BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:ugly bumpyou have touted a billion guys in 10000 different posts.
if you manned up and created a Briggs Draft Sticky Post and we can all follow and see a centralized history of your predictions, then you can tout your victories.
this spaghetti posting as if you were a tabloid writer is not cool and very old school
Briggs, if you agreed to do this, I promise that I would read everything you wrote and would be the first to praise your winners.
The way you do it today, there is zero accountability. Its like when Iverson can shoot 30 shots a game at < 40% and nobody realized since they could not accurately keep track.
This was my pick--I make one last pick every year. The year before I picked Vucevic--he just happened to go a spot before we picked.
and instead of telling me who you picked (which may have been great picks), why can't I just go directly to the "briggs draft 201X sticky"??
really! why are you so against this? (and refuse to address it)
if you have a valid reason, just state it.
Do you feel that it will get less hits then the compilation of all the posts? Maybe ... and maybe that is valid. But you can't/shouldn't get proper credit unless you organized and document your picks and show the timeline.
Could you imagine if twitter documented their API's instead of in one central location, but by breaking it into 10000 pieces and randomly posting it?
so here is what phil is thinking ....