Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
subzero0
Posts: 21244 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/24/2003 Member: #410 |
![]() mrKnickShot wrote:subzero0 wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:subzero0 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:LOL, i love these amateur wall-street guys trying to affix market conditions to the knicks losing jeremy lin (who they haven't even lost yet) makes for great comedy. Umm ok, wow. Im not sure how you claim to be a trader and cant possibly see a connection between Jeremy Lin leaving and the MSG price sinking. It seems pretty elementary to me. But maybe you're right, perhaps you are a much better trader than I am. I am not claiming to be the greatest trader of all time but I like to think that I am pretty good. Besides all that though, this is really just simple math. But dont take my word for it. You want articles ok, just remember, you asked for this. How about MarketWatch, SeekingAlpha, Business Week and Bloomberg? You have heard of those havent you? http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2012/07/16/mondays-msg-market-cap-drop-would-have-paid-for-lin-contract/ |
subzero0
Posts: 21244 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/24/2003 Member: #410 |
![]() http://imgur.com/IbRmB
Thats pretty damning, I dont care what kind of trader you are. |
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157 Alba Posts: 16 Joined: 5/3/2011 Member: #3553 |
![]() http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-17/jeremy-lin-no-longer-benefits-msg-stock-gamco-s-marangi-says.html?cmpid=yhoo
The real analysts seem to be mostly against the idea. Here is a real article. |
subzero0
Posts: 21244 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/24/2003 Member: #410 |
![]() mrKnickShot wrote:http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-17/jeremy-lin-no-longer-benefits-msg-stock-gamco-s-marangi-says.html?cmpid=yhoo Yes, Im glad you brought up that article. From the article... Lin’s success fueled a 37 percent increase in ticket and merchandising sales last quarter to $216.1 million. His presence already has been priced into the stock, said David Joyce, an analyst at Miller Tabak & Co. in New York. Now while it is true that this investor is saying they would be wise to cut Jeremy Lin loose, he is not saying that the stock performing poorly is not a result of Jeremy Lin's evident departure. So that is not even in question here. What I will question is why they are saying that it is financially ok to let Jeremy go. Also from your article... Ultimately, signing Lin won’t be as important to MSG’s performance as a winning Knicks team, Marangi said. “I think Jeremy Lin would be forgotten if the Knicks are able to put together a strong run next year.” Ah, so they believe that the Knicks can recoup the losses Jeremy will cause if the knicks are able to put together a strong run next year. But this analyst doesnt say what a strong run is and worst yet, he does not even say how much MSG will be able to recoup from the monetary loss of Jeremy Lin and a "strong run" in the coming season. It sounds more like he is getting ready for damage control so that the investors dont get too worried if Jeremy Lin really does leave tonight. That's just my take. But if you want to believe what every investor tells you, then by all means, be my guest. |
subzero0
Posts: 21244 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/24/2003 Member: #410 |
![]() ![]() As of the writing of this: Still think MSG stock downturn has nothing to do with Lin leaving? |