VCoug wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:I know people are liking the nets but this makes them older and slower.

I think it probably makes them better for about a year but that's it. And I'm not even sure how much better. This is a team that just lost in the 1st round to a broken down Bulls team and I don't see them improving that much. And who knows if they'll be able to stay healthy. Also, who the **** knows how good of a coach Kidd will be. Honestly, I think they would've been better off if they had just stood pat 3 seasons ago and not traded for DWill. Right now they'd potentially be building around Brook Lopez, Derrick Favors, and Damian Lillard with cap space to make other moves. Now, if they can stay healthy they might be as good as we were last season.

That supposed old rickety Celtic team gave us all we could handle practically. They just added championship caliber players to their team and have depth now.

Teletovic 27
Brooks 24
Joseph 25
PlumLee 23
Tyshawn Taylor 23
Andray Blatche 27(if re-signed)

So where is all this old talk coming from?

VCoug wrote:

3G4G wrote:

VCoug wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:I know people are liking the nets but this makes them older and slower.

I think it probably makes them better for about a year but that's it. And I'm not even sure how much better. This is a team that just lost in the 1st round to a broken down Bulls team and I don't see them improving that much. And who knows if they'll be able to stay healthy. Also, who the **** knows how good of a coach Kidd will be. Honestly, I think they would've been better off if they had just stood pat 3 seasons ago and not traded for DWill. Right now they'd potentially be building around Brook Lopez, Derrick Favors, and Damian Lillard with cap space to make other moves. Now, if they can stay healthy they might be as good as we were last season.

That supposed old rickety Celtic team gave us all we could handle practically. They just added championship caliber players to their team and have depth now.

Teletovic 27
Brooks 24
Joseph 25
PlumLee 23
Tyshawn Taylor 23
Andray Blatche 27(if re-signed)

So where is all this old talk coming from?

Yeah that gave us all WE could handle but we're not a very good team are we? I said I think they've improved I just don't see by how much. To me, they're a 2nd round team with almost no room for growth.

So now you're regurgitating what we've been saying about this team for the past 3yrs? Put it this way who cares how good you think they are, here's what's fact that team just became a tougher roadblock for us because they actually play in our Division? So if either team loses doesn't make it to the Finals who cares we're still losers and that's all that matters.

3G4G wrote:

VCoug wrote:

3G4G wrote:

VCoug wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:I know people are liking the nets but this makes them older and slower.

I think it probably makes them better for about a year but that's it. And I'm not even sure how much better. This is a team that just lost in the 1st round to a broken down Bulls team and I don't see them improving that much. And who knows if they'll be able to stay healthy. Also, who the **** knows how good of a coach Kidd will be. Honestly, I think they would've been better off if they had just stood pat 3 seasons ago and not traded for DWill. Right now they'd potentially be building around Brook Lopez, Derrick Favors, and Damian Lillard with cap space to make other moves. Now, if they can stay healthy they might be as good as we were last season.

That supposed old rickety Celtic team gave us all we could handle practically. They just added championship caliber players to their team and have depth now.

Teletovic 27
Brooks 24
Joseph 25
PlumLee 23
Tyshawn Taylor 23
Andray Blatche 27(if re-signed)

So where is all this old talk coming from?

Yeah that gave us all WE could handle but we're not a very good team are we? I said I think they've improved I just don't see by how much. To me, they're a 2nd round team with almost no room for growth.

So now you're regurgitating what we've been about this team for the past 3yrs? Put it this way who cares how good you think they are, here's what's fact that team just became a tougher roadblock for us because they actually play in our Division? So if either team loses doesn't make it to the Finals who cares we're still losers and that's all that matters.

I'm completely lost right now. What are you trying to argue?

Now send chandler to the celtics for rondo

3G4G wrote:

VCoug wrote:

3G4G wrote:

VCoug wrote:

3G4G wrote:

VCoug wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:I know people are liking the nets but this makes them older and slower.

I think it probably makes them better for about a year but that's it. And I'm not even sure how much better. This is a team that just lost in the 1st round to a broken down Bulls team and I don't see them improving that much. And who knows if they'll be able to stay healthy. Also, who the **** knows how good of a coach Kidd will be. Honestly, I think they would've been better off if they had just stood pat 3 seasons ago and not traded for DWill. Right now they'd potentially be building around Brook Lopez, Derrick Favors, and Damian Lillard with cap space to make other moves. Now, if they can stay healthy they might be as good as we were last season.

That supposed old rickety Celtic team gave us all we could handle practically. They just added championship caliber players to their team and have depth now.

Teletovic 27
Brooks 24
Joseph 25
PlumLee 23
Tyshawn Taylor 23
Andray Blatche 27(if re-signed)

So where is all this old talk coming from?

Yeah that gave us all WE could handle but we're not a very good team are we? I said I think they've improved I just don't see by how much. To me, they're a 2nd round team with almost no room for growth.

So now you're regurgitating what we've been about this team for the past 3yrs? Put it this way who cares how good you think they are, here's what's fact that team just became a tougher roadblock for us because they actually play in our Division? So if either team loses doesn't make it to the Finals who cares we're still losers and that's all that matters.

I'm completely lost right now. What are you trying to argue?

Basically we're in the same boat an old aging team with a short window except in Brooklyn's case they have championship pedigree on the team, more depth, and some youth.

They are a bigger road block for us now. We only won like 5-6gms more than they did last yr. I bet we don't win 54gms next near and I bet they win more gms than we do while being in our division.

You think that roster is just going to click like that just off of talent, boston was bad with rondo, pp, and KG, they went on a run once rondo went down..there bench is in experience and young, and are all prospects at best

knicks1248 wrote:Dumb trade for the nets, mortgage your future for kg and pp who are old and won't play 82 games, the JET has landed, and lopez and kg are perimeter big men..lol..Lets throw in a rookie coach with lawrence frank who look clue less in Detriot, and hasn't had success since his boss played for him..

Now send chandler to the celtics for rondo

Now theres a "Great" trade idea!

Rondo is toxic. Ray left, Doc wanted him gone and Ainge can't get spit for him.

The dude has borderline personality disorder. He ain't right.

Simmons who is a Celtic fan thinks the nets are getting a steal. They dump Wallace's contract.

Regarding the Picks, have we confirmed they are all the nets picks?

Nets see a window next year. Maybe its worth them taking a shot. Outside of KG and PP they keep their core.

Im not a Net hater like some of you so I can be more objective.

I do not like KG and PP as celtics and won't love them in brooklyn either.

Knicks have not gained a generation of bandwagon fans since the Ewing era. Knicks went all in this season to ****block the nets and there quest to eclipse them.

the first team to win a chip in the city will grab the younger crowd and build on that. Im a knick fan because as a child the Clyde-Reed era got me. For many of you its the Ewing era. Bernard King grabbed a few. Melo is a star and gained a lot of fans but there is a difference between being a fan of a star and following a team that goes all the way!

Does this put them over the top? Long way to go before the final rosters are seen and nothing is won on paper.

But there is a lot at stake here for both teams.

I can't stand Pierce and KG but im learning in the new NBA, like in the NFL rosters can change quickly. I was never a big fan of Melo as a Nugget. Dude is ok with me now but its not like the old days.

Yeah, I'll root for the next always first but when they are eliminated I will root for The nets before I'll root for Miami, Bulls or Pacers.

Other teams losing don't really make me feel better. Heat win vs. Spurs kind of sucks but the day after who the phuch cares.

NardDogNation wrote:

loweyecue wrote:KG in Brooklyn? UGH

The bright side is that it makes it that much easier for us to consolidate our hate, lol.

Not to mention Kidd took our playbook with him across the river.

nixluva wrote:This is not a joke. The Knicks are in trouble. Teams in the East are getting much better and we're not even sure we can keep the guys we already had on a team that wasn't title worthy. How do we get better from here with almost no options? I'm not happy about this.

It's interesting...The more I look back at our season last year and I look at who we had on our roster to start the season vs who is on the team now it really does seem like a miracle we made it as far as we did. Many of the personnel we acquired seemed like "spare parts"...old, weary and some unknowns needed to be shipped in from overseas (KT, Wallace, Kidd, Brewer, Pablo, Cope, White). And now we have the chance of losing Pablo, Cope and Smith (don't mind him walking I just don't see who would replace him) and I don't mind moving Chandler.
Lets see what Grundwald can pull off this season. The Nets are all in and we have a lot of holes to fill.