crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:
Before saying "horse manure", you should check if one actually stated their position at the point of impact.And please let us not forget that it left us with Toney Fukkin Douglass as our starting PG before the Lin miracle. Or, did GG already know how Lin would turn out?
He brought in Baron Davis and Mike Bibby, who were both pathetic, obviously. The PG thing was a debacle until D'Antoni played Lin over a month after he got here. It was a good move by Grunwald to have the kid on hand.
What's the alternative you're suggesting? That the Knicks should have amnestied Amar'e and started Billups at PG... until he potentially went down with the exact same career ending injury? Amar'e had a bad season and doesn't seem like he's a fit. Unless you consider that in the 6 games the Knicks had a fully healthy lineup and Woodson coaching they went 5-1 and blew out Indiana twice and ended Portland.
Everything was clicking then. Don't know why a first round loss to the NBA champions where three starters were injured and Tyson was limited due to flu has rattled everyone so much.
I wish the Knicks could just come back as they were and build some continuity and consistency. All they needed was a solid backup PG and now it's all a big mess.
I wanted to save Amare/amnesty for this summer. Keep Billups as the starting PG (no way to know he would have gotten injured - talk about hindsight!!) and he would have been a huge commodity with a 14 mil expiring.
We would have been in a crazy position with huge cap room! The same sh1tty gamble of signing Amare was the sh1tty gamble of keeping him on the roster without the amnesty as a possibility.
Tyson is not Lebron - he is not worth it - not even close!! - to carry his salary and Amare's. Talk about Starphucking!
BD and Bibby? Please!! And, at that point, we did not even have BShitty.
Tyson won defensive player of the year and was the main reason this team became good at defense. I know in a fantasy basketball world that's not important, but I think he was a major piece. If that meant carrying Amar'e, who even in an off year is 17ppg on 50%+ shooting... I can live with it.
Unwrap this riddle for me: the main complaint with Amar'e is defense. But with Tyson on board, the Knicks became a top five defensive team.
Sooooo... doesn't Tyson kind of cover for Amar'e's defense then? Seems like it.
Mark Eaton was a great defensive player too - that is not everything.
Amare's biggest problem is his knees, back, eyes, brain and untradeable contract.
And no, Chandler cannot carry him, even if Chandler had any offensive game, was a better rebounder or had a long career of greatness, not just a solid 2 years.
You are clearly not looking or understanding their position they would have been in this summer - it was an act of full fledged desperation and starphucking.