This was an opinion piece written from the personal point of view of the writer. I wouldn't give this article anymore credence than I would to a random poster on this site that took several minutes of their time to write a similar opinion in the quick reply box. Anyone latching onto this article as a way to thump their chest and say, "See, its what I've been saying all along," is severely misguided. I highly doubt this columnist is more in the
no than an independent blogger or some of us here. It doesn't take much to put together a piece like this: comb through a litany of previous Knick articles, watch/read interviews, study body language and a large helping of one's own prejudices or point of view and Voila...you got yourself a propaganda article.
I speak from some experience being that I used to be a journalist (no longer, am a teacher now). I wrote for independent music mags; traditional and internet based. I wouldn't be so quick to validate this article just because, for good measure the writer sprinkled the word "Source" through-out and for good measure packaged quotations around quick thoughts. Is there really a "source?" perhaps, but I've witnessed the conjuring-up of articles with imaginary "Sources" in the past and in today's new-age, social media, do anything to stand out in the overcrowded journalistic world, I wouldn't put it past anyone. You also have to question, "Who is the source?" and what agenda does said source have. Since its clear this writer has an agenda, its pretty obvious that the "source" if there is one, shares a similar point of view. And this is how you produce a one-sided argument.
I should use this article in my class tom since we are just beginning to study persuasion