[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

anybody miss Zach Randolph or David lee yet?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 4 of 4 « First‹ Previous 2  3  4 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
MarburyAnd1Crossover
Posts: 23120
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/24/2011
Member: #3650
2/27/2012  8:47 AM
franco12 wrote:
MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:
franco12 wrote:For those saying Zach wouldn't fit in this system, he was part of the last squad that, albeit small sample size, was over 500.

Fits it better than some of the guys we have now.

Zach, you remember, was dropping the trey bucket, he was playing well with Jamal, we were 6-4. That was the first taste of MDA ball, and it was so good.

I thought we were 6 & 5 when they got traded - but I do remember them playing well together.

I said at the time that Zach was a skilled passer for a big man, unlike Eddy Curry who is unable to pass the ball.

Could be 6-5. ZBo could pass it for sure, and he was money with the mid-range J, plus he would rebound for you. His rebounding was funny because he wouldn't leave the ground but would still grab 10-12 for you.

Carmelo Anthony is ANTI-BASKETBALL
AUTOADVERT
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
2/27/2012  9:19 AM
I loved Z-Bo and to a greater extent Lee. Guys magnified their weaknesses on Defense but, now they appreciated the multi-skill levels both players possess and Amare seems to lack. David was an awesome passing big and excelled in the pick-n-roll. They both ate rebounds but Zach was a true monster inside and Lee the better passer. No matter what was happening, you'd look up and dude would have 20/10.

Those guys would be better complimentary pieces than either Melo or Amare. Amare, if he is not scoring is utterly useless. I got killed for saying I want Lee over Stat on multiple boards.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/27/2012  10:05 AM
MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:
franco12 wrote:
MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:
franco12 wrote:For those saying Zach wouldn't fit in this system, he was part of the last squad that, albeit small sample size, was over 500.

Fits it better than some of the guys we have now.

Zach, you remember, was dropping the trey bucket, he was playing well with Jamal, we were 6-4. That was the first taste of MDA ball, and it was so good.

I thought we were 6 & 5 when they got traded - but I do remember them playing well together.

I said at the time that Zach was a skilled passer for a big man, unlike Eddy Curry who is unable to pass the ball.

Could be 6-5. ZBo could pass it for sure, and he was money with the mid-range J, plus he would rebound for you. His rebounding was funny because he wouldn't leave the ground but would still grab 10-12 for you.

As Amar'e has proven, its not how high you can jump that determines how many rebounds you can grab.

Same with KT - and for that matter, Charles Barkley. Rebounding is more an art, almost, than pure skill.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
2/27/2012  10:08 AM
hahaha
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Page 4 of 4 « First‹ Previous 2  3  4 
« Reply To Topic
anybody miss Zach Randolph or David lee yet?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy