[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

There's nothing wrong with the System
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/4/2012  10:19 PM
KNICKSBIGCATS wrote:This system svcks, I hate SSOL.
Mediocre teams are owning us.
I do not believe that playing in this system can lead to a championship.
Nobody can convince me otherwise.
We need a new coach.
I wish that JVG would come back....I don't want that prima donna Phil Jax.

1st of all the Knicks aren't playing SSOL. SSOL was the fastbreak offense that the Suns played. We haven't run SSOL since MDA has been here!!!

2nd, this team was 2nd leading scoring team in the league last year!!! WTF have you been watching? the problem with this team has always been the defense. That's the reason why I keep saying that there's nothing wrong with the system.

There really aren't a lot of different defensive schemes that pro teams run. It's about execution and effort on D. Also you need defensive talent too. Right now our best defender is Shumpert, a rookie!!!

The team needs a TON of work on the defensive end, but we are talking about a team that has never been good defensively so it's just gonna take some more work. I think we need STAT in particular to play with better concentration on defense. He's constantly making bad defensive plays. It should help to get Jared back in the mix, cuz he's a very solid TEAM defender, which we need more of.

AUTOADVERT
KncksbigKATS
Posts: 20863
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/15/2011
Member: #3745

1/5/2012  12:10 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/5/2012  12:21 AM
nixluva wrote:
KNICKSBIGCATS wrote:This system svcks, I hate SSOL.
Mediocre teams are owning us.
I do not believe that playing in this system can lead to a championship.
Nobody can convince me otherwise.
We need a new coach.
I wish that JVG would come back....I don't want that prima donna Phil Jax.

1st of all the Knicks aren't playing SSOL. SSOL was the fastbreak offense that the Suns played. We haven't run SSOL since MDA has been here!!!

2nd, this team was 2nd leading scoring team in the league last year!!! WTF have you been watching? the problem with this team has always been the defense. That's the reason why I keep saying that there's nothing wrong with the system.

There really aren't a lot of different defensive schemes that pro teams run. It's about execution and effort on D. Also you need defensive talent too. Right now our best defender is Shumpert, a rookie!!!

The team needs a TON of work on the defensive end, but we are talking about a team that has never been good defensively so it's just gonna take some more work. I think we need STAT in particular to play with better concentration on defense. He's constantly making bad defensive plays. It should help to get Jared back in the mix, cuz he's a very solid TEAM defender, which we need more of.

Your posts are actually comical because you think that there's nothing wrong with the system.
For one thing, where is the rebounding after the three point shots are attempted?
What's our record since we acquired Melo? Something like 16-22? Not good. It's the system, man.
D'Antoni is the wrong coach with the wrong system for this team as constructed. Period.

We are one injury away to Melo or Chandler to this getting coyote UGLY in a hurry....did you even hear the BOO BIRDS tonight?
And, please don't try to tell me that we're not playing a form of SSOL! How many threes have we shot in the past few games? LOL....carry on with your unjustified man love for .

Mark my words, IF he is still the head coach for the rest of the season, it'll be a miracle.
Personally, I don't think he lasts the season. He's headed to Toronto next year (:thank goodness:). Then MAYBE somebody like JVG can actually implement a REAL system here(cause there ain't one here now).

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships." -Michael Jordan
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/5/2012  1:05 AM
JVG is not coming back to coach the Knicks. He will never work for Dolan again. He quit remember? Right now I'm wishing we had hired Mark Jackson, Tom Tihbideau or Doc Rivers when we had the chance
KncksbigKATS
Posts: 20863
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/15/2011
Member: #3745

1/5/2012  7:59 AM
gunsnewing wrote:JVG is not coming back to coach the Knicks. He will never work for Dolan again. He quit remember? Right now I'm wishing we had hired Mark Jackson, Tom Tihbideau or Doc Rivers when we had the chance

Never say never.
Stranger things have happened.

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships." -Michael Jordan
nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
1/5/2012  9:35 AM
Well frankly it's confusing. If anyone says anything bad about the coaching it's who cares what happened a few weeks ago we just won 2 in a row, that's all in the past! Praise and glory be to MDA! Then when we are losing it's look what Steve Nash did half a decade ago! That's proof that the coach is great! It hurts your credibility because there does not exist a scenario where MDA is not thee best. If you were consistent in your arguments it might help them.

Duhon was awful and he was awful here under MDA as well. The system has not worked the entire time here in NY. It's theoretically possible for the system to work, but no team wins without defense and rebounding. Unfortunately MDA is master of 'the system' but a rank amateur in the other two which has been seen in years past(am I allowed to reference that or you don't care?). The O will get better but we will still get nowhere without competent coaching identity in the areas of weakness. The only brightside so far has been the dimming of the chorus of zombies telling everyone that if you score more points than the other team you win, like it's some sort of revelation.

nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:

For someone who always says they don't care about last season, the season before or even the 1st half of a season when in the second you're sure spinning the wheels a lot.

Did you have an actual point to make or just critique my posts? The past is only relevant to prove that D'Antoni's system has been effective. In fact extremely effective! The point of bringing up last year is to show that with a DECENT PG the team was ranked near the top of the league in offense. Right now the only thing missing from this team is a capable PG. We're not talking great, just capable. It makes a world of difference. STAT, Melo, Fields started and we improved the C spot with Tyson. Tyson basically is doing what we asked Ronny and Moz to do. The only negative difference is that we have TD starting at the point.

Davis is a possible improvement at PG if he can get healthy. Meanwhile we have to allow time for TD to try and adjust in much the same way every PG has had to learn how to play on a higher level than they did before. Mike's system makes PG's more efficient if they can apply what he's teaching them,but you can't make something from nothing. There has to be some ability there to work with. Even just a small amount of ability and Mike has been able to get something out of them. Guys like Duhon and Felton played better under Mike than they had in their career. God knows Duhon wasn't any good, but he was able to get something out of him. TD has to play better and the hope is that he'll eventually get it.

My main point is that you don't have to change a system that works because the team is struggling early.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/5/2012  7:48 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/5/2012  7:52 PM
nykshaknbake wrote:Well frankly it's confusing. If anyone says anything bad about the coaching it's who cares what happened a few weeks ago we just won 2 in a row, that's all in the past! Praise and glory be to MDA! Then when we are losing it's look what Steve Nash did half a decade ago! That's proof that the coach is great! It hurts your credibility because there does not exist a scenario where MDA is not thee best. If you were consistent in your arguments it might help them.

You are a real piece of work! I've never said that the coach is great or that he's "thee Best". I have not been changing my stance. I've been very consistent. I provide facts to back up my statements. It's not just my opinion.

65 different players in 3 years is an unmatched disruptive situation. Do you think Jax or Adelman or any other top coach would succeed under such a situation?

The coach usually needs a coach on the floor and we've had nothing but change at the PG spot, not to mention not having a passing PG to begin with. This year TD is a major downgrade and it's hurting the team. There's no one to actually run the plays effectively. Still this team needs some continuity and time to gel. The team started off slow last year and then settled down. I would think that will happen this year too.

colombian0725
Posts: 20632
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/30/2011
Member: #3795

1/5/2012  7:56 PM
nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:Well frankly it's confusing. If anyone says anything bad about the coaching it's who cares what happened a few weeks ago we just won 2 in a row, that's all in the past! Praise and glory be to MDA! Then when we are losing it's look what Steve Nash did half a decade ago! That's proof that the coach is great! It hurts your credibility because there does not exist a scenario where MDA is not thee best. If you were consistent in your arguments it might help them.

You are a real piece of work! I've never said that the coach is great or that he's "thee Best". I have not been changing my stance. I've been very consistent. I provide facts to back up my statements. It's not just my opinion.

65 different players in 3 years is an unmatched disruptive situation. Do you think Jax or Adelman or any other top coach would succeed under such a situation?

The coach usually needs a coach on the floor and we've had nothing but change at the PG spot, not to mention not having a passing PG to begin with. This year TD is a major downgrade and it's hurting the team. There's no one to actually run the plays effectively. Still this team needs some continuity and time to gel. The team started off slow last year and then settled down. I would think that will happen this year too.

So MDA what about your Defense? any excuse for that?

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
1/5/2012  8:16 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/5/2012  8:17 PM
nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:Well frankly it's confusing. If anyone says anything bad about the coaching it's who cares what happened a few weeks ago we just won 2 in a row, that's all in the past! Praise and glory be to MDA! Then when we are losing it's look what Steve Nash did half a decade ago! That's proof that the coach is great! It hurts your credibility because there does not exist a scenario where MDA is not thee best. If you were consistent in your arguments it might help them.

You are a real piece of work! I've never said that the coach is great or that he's "thee Best". I have not been changing my stance. I've been very consistent. I provide facts to back up my statements. It's not just my opinion.

65 different players in 3 years is an unmatched disruptive situation. Do you think Jax or Adelman or any other top coach would succeed under such a situation?

The coach usually needs a coach on the floor and we've had nothing but change at the PG spot, not to mention not having a passing PG to begin with. This year TD is a major downgrade and it's hurting the team. There's no one to actually run the plays effectively. Still this team needs some continuity and time to gel. The team started off slow last year and then settled down. I would think that will happen this year too.

How many of those 65 were banished and never really a part of things in NY. D'Antoni had the same rotation of players from the 12th game of his first season in NY until the trading deadline in the 09-10 season. That was around 130 games. The only change from his first year was Walsh traded Q for Darko.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/5/2012  9:19 PM
CrushAlot wrote:How many of those 65 were banished and never really a part of things in NY. D'Antoni had the same rotation of players from the 12th game of his first season in NY until the trading deadline in the 09-10 season. That was around 130 games. The only change from his first year was Walsh traded Q for Darko.

Once again here you go with your overly simplified arguments. The truth is in the details. There was talent but guys had to buy in and unfortunately many of the guys in 08-09 were just playing for new contracts. Then 09-10 was not a team built to win. It was a team built to tear down. Your point is weak.

2008-09                       2009-10
Roster Age Games Roster Age Games
W. Chandler 21 82 D. Lee 26 81
D. Lee 25 81 D. Gallinari 21 81
C. Duhon 26 79 A. Harrington 29 72
N. Robinson 24 74 C. Duhon 27 67
Q. Richardson 28 72 W. Chandler 22 65
A. Harrington 28 68 T. Douglas 23 56
J. Jeffries 27 56 J. Jeffries 28 52
T. Thomas 31 36 L. Hughes 31 31
D. Gallinari 20 28 N. Robinson 25 30
L. Hughes 30 25 B. Walker 22 27
C. Wilcox 26 25 S. Rodriguez 23 27
A. Roberson 25 23 J. Bender 29 25
M. Rose 34 18 T. McGrady 30 24
Z. Randolph 27 11 J. Hill 22 24
J. Crawford 28 11 E. House 31 18
M. Collins 24 9 M. Landry 24 17
E. Curry 26 3 J. Giddens 24 11
J. Crawford 22 2 D. Milicic 24 8
J. James 33 2 E. Barron 28 7
D. Nichols 24 2 E. Curry 27 7
C. Samb 24 2 11 Different Players and 8 returning players, tho Curry doesn't count.
C. Sims 25 1 It's also important to note the games played by each player.
M. Sene 22 1
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
1/5/2012  9:41 PM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:How many of those 65 were banished and never really a part of things in NY. D'Antoni had the same rotation of players from the 12th game of his first season in NY until the trading deadline in the 09-10 season. That was around 130 games. The only change from his first year was Walsh traded Q for Darko.

Once again here you go with your overly simplified arguments. The truth is in the details. There was talent but guys had to buy in and unfortunately many of the guys in 08-09 were just playing for new contracts. Then 09-10 was not a team built to win. It was a team built to tear down. Your point is weak.

2008-09                       2009-10
Roster Age Games Roster Age Games
W. Chandler 21 82 D. Lee 26 81
D. Lee 25 81 D. Gallinari 21 81
C. Duhon 26 79 A. Harrington 29 72
N. Robinson 24 74 C. Duhon 27 67
Q. Richardson 28 72 W. Chandler 22 65
A. Harrington 28 68 T. Douglas 23 56
J. Jeffries 27 56 J. Jeffries 28 52
T. Thomas 31 36 L. Hughes 31 31
D. Gallinari 20 28 N. Robinson 25 30
L. Hughes 30 25 B. Walker 22 27
C. Wilcox 26 25 S. Rodriguez 23 27
A. Roberson 25 23 J. Bender 29 25
M. Rose 34 18 T. McGrady 30 24
Z. Randolph 27 11 J. Hill 22 24
J. Crawford 28 11 E. House 31 18
M. Collins 24 9 M. Landry 24 17
E. Curry 26 3 J. Giddens 24 11
J. Crawford 22 2 D. Milicic 24 8
J. James 33 2 E. Barron 28 7
D. Nichols 24 2 E. Curry 27 7
C. Samb 24 2 11 Different Players and 8 returning players, tho Curry doesn't count.
C. Sims 25 1 It's also important to note the games played by each player.
M. Sene 22 1

Honestly, I think you made my point. The 7 of the top 9 guys in on 08-09 were najor rotation guys in 09-10 up until the trade deadline. Douglas was not a part of the rotation until March so though he is down as playing 52 games the vast majority of his minutes came in the final 20 games of the season. Also including the d-league guys that walsh brought in brings your number up quite a bit since most of them played under 10 games. I counted 34 guys on your list. I may have made a mistake but were there 31 new players added last year?

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/5/2012  10:15 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/5/2012  10:17 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:How many of those 65 were banished and never really a part of things in NY. D'Antoni had the same rotation of players from the 12th game of his first season in NY until the trading deadline in the 09-10 season. That was around 130 games. The only change from his first year was Walsh traded Q for Darko.

Once again here you go with your overly simplified arguments. The truth is in the details. There was talent but guys had to buy in and unfortunately many of the guys in 08-09 were just playing for new contracts. Then 09-10 was not a team built to win. It was a team built to tear down. Your point is weak.

2008-09                       2009-10
Roster Age Games Roster Age Games
W. Chandler 21 82 D. Lee 26 81
D. Lee 25 81 D. Gallinari 21 81
C. Duhon 26 79 A. Harrington 29 72
N. Robinson 24 74 C. Duhon 27 67
Q. Richardson 28 72 W. Chandler 22 65
A. Harrington 28 68 T. Douglas 23 56
J. Jeffries 27 56 J. Jeffries 28 52
T. Thomas 31 36 L. Hughes 31 31
D. Gallinari 20 28 N. Robinson 25 30
L. Hughes 30 25 B. Walker 22 27
C. Wilcox 26 25 S. Rodriguez 23 27
A. Roberson 25 23 J. Bender 29 25
M. Rose 34 18 T. McGrady 30 24
Z. Randolph 27 11 J. Hill 22 24
J. Crawford 28 11 E. House 31 18
M. Collins 24 9 M. Landry 24 17
E. Curry 26 3 J. Giddens 24 11
J. Crawford 22 2 D. Milicic 24 8
J. James 33 2 E. Barron 28 7
D. Nichols 24 2 E. Curry 27 7
C. Samb 24 2 11 Different Players and 8 returning players, tho Curry doesn't count.
C. Sims 25 1 It's also important to note the games played by each player.
M. Sene 22 1

Honestly, I think you made my point. The 7 of the top 9 guys in on 08-09 were najor rotation guys in 09-10 up until the trade deadline. Douglas was not a part of the rotation until March so though he is down as playing 52 games the vast majority of his minutes came in the final 20 games of the season. Also including the d-league guys that walsh brought in brings your number up quite a bit since most of them played under 10 games. I counted 34 guys on your list. I may have made a mistake but were there 31 new players added last year?

Dude look at that group!!! You think that makes for a strong argument against D'Antoni? Look at the main guys on the 09-10 roster. That's not a great group. I think they underachieved, but it was far from a winning group of players. So what is your real point aside from saying that he had some of the same core guys over a period of time those 2 years? They didn't have most of those key guys play a full 82 games!!!

nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
1/5/2012  11:06 PM
Do you read? You do exactly what I've said. Which is you use one standard which is past doesn't matter to gloss over the bad play we've had. And then you bring up things up to half a decade ago to support your arguments. You can't summarily dismiss facts that don't support your view and expect anyone to take you seriously. I'm actually trying to help you out here.

Jax or Adelman would have had this thing humming like a new car. We would not have even gotten to 65 players.

nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:Well frankly it's confusing. If anyone says anything bad about the coaching it's who cares what happened a few weeks ago we just won 2 in a row, that's all in the past! Praise and glory be to MDA! Then when we are losing it's look what Steve Nash did half a decade ago! That's proof that the coach is great! It hurts your credibility because there does not exist a scenario where MDA is not thee best. If you were consistent in your arguments it might help them.

You are a real piece of work! I've never said that the coach is great or that he's "thee Best". I have not been changing my stance. I've been very consistent. I provide facts to back up my statements. It's not just my opinion.

65 different players in 3 years is an unmatched disruptive situation. Do you think Jax or Adelman or any other top coach would succeed under such a situation?

The coach usually needs a coach on the floor and we've had nothing but change at the PG spot, not to mention not having a passing PG to begin with. This year TD is a major downgrade and it's hurting the team. There's no one to actually run the plays effectively. Still this team needs some continuity and time to gel. The team started off slow last year and then settled down. I would think that will happen this year too.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/5/2012  11:46 PM
nykshaknbake wrote:Do you read? You do exactly what I've said. Which is you use one standard which is past doesn't matter to gloss over the bad play we've had. And then you bring up things up to half a decade ago to support your arguments. You can't summarily dismiss facts that don't support your view and expect anyone to take you seriously. I'm actually trying to help you out here.

Jax or Adelman would have had this thing humming like a new car. We would not have even gotten to 65 players.

1. There have been 65 different players that this coach has had during his tenture. The reason we've had 65 diferent players is not because of MDA's coaching. It's been driven by managment's desire to build a title contender. I use the stat's from MDA's time in PHX, cuz it represents a more stable situation to gauge. You can't gauge a 3 year period in which you've had 65 different players!!! No one's ever done that before.

2. NO Jax or Adelman wouldn't have just skated thru this last 3 years. Jax wouldn't have even taken the job!!! If he did, he would've QUIT! Adelman hasn't been able to stick on the teams he's been coaching and they've won games. What makes you think he'd be able to cut it in NY the last 3 years? Both Jax and Adelman are great coaches, but they still need good circumstances to succeed.

3. MDA was brought here to coach the team we have now, but it's been a tough road getting here. We still don't have a floor leader, which is a major problem. I can assure you they never intended to end up at this point with no PG in place. They're hoping Davis can recover and be that PG.

4. MDA has a new defensive assistant in Woodson, but it's gonna take some time to get everyone on the same page. If they still aren't defending a month from now then I suspect there will be a change. IMO I think things will settle down and they'll start to gel.

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

1/5/2012  11:59 PM
nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:Do you read? You do exactly what I've said. Which is you use one standard which is past doesn't matter to gloss over the bad play we've had. And then you bring up things up to half a decade ago to support your arguments. You can't summarily dismiss facts that don't support your view and expect anyone to take you seriously. I'm actually trying to help you out here.

Jax or Adelman would have had this thing humming like a new car. We would not have even gotten to 65 players.

1. There have been 65 different players that this coach has had during his tenture. The reason we've had 65 diferent players is not because of MDA's coaching. It's been driven by managment's desire to build a title contender. I use the stat's from MDA's time in PHX, cuz it represents a more stable situation to gauge. You can't gauge a 3 year period in which you've had 65 different players!!! No one's ever done that before.

2. NO Jax or Adelman wouldn't have just skated thru this last 3 years. Jax wouldn't have even taken the job!!! If he did, he would've QUIT! Adelman hasn't been able to stick on the teams he's been coaching and they've won games. What makes you think he'd be able to cut it in NY the last 3 years? Both Jax and Adelman are great coaches, but they still need good circumstances to succeed.

3. MDA was brought here to coach the team we have now, but it's been a tough road getting here. We still don't have a floor leader, which is a major problem. I can assure you they never intended to end up at this point with no PG in place. They're hoping Davis can recover and be that PG.

4. MDA has a new defensive assistant in Woodson, but it's gonna take some time to get everyone on the same page. If they still aren't defending a month from now then I suspect there will be a change. IMO I think things will settle down and they'll start to gel.

Wow - you sure are feisty about him. It reminds me of a political debate when one steadfastly defends their position even when its weak because that is the side they are on. After a while it becomes less about facts and true belief and more about defending a position.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/6/2012  12:48 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/6/2012  12:49 AM
KNICKSBIGCATS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
KNICKSBIGCATS wrote:This system svcks, I hate SSOL.
Mediocre teams are owning us.
I do not believe that playing in this system can lead to a championship.
Nobody can convince me otherwise.
We need a new coach.
I wish that JVG would come back....I don't want that prima donna Phil Jax.

1st of all the Knicks aren't playing SSOL. SSOL was the fastbreak offense that the Suns played. We haven't run SSOL since MDA has been here!!!

2nd, this team was 2nd leading scoring team in the league last year!!! WTF have you been watching? the problem with this team has always been the defense. That's the reason why I keep saying that there's nothing wrong with the system.

There really aren't a lot of different defensive schemes that pro teams run. It's about execution and effort on D. Also you need defensive talent too. Right now our best defender is Shumpert, a rookie!!!

The team needs a TON of work on the defensive end, but we are talking about a team that has never been good defensively so it's just gonna take some more work. I think we need STAT in particular to play with better concentration on defense. He's constantly making bad defensive plays. It should help to get Jared back in the mix, cuz he's a very solid TEAM defender, which we need more of.

Your posts are actually comical because you think that there's nothing wrong with the system.
For one thing, where is the rebounding after the three point shots are attempted?
What's our record since we acquired Melo? Something like 16-22? Not good. It's the system, man.
D'Antoni is the wrong coach with the wrong system for this team as constructed. Period.

We are one injury away to Melo or Chandler to this getting coyote UGLY in a hurry....did you even hear the BOO BIRDS tonight?
And, please don't try to tell me that we're not playing a form of SSOL! How many threes have we shot in the past few games? LOL....carry on with your unjustified man love for .

Mark my words, IF he is still the head coach for the rest of the season, it'll be a miracle.
Personally, I don't think he lasts the season. He's headed to Toronto next year (:thank goodness:). Then MAYBE somebody like JVG can actually implement a REAL system here(cause there ain't one here now).

You really think MDA is under acheiving..You feel like this roster should have automatically click, blowing everybody out with our 2 big super stars, and defensive big in the middle. Forget the fact that MDA hasnt had a steady roster for more then 12 weeks, forget the fact that he didn't ochestrate really, any of these trades, forget the fact that he did go after guys like Hill, Kidd, JC, shawne ect, who are more suited to play his style of ball.

All he can do with his team at this point is 90 minute film sessions to try and correct the teams flaws, No actually practices, an assistant coach who he's never coached with before, and most importantly, a lame duck wanna be pg, who's streaky in every catagory at best..

we have to look a wide range of things before we go harping that MDA is not the right coach, or the system he was super successfull at, can't work.. Because i didn't here one single olympic player say anything negative about MDA, it was just the opposite

ES
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/6/2012  1:06 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:Do you read? You do exactly what I've said. Which is you use one standard which is past doesn't matter to gloss over the bad play we've had. And then you bring up things up to half a decade ago to support your arguments. You can't summarily dismiss facts that don't support your view and expect anyone to take you seriously. I'm actually trying to help you out here.

Jax or Adelman would have had this thing humming like a new car. We would not have even gotten to 65 players.

1. There have been 65 different players that this coach has had during his tenture. The reason we've had 65 diferent players is not because of MDA's coaching. It's been driven by managment's desire to build a title contender. I use the stat's from MDA's time in PHX, cuz it represents a more stable situation to gauge. You can't gauge a 3 year period in which you've had 65 different players!!! No one's ever done that before.

2. NO Jax or Adelman wouldn't have just skated thru this last 3 years. Jax wouldn't have even taken the job!!! If he did, he would've QUIT! Adelman hasn't been able to stick on the teams he's been coaching and they've won games. What makes you think he'd be able to cut it in NY the last 3 years? Both Jax and Adelman are great coaches, but they still need good circumstances to succeed.

3. MDA was brought here to coach the team we have now, but it's been a tough road getting here. We still don't have a floor leader, which is a major problem. I can assure you they never intended to end up at this point with no PG in place. They're hoping Davis can recover and be that PG.

4. MDA has a new defensive assistant in Woodson, but it's gonna take some time to get everyone on the same page. If they still aren't defending a month from now then I suspect there will be a change. IMO I think things will settle down and they'll start to gel.

Wow - you sure are feisty about him. It reminds me of a political debate when one steadfastly defends their position even when its weak because that is the side they are on. After a while it becomes less about facts and true belief and more about defending a position.

I don't know who you are, but you haven't been paying attention, cuz i've been presenting PLENTY of facts. I'm not just defending a position, unlike you who is just parroting what everyone else is saying right now, cuz the team has not looked good early. I have a mind of my own and i've made observations based on real things.

It was just LAST YEAR that this team was the 2nd highest scoring and 5 most efficient offense in the league. We did this with Felton as the PG, who isn't an All Star. This is why I've said that the there is nothing wrong with the system. If we had Felton instead of TD, things would look a lot different.

Now we have to hope that Davis can get back on the court sooner than expected. Otherwise we are stuck with TD and hoping Shump or Lin can help the team get by offensively. IMO things will improve defensively with more time to develop chemistry and I think getting Jared back will also help the defense.

Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
1/6/2012  1:12 AM
Don't worry mrKnickShot, this guy acted the same way with Isiah.
"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

1/6/2012  1:16 AM
nixluva wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:Do you read? You do exactly what I've said. Which is you use one standard which is past doesn't matter to gloss over the bad play we've had. And then you bring up things up to half a decade ago to support your arguments. You can't summarily dismiss facts that don't support your view and expect anyone to take you seriously. I'm actually trying to help you out here.

Jax or Adelman would have had this thing humming like a new car. We would not have even gotten to 65 players.

1. There have been 65 different players that this coach has had during his tenture. The reason we've had 65 diferent players is not because of MDA's coaching. It's been driven by managment's desire to build a title contender. I use the stat's from MDA's time in PHX, cuz it represents a more stable situation to gauge. You can't gauge a 3 year period in which you've had 65 different players!!! No one's ever done that before.

2. NO Jax or Adelman wouldn't have just skated thru this last 3 years. Jax wouldn't have even taken the job!!! If he did, he would've QUIT! Adelman hasn't been able to stick on the teams he's been coaching and they've won games. What makes you think he'd be able to cut it in NY the last 3 years? Both Jax and Adelman are great coaches, but they still need good circumstances to succeed.

3. MDA was brought here to coach the team we have now, but it's been a tough road getting here. We still don't have a floor leader, which is a major problem. I can assure you they never intended to end up at this point with no PG in place. They're hoping Davis can recover and be that PG.

4. MDA has a new defensive assistant in Woodson, but it's gonna take some time to get everyone on the same page. If they still aren't defending a month from now then I suspect there will be a change. IMO I think things will settle down and they'll start to gel.

Wow - you sure are feisty about him. It reminds me of a political debate when one steadfastly defends their position even when its weak because that is the side they are on. After a while it becomes less about facts and true belief and more about defending a position.

I don't know who you are, but you haven't been paying attention, cuz i've been presenting PLENTY of facts. I'm not just defending a position, unlike you who is just parroting what everyone else is saying right now, cuz the team has not looked good early. I have a mind of my own and i've made observations based on real things.

It was just LAST YEAR that this team was the 2nd highest scoring and 5 most efficient offense in the league. We did this with Felton as the PG, who isn't an All Star. This is why I've said that the there is nothing wrong with the system. If we had Felton instead of TD, things would look a lot different.

Now we have to hope that Davis can get back on the court sooner than expected. Otherwise we are stuck with TD and hoping Shump or Lin can help the team get by offensively. IMO things will improve defensively with more time to develop chemistry and I think getting Jared back will also help the defense.

Parroting? Eh Whatever. I too have a mind of my own even if it means disagreeing with you (respecfully).

It's pointless if he is a good coach or not. I personally feel that he is not. But he does not have an open ended invitation. Fault or not, he might need to pay the price. Like I said, blame the GM('s), players, owner ...

The coach is always the fall guy. Nobody wants to hear excuses. And, putting it all on BD is scary. If his back goes out then you can just say. "Look MDA just does not have a PG"

Like I said in another post. Wasn't Westphal a great coach in PHX? BUT HE SUX NOW!! But he had a ****ty team in SAC - so what, no one cares.

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

1/6/2012  1:17 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:Don't worry mrKnickShot, this guy acted the same way with Isiah.

And hopefully he will with PJax

colombian0725
Posts: 20632
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/30/2011
Member: #3795

1/6/2012  2:35 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:Do you read? You do exactly what I've said. Which is you use one standard which is past doesn't matter to gloss over the bad play we've had. And then you bring up things up to half a decade ago to support your arguments. You can't summarily dismiss facts that don't support your view and expect anyone to take you seriously. I'm actually trying to help you out here.

Jax or Adelman would have had this thing humming like a new car. We would not have even gotten to 65 players.

1. There have been 65 different players that this coach has had during his tenture. The reason we've had 65 diferent players is not because of MDA's coaching. It's been driven by managment's desire to build a title contender. I use the stat's from MDA's time in PHX, cuz it represents a more stable situation to gauge. You can't gauge a 3 year period in which you've had 65 different players!!! No one's ever done that before.

2. NO Jax or Adelman wouldn't have just skated thru this last 3 years. Jax wouldn't have even taken the job!!! If he did, he would've QUIT! Adelman hasn't been able to stick on the teams he's been coaching and they've won games. What makes you think he'd be able to cut it in NY the last 3 years? Both Jax and Adelman are great coaches, but they still need good circumstances to succeed.

3. MDA was brought here to coach the team we have now, but it's been a tough road getting here. We still don't have a floor leader, which is a major problem. I can assure you they never intended to end up at this point with no PG in place. They're hoping Davis can recover and be that PG.

4. MDA has a new defensive assistant in Woodson, but it's gonna take some time to get everyone on the same page. If they still aren't defending a month from now then I suspect there will be a change. IMO I think things will settle down and they'll start to gel.

Wow - you sure are feisty about him. It reminds me of a political debate when one steadfastly defends their position even when its weak because that is the side they are on. After a while it becomes less about facts and true belief and more about defending a position.

Either he is MDA or He has a man crush on MDA.

There's nothing wrong with the System

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy