[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

the most damning gallo review you will ever read [forewarned]
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53837
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/31/2010  1:59 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
nixluva wrote:I see good things in Gallo. I think he's still developing and finding his way in the NBA and I think it's too soon to give up on him as if he's a finished product. I've seen growth this year and I don't want to assume that this kid is not gonna "get it" one day soon. We see a lot of young talent play inconsistently early on and not everyone develops at the same speed. ie Billups. You can't get crazy. That's why I love Donnie. He's not a guy that makes rash decisions.

How long are we supposed to give him to develop? 2-3 more seasons? By then Amare will be 31 yrs old.

People like to use Billups as an example but most guys arent turning the corner after their 3rd-4th years in the league.

plenty do, especially bigs. Plus Gallo is pretty good right now. Its not like he's AR and sitting on the bench.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

12/31/2010  2:15 PM
Ok, let me try to understand this sh!tty breakdown.

-Will wants it more than Gallo? That's BS. Will is one of the least aggressive players in the league. Dude is so tentative it's unbelivable. Will just happens to be a bit more talented.

-Gallo and Will have both made very nice improvements in their game. Gallo's passing and intelligence took a huge leap. He kicks it out when driving because the defense collapses on him! Last year he would have kept driving into the double team and threw up a terrible shot. Now he makes the smart play almost all the time.

-You get shots by moving? Yo, where have you been the last 2 years? This is mainly a pick and roll offense. NY only uses a few sets where Fields comes around Amare. Will hardly moves unless he is setting the pick and breaking to the basket.

-Again with the improvement? Nothing new in Gallo's game? he is driving better, passing much better, and playing even better d than he was last year. Why? Because his mid range game struggles and he rarely posts up? Again, SPACING, uptempo...

-Will's driving was better last year. Especially given that he had almost no jumper last year. Will needs to drive left more. He's shown a couple solid lefty drives this year. MDA said it himself last year that Will has one of the best right handed drives in the league. At the time I agreed but he's fallen off a bit in creating by himself.

Gallo still can improve A LOT, but saying that he didn't from last year to now is stupidity. He went from nothing but a 3 point jacker to a very solid all around player.

tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

12/31/2010  2:21 PM
fishmike wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
Vmart wrote:
fishmike wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Being a young team with promise like us is great, no doubt. But when your franchise player is in his prime you have to make a move to acquire the best possible talent while giving up young talent. Waiting for Gallo to be something he's not gonna be is just ridiculous.
why does it have to be Gallo? I'm not banking on him becoming a star. I do think he can and will be a 20ppg scorer who defends very well. Chandler is on a Danny Granger type schedule himself. Fields is a rookie but you know the way he works he's going to get much better.

VMart.. whats the trade? If Denver wants 5 first rounder from NJ plus Favors plus Harris what are they going to ask the Knicks for? A Knick trade STARTS with Gallo + Fields + Chandler and includes some kind of mix of Douglas, Mosgov and AR to get some picks from other teams.

If Melo was Lebron I would do that. He's not.

I understand the thinking behind the coveted 2nd star but Melo isnt even as good as Steve Nash.

Also the Knicks got hurt by losing Lee, who was an all star for junk. That trade has not worked out at all. I dont want to see the same thing happen with Chandler who is close to being an all star himself if he keeps this up

If you go back into history of trades you will find that stars like Shaq didn't even yeild so much or for that matter Gasol, or Garnett. Melo holds the cards and that has held up a Nets trade. A good deal for Denver will be Gallo, AR and Field with Curry thrown in to make number work. That is a price I'm willing to pay and if they want a future number one I might add that too. The purpose is to get Amare his much needed second star and make sure this window of opportunity at least has a finals appearance. There are only so many windows teams like the Knicks have to make it work and this window is opening and we need to make the most out of the crack in the window that Amare has given the Knicks. Adding Melo opens the window a little more.

The idea is to get away from these one sided trade scenarios. Melo is a nice player, but he's not worth 4 players plus a 5th to be named later(the 1st rounder). Teams make trades to A) get better or B) relieve themselves of headaches. We do not GUT THE TEAM to have less value.

thats all I am saying. He's good. He's an upgrade at SF.

Melo is Gilbert Arenas (before he got hurt). A really good player making a ton of money, but people here treat him like Lebron, Wade, etc.

Melo is a complimentary player and a 3 time all star. He's very popular. He's a nice piece. Gallo, Fields and Chandler are nice pieces too, and if you give Chandler $8mm a year they are all still cheaper than Melo


I'm on the fencr about giving him that 65 mill, that's ridiculous. But 16.5 or whatever the number will be with the new cba is very worth it. Look how far Melo has gotten Denver as their best player. He's never played with someone as good as Amare. And a lot of people would say that Melo is better than Amare. Maybe not after this year he's having, and dont go by a biased knicks board lol.
smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
12/31/2010  2:24 PM
I still like Gallo, but less so than last year- my problem with him is that you can see sometimes he just is not making any effort at all. It's not about the number of shots he's taking- sometimes he's putting in the effort but is playing unselfishly and passing, which is good. But then there are entire halves where he just seems like he can't be bothered or gets quickly discouraged, and it's just annoying. Another thing is that it seems after that first month a year ago, he's not the shooter we seem to think he is- I think he'll stick around 37 or 38% on 3's which is okay, BUT it makes him more expendible than if he were the 42% 3pt shooter- there are plenty of players with his offensive skills.

However what makes me want to keep him on the team is I think he'll be one of those players who really steps up in the playoffs, and thats really rare and valuable to have- I remember Alan Houston in his first few years with us would disappoint in the regular season (in much the same way Gallo sometimes does) but stepped it up come the playoffs, so all was quickly forgiven come May!

AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/31/2010  4:57 PM
fishmike wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
nixluva wrote:I see good things in Gallo. I think he's still developing and finding his way in the NBA and I think it's too soon to give up on him as if he's a finished product. I've seen growth this year and I don't want to assume that this kid is not gonna "get it" one day soon. We see a lot of young talent play inconsistently early on and not everyone develops at the same speed. ie Billups. You can't get crazy. That's why I love Donnie. He's not a guy that makes rash decisions.

How long are we supposed to give him to develop? 2-3 more seasons? By then Amare will be 31 yrs old.

People like to use Billups as an example but most guys arent turning the corner after their 3rd-4th years in the league.

plenty do, especially bigs. Plus Gallo is pretty good right now. Its not like he's AR and sitting on the bench.

Please give me an example of some since plenty of guys blow up after their 3rd and 4th years.

Also Gallo isnt a big nor does he play like one.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/31/2010  5:07 PM
tj23 wrote:Ok, let me try to understand this sh!tty breakdown.

-Will wants it more than Gallo? That's BS. Will is one of the least aggressive players in the league. Dude is so tentative it's unbelivable. Will just happens to be a bit more talented.

-Gallo and Will have both made very nice improvements in their game. Gallo's passing and intelligence took a huge leap. He kicks it out when driving because the defense collapses on him! Last year he would have kept driving into the double team and threw up a terrible shot. Now he makes the smart play almost all the time.

-You get shots by moving? Yo, where have you been the last 2 years? This is mainly a pick and roll offense. NY only uses a few sets where Fields comes around Amare. Will hardly moves unless he is setting the pick and breaking to the basket.

-Again with the improvement? Nothing new in Gallo's game? he is driving better, passing much better, and playing even better d than he was last year. Why? Because his mid range game struggles and he rarely posts up? Again, SPACING, uptempo...

-Will's driving was better last year. Especially given that he had almost no jumper last year. Will needs to drive left more. He's shown a couple solid lefty drives this year. MDA said it himself last year that Will has one of the best right handed drives in the league. At the time I agreed but he's fallen off a bit in creating by himself.

Gallo still can improve A LOT, but saying that he didn't from last year to now is stupidity. He went from nothing but a 3 point jacker to a very solid all around player.

- Chandler more talented than Gallo? Chandler isn't passing up shot opportunities.

- So instead of becoming a better finisher at the rim he passes to perimeter and you call that a huge improvement. He could do that last year.

- Gallo is looking like the same way he played toward the end of last year. Good a game here and there and forgettable for most games.

- Gallo can improve but that doesnt mean he will. I can name a few players around the league that fans are waiting to improve.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

1/1/2011  11:58 AM
this was the most damning gallo review ever. next up a damning review of rautins. i havent liked his choice of ties lately.
Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

1/1/2011  12:27 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/1/2011  12:28 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
tj23 wrote:Ok, let me try to understand this sh!tty breakdown.

-Will wants it more than Gallo? That's BS. Will is one of the least aggressive players in the league. Dude is so tentative it's unbelivable. Will just happens to be a bit more talented.

-Gallo and Will have both made very nice improvements in their game. Gallo's passing and intelligence took a huge leap. He kicks it out when driving because the defense collapses on him! Last year he would have kept driving into the double team and threw up a terrible shot. Now he makes the smart play almost all the time.

-You get shots by moving? Yo, where have you been the last 2 years? This is mainly a pick and roll offense. NY only uses a few sets where Fields comes around Amare. Will hardly moves unless he is setting the pick and breaking to the basket.

-Again with the improvement? Nothing new in Gallo's game? he is driving better, passing much better, and playing even better d than he was last year. Why? Because his mid range game struggles and he rarely posts up? Again, SPACING, uptempo...

-Will's driving was better last year. Especially given that he had almost no jumper last year. Will needs to drive left more. He's shown a couple solid lefty drives this year. MDA said it himself last year that Will has one of the best right handed drives in the league. At the time I agreed but he's fallen off a bit in creating by himself.

Gallo still can improve A LOT, but saying that he didn't from last year to now is stupidity. He went from nothing but a 3 point jacker to a very solid all around player.

- Chandler more talented than Gallo? Chandler isn't passing up shot opportunities.

- So instead of becoming a better finisher at the rim he passes to perimeter and you call that a huge improvement. He could do that last year.

- Gallo is looking like the same way he played toward the end of last year. Good a game here and there and forgettable for most games.

- Gallo can improve but that doesnt mean he will. I can name a few players around the league that fans are waiting to improve.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
1/1/2011  12:30 PM
I remember how the this same board use to rip KVH, but whats the difference between Gallo and KVH if anything KVH use to be a better player than Gallo.
cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

1/1/2011  2:34 PM
Vmart wrote:I remember how the this same board use to rip KVH, but whats the difference between Gallo and KVH if anything KVH use to be a better player than Gallo.

wow you did not just go there. kvh was yet another player to get next coming of bird rep. and when he was in new jersey he came damn close, but faded into just being another gallo. ooooo no i didnt! just teasing i like gallo but he needs to step up or briggs will start another gallo for melo trade.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/1/2011  3:22 PM
Vmart wrote:I remember how the this same board use to rip KVH, but whats the difference between Gallo and KVH if anything KVH use to be a better player than Gallo.

IMO the only difference is in our percieved expectations... because of the fact that we used up a #6 lottery pick to take Gallo & passed up on some potential star talent like Eric Gordon & Brooke Lopez in the process, we want this kid to become that star player to justify that pick... when we traded Spree for KVH, he was never looked upon w/the same kind of expectation... we were getting rid of a malcontented past his prime player & hoping to fill the void w/someone that was never going to be that star player people thought he might be when he was originally drafted.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
1/1/2011  5:07 PM
Galo is just nothing special. He is an ok 4th option on a decent team who can shoot above average.

On top of it he acts like he is the man. Just annoying. All that swagger backed up by nothing, he reminds me of the Jersey Shore guidos.

A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
rojasmas
Posts: 21207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/25/2004
Member: #639
1/1/2011  6:37 PM
Who cares if we lose Gallo? He is no Dirk Nowitzki. He doesn't play defense and doesn't rebound. I would rather have a tough Argentinian like Luis Scola than a softie European 3 point shooter. Move him as soon as possible. And Chandler should be moved now too when his value is highest. Let's get Melo and then some defensive role players and we'll be a 55 win team who competes and probably beats the Hawks and Bulls of the world. Will be be there with Miami and Boston? No but we won't be as presently assembled either.
We could be the Dallas Mavs of the East.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38412
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/1/2011  7:06 PM
fishmike wrote:
Vmart wrote:
fishmike wrote:he's 22 and still figuring it out. He's got a lot of talent but clearly he's inconsistant.

This team needs a center. Not Melo, not Gallo to pick up his game.

You are 100% wrong on this. The Knicks need Melo's consistency very badly. As for a Center yes that is needed too but only after Melo is added.


I'm 100% wrong? We got outrebounded by 15 last night. How does Melo fix that? We cant stop players in the post, how does Melo fix that? We are the #1 scoring team in the NBA.

Sorry.. I'm a 100% right. If Chandler isnt dropping 25 then Gallo is picking up the slack. Consistant scoring isnt the problem. Defending the post and rebounding is. Keep telling yourself different maybe you will start to believe it

100% agree. Our problem is not offense. It is defense and rebounding. Melo does not fix this.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/1/2011  7:54 PM
rojasmas wrote:Who cares if we lose Gallo? He is no Dirk Nowitzki. He doesn't play defense and doesn't rebound. I would rather have a tough Argentinian like Luis Scola than a softie European 3 point shooter. Move him as soon as possible. And Chandler should be moved now too when his value is highest. Let's get Melo and then some defensive role players and we'll be a 55 win team who competes and probably beats the Hawks and Bulls of the world. Will be be there with Miami and Boston? No but we won't be as presently assembled either.

rofl!!!! nice insightful, basketball breakdown.. I am sure there was nothing personal in that at all... but this is what I got from your post...

I HATE YOU GALLO
I HATE YOU GALLO
I HATE YOU GALLO
I HATE YOU GALLO
I HATE YOU GALLO

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/1/2011  10:25 PM
Maybe Melo would have the same kind of turn-around that Vince Carter had after being traded from Toronto. He has the ability to be good on defense. If we're in win-now mode and you can keep Chandler, he'd be worth getting.
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

1/2/2011  11:26 AM
Assume that the Orlando game was a major factor inspiring this thread.

I thought the Orlando game revealed more about the way the team played than about Gallinari, and for that matter, Fields.

The lack of shots taken by those two guys says more about team chemistry and our PGs than anything else, IMO.

Look at Felton's line- 6/22, 1/7, and 6 assists and 6 turnovers. Gallinari and Fields, the two "glue" guys on the team get 8 shots between them in about 70 minutes on the floor. The lack of shots for those two guys is as much on Felton as themselves not wanting to score for some strange reason.


How does Williams get more open looks than Gallinari in the Orlando game? Is it because Orlando is not respecting his outside shot? It is because he does more than what Gallo will do at times- i.e. stand in a corner and wait for an open shot? In fact, Wiliams got more open shots in that game than Gallo and Fields combined, but really did nothing different in terms of trying to get open- it was just a matter of his teammates getting him the ball when he was open. I watch Williams a lot, and he does nothing special to get open, but he seemed to get the ball in a great position to shoot a lot of times the other day.

Another funny thing is that Gallinari, I think twice, actually did what Felton is supposed to do- he drove to the basket, drew in defenders, and kicked it out for open jump shots (I think they were misses, unfortunately).

I would like to see Gallo do more for himself, but I don't think he is the kind of player who is going to force the issue in this system. I would also like to see MDA run some plays from him off a high screen, and see what he can do as a driver or distributor.

The 3 guys who took the most shots in our starting lineup are also the guys who are more willing to go 1/1, but even Chandler had more open looks for 3s than Gallinari did.

Whose fault is it that Gallinari is not getting the open 3s that he is paid to hit? Maybe players have lost confidence in his shot, because it has been inconsistent, but there was a moment when Gallo started hitting shots in the Heat game and then he was seemingly forgotten the rest of the game. I rarely see others on the team set picks for him. He has a little routine with Amare that he seems to do once a game, but to be honest, it leaves him with a step back attempt at a 3, which is hardly a high % shot IMO.

You look at the Orlando stats- 8 players had 8 or more shots, with Howard taking 19- you look at the Knicks and you had 3 players who had more than 19 shots, including your PG.

Folks like to over-simplify things and find easiest way to analyze things, but this is still a team sport, and the Gallo/Fields stat line tells me more about the team chemistry for that game than it does about the two players who took a total of 8 shots combined.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
NYKBocker
Posts: 38412
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/2/2011  12:11 PM
Paladin55 wrote:Assume that the Orlando game was a major factor inspiring this thread.

I thought the Orlando game revealed more about the way the team played than about Gallinari, and for that matter, Fields.

The lack of shots taken by those two guys says more about team chemistry and our PGs than anything else, IMO.

Look at Felton's line- 6/22, 1/7, and 6 assists and 6 turnovers. Gallinari and Fields, the two "glue" guys on the team get 8 shots between them in about 70 minutes on the floor. The lack of shots for those two guys is as much on Felton as themselves not wanting to score for some strange reason.


How does Williams get more open looks than Gallinari in the Orlando game? Is it because Orlando is not respecting his outside shot? It is because he does more than what Gallo will do at times- i.e. stand in a corner and wait for an open shot? In fact, Wiliams got more open shots in that game than Gallo and Fields combined, but really did nothing different in terms of trying to get open- it was just a matter of his teammates getting him the ball when he was open. I watch Williams a lot, and he does nothing special to get open, but he seemed to get the ball in a great position to shoot a lot of times the other day.

Another funny thing is that Gallinari, I think twice, actually did what Felton is supposed to do- he drove to the basket, drew in defenders, and kicked it out for open jump shots (I think they were misses, unfortunately).

I would like to see Gallo do more for himself, but I don't think he is the kind of player who is going to force the issue in this system. I would also like to see MDA run some plays from him off a high screen, and see what he can do as a driver or distributor.

The 3 guys who took the most shots in our starting lineup are also the guys who are more willing to go 1/1, but even Chandler had more open looks for 3s than Gallinari did.

Whose fault is it that Gallinari is not getting the open 3s that he is paid to hit? Maybe players have lost confidence in his shot, because it has been inconsistent, but there was a moment when Gallo started hitting shots in the Heat game and then he was seemingly forgotten the rest of the game. I rarely see others on the team set picks for him. He has a little routine with Amare that he seems to do once a game, but to be honest, it leaves him with a step back attempt at a 3, which is hardly a high % shot IMO.

You look at the Orlando stats- 8 players had 8 or more shots, with Howard taking 19- you look at the Knicks and you had 3 players who had more than 19 shots, including your PG.

Folks like to over-simplify things and find easiest way to analyze things, but this is still a team sport, and the Gallo/Fields stat line tells me more about the team chemistry for that game than it does about the two players who took a total of 8 shots combined.

Very good analysis and I agree 100%. Everybody blame Gallo that he does not get more aggressive. He is aggressive when he gets the ball as evidence to the number of times he goes to the line. His opportunities is just not there. For some reason, Felton seem to have been infected by what infected Dudu these past couple of weeks. He really needs to setup the whole team and not just Amare, himself and The Mayor.

I also posted in another thread how Gallo penetrated and dished where his teammates just missed their shots. These were all open shots. He created but people are mad he did not dunk over people. Weird.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/2/2011  12:12 PM
Paladin55 wrote:Assume that the Orlando game was a major factor inspiring this thread.

I thought the Orlando game revealed more about the way the team played than about Gallinari, and for that matter, Fields.

The lack of shots taken by those two guys says more about team chemistry and our PGs than anything else, IMO.

Look at Felton's line- 6/22, 1/7, and 6 assists and 6 turnovers. Gallinari and Fields, the two "glue" guys on the team get 8 shots between them in about 70 minutes on the floor. The lack of shots for those two guys is as much on Felton as themselves not wanting to score for some strange reason.


How does Williams get more open looks than Gallinari in the Orlando game? Is it because Orlando is not respecting his outside shot? It is because he does more than what Gallo will do at times- i.e. stand in a corner and wait for an open shot? In fact, Wiliams got more open shots in that game than Gallo and Fields combined, but really did nothing different in terms of trying to get open- it was just a matter of his teammates getting him the ball when he was open. I watch Williams a lot, and he does nothing special to get open, but he seemed to get the ball in a great position to shoot a lot of times the other day.

Another funny thing is that Gallinari, I think twice, actually did what Felton is supposed to do- he drove to the basket, drew in defenders, and kicked it out for open jump shots (I think they were misses, unfortunately).

I would like to see Gallo do more for himself, but I don't think he is the kind of player who is going to force the issue in this system. I would also like to see MDA run some plays from him off a high screen, and see what he can do as a driver or distributor.

The 3 guys who took the most shots in our starting lineup are also the guys who are more willing to go 1/1, but even Chandler had more open looks for 3s than Gallinari did.

Whose fault is it that Gallinari is not getting the open 3s that he is paid to hit? Maybe players have lost confidence in his shot, because it has been inconsistent, but there was a moment when Gallo started hitting shots in the Heat game and then he was seemingly forgotten the rest of the game. I rarely see others on the team set picks for him. He has a little routine with Amare that he seems to do once a game, but to be honest, it leaves him with a step back attempt at a 3, which is hardly a high % shot IMO.

You look at the Orlando stats- 8 players had 8 or more shots, with Howard taking 19- you look at the Knicks and you had 3 players who had more than 19 shots, including your PG.

Folks like to over-simplify things and find easiest way to analyze things, but this is still a team sport, and the Gallo/Fields stat line tells me more about the team chemistry for that game than it does about the two players who took a total of 8 shots combined.

excellent post & i agree w/everything u said, but as i think even u will agree, there are legitimate concerns when it comes to Gallo's upside potential, especially w/the way this team is utilizing him & his apparent willingness to defer to other teammates when it comes to shot taking... u can only be as good as your team allows u to be, but you also need to gain the trust of your teammates to go to you when the team needs someone to score, & so far this team has not shown that on a consistent basis anytime he has been here... we've seen it before... to his credit he has made a clear effort to be more aggressive taking the ball to the rack this season, but he needs to do more... he needs to raise the level of his consistency, not just in his shot making, but in his level of intensity & focus during games as well... sometimes it almost seems like his head isn't even into the game until halfway through the 3rd quarter, & that's simply not acceptable from a guy who we drafted to become a cornerstone of our franchise for the next decade or more.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

1/2/2011  12:52 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/2/2011  12:53 PM
TMS wrote:

excellent post & i agree w/everything u said, but as i think even u will agree, there are legitimate concerns when it comes to Gallo's upside potential, especially w/the way this team is utilizing him & his apparent willingness to defer to other teammates when it comes to shot taking... u can only be as good as your team allows u to be, but you also need to gain the trust of your teammates to go to you when the team needs someone to score, & so far this team has not shown that on a consistent basis anytime he has been here... we've seen it before... to his credit he has made a clear effort to be more aggressive taking the ball to the rack this season, but he needs to do more... he needs to raise the level of his consistency, not just in his shot making, but in his level of intensity & focus during games as well... sometimes it almost seems like his head isn't even into the game until halfway through the 3rd quarter, & that's simply not acceptable from a guy who we drafted to become a cornerstone of our franchise for the next decade or more.

I can't lie and say that I haven't screamed at the TV or computer screen while watching him play at times.

My biggest issues with him:

1) he was told to work on his game in the post- I have not seen any new shots or footwork. At times he plays like a 6'1" guard when trying to get a shot off in the post. He does not play like he is 6"10." A single new shot, like a jump hook, would have been a nice addition.

2) Shooting inconsistency- I still wonder if he has some kind of lingering arm injury, but the simple fact is that his 3 pt shooting % has gone down since his rookie year, and he seems to be more streakish than consistent. Is this the reason he is not looked for by teammates sometimes? Do they see an inconsistency in his shooting during their practice days which we don't see, and which translates into decisions made during actual games?

3) He really wants to be a team player first (anyone who doesn't see this in how he plays is not really watching him offensively or defensively), but he continues to defer to other players instead of being more aggressive and assertive, especially in terms of using the ball when he has it, and especially taking it to the basket when he recognizes that his outside shooting touch is off on a particular night. I think a lot of his inconsistency comes from his hesitation in this area, and what he sees as his role on the team.

With this said, I also have to say that at this point in Gallo's career (I'll thrown in Fields here, too.) his scoring stats are going to reflect, in many ways, the selflessness of his teammates, and 11/35 shooting by your PG with a significant decrease (30%+) in assists in your two recent losses, is not the selflessness that you want to see from your distributor in big games.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
the most damning gallo review you will ever read [forewarned]

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy