http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/chambliss-law-enforcement-agency-may-have-known-ab/nXT7x/

He should stay away from flying in a small plane.

playa2 wrote:

Solace wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Anyone who ever watched a movie in the last decade should know that ANY video can be manufactured in cgi, let alone edited or tampered with. I don't have a point deeper than a well funded organization, such as FBI, CIA, DHS etc.. can show us absolutely anything they desire, or say confiscate every ones video and return or publish it modified.

Some of it is pretty good stuff, but this one is really lame.

Bottom line is if you think its a conspiracy in the first hour (like your boy Alex Jones does) then every you can't explain must be a conspiracy. Its all your looking for. All inconsistancies. Sandy hook was really a lame conspiracy.

How many years will it take for the "new world order" to take place? Seems by now they would have figured it out. Who are "they" and how do they profit and when?

Not one shread of legit media ever goes after this? No foreign journalist? Al Jazeera? If there is a conspiracy to shut them up, then why do the "alternative" press" get to do it? Whouldn't it be real easy to shut them down? Or is that part of the conspiracy too. We got "conspiracies for the Conspiracies?"

I agree with you, Nalod. Actually, people started posting this stuff on Facebook. The main reasoning why they say it's a cover up: to distract us from CISPA. What I don't get is that these things makes absolutely no sense and you would have to get a significant collaboration of people to go along with basically agreeing to attack their own country and to arrest/kill the wrong men. But despite that, I did some research, and most of the conspiracy theories were already debunked on snopes.

There was something about the backpacks not matching, which I thought was vaguely interesting.

The media, the government, the International bankers, Hollywood, and Academia are all part of the same incestuous complex. The media is part of the conspiracy, so why would you expect them to tell you the truth?

The corruption doesn't come from the outside-in. It comes from the top-down. If the ownership of a major media organization decides that a certain story is to be spiked, or if another story is to be hyped, then the rest of the organization follows. If a low level reporter decides to defy his bosses, he will lose his job and be blacklisted.

Remember Helen Thomas?

After 50 years as a White House Correspondent, she was dumped like a hot potato for publicly criticizing Israel. The same fearful top-down control works in government and academia as well.

Wha?

HOw do bankers, media, and hollywood profit from it?

playa2 wrote:You wouldn't care if I told you, this info is only for people who care , not those who ask lame questions but never address the info presented. You are asking shill questions that wouldn't be answered.

Info for people that "Care"?

Perfect. Thought it was for people that were open minded? Really what your saying is "for people that have come to the conclusion and need to keep finding ways to justify it".

FYI, I read your stuff and watched the videos. Its not convincing. I suppose I don't want to believe it either. You want to believe it and thus you do.

Kind of like religion. "Faith is an unsubstantiated belief"!

We not talking about the origin of a religion, these are making accusations at the first moment the media reports with the conclusion already determined. Alex Jones did the same thing in Sandy Hook and much of it was explained in the days/weeks after. Im sure you think it was "they" who also covered their tracks. Fact is Alex Jones is getting rich.

Don't the people of Boston and the rest of Americans need to know!

Look how the cop( BEHIND THE FBI GUY) with the frets on his hat reacts when the question is asked by journalist. Goes for the nose dig/ scratch.

The media, the government, the International bankers, Hollywood, and Academia are all part of the same incestuous complex. The media is part of the conspiracy, so why would you expect them to tell you the truth?

If your trying to control people isn't the media one of the first things that would be taken out?

If so, isn't that a conflict of interest?

If the Media is part of the conspiracy then why wouldn't "sources" like Infowars try to expose it?

How does "liberal" hollywood stand to profit from the new world order? Wouldn't "Academia" be removed in the NEw world order?

Im trying to be open minded here but I find those entities would have inherent conflicts of interest?

The burden of proof is on the accuser.

http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU

How did the older brother end up dead when they have pictures of him on the ground face down with his hands out to his sides in surrender position ?

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/134543/Eyewitness__Boston_Suspect_was_run_over_by_police_SUV__no_bombs/

Nalod wrote:I could be the ONLY one reading your "research"!

Not true sir many are reading and comparing to what MSM is telling them. People are waking up, there has been way too many coincidences. Even some high school drop out can see that !

Funny enough, they're searching door to door, because they believe this dangerous guy would enter someone's home or business. However, the same state doesn't want the residents to have access to firearms to protect their families if their suspicions are right!