Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
![]() Clean wrote:Melo is an easy nut to crack. To know what his actions will be in the future just ask yourself 1 question. What will make him the most money? Every decision in his NBA career was done for max money. I said this last season and it still holds true today. Different players have different motivations. Melo's motivation is money. I am not angry at that fact , that is his decision to make. I just ask you not to be surprised when that is the direction he goes in. No sane person is going to blame Melo. This is on the Knicks to make the right decision for the next 7years. And history proves the Knicks won't do the right thing. Especially with Mills back in the fold. Grunwald would've probably tried to convince Dolan to trade Melo but then he would be fired immediately. Oh wait he was fired |
holfresh
Posts: 38679 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/14/2006 Member: #1081 |
![]() Guys, its a foregone conclusion that Melo will get paid...Since being traded to the Knicks, MSG Network revenues has increase significantly...Add to that, MSG stock has more than tripled, from 18 to close to 60..This is worth billions, and won't be surprised if it's 10s of billions to Dolan...Add to that, the Knicks are now the most valuable franchise in basketball, now worth 1.1 billion...They just poured 1 billion into MSG...Dolan isn't messing with this biz plan to rebuild...Melo isn't leaving anything on the table, nor would I...Get pass that part of the biz...Let's hope they can add players the way the Lakers seem to..They figured out a way to have 5 guys making 20 mio per and somehow make it legal via NBA rules...
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() Dagger wrote:smackeddog wrote:Dagger wrote: And how many nba players aren't? Why are people making out that Melo is the only player to try and get the most money he can? Did everyone forget that the beloved Roy Hibbert signed an offer sheet with the Blazers and asked the pacers not to match. Then when they did, said that it had just been a negotiating thing. Is he a greedy monster like Melo? Sheesh. |
holfresh
Posts: 38679 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/14/2006 Member: #1081 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:Dagger wrote:smackeddog wrote:Dagger wrote: Also they praise Bron and Wade for taking less money...They shaved 1 to 2 mil per year off their salaries knowing that when they win Championships, their endorsement deals ratchets up higher, in a way their NBA salaries could never do..It now cost a fortune to sign these guys to endorsement deals..But they don't care about the money, they care about winning, they took less to play together, one love... |
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010 Alba Posts: 12 Joined: 1/12/2005 Member: #848 USA |
![]() fishmike wrote:nyk4ever wrote:i'm not mad at melo for opting out or for getting the most money he can get - if anyone of us was in that position we'd do the same thing. personally i don't see him leaving 30million on the table and going elsewhere but i'm fine with calling his bluff and letting him explore other opportunities. if he ends up signing somewhere else, so be it, it'll open a boatload of money for us to sign some other guys.realy? Cause I just took some less money to be in a better workplace, better culture, better quality of life. Some other players have done that as well. Lebron, Duncan, Wade all come to mind.. i get what you're saying fish - i've sacrificed a few thousand dollars myself for better peace of mind at work and lifestyle, but i don't think many of us here turned down an extra 30mil. it's apples and oranges though i know, but i get what you're saying. i absolutely agree with your post though, thats why i have no problem calling his bluff. if he leaves, he leaves, we'll find someone else. and i like melo - i just dont think him taking up EVEN MORE of our cap is going to help us win anything, infact it's going to deter us from winning anything. so you know what, go ahead, go play somewhere else for less money. if he's willing to take a smaller contract elsewhere he should be willing to do the same thing here to help his "hometown" team win. "OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
|
Dagger
Posts: 22065 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/12/2012 Member: #4184 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:Dagger wrote:smackeddog wrote:Dagger wrote: The only people that love Hibbert are Pacer homers, and yes his contract is inflated and is hurting the Pacers. It's not about what is expected of melo, I know he won't sit there and say I want 20 mil a year instead of 29. It's on the Knicks management to take a hard stance with him and say it's 20 mil or you pack your bags. If we lose Melo then we lose him, but any salary cap sport is about getting bang for your buck and you're not getting that with 34 year old melo at 30m. Do I expect melo to take a paycut? Absolutely not. Do I think if he truly cared about winning he would accept a little less money when told by management that was his only chance to stay a Knick? Yes, but he doesn't, so we'll be better off just letting him walk. You say the players you mentioned only took less money because they could make more money in endorsements if they win the championship. Well guess what, if Melo took less money he could win a championship and make the same money in endorsements as a result. After all, it's legacies and winning that build up endorsements in reality, so it would be nice if melo could realize that a sacrifice he makes in the short-run would be a win-win in the long run,with more money and a stronger legacy when he retires as a result (and elevated status, we all know melo loves his celebrity status). If Melo really puts on a show this year, such as a STRONG performance in a long ECF or Finals then I'm alright with him getting all this money. But until he proves we can have real success with him as the best player on the team I don't think that commitment is wise. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() holfresh wrote: I think it's wonderful to have found a forum in which only selfless monks post- it seems like most of the people up in arms on this thread are uninterested in material wealth. If they were offered $30million or so, they would refuse it in order to be loyal. If all they had to do was pretend they were leaving their current job and they would get a significant pay rise, they would all refuse and would instead work for less in order to make a stand against greed. It's really heart warming stuff. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() Dagger wrote: I pretty much agree with everything you've said here. I see the value in Melo, but I don't want to be paying him $30mil a year when he's 34, 35 (or even 31!). This new CBA is brutal, and we're coming up for a new one in few years- who knows if that will be even worse (hello hard cap!). I don't think Melo is evil for trying to maximize his earnings, but I do hope he is willing to take a bit less to increase our ability to sign other players. |
toad
Posts: 20210 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/14/2012 Member: #4338 |
![]() I don't have a problem with Melo looking for top dollar. The problem is that we have a front office that is more concerned about keeping CAA and Melo happy than producing a championship basketball team. Trying to build around a maxed out Melo is not going to get us far.
|
dk7th
Posts: 30006 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/14/2012 Member: #4228 USA |
![]() smackeddog wrote:holfresh wrote: you don't understand order of magnitude, powers of ten. it can't be about needing the money since he is wealthy beyond anything you can conceive. he will have earned over 230 million when all is said and done. it's about ego and hubris and greed. it's also about not facing the fact that he is a loser... maybe this is what drives him to pursue as much money as possible. can't wait to see what this clown does next. knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
|
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952 Alba Posts: 21 Joined: 11/21/2006 Member: #1207 USA |
![]() toad wrote:I don't have a problem with Melo looking for top dollar. The problem is that we have a front office that is more concerned about keeping CAA and Melo happy than producing a championship basketball team. Trying to build around a maxed out Melo is not going to get us far. this stance and the others like it on this thread seem pretty reasonable. makes sense for Melo to look for the biggest payday he can. this is gonna be his last big contract. may not make the most sense to basically repeat the same mistakes the Yankees did with ARod. blech. Dolan is sucking the life out of my love for the Knicks. Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
|
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
![]() Again this is not on Melo it is on the Knicks. Of course Melo wants the max. It is up to the Knicks and their future plan. My guess is Dolan is happy making the playoffs every year while fans and media marvel at Melos ppg totals in the regular season so he will be brought back at $29mil per
|
Dagger
Posts: 22065 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/12/2012 Member: #4184 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:Dagger wrote: A hard cap would be devastating for the Knicks, just awful to the point where we wouldn't be able to field a good team until Dolan left. Hard caps require very shrewd personnel decisions to deal with successfully and there's no way we would be able to thrive in that situation with Jimmy breathing down everyone's neck every time a decision is made. If the league implements a hard cap I really hope they raise the cap limit substantially for our sake. |
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
![]() A hard cap like hockey would be the best thing to happen for the Knicks. It forced the Rangers to field a championship calibur team and develop young players. As long as Dolan gets out of the way and let's a savy GM do his job
|
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
![]() If there was no cap Dolan would field another clumsy implosive roster full of overpaid castoffs
|
Dagger
Posts: 22065 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/12/2012 Member: #4184 |
![]() gunsnewing wrote:If there was no cap Dolan would field another clumsy implosive roster full of overpaid castoffs I really doubt Dolan would step back and let things happen with the Knicks, but I didn't know the Rangers operated on a hard cap, so if they've had some success maybe there is a glimmer of hope. I don't follow hockey so I'm not sure how the rules changed when the hard cap was implemented compared to what they were before. However, I think Dolan is a lot more involved with the Knicks decisions than the Ranger's decisions and I don't think that has anything to with the NBA having a soft cap. Besides, we don't exactly have the "savvy GM" you described to fall back on. We had a decent GM (not great) and he was booted out the door. Getting rid of the cap would be the best thing that could happen to the Knicks, are you out of your mind? We are one of the wealthiest teams in the league and we could throw stupid money at any player we wanted with no penalty but the strain on Dolan's wallet. We'd have a ridiculous payroll, but our dumb decisions would not hurt nearly as badly. We wouldn't be forced to make smart decisions so we could acquire anyone that wanted money, and we'd easily accumulate enough talent to be a perennially strong team. We would have essentially been the Yankees of basketball before the Nets arrived. And you're telling me a hard cap would be bad for the Knicks? NO WAY, it would be a gift from the basketball gods. |
toad
Posts: 20210 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/14/2012 Member: #4338 |
![]() Here's my fear for the Knicks--The CBA is creating a situation where there's only certain markets that can absorb these kinds of contracts and not commit financial suicide. Smaller markets are just not in this game, so it's a limited field for these guys. CAA is going after these markets, not only for the branding opportunities, but also because they are the only ones that can still make money without really contending as long as there is a marquis name. My guess is, with an owner that is in bed with CAA because of his other holdings, the Knicks will never have a GM who can make decisions based only on basketball. New York is going to be a cash grab city for CAA and its clients, and the only way we're going to ever contend is pure luck. Steve Mills is not here because of his ability to build a championship team.
|
tkf
Posts: 36487 Alba Posts: 6 Joined: 8/13/2001 Member: #87 |
![]() nyk4ever wrote:fishmike wrote:nyk4ever wrote:i'm not mad at melo for opting out or for getting the most money he can get - if anyone of us was in that position we'd do the same thing. personally i don't see him leaving 30million on the table and going elsewhere but i'm fine with calling his bluff and letting him explore other opportunities. if he ends up signing somewhere else, so be it, it'll open a boatload of money for us to sign some other guys.realy? Cause I just took some less money to be in a better workplace, better culture, better quality of life. Some other players have done that as well. Lebron, Duncan, Wade all come to mind.. True, but how many of us have already made over 100 mil to have the option to do so? turning down 30 mil after you made 100 mil with the option to make 100 more doesn't sound as bad, as when you make 50k a year..... Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF
|
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
![]() Difference is Dolan doesn't care for the Rangers and for whatever reason he feels the need to be involved with the knicks
|