HE refuses to become a star?

I say it because I have seen Shump play. I was impressed enough by his play to say he will be a 17-5-5 player. Ever since summer league he has been having a hissy fit. How does he bust out in the new year and go back to being a non factor. There more to Shump and believe it or not he wants off the knicks.

Woj: Knicks, Clippers talking Shump for Darren Collison

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy