mrKnickShot wrote:fishmike wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:fishmike wrote:perspective... Melo's team is 2 games over .500 and the dude has like a .250 winning % in the playoffs. Win me some games in may and I will cosign this post
Perspective, Knicks are missing 2 starters, one a 20 pt, 9 rebound guy, and the other the primary point guard.
Funny how MDA got a pass here from some for his horrible record based on circumstance/excuse after excuse but will now say things like "we are not beating the best teams consistently" and "Melo is 2 games over .500 for us" "wins are what counts" ... ... ...
Just sayin ... a bit disingenuous being that their sole argument was always circumstance. And, the fact that every article and every sports show/sports cast says that Melo can't do it alone ... eh whatever. Thus is the political spectrum.
why are you responding to me as if MDA had anything to do with my post? He didnt. I thought the thread was about Melo being a top 10 player, which he has NOT shown. Go post that MDA is a top 10 coach and we can talk about it on that thread.
First, I was not responding to you, I was responding to ChuckB. Second, I did not create this thread. Third, how posters excused MDA and showing the double standard and partisanship is completely relevant and a basis in any post that a poster calls for accountability or requires that WINNING be a prerequisite for judgement.
I respect your opinion. However, I believe that it is disingenuous and I am stating why.
its not. It really isnt. Sure, I defended MDA as I did EVERY coach before him. I defended Chaney, Wilkins, Larry, MDA... always saying the same thing: ITS THE PLAYERS.
However I never called MDA anything better than a "good coach" who did an excellent job for an extended period of time in Pho.
This thread is about Melo being a top 10 player.
So for me, its simple... Melo doesnt win enough to be in that category. Not even close.
Ewing WON. A title? No... but dude's teams went to round 2 for 10 straight years. That says that year after year a playoff team that advanced every year was built around him. Thats a top 10 player to me (Ewing nostalgia aside).
Seriously.. what has Melo accomplished that Trace McGrady, Vince Carter, Gilbert Arenas, Baron Davis, etc etc.. accomplished? All excellent players and all stars but clearly a tier below Duncans, Kobe's etc, The guys who do it after the 82 games are over.
Trust me.
Nobody. NOBODY here wants to call Melo a top ten player more than me, because when I do it will be after he's knocked off a couple of the other top ten players in a few weeks from now.
That being said Im really not interested in celebrating Melo's big nights in losing games. Thats just me. I actually like Melo. I just see him for what he is, not what I hope he can become.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs