foosballnick wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:foosballnick wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Rangers had a 7 year bad stretch. So that's not the same as our 11 years. I could generously say that is almost your 3rd example in the history of sports though.
It's often common for a forum poster to resort to snide comments or sarcasm when beaten in a debated topic.
It's often common to claim you won a debate when you can't think of anything on topic to say
The interesting is that you seemed to create this thread/poll just to further your I hate Dolan crusade.......not to discuss or debate the topic in any form of rational manner. When presented with alternate evidence that Dolan can show success as an owner, you choose to become sarcastic, apparently since it does not fit your agenda.
The funny thing is that Based on your poll, almost 75% tatted Dolan as a D/F. I suspect the 4 people who graded him as an A/B are just yanking your chain.....so it really is a moot point. You can continue on with this obsession, or choose to think that with a correct management team there is hope.
Just wanted to add another post to your thread to make you feel important, since one of your previous posts indicates you keep tabs on the number of responses you get....LOL.
foos, i wouldn't waste your time bro. bonn does this to everyone when he's asked to back up claims or look beyond his hollinger stats, it's a waste of time to try and have a worthwhile debate with him, because it's not possible.
i was wondering myself what the point of this poll was? i voted A personally, just for ****s and giggles. i'm pretty sure you couldn't find a person on this board who would actually give dolan anything higher than a D grade. but hey, we need a poll to prove it.