[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Andrea "Il Mago" (The Magician) Bargnani Appreciation
Author Thread
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

7/1/2013  10:10 AM
JayNYC wrote:
Andrew wrote:
JayNYC wrote:hahaha did you just nice try me.. ALL JOKES ASIDE, I ain't gotta make this up .. MEN LIE, WOMAN LIE.. NUMBERS DONT. Looking at his numbers 43 % Career FG 36% 3PT RANGE. NEVER AVG'D MORE THAN 5 BOARDS.. NO DIMES. I didn't even look at his stats til you called me out, But I'm on point.. #FACTS

Apparently men who can't read stats do lie though.

Bargs has averaged more than 5 boards 4 different seasons. But really that's not the point. He's being brought in for a backup role, and for insurance for Amare. Camby and Novak were providing nothing in the playoffs, so why not take a chance. The move is a gamble, and after 2 years his contract comes off the books.


Hahaha. Let me be clear.. for his career he averages less than 5 boards per game.. As a 7ft 260 man that is horrendous! I keep telling folks ... you've just prove'n my argument. I don't hate the move when considering his role, and ability to give NYK a more conventional lineup. The reason i continue this debate is simply based on the idea of it being a lateral move. He is Amare .. trading picks away are reminiscent of years past. Mortgaging the future, for players with problem as a stop gag solution. I never once said i am opposed to acquiring him for Camby or Novak. They weren't factors here.. but i'm not gonna go over hype him like some other people on your UK boards either. The numbers are what they are.. you read em' why skew the argument. Accept it! 2015-2016 free agency cap space only matter if this organization makes a move that produces a winner.

I kind of like the trade because, in your words, 'He is Amare'. I don't want to rely on Amar'e for a full season. Do you? Not really a Bargs fan but I can see him fitting in here

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
AUTOADVERT
NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

7/1/2013  10:21 AM
Not a fan of this trade but I hope his play wins me over...
Knixkik
Posts: 35475
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/1/2013  10:23 AM
misterearl wrote:
Knixkik wrote:To me we got back our Gallinari. Gallinari is a better all-around player, but Bargnani has proven more as a scorer, is a little more efficient scorer, and bigger.

Exactly

Bargnani is a bargain.

Clyde will have fun with pronunciation.

We just got younger. Glen Grunwald knows what he is doing.

I know people value the draft picks around here, but we just got a former 20 ppg player at age 27 on a very "buy-low" trade. Really, this is how successful teams do business. They get decent players at the lowest cost possible.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2013  10:23 AM
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

U think we could have gotten a first overall pick for Novak and Camby??

I did not say that

JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
7/1/2013  10:27 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/1/2013  10:28 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
JayNYC wrote:
Andrew wrote:
JayNYC wrote:hahaha did you just nice try me.. ALL JOKES ASIDE, I ain't gotta make this up .. MEN LIE, WOMAN LIE.. NUMBERS DONT. Looking at his numbers 43 % Career FG 36% 3PT RANGE. NEVER AVG'D MORE THAN 5 BOARDS.. NO DIMES. I didn't even look at his stats til you called me out, But I'm on point.. #FACTS

Apparently men who can't read stats do lie though.

Bargs has averaged more than 5 boards 4 different seasons. But really that's not the point. He's being brought in for a backup role, and for insurance for Amare. Camby and Novak were providing nothing in the playoffs, so why not take a chance. The move is a gamble, and after 2 years his contract comes off the books.


Hahaha. Let me be clear.. for his career he averages less than 5 boards per game.. As a 7ft 260 man that is horrendous! I keep telling folks ... you've just prove'n my argument. I don't hate the move when considering his role, and ability to give NYK a more conventional lineup. The reason i continue this debate is simply based on the idea of it being a lateral move. He is Amare .. trading picks away are reminiscent of years past. Mortgaging the future, for players with problem as a stop gag solution. I never once said i am opposed to acquiring him for Camby or Novak. They weren't factors here.. but i'm not gonna go over hype him like some other people on your UK boards either. The numbers are what they are.. you read em' why skew the argument. Accept it! 2015-2016 free agency cap space only matter if this organization makes a move that produces a winner.

I kind of like the trade because, in your words, 'He is Amare'. I don't want to rely on Amar'e for a full season. Do you? Not really a Bargs fan but I can see him fitting in here


It's not a matter of wanting to rely on STAT.. I think most overstand his struggle. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH TRADING CAMBY OR NOVAK .. not my issue, it's the picks and .. we overpaid in my opinion. Its crazy that most are ignoring that notion. As far as statistics .. I gave his numbers to show those that believe him as being an outerwordly talent that they are overestimating his worth. You've got people saying that he's not here as insurance for Amare.. in effort to justify there stance. Keep it 100%
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
Knixkik
Posts: 35475
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/1/2013  10:29 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/1/2013  10:30 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

U think we could have gotten a first overall pick for Novak and Camby??

I did not say that

If we aren't giving picks then we would have gotten Bargnani for free. Novak and Camby aren't viewed as positives. As much as free would be great, you actually have to give away something to get something back. Just can't get players for free typically. Getting Bargnani for 1 late first round pick and 2 late second round picks, and getting rid of the last year of Novak's contract is a steal.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2013  10:33 AM
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

U think we could have gotten a first overall pick for Novak and Camby??

I did not say that

If we aren't giving picks then we would have gotten Bargnani for free. Novak and Camby aren't viewed as positives. As much as free would be great, you actually have to give away something to get something back. Just can't get players for free typically. Getting Bargnani for 1 late first round pick and 2 late second round picks, and getting rid of the last year of Novak's contract is a steal.


We're not getting anything back. We shouldn't be giving anything up. Novak has played better the past 2 years than Bargnani has. And Camby played better 2 years ago than Bargnani. We should be the ones getting picks in this deal.
Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

7/1/2013  10:35 AM
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

U think we could have gotten a first overall pick for Novak and Camby??

I did not say that

If we aren't giving picks then we would have gotten Bargnani for free. Novak and Camby aren't viewed as positives. As much as free would be great, you actually have to give away something to get something back. Just can't get players for free typically. Getting Bargnani for 1 late first round pick and 2 late second round picks, and getting rid of the last year of Novak's contract is a steal.

+1. Getting out of Novak's contract is a HUGE plus to this deal. If Bargs works out, we got a steal. If not, we got a better shot at rebooting in '15. A big who shoots is better than a big who sits + a wing shooter who shuts down in the playoffs.

I like this deal...tentatively, but still think it was worthwhile for the 2015 benefit.

Knixkik
Posts: 35475
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/1/2013  10:37 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

U think we could have gotten a first overall pick for Novak and Camby??

I did not say that

If we aren't giving picks then we would have gotten Bargnani for free. Novak and Camby aren't viewed as positives. As much as free would be great, you actually have to give away something to get something back. Just can't get players for free typically. Getting Bargnani for 1 late first round pick and 2 late second round picks, and getting rid of the last year of Novak's contract is a steal.


We're not getting anything back. We shouldn't be giving anything up. Novak has played better the past 2 years than Bargnani has. And Camby played better 2 years ago than Bargnani. We should be the ones getting picks in this deal.

We just got a player who averaged 2 straight seasons at 20 ppg and is coming off 2 injury plaqued, un-motivated years. From a potential standpoint, which is how we treat draftees, he is great value for the cost, because you know what he is capable of when healthy and motivated. He is a proven scorer. As a bonus, we just saved a bunch of money for summer 2015 when we will have a shot at a max contract and some. That shouldn't be overlooked.

JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
7/1/2013  10:47 AM
I could never be mad at someone for supporting, or cheering for a player that is liked. I'm just saying keep it 100% when stating your argument. Some in this thread are victims of warped objectivity! I hope he is an allstar NYK. That said, i can't ignore his flaws like some.. nor feel like we havent once again been fleeced in a trade. No way should NYK have surrendered multiple picks for an underachieving 4 that has a history of being injured. My opinion .. I'm sticking to it! 2015 cap relief or not!
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
7/1/2013  10:54 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/1/2013  10:56 AM
I agree with Bonn and JayNYC. You other guys are saying that Novak is useless because he had a bad playoff. As did Chandler, Kidd, JR Smith so all are useless. But these players all contributed to the Knick's season. Novak does have some value.
I don't like Bargs as a player.

You are assuming Bargs can shoot. Well, he hasn't shot well in the last 3 years.

You say that Novak was nothing, but guess who led the Knicks in 3 pt shooting last year as well as the year before. Novak. Last year he "fell" to 43% from 47% the yr before. The Knicks take the most 3 pt shots of any team. Bargs can't shoot 3 pointers any more. From last years 30.9%; to 29.6%; 34.5% 3 years ago. Don't give me the excuse that Bargs was injured. He's still on the perimeter - just has to shoot. How many games will Bargs be able to play this year? Novak missed one game last year. Bargs played 35. And only 31 the year before. And 3 years ago when healthy - 66 games.

Novak can't play defense and doesn't rebound. But neither does Bargs. The excuse people make for Bargs is that he plays on the perimeter. But so does Novak.

Turnovers - Knicks had the fewest turnovers of any team in the league last year. Give Kidd a lot of credit. However, Novak had .1 turnovers/game. Yes the decimal point is in the right place. 1/10 of a turnover/game. Bargs was respectable for the amt of action he gets at 1.1 last year and 2.0 the year before. But that difference is at least 2 pts/game.

Re: Camby - I am not sure why Woody didn't play him even when Camby was healthy. The previous year, Camby, at age 38 had an excellent year. Maybe Woody doesn't like Camby?

The idea that we are trading Novak to free up cap space for 2015-16 is ridiculous. That is 2 whole years from now. We'd have lots of time....and still have the picks to add if we needed, to make a trade. And less years on Novaks contract for another team to take on.

Giving up 3 picks. Picks are assets. If we give them up now when we shouldn't have to, then we don't have them to give up in another future trade.

Bad trade. I hope Stern disallows it.

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/1/2013  10:57 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/1/2013  11:02 AM
JayNYC wrote:I could never be mad at someone for supporting, or cheering for a player that is liked. I'm just saying keep it 100% when stating your argument. Some in this thread are victims of warped objectivity! I hope he is an allstar NYK. That said, i can't ignore his flaws like some.. nor feel like we havent once again been fleeced in a trade. No way should NYK have surrendered multiple picks for an underachieving 4 that has a history of being injured. My opinion .. I'm sticking to it! 2015 cap relief or not!

I respect that. If there's anything I've learned is stick to your opinion and don't cave in to please anyone. State your opinion and let others agree or disagree and if that isn't enough let it go. No sense in circles. Let it play out on the court

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
7/1/2013  10:59 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

Why is it 3 picks again? I've read only the 2016 first round pick which Denver has the option to swap picks with.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2013  11:00 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

Why is it 3 picks again? I've read only the 2016 first round pick which Denver has the option to swap picks with.

I thought we were giving up 1 1st and 2 2nd rd picks

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
7/1/2013  11:01 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

Why is it 3 picks again? I've read only the 2016 first round pick which Denver has the option to swap picks with.

I thought we were giving up 1 1st and 2 2nd rd picks

We are?

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

7/1/2013  11:02 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

Why is it 3 picks again? I've read only the 2016 first round pick which Denver has the option to swap picks with.

I thought we were giving up 1 1st and 2 2nd rd picks

I've seen two variations - 2016 first only and 2016 first + 2014 2nd. Have seen nothing on two 2nds

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2013  11:11 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

Why is it 3 picks again? I've read only the 2016 first round pick which Denver has the option to swap picks with.

I thought we were giving up 1 1st and 2 2nd rd picks

We are?


Obviously no one knows for sure but that's what Wajnarowski said
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--sources--knicks-trade-for-raptors--andrea-bargnani--toronto-gets-steve-novak--marcus-camby-and-draft-picks-223847584.html

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
7/1/2013  11:14 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

Why is it 3 picks again? I've read only the 2016 first round pick which Denver has the option to swap picks with.

I thought we were giving up 1 1st and 2 2nd rd picks

We are?


Obviously no one knows for sure but that's what Wajnarowski said
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--sources--knicks-trade-for-raptors--andrea-bargnani--toronto-gets-steve-novak--marcus-camby-and-draft-picks-223847584.html

Didn't see that from Howard Beck:


The Knicks and the Raptors agreed to a deal Sunday that would bring Bargnani to New York for Steve Novak, Marcus Camby and a first-round draft pick in 2016, according to a person involved in the talks.

ESPN also doesn't mention 2 2nd rounders.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2013  11:18 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:It's a fine gamble if we aren't giving up 3 picks. But we are.

Why is it 3 picks again? I've read only the 2016 first round pick which Denver has the option to swap picks with.

I thought we were giving up 1 1st and 2 2nd rd picks

We are?


Obviously no one knows for sure but that's what Wajnarowski said
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--sources--knicks-trade-for-raptors--andrea-bargnani--toronto-gets-steve-novak--marcus-camby-and-draft-picks-223847584.html

Didn't see that from Howard Beck:


The Knicks and the Raptors agreed to a deal Sunday that would bring Bargnani to New York for Steve Novak, Marcus Camby and a first-round draft pick in 2016, according to a person involved in the talks.

ESPN also doesn't mention 2 2nd rounders.


Yeah, there have been 2 reported versions of the trade. That's why I said no one knows for sure.
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
7/1/2013  11:33 AM
JayNYC wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
JayNYC wrote:
Andrew wrote:
JayNYC wrote:hahaha did you just nice try me.. ALL JOKES ASIDE, I ain't gotta make this up .. MEN LIE, WOMAN LIE.. NUMBERS DONT. Looking at his numbers 43 % Career FG 36% 3PT RANGE. NEVER AVG'D MORE THAN 5 BOARDS.. NO DIMES. I didn't even look at his stats til you called me out, But I'm on point.. #FACTS

Apparently men who can't read stats do lie though.

Bargs has averaged more than 5 boards 4 different seasons. But really that's not the point. He's being brought in for a backup role, and for insurance for Amare. Camby and Novak were providing nothing in the playoffs, so why not take a chance. The move is a gamble, and after 2 years his contract comes off the books.


Hahaha. Let me be clear.. for his career he averages less than 5 boards per game.. As a 7ft 260 man that is horrendous! I keep telling folks ... you've just prove'n my argument. I don't hate the move when considering his role, and ability to give NYK a more conventional lineup. The reason i continue this debate is simply based on the idea of it being a lateral move. He is Amare .. trading picks away are reminiscent of years past. Mortgaging the future, for players with problem as a stop gag solution. I never once said i am opposed to acquiring him for Camby or Novak. They weren't factors here.. but i'm not gonna go over hype him like some other people on your UK boards either. The numbers are what they are.. you read em' why skew the argument. Accept it! 2015-2016 free agency cap space only matter if this organization makes a move that produces a winner.

I kind of like the trade because, in your words, 'He is Amare'. I don't want to rely on Amar'e for a full season. Do you? Not really a Bargs fan but I can see him fitting in here


It's not a matter of wanting to rely on STAT.. I think most overstand his struggle. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH TRADING CAMBY OR NOVAK .. not my issue, it's the picks and .. we overpaid in my opinion. Its crazy that most are ignoring that notion. As far as statistics .. I gave his numbers to show those that believe him as being an outerwordly talent that they are overestimating his worth. You've got people saying that he's not here as insurance for Amare.. in effort to justify there stance. Keep it 100%

Overpaid by giving up what will be a late 1st round pick. This guys is worth a late 1st round pick. 2nd round picks and Dolan has shown he has no problem buying 2nd round picks...you guys are reaching for reasons to complain. WE also opened up the roster spot for Purp who I expect to see signed next.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Andrea "Il Mago" (The Magician) Bargnani Appreciation

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy