[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Revisit the trade with Denver


Author Poll
playa2
Posts: 14922
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

DID WE GIVE UP TOO MUCH FOR THE DEMAND OF PLAYING IN NY.... WIN NOW
OH YES
NO WAY
DON'T KNOW YET
View Results


Author Thread
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
4/6/2013  4:15 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
And if that happens, THEN you can build a slight case that we have a closer, etc., although winning one playoff series really doesn't make you a great closer, proven playoff performer, etc.
This is like a fat guy saying he's in great shape because he bought a treadmill and weight set. No, you gotta consistently work out hard first and then you get to praise yourself.

So Melo winning a chip in college, transforming the Nuggets from sad sack losers into a perennial playoff team & taking them to the WCF in 2008/09 doesn't really count in the Winner/Closer ledger does it??? You %$@)(*^ people and your revisionist history astound me.


No, perennial 1st round playoff exits don't and success in college almost by definition do not make someone a proven playoff performer. It looks desperate to have to go back ten years - when he was playing against amateurs rather than professional players - to cite a meaningful team accomplishment.

This is pretty poor reasoning.

A fan can think whatever they want to think and use the rationale that applies.

Some think the Knicks should have kept Lin, personally i think because of his history, which is proven, he's the Miami Heat's bitch, and would be an absolute hinderance to the team going to higher places.

But I'm sure someone would think he can overcome that, even though there is zero evidence.

Kevin Garnett prior to Boston? First round maid

Chris Paul who's never sniffed the conference finals, guess he'll never get there either.

bottom line...play the games, but anyone can talk about what they expect to happen.

AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/6/2013  4:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/6/2013  4:51 PM
knickscity wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
And if that happens, THEN you can build a slight case that we have a closer, etc., although winning one playoff series really doesn't make you a great closer, proven playoff performer, etc.
This is like a fat guy saying he's in great shape because he bought a treadmill and weight set. No, you gotta consistently work out hard first and then you get to praise yourself.

So Melo winning a chip in college, transforming the Nuggets from sad sack losers into a perennial playoff team & taking them to the WCF in 2008/09 doesn't really count in the Winner/Closer ledger does it??? You %$@)(*^ people and your revisionist history astound me.


No, perennial 1st round playoff exits don't and success in college almost by definition do not make someone a proven playoff performer. It looks desperate to have to go back ten years - when he was playing against amateurs rather than professional players - to cite a meaningful team accomplishment.

This is pretty poor reasoning.

A fan can think whatever they want to think and use the rationale that applies.

Some think the Knicks should have kept Lin, personally i think because of his history, which is proven, he's the Miami Heat's bitch, and would be an absolute hinderance to the team going to higher places.

But I'm sure someone would think he can overcome that, even though there is zero evidence.

Kevin Garnett prior to Boston? First round maid

Chris Paul who's never sniffed the conference finals, guess he'll never get there either.

bottom line...play the games, but anyone can talk about what they expect to happen.


I think you're just misinterpreting my statements. My only goal in the previous comment was to point out that it doesn't make sense to criticize Denver for having no proven playoff closers/heroes/clutch players, etc., unless you also say that we don't have one. I've consistently said that I don't judge players based on team performance, or at least it has only a minor impact on my judgment. It definitely wouldn't be a central point in my evaluation of Carmelo.
Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

4/6/2013  5:05 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
And if that happens, THEN you can build a slight case that we have a closer, etc., although winning one playoff series really doesn't make you a great closer, proven playoff performer, etc.
This is like a fat guy saying he's in great shape because he bought a treadmill and weight set. No, you gotta consistently work out hard first and then you get to praise yourself.

So Melo winning a chip in college, transforming the Nuggets from sad sack losers into a perennial playoff team & taking them to the WCF in 2008/09 doesn't really count in the Winner/Closer ledger does it??? You %$@)(*^ people and your revisionist history astound me.


No, perennial 1st round playoff exits don't and success in college almost by definition do not make someone a proven playoff performer. It looks desperate to have to go back ten years - when he was playing against amateurs rather than professional players - to cite a meaningful team accomplishment.

Papabear Says

What the hell do you want us to do??? Tank the team?? Tar and feather Melo?? Melo is playing the best ball in his life right now. If you don't like what he brings that's on you. One question? what does Melo have to do to convince you that he is a superstar??? Or maybe your hate is so deep that there is nothing he can do. SPEAK UP!

Papabear
Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

4/6/2013  5:26 PM
Papabear wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
And if that happens, THEN you can build a slight case that we have a closer, etc., although winning one playoff series really doesn't make you a great closer, proven playoff performer, etc.
This is like a fat guy saying he's in great shape because he bought a treadmill and weight set. No, you gotta consistently work out hard first and then you get to praise yourself.

So Melo winning a chip in college, transforming the Nuggets from sad sack losers into a perennial playoff team & taking them to the WCF in 2008/09 doesn't really count in the Winner/Closer ledger does it??? You %$@)(*^ people and your revisionist history astound me.


No, perennial 1st round playoff exits don't and success in college almost by definition do not make someone a proven playoff performer. It looks desperate to have to go back ten years - when he was playing against amateurs rather than professional players - to cite a meaningful team accomplishment.

Papabear Says

What the hell do you want us to do??? Tank the team?? Tar and feather Melo?? Melo is playing the best ball in his life right now. If you don't like what he brings that's on you. One question? what does Melo have to do to convince you that he is a superstar??? Or maybe your hate is so deep that there is nothing he can do. SPEAK UP!

Papabear Says

You know what? I think I may need a vacation from this forum. The Knicks are playing the best ball in years and still that ain't enough. We got a star from Denver and still it ain't good enough. What I believe is that ain't nothing this team can do can make a hater stop hating because they will always have an excuse. Ive been a Knicks fan before some of you were born. Take a look at some of the teams in the NBA who never won a championship yet thier fans keep coming.

Papabear
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/6/2013  5:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/6/2013  5:44 PM
Papabear wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
And if that happens, THEN you can build a slight case that we have a closer, etc., although winning one playoff series really doesn't make you a great closer, proven playoff performer, etc.
This is like a fat guy saying he's in great shape because he bought a treadmill and weight set. No, you gotta consistently work out hard first and then you get to praise yourself.

So Melo winning a chip in college, transforming the Nuggets from sad sack losers into a perennial playoff team & taking them to the WCF in 2008/09 doesn't really count in the Winner/Closer ledger does it??? You %$@)(*^ people and your revisionist history astound me.


No, perennial 1st round playoff exits don't and success in college almost by definition do not make someone a proven playoff performer. It looks desperate to have to go back ten years - when he was playing against amateurs rather than professional players - to cite a meaningful team accomplishment.

Papabear Says

What the hell do you want us to do??? Tank the team?? Tar and feather Melo?? Melo is playing the best ball in his life right now. If you don't like what he brings that's on you. One question? what does Melo have to do to convince you that he is a superstar??? Or maybe your hate is so deep that there is nothing he can do. SPEAK UP!


I normally don't respond to that kind of tone but I think in between a bunch of rude comments you asked a very good question - what does Melo have to do. Most of what he has to do is captured by the sabermetrics but I will translate it into lay terminology. The more of the following that he does the better:

-Become an inefficient scorer. I'm pleased but not ecstatic with his work here. He's improved more than I expected but is nowhere near where he should be given his physical gifts. The James/Harden/Wade/Durant/Paul level should be the goal.
-Get a better assist/TO ratio
-Rebound better for whatever position he is assigned to
-Better defensive stats (blocks, steals, drawn charges, low opponent production).

He'd have to do almost all of those for me to call him a superstar. If he does just a few of them, I'll praise him for the improvement though. The more of them he does, the more likely what we really care about - team playoff success - will happen. If he does most of them, I will buy several Melo jerseys and become his biggest fan. The alternative, and I would give some praise here, is that he doesn't do those things but still somehow (in some way my imperfect mind can't imagine) plays a huge role in a championship or multiple finals appearances. It's nothing personal with Melo. These are the same criteria I have for evaluating every player.

I don't expect you or others to agree with this. You don't need to say derogatory comments. I thought you asked a good question and were entitled to an honest answer though.

ActionJackson
Posts: 21398
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/5/2007
Member: #1602

4/6/2013  5:45 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
He'd have to do almost all of those for me to call him a superstar.

and do these criteria also apply to Gallo, Chandler, Mozgov or the two future Larry Bird/Magic Johnson type draft picks

If he does just a few of them, I'll praise him for the improvement though.

Bull*%$#

If he does most of them, I will buy several Melo jerseys and become his biggest fan.

again Bull*%$#

It's nothing personal with Melo.

Thrice more i say unto thee Bull*%$#

These are the same criteria I have for evaluating every player.

For the last & final time...Bull*%$#

I don't expect you or others to agree with this.

AGREED

Nalod
Posts: 71305
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/6/2013  5:49 PM
Homers rage hard!

Faith: In unsubstantiated belief.

Beleave? Got to have faith. chase your tail around and round!

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/6/2013  5:57 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/6/2013  6:05 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
knickscity wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
And if that happens, THEN you can build a slight case that we have a closer, etc., although winning one playoff series really doesn't make you a great closer, proven playoff performer, etc.
This is like a fat guy saying he's in great shape because he bought a treadmill and weight set. No, you gotta consistently work out hard first and then you get to praise yourself.

So Melo winning a chip in college, transforming the Nuggets from sad sack losers into a perennial playoff team & taking them to the WCF in 2008/09 doesn't really count in the Winner/Closer ledger does it??? You %$@)(*^ people and your revisionist history astound me.


No, perennial 1st round playoff exits don't and success in college almost by definition do not make someone a proven playoff performer. It looks desperate to have to go back ten years - when he was playing against amateurs rather than professional players - to cite a meaningful team accomplishment.

This is pretty poor reasoning.

A fan can think whatever they want to think and use the rationale that applies.

Some think the Knicks should have kept Lin, personally i think because of his history, which is proven, he's the Miami Heat's bitch, and would be an absolute hinderance to the team going to higher places.

But I'm sure someone would think he can overcome that, even though there is zero evidence.

Kevin Garnett prior to Boston? First round maid

Chris Paul who's never sniffed the conference finals, guess he'll never get there either.

bottom line...play the games, but anyone can talk about what they expect to happen.


I think you're just misinterpreting my statements. My only goal in the previous comment was to point out that it doesn't make sense to criticize Denver for having no proven playoff closers/heroes/clutch players, etc., unless you also say that we don't have one. I've consistently said that I don't judge players based on team performance, or at least it has only a minor impact on my judgment. It definitely wouldn't be a central point in my evaluation of Carmelo.

One of your main arguments against Melo has been his teams don't make it out the first round..How is that not viewed as team performance??

Also, Melo is not a PF..Having force into the position doesn't make u a power forward..His rebounding numbers for a small forward is more than adequate...

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/6/2013  6:34 PM
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
knickscity wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
And if that happens, THEN you can build a slight case that we have a closer, etc., although winning one playoff series really doesn't make you a great closer, proven playoff performer, etc.
This is like a fat guy saying he's in great shape because he bought a treadmill and weight set. No, you gotta consistently work out hard first and then you get to praise yourself.

So Melo winning a chip in college, transforming the Nuggets from sad sack losers into a perennial playoff team & taking them to the WCF in 2008/09 doesn't really count in the Winner/Closer ledger does it??? You %$@)(*^ people and your revisionist history astound me.


No, perennial 1st round playoff exits don't and success in college almost by definition do not make someone a proven playoff performer. It looks desperate to have to go back ten years - when he was playing against amateurs rather than professional players - to cite a meaningful team accomplishment.

This is pretty poor reasoning.

A fan can think whatever they want to think and use the rationale that applies.

Some think the Knicks should have kept Lin, personally i think because of his history, which is proven, he's the Miami Heat's bitch, and would be an absolute hinderance to the team going to higher places.

But I'm sure someone would think he can overcome that, even though there is zero evidence.

Kevin Garnett prior to Boston? First round maid

Chris Paul who's never sniffed the conference finals, guess he'll never get there either.

bottom line...play the games, but anyone can talk about what they expect to happen.


I think you're just misinterpreting my statements. My only goal in the previous comment was to point out that it doesn't make sense to criticize Denver for having no proven playoff closers/heroes/clutch players, etc., unless you also say that we don't have one. I've consistently said that I don't judge players based on team performance, or at least it has only a minor impact on my judgment. It definitely wouldn't be a central point in my evaluation of Carmelo.

One of your main arguments against Melo has been his teams don't make it out the first round..How is that not viewed as team performance??

Also, Melo is not a PF..Having force into the position doesn't make u a power forward..His rebounding numbers for a small forward is more than adequate...


No it's not one of my main arguments - I mention it frequently because it contradicts the claims people make that we have an awesome. I mention it when I'm evaluating other posters' claims, not when I'm evaluating Melo per se. I don't think the starts are perfect and I would give a tiny weight to team success but it's definitely not a main component to my evaluation of Melo. I'm just pointing out internal inconsistency in others' responses. They do that often. So I bring up the inconsistency often. I implied but never specifically stated this. So I can understand why you thought that though.
ActionJackson
Posts: 21398
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/5/2007
Member: #1602

4/6/2013  6:37 PM
Nalod wrote:
Beleave? Got to have faith. chase your tail around and round!

It's so much easier to snipe at everything your "own" team does & if/when they achieve success you then say "I knew it all along" or "well Melo/A-Rod finally started doing the things that i said he should do" which of course translates into I was never wrong about anything he just needed to listen to me & play the right way...blah, blah, blah

What i find reaaaaallly interesting here in UK land is that the people who have the most negativity to spew never have the stones to show up in person at the bar get togethers or the actual B-Ball games we sometimes have, instead preferring to hide behind the anonymity of the net to tell everybody how badly the team sucks according to some nerd numerology (( seriously dude sabre-friggin-metrics??? were you also one of those kids that preferred flipping baseball cards or strat-o-matic to actually playing the game?)).

The only thing you said that was mildly relevant and I actually think it was a typo, was the word Beleave.
Which should forever be used in the new Clyde Frazier'esque UK Motto "Orange & Blue Fever...Believe or Beleavin!!!"

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/6/2013  6:39 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/6/2013  7:06 PM
ActionJackson wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
He'd have to do almost all of those for me to call him a superstar.

and do these criteria also apply to Gallo, Chandler, Mozgov or the two future Larry Bird/Magic Johnson type draft picks

If he does just a few of them, I'll praise him for the improvement though.

Bull*%$#

If he does most of them, I will buy several Melo jerseys and become his biggest fan.

again Bull*%$#

It's nothing personal with Melo.

Thrice more i say unto thee Bull*%$#

These are the same criteria I have for evaluating every player.

For the last & final time...Bull*%$#

I don't expect you or others to agree with this.

AGREED

You think I'm lying. I'm astonished. Okay that last statement was a lie but it's my only one here. Those criteria apply to everyone though. I've praised several Knicks, especially Tyson Chandler, for doing them. Kidd deserves a ton of credit too although a lot of that is from his first half of the season. Novak isn't special but he deserves more credit than he gets here. In fact, if you, AJ, get into the NBA and meet those criteria while on the Knicks, I'll buy your jersey and give you my left nut.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/6/2013  6:40 PM
ActionJackson wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Beleave? Got to have faith. chase your tail around and round!

It's so much easier to snipe at everything your "own" team does & if/when they achieve success you then say "I knew it all along" or "well Melo/A-Rod finally started doing the things that i said he should do" which of course translates into I was never wrong about anything he just needed to listen to me & play the right way...blah, blah, blah

What i find reaaaaallly interesting here in UK land is that the people who have the most negativity to spew never have the stones to show up in person at the bar get togethers or the actual B-Ball games we sometimes have, instead preferring to hide behind the anonymity of the net to tell everybody how badly the team sucks according to some nerd numerology (( seriously dude sabre-friggin-metrics??? were you also one of those kids that preferred flipping baseball cards or strat-o-matic to actually playing the game?)).

The only thing you said that was mildly relevant and I actually think it was a typo, was the word Beleave.
Which should forever be used in the new Clyde Frazier'esque UK Motto "Orange & Blue Fever...Believe or Beleavin!!!"

I showed up in person to one of the first get togethers. I live about 10 hours away from NYC now.

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
4/6/2013  10:20 PM
if the knicks make it to the 2nd round it will be only the second time in carmelo's entire professional career that he can claim some measure of genuine professional success. for his legion's of fans i hope this happens and for the rest of the knick fanbase i also hope it happens.

however if the knicks fail to make it out of the first round or get spanked in the second round i wonder what the excuses and rationalizations are going to be.

surely not "melo did his job but his teammates just didn't step up."

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/6/2013  10:24 PM
dk7th wrote:if the knicks make it to the 2nd round it will be only the second time in carmelo's entire professional career that he can claim some measure of genuine professional success. for his legion's of fans i hope this happens and for the rest of the knick fanbase i also hope it happens.

however if the knicks fail to make it out of the first round or get spanked in the second round i wonder what the excuses and rationalizations are going to be.

surely not "melo did his job but his teammates just didn't step up."


Injuries. Bad refs. Poor coaching rotations.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/6/2013  11:22 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
dk7th wrote:if the knicks make it to the 2nd round it will be only the second time in carmelo's entire professional career that he can claim some measure of genuine professional success. for his legion's of fans i hope this happens and for the rest of the knick fanbase i also hope it happens.

however if the knicks fail to make it out of the first round or get spanked in the second round i wonder what the excuses and rationalizations are going to be.

surely not "melo did his job but his teammates just didn't step up."


Injuries. Bad refs. Poor coaching rotations.

Would the injury excuse be far fetched? Last year the injuries were ridiculous. The Knicks are going to play OKC down 5 bigs and the big they have is playing despite being injured. Glass half full guys would be raving about how much the Knicks have overcome despite injuries. In regards to the refs does melo get the calls he should? Did the refs totally change game 1 of the heat series last year. If you think refs don't have a bias google Ed t rush.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
4/7/2013  12:58 AM
it has to do with identity and a system. when the coaching is solid and all the players understand their function WITHIN a system then the team shows resilience in adversity. gifted players are capable of adapting their games to suit circumstances so long as they are properly coached and are themselves coachable.

and then there's defense-- good teams give the kind of defensive effort that keeps them in games and prevents blowouts. good coaches preserve solidarity by dint of their will and force of personality.

the knicks are completely unproven and i look forward to see what this team really is, since the crucible of the playoffs tears off all masks.

and by "playoffs" i mean the second round of course. first round success means nothing much.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/7/2013  1:14 AM
dk7th wrote:it has to do with identity and a system. when the coaching is solid and all the players understand their function WITHIN a system then the team shows resilience in adversity. gifted players are capable of adapting their games to suit circumstances so long as they are properly coached and are themselves coachable.

and then there's defense-- good teams give the kind of defensive effort that keeps them in games and prevents blowouts. good coaches preserve solidarity by dint of their will and force of personality.

the knicks are completely unproven and i look forward to see what this team really is, since the crucible of the playoffs tears off all masks.

and by "playoffs" i mean the second round of course. first round success means nothing much.

Do you think the Knicks have shown resiliency in adversity? The team lost 4 games in a row and didn't have a big other than KMart and a guy with a broken foot started them on an 11 game winning streak. They still don't have a healthy big and have continued winning. During the streak only 5 teams have scored over 90 pts and only two over 100.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

4/7/2013  2:09 AM
Papabear Says

Homers don't waste your time with these sick dude's. I call them FAKERS! They are angry sick FAKERS. They could never accept this team. Or should I say a Melo type personality. Profile the type of players they love. With them it's not really about winning it's about the personality of the player. I will give you an example the NBA star The Mail man and John Stalkton in thier whole career went to the Championship game just once I believe. Their fans however love them. Charles Barkley went to the championship game just once.None of these guys ever got a ring and only went to the big one once. Never an NCAA title. But Melo did. The hate have nothing to do about basketball. Just profile the way they write and profile their usage of their vocabulary where they think they are smarter then anyone else. They probably was the towel boy or water boy on a basketball team. Just profile what they say and you will understand that debating them about the Knicks is useless. The best way to put them down is just keep enjoying the Knicks the rest of the games and the playoffs. Write about it and every positive thing you say or negative concerns will blow them away. You see they can't stand to see us happy they want us miserable like them and these last 11 games have been the saddest time of their life. Especially with Melo scoring like he has and his rebounds, and leadership. They can't stand it. They are trolling just waiting and praying for a loss so they can jump back on the forum and start posting like crazy. THEY WON'T TAKE MY JOY. GO KNICKS!

Papabear
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

4/7/2013  2:10 AM
So if the Clips get trounced in the 1st round will people stop considering Chris Paul elite? Melo and Paul are pretty close with their playoffs record.

All this debating doesn't matter until the end of the season.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
4/7/2013  4:55 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ActionJackson wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Beleave? Got to have faith. chase your tail around and round!

It's so much easier to snipe at everything your "own" team does & if/when they achieve success you then say "I knew it all along" or "well Melo/A-Rod finally started doing the things that i said he should do" which of course translates into I was never wrong about anything he just needed to listen to me & play the right way...blah, blah, blah

What i find reaaaaallly interesting here in UK land is that the people who have the most negativity to spew never have the stones to show up in person at the bar get togethers or the actual B-Ball games we sometimes have, instead preferring to hide behind the anonymity of the net to tell everybody how badly the team sucks according to some nerd numerology (( seriously dude sabre-friggin-metrics??? were you also one of those kids that preferred flipping baseball cards or strat-o-matic to actually playing the game?)).

The only thing you said that was mildly relevant and I actually think it was a typo, was the word Beleave.
Which should forever be used in the new Clyde Frazier'esque UK Motto "Orange & Blue Fever...Believe or Beleavin!!!"

I showed up in person to one of the first get togethers. I live about 10 hours away from NYC now.

Gotta give you credit for that one lol

Unfortunately I missed that one

Revisit the trade with Denver

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy