YOU KNOW WHAT, I ONCE was like GTFOH with rondo leading that celtics team.. yes pierce was GREAT, Garnett a stud, but rondo was like the glue to that team... especially in the following years. It went from the big 3 and rondo, to really Rondo being the best player on that team.. quickly.. you can't take that away from him..
I'll give that to you, I just thought his leadership came post-championship and it was heavily influenced from being out vets like KG, Pierce, and even the oldies they had during that run. Again, you're right, but I just think he was important post-2008 and wasn't a huge factor in 2008.
yes, I do know why kidd didn't win.... the Spurs team was just better.. no reflection on kidd as he was one of the very best players in the league..what he did with that nets team was amazing.. And I am just not talking PG's here.. I mentioned lebron as special players, guys who can lead teams... of course the leader of a team does not have to be a PG.. I never said that.. it can come from anywhere.. still, I don't think we have that at all.. if kidd were 6 years younger and the face of this team, I might change that view.... And no the leader doesn't have to be the best player on the team, but when your team empowers the wrong guys, it makes it hard for anyone else to assume leadership roles...
The Lakers & Spurs teams were more talented, but the Nets did rely on Kidd because no one else could really create their own shots. Kittles was good, not a scoring threat. Van Horn was and is soft. RJ was just blossoming and K-Mart was a recipient of all those Kidd assists. The Lakers and Spurs had a frontcourt that pretty much made Martin very ordinary and no one else stepped up. I agree, nothing against Kidd, but he couldn't lead them by himself.
Now we don't really know who the true leaders are on the team until we actually get to see the team in practice and the locker room every day. Everyone would think Melo, but maybe it's not really him. I don't know who the leaders and it is to be determined later whether this team has good leadership. Too early to tell.
you do realize that without jordan the bulls were close advancing again, if not for the gift we got on that hubert Davis foul...And yes defenses focus on Jordan, don't fool yourself, no one is doubling carmelo for a final shot, it hasn't happened in the playoffs, teams have been going at him straight up with guys like battier.. even then, jordan passed to those guys because they were capable, and he knew it was the right thing to do.... if there were two scottie pippens on that team, I would certainly believe they could muster a good shot with two talented players like that... with that said.. we don't have a jordan... or a pippen for that matter..
Take Phil Jackson off that team and the Bulls would be a first round exit, if even. I think double teaming scorers especially come playoff is not as frequent as I thought it was just because of the inherent risks with doing it. Maybe it's just my thinking, I don't know. Yes, no team will need to double Melo. And yes, Melo's weakness is against tougher defenders, I'll agree. And obviously we don't have a Jordan or Pippen either, but I can say Melo and Amare are two good players.
this is where we differ.. and I will say this being a huge amare fan.. he is a finisher, and Dk mentioned this long ago, amare needs to be a better passer and play maker for others in order for the knicks to go to another level, he said this before the carmelo trade.. now in carmelo we have the similar problem.. he is not a playmaker, he doesn't make plays for others.. the other guys you mentioned.. parker, manu, wade, shaq, all were play makers.. huge difference... I just think you guys are expecting something out of carmelo that he has never been in 10 years and hasn't shown any consistent behavior in changing that... but again, we just dissagree here.... as far as guys who can make big shots.. kidd has proven he can, but he is aging and declining.. lets hope he has some big shots left in him... novak, jr, felton, they have to prove they can... we will see, I will give you that.. It remains to be seen..... not saying it can't, they just don't have that track record at this point.. but that can change.... I will say that guys like novak and to some degree felton have never really been given that type of chance...
Amare DOES need to be a better playmaker I agree. The thing is Carmelo CAN be a playmaker when he wants. He just needs to make better decisions on when to pass the ball and when to shoot. Now if you and I want to go into his brain and make him think that way, I'm down for that, but I'll agree to an extent. Parker, Manu, & Wade are playmakers because it is essentially required for them at their positions. It's in their innate abilities.
I'll end my thoughts with saying that we agree and we disagree at the same time. Done deal. Agree with this?