[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

i just heard Stephen A say he wishes NY still had Jeremy Lin
Author Thread
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  7:11 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

The #s don't support any of those claims. Even taking care of the ball - Lin has a much better assist:turnover ratio than Smith.
You should check your claims on basketball-reference.com or any other metrics site before making them

Naturally, Smith will have a lower assist to turnover ratio; he doesn't run point and I never suggested he did (I actually stated the opposite). In turns of turnovers per minute, Smith does a better job in not turning over the ball.

AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  7:12 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2013  7:14 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

The #s don't support any of those claims. Even taking care of the ball - Lin has a much better assist:turnover ratio than Smith.
You should check your claims on basketball-reference.com or any other metrics site before making them

Naturally, Smith will have a lower assist to turnover ratio; he doesn't run point and I never suggested he did (I actually stated the opposite). In turns of turnovers per minute, Smith does a better job in not turning over the ball.


Right, just like naturally the PG has more turnovers - not because they're worse at protecting the ball but just because they have the ball so much more. The point remains that none of your claims is supported. Vcoug posted all the relevant data.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  7:14 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

The #s don't support any of those claims. Even taking care of the ball - Lin has a much better assist:turnover ratio than Smith.
You should check your claims on basketball-reference.com or any other metrics site before making them

Naturally, Smith will have a lower assist to turnover ratio; he doesn't run point and I never suggested he did (I actually stated the opposite). In turns of turnovers per minute, Smith does a better job in not turning over the ball.


Right, just like naturally the PG has more turnovers. So, again, none of your claims is supported. Vcoug posted all the relevant data.

Bull****. None of it was conclusive.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  7:16 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

The #s don't support any of those claims. Even taking care of the ball - Lin has a much better assist:turnover ratio than Smith.
You should check your claims on basketball-reference.com or any other metrics site before making them

Naturally, Smith will have a lower assist to turnover ratio; he doesn't run point and I never suggested he did (I actually stated the opposite). In turns of turnovers per minute, Smith does a better job in not turning over the ball.


Right, just like naturally the PG has more turnovers. So, again, none of your claims is supported. Vcoug posted all the relevant data.

Bull****. None of it was conclusive.


You like to make statements rather than arguments. Can you finish the argument. Perhaps you can write a sentence like "None of it was conclusive because ..."
You know, where you actually put an argument with evidence after the word because?
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  7:39 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

The #s don't support any of those claims. Even taking care of the ball - Lin has a much better assist:turnover ratio than Smith.
You should check your claims on basketball-reference.com or any other metrics site before making them

Naturally, Smith will have a lower assist to turnover ratio; he doesn't run point and I never suggested he did (I actually stated the opposite). In turns of turnovers per minute, Smith does a better job in not turning over the ball.


Right, just like naturally the PG has more turnovers. So, again, none of your claims is supported. Vcoug posted all the relevant data.

Bull****. None of it was conclusive.


You like to make statements rather than arguments. Can you finish the argument. Perhaps you can write a sentence like "None of it was conclusive because ..."
You know, where you actually put an argument with evidence after the word because?

I'm typing this stuff from my phone, which is why I keep things short and sweet, generally devoid of stats. Then again, I don't need stats to counter his points. Just looking at them, the +/- of each metric is less than 1 unit, which is generally never enough to prove statistical significance. And as I've said to you in the past, you can torture numbers enough to get them to say what you want them to say. In 2007, David Lee would've been considered the best player on the planet if you subscribed to the Wins Produced per 48 minutes and Kevin Durant would've been a cancer in 2009 if you subscribed to the plus-minus ratio. In spite of the inherent flaws in all of these models, you guys generally use them and present it as conclusive even though they are meant to be used as tools to supplement the eye test. For instance, does true shooting percentage take into account the level of pressure that a player is taking those shots under or the extent that opposing teams gameplan for them? Do they take into account the quality of competition that these shots are taken under (starting vs bench units)? No. So then rolling it out to me to suggest that Lin is a better shooter does nothing for me because it's fool's gold without context.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  7:53 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2013  7:54 PM
Well we're not gonna agree on a lot of the things you mentioned. I just want to point out though that you didn't say Lin and JR were comparable but rather that JR is better. Those stats pretty conclusively establish that there is not a clear advantage for JR.
The only area that's not close is the scoring efficiency, which is a large advantage for Lin. Note that scoring efficiency is remarkably constant across contexts (new teams, new seasons, etc.). Scoring volume might change but efficiency is unlikely to change much.
And I give a little but not much credibility to wins produced. I'd give more weight to win shares and the offensive and defensive ratings.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  7:56 PM
I'm typing this stuff from my phone, which is why I keep things short and sweet, generally devoid of stats.

That's fair enough. I realized after I typed that message that my comment was obnoxious. My bad
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  8:00 PM
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

Let's see if this is actually true. All numbers taken from last season.

Shooting:

JR Smith

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
42.2% 45.8% 35.6% 48.4% 52.2%

Jeremy Lin

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
44.1% 48.3% 33.9% 49.0% 53.8%

Defending:

JR Smith


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.3 0.3 106 2.7

Jeremy Lin


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.6 0.4 107 2.5

Finishing

JR Smith


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
147/245 60% 38/125 30.4% 174/333 52.25%

Jeremy Lin


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
207/356 58.15 33/111 29.73 324/437 53.55

Drawing Free Throws

JR Smith


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.9 .249

Jeremy Lin


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.4 .307

Better at taking care of the ball

This one isn't a fair comparison. Point guards always more turnovers and higher turnover rates because they're trying to create for others. Gunners who don't pass always have fewer turnovers and lower turnover rates because they're just chucking up shots.

As I told Bonn, offering these statistics without context does not prove a point. None of these metrics take into account the extent that opposing teams gameplan for a player, the respective competition that a player faces (first string vs second string) or their respective roles on the team. The game is too dynamic to sum up entirely with numbers, despite what some are leading us to think. At their best, they tell a very limited story, which is why they can only be used in conjunction with an eye test. If not, we would've arrived at the conclusion that David Lee was better than Kobe Bryant in 2007 based on Wins Per 48 minutes and that Kevin Durant was a cancer in 2009.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  8:02 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
I'm typing this stuff from my phone, which is why I keep things short and sweet, generally devoid of stats.

That's fair enough. I realized after I typed that message that my comment was obnoxious. My bad

It was a fair point because I hate it when people do that. When I submitted the post, I realized just how bad it was and was going to edit it before realizing you made another post.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  8:07 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

Let's see if this is actually true. All numbers taken from last season.

Shooting:

JR Smith

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
42.2% 45.8% 35.6% 48.4% 52.2%

Jeremy Lin

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
44.1% 48.3% 33.9% 49.0% 53.8%

Defending:

JR Smith


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.3 0.3 106 2.7

Jeremy Lin


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.6 0.4 107 2.5

Finishing

JR Smith


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
147/245 60% 38/125 30.4% 174/333 52.25%

Jeremy Lin


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
207/356 58.15 33/111 29.73 324/437 53.55

Drawing Free Throws

JR Smith


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.9 .249

Jeremy Lin


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.4 .307

Better at taking care of the ball

This one isn't a fair comparison. Point guards always more turnovers and higher turnover rates because they're trying to create for others. Gunners who don't pass always have fewer turnovers and lower turnover rates because they're just chucking up shots.

As I told Bonn, offering these statistics without context does not prove a point. None of these metrics take into account the extent that opposing teams gameplan for a player, the respective competition that a player faces (first string vs second string) or their respective roles on the team. The game is too dynamic to sum up entirely with numbers, despite what some are leading us to think. At their best, they tell a very limited story, which is why they can only be used in conjunction with an eye test. If not, we would've arrived at the conclusion that David Lee was better than Kobe Bryant in 2007 based on Wins Per 48 minutes and that Kevin Durant was a cancer in 2009.


None of the metrics would have suggested that. Are you talking about wins produced (in contrast to win shares)? I don't think anyone on this board gives much weight to wins produced.
Durant's win shares were mediocre (not great but definitely not cancerous) for a rookie. A metrics expert wouldn't have reached any conclusion other than that more years of data are needed after 2007-8 for Durant.
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

11/29/2013  8:08 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

Let's see if this is actually true. All numbers taken from last season.

Shooting:

JR Smith

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
42.2% 45.8% 35.6% 48.4% 52.2%

Jeremy Lin

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
44.1% 48.3% 33.9% 49.0% 53.8%

Defending:

JR Smith


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.3 0.3 106 2.7

Jeremy Lin


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.6 0.4 107 2.5

Finishing

JR Smith


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
147/245 60% 38/125 30.4% 174/333 52.25%

Jeremy Lin


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
207/356 58.15 33/111 29.73 324/437 53.55

Drawing Free Throws

JR Smith


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.9 .249

Jeremy Lin


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.4 .307

Better at taking care of the ball

This one isn't a fair comparison. Point guards always more turnovers and higher turnover rates because they're trying to create for others. Gunners who don't pass always have fewer turnovers and lower turnover rates because they're just chucking up shots.

As I told Bonn, offering these statistics without context does not prove a point. None of these metrics take into account the extent that opposing teams gameplan for a player, the respective competition that a player faces (first string vs second string) or their respective roles on the team. The game is too dynamic to sum up entirely with numbers, despite what some are leading us to think. At their best, they tell a very limited story, which is why they can only be used in conjunction with an eye test. If not, we would've arrived at the conclusion that David Lee was better than Kobe Bryant in 2007 based on Wins Per 48 minutes and that Kevin Durant was a cancer in 2009.


A good example of this was a few games ago where JR was + 10. If you watched the game you'd know that he had very little to do with it.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  8:09 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

Let's see if this is actually true. All numbers taken from last season.

Shooting:

JR Smith

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
42.2% 45.8% 35.6% 48.4% 52.2%

Jeremy Lin

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
44.1% 48.3% 33.9% 49.0% 53.8%

Defending:

JR Smith


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.3 0.3 106 2.7

Jeremy Lin


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.6 0.4 107 2.5

Finishing

JR Smith


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
147/245 60% 38/125 30.4% 174/333 52.25%

Jeremy Lin


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
207/356 58.15 33/111 29.73 324/437 53.55

Drawing Free Throws

JR Smith


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.9 .249

Jeremy Lin


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.4 .307

Better at taking care of the ball

This one isn't a fair comparison. Point guards always more turnovers and higher turnover rates because they're trying to create for others. Gunners who don't pass always have fewer turnovers and lower turnover rates because they're just chucking up shots.

As I told Bonn, offering these statistics without context does not prove a point. None of these metrics take into account the extent that opposing teams gameplan for a player, the respective competition that a player faces (first string vs second string) or their respective roles on the team. The game is too dynamic to sum up entirely with numbers, despite what some are leading us to think. At their best, they tell a very limited story, which is why they can only be used in conjunction with an eye test. If not, we would've arrived at the conclusion that David Lee was better than Kobe Bryant in 2007 based on Wins Per 48 minutes and that Kevin Durant was a cancer in 2009.


A good example of this was a few games ago where JR was + 10. If you watched the game you'd know that he had very little to do with it.

Are you talking about the on/off +/-? That's not one of the stats VCoug cited. There are far better stats to look at - stats that have very little dependence on "context"

GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

11/29/2013  8:15 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

Let's see if this is actually true. All numbers taken from last season.

Shooting:

JR Smith

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
42.2% 45.8% 35.6% 48.4% 52.2%

Jeremy Lin

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
44.1% 48.3% 33.9% 49.0% 53.8%

Defending:

JR Smith


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.3 0.3 106 2.7

Jeremy Lin


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.6 0.4 107 2.5

Finishing

JR Smith


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
147/245 60% 38/125 30.4% 174/333 52.25%

Jeremy Lin


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
207/356 58.15 33/111 29.73 324/437 53.55

Drawing Free Throws

JR Smith


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.9 .249

Jeremy Lin


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.4 .307

Better at taking care of the ball

This one isn't a fair comparison. Point guards always more turnovers and higher turnover rates because they're trying to create for others. Gunners who don't pass always have fewer turnovers and lower turnover rates because they're just chucking up shots.

As I told Bonn, offering these statistics without context does not prove a point. None of these metrics take into account the extent that opposing teams gameplan for a player, the respective competition that a player faces (first string vs second string) or their respective roles on the team. The game is too dynamic to sum up entirely with numbers, despite what some are leading us to think. At their best, they tell a very limited story, which is why they can only be used in conjunction with an eye test. If not, we would've arrived at the conclusion that David Lee was better than Kobe Bryant in 2007 based on Wins Per 48 minutes and that Kevin Durant was a cancer in 2009.


A good example of this was a few games ago where JR was + 10. If you watched the game you'd know that he had very little to do with it.

Are you talking about the on/off +/-? That's not one of the stats VCoug cited. There are far better stats to look at - stats that have very little dependence on "context"


I'm speaking of relying on stats in general at the expense of everything else. They're a helpful tool, but as NardDog pointed out, only part of the picture. Sometimes it sounds like its the only thing that matters here.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  8:16 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:Well we're not gonna agree on a lot of the things you mentioned. I just want to point out though that you didn't say Lin and JR were comparable but rather that JR is better. Those stats pretty conclusively establish that there is not a clear advantage for JR.
The only area that's not close is the scoring efficiency, which is a large advantage for Lin. Note that scoring efficiency is remarkably constant across contexts (new teams, new seasons, etc.). Scoring volume might change but efficiency is unlikely to change much.
And I give a little but not much credibility to wins produced. I'd give more weight to win shares and the offensive and defensive ratings.

Fair but I still think you're underestimating context with these stats. Just to drive home the point, I'll use an extreme:

You and I play pickup basketball in our neighborhood. You and I are 3 point specialist. You play against high school varsity, and I play against the junior high school JV. You shoot 33% from deep. I shoot 45%. Should I be considered the better shooter based strictly on the metric?

When talking about JR and Lin, we first have to standardized the conditions to get a good idea of what's what. That is extremely difficult to do because the conditions were so dramatically different for the two players. JR was the 2nd best player on a 54 win team. Lin became an afterthought, losing his spot to a dude that was cut from a team in need of a PG earlier that year. The two players were in vastly different circumstances but based on the context and eye test, I go with Smith every time.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  8:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2013  8:23 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Well we're not gonna agree on a lot of the things you mentioned. I just want to point out though that you didn't say Lin and JR were comparable but rather that JR is better. Those stats pretty conclusively establish that there is not a clear advantage for JR.
The only area that's not close is the scoring efficiency, which is a large advantage for Lin. Note that scoring efficiency is remarkably constant across contexts (new teams, new seasons, etc.). Scoring volume might change but efficiency is unlikely to change much.
And I give a little but not much credibility to wins produced. I'd give more weight to win shares and the offensive and defensive ratings.

Fair but I still think you're underestimating context with these stats. Just to drive home the point, I'll use an extreme:

You and I play pickup basketball in our neighborhood. You and I are 3 point specialist. You play against high school varsity, and I play against the junior high school JV. You shoot 33% from deep. I shoot 45%. Should I be considered the better shooter based strictly on the metric?

When talking about JR and Lin, we first have to standardized the conditions to get a good idea of what's what. That is extremely difficult to do because the conditions were so dramatically different for the two players. JR was the 2nd best player on a 54 win team. Lin became an afterthought, losing his spot to a dude that was cut from a team in need of a PG earlier that year. The two players were in vastly different circumstances but based on the context and eye test, I go with Smith every time.


Actually JR's team won 9 more games in a conference where you get about a 9 win bonus - the two teams were pretty equal. The power rankings if I remember right had us pretty close. If anything, being in the east, JR was playing against junior varsity and Lin in the west was going against varsity players.
You're also losing sight of the fact that that was Lin's first full season while JR was in his prime. I'd salivate over the mere possibility of swapping JR and Lin. It would never happen though.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  8:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2013  8:31 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
VCoug wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
RonRon wrote:JR: 12 pts, 1 assist on .322% FG.
J Lin: 15 pts, 4.5 assists on .503% FG.

Who has the "ridiculous" contract now Melo? Ridiculous to let Jeremy Lin go, Dolan.

You are aware that the body of work you're citing is only 12 games long and that JR Smith has been the exponentially better of the two over the course of their respective careers, right? Never mind the fact that Lin still makes $2 million more than Smith this season and will have that figure triple by next season.


The only thing JR is better at is getting suspensions.

seriously? What are you basing this off of?

The same thing they base everything off of. FG%. It's the key to life.

Who cares about the playoffs, anyway?

Next brilliant quip: With the way JR performed last year, Lin had a greater impact by sitting out of the playoffs.

Yeah, I just don't get them. JR's antics piss me off to no end, which is why I thought we should've traded him in 2011 after he first signed with us. I'd still trade him now if the right deal came along but his talent and impact on the floor can't be denied.

P.S., I'm glad that we can agree on something and be civil to one another. My apologies if you've felt insulted by me in the past.

Dude! Not at all! I may be a friggin rightwingnut conservative, board-on homer, but I never take any of this internet stuff all that seriously. No matter what the typing may look like. This always beats actually working.

No insults taken, and hopefully likewise.

Peace.

You guys are great at stroking each other but tell me what JR does better than Lin


JR is the better shooter, defender, finisher, drawer of free throws, better at taking care of the ball. Just about anything that doesn't involve the running of an offense, JR is the better of.

Let's see if this is actually true. All numbers taken from last season.

Shooting:

JR Smith

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
42.2% 45.8% 35.6% 48.4% 52.2%

Jeremy Lin

FG%     2FG%     3FG%     eFG%     TS%
44.1% 48.3% 33.9% 49.0% 53.8%

Defending:

JR Smith


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.3 0.3 106 2.7

Jeremy Lin


Steals/game Blocks/game Defensive Rating Defensive Win Shares
1.6 0.4 107 2.5

Finishing

JR Smith


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
147/245 60% 38/125 30.4% 174/333 52.25%

Jeremy Lin


Shot% in the Restricted Area Shot% in the Paint Shot% within 8ft of the Hoop
207/356 58.15 33/111 29.73 324/437 53.55

Drawing Free Throws

JR Smith


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.9 .249

Jeremy Lin


FTA/game FTr(FTA/FGA)
3.4 .307

Better at taking care of the ball

This one isn't a fair comparison. Point guards always more turnovers and higher turnover rates because they're trying to create for others. Gunners who don't pass always have fewer turnovers and lower turnover rates because they're just chucking up shots.

As I told Bonn, offering these statistics without context does not prove a point. None of these metrics take into account the extent that opposing teams gameplan for a player, the respective competition that a player faces (first string vs second string) or their respective roles on the team. The game is too dynamic to sum up entirely with numbers, despite what some are leading us to think. At their best, they tell a very limited story, which is why they can only be used in conjunction with an eye test. If not, we would've arrived at the conclusion that David Lee was better than Kobe Bryant in 2007 based on Wins Per 48 minutes and that Kevin Durant was a cancer in 2009.


A good example of this was a few games ago where JR was + 10. If you watched the game you'd know that he had very little to do with it.

Are you talking about the on/off +/-? That's not one of the stats VCoug cited. There are far better stats to look at - stats that have very little dependence on "context"

He didn't use it but the point is to demonstrate that every metric is inherently flawed. I discussed JR being the better defender of the two and he provided stats for steals per unit, blocks per unit and defensive rating, which I have no idea how that number is devised. Chances are that the later metric (and really all of them) fail to encapsulate a ton of things that can't be quantified readily, like intimidation factor, number/quality of contested shots per game, the number of other responsibilities the player has on the floor that sap his energy, the team effect vs individual effect vs the opposing player just having a bad game, etc. And really, I could run down the list with each of those metrics. I'm encouraged that people are taking a more scientific approach to the game, no doubt, BUT the first and most central step in the process is the making of an observations and then working backward from that point.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

11/29/2013  8:29 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2013  8:34 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Well we're not gonna agree on a lot of the things you mentioned. I just want to point out though that you didn't say Lin and JR were comparable but rather that JR is better. Those stats pretty conclusively establish that there is not a clear advantage for JR.
The only area that's not close is the scoring efficiency, which is a large advantage for Lin. Note that scoring efficiency is remarkably constant across contexts (new teams, new seasons, etc.). Scoring volume might change but efficiency is unlikely to change much.
And I give a little but not much credibility to wins produced. I'd give more weight to win shares and the offensive and defensive ratings.

Fair but I still think you're underestimating context with these stats. Just to drive home the point, I'll use an extreme:

You and I play pickup basketball in our neighborhood. You and I are 3 point specialist. You play against high school varsity, and I play against the junior high school JV. You shoot 33% from deep. I shoot 45%. Should I be considered the better shooter based strictly on the metric?

When talking about JR and Lin, we first have to standardized the conditions to get a good idea of what's what. That is extremely difficult to do because the conditions were so dramatically different for the two players. JR was the 2nd best player on a 54 win team. Lin became an afterthought, losing his spot to a dude that was cut from a team in need of a PG earlier that year. The two players were in vastly different circumstances but based on the context and eye test, I go with Smith every time.


Actually JR's team won 9 more games in a conference where you get about a 9 win bonus - the two teams were pretty equal. The power rankings if I remember right had us pretty close. If anything, being in the east, JR was playing against junior varsity and Lin in the west was going against varsity players.
You're also losing sight of the fact that that was Lin's first full season while JR was in his prime. I'd salivate over the mere possibility of swapping JR and Lin. It would never happen though.

Right but Smith was playing in meaningful minutes against the best teams could throw at us. Lin, at points during the season, became a human victory cigar and/or played against opponents 2nd and 3rd stringers. That's a big difference. Besides, the East might be the weaker conference but that doesn't mean that better teams will have better stats that their Western Conference counterparts. Remember that most offensive stats are more favorably skewed in the West where these is more of an emphasis on speedy tempo, shot attempts and ball movement while the East is more methodical, which is easier to defend.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  9:09 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2013  9:11 PM
So are you still trying to argue that JR is better than Lin? I don't know what your main point is? They still look even in most areas with the exception of a huge advantage in scoring efficiency for Lin. They both were sixth men on comparable teams. Until you provide evidence that JR was playing more meaningful minutes than Lin, that's just an unsupported statement.
BTW, the defensive rating is how many points per 100 possessions the man you're guarding scores. So all of those factors - at least insofar as they impact the amount your man scores - do count.
nycisgreat
Posts: 20872
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/7/2012
Member: #3894

11/29/2013  9:27 PM
I didn't want to lose Lin either, but I hated the way he negotiated his way out of NYC. I was fine with Felton coming back the 2nd time around. He played very well when it was him a Stat. Now Felton is injury riddled. I do wish we had Lin too. I think the guy is done.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/29/2013  9:30 PM
nycisgreat wrote:I didn't want to lose Lin either, but I hated the way he negotiated his way out of NYC. I was fine with Felton coming back the 2nd time around. He played very well when it was him a Stat. Now Felton is injury riddled. I do wish we had Lin too. I think the guy is done.

We never offered him a contract. What was he just supposed to sit around all summer waiting for us?
i just heard Stephen A say he wishes NY still had Jeremy Lin

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy