[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Do the Knicks really need a 2nd banana
Author Thread
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

12/16/2010  2:55 PM
knickstorrents wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
VDesai wrote:It boils down to this. Did the Knicks lose last night because they didn't have a 2nd go to option to get them a basket when they needed or because we couldn't get stops when we needed?

I know the Knicks missed 2 shots down the stretch, but Amare's shot was a good look that went in and out and Felton got hammered without a whistle. Was another offensive player really going to get us a much better result than the opportunities we had? Or would we have been better off denying KG the ball or keeping him off the offensive glass down the stretch. My ultimate point was there was a much more glaring need for the latter. We seem to operating just fine without the established 2nd banana right now. We have a whole bunch of guys that are acting like that "2nd banana" already on the roster- they just haven't been established as that kind of player by leaguewide perception as of yet.

The Knicks didn't lose last night because they lacked a second star.

But come playoff time, they will.

Exactly right. We could be a 50-win team whether we have Melo or not, but we are a much better playoff team if he is on the roster.

Too many people stress over the regular season instead of emphasizing what it takes to succeed in the poststeason. The defense automatically tightens up, shots are harder to get off, the play beomes a lot more physical.

These are ALL things that Carmelo Anthony would assist the Knicks with. He brings it.

Carmelo only helps if you can stay in the game until the last 5 minutes. If we are getting destroyed inside for 3+ quarters, a 2nd go-to scorer will not be enough to bring us back.

This is why I think we need a defensive big man. I'm not counting on AR to fill that role.

AUTOADVERT
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30134
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
12/16/2010  3:15 PM
Felton is already the 2nd banana, we need more size really. While adding Melo would be great, it will depend on the price. Even with Melo we need another good big or 2 around Amare and Turiaf.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Knixkik
Posts: 35457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/16/2010  4:40 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:Felton is already the 2nd banana, we need more size really. While adding Melo would be great, it will depend on the price. Even with Melo we need another good big or 2 around Amare and Turiaf.

They are much easier to find. Guys like Pryzbilla, who we are looking into now, Jeff Foster, Dalembert. These are guys who will be available this summer that can fill that role. Between Turiaf, Moz, and one of these guys, we should be strong off the bench with post defense, or replacing Chandler in the starting lineup against big teams.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
12/16/2010  5:32 PM
cheers wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:No, they don't. We have so many bananas right now, this is the most balanced attack in the L. Just need relief for the Amar'e and Felton, that's all. You have to remember Gallinari will continue developing and he has superstar potential.

we need gallo to show for four quarters. like i said in the gallo intervention thread. amar'e and felton can get gallo paid, talking david lee paid. but gallo needs to be a rockstar everytime he is playing with em. trust they need gallo. they want to dish him the ball and have him do the superstar stuff he did second half of celtics game.

Gallo that dude though. He needs to get over that mental barrier, he has to go hard 24/7, 365. Let's hope that's sooner than later, but what is not in doubt is that it's coming, IT'S COMING IN A BIG WAY.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

12/16/2010  6:30 PM
knickstorrents wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
VDesai wrote:It boils down to this. Did the Knicks lose last night because they didn't have a 2nd go to option to get them a basket when they needed or because we couldn't get stops when we needed?

I know the Knicks missed 2 shots down the stretch, but Amare's shot was a good look that went in and out and Felton got hammered without a whistle. Was another offensive player really going to get us a much better result than the opportunities we had? Or would we have been better off denying KG the ball or keeping him off the offensive glass down the stretch. My ultimate point was there was a much more glaring need for the latter. We seem to operating just fine without the established 2nd banana right now. We have a whole bunch of guys that are acting like that "2nd banana" already on the roster- they just haven't been established as that kind of player by leaguewide perception as of yet.

The Knicks didn't lose last night because they lacked a second star.

But come playoff time, they will.

Exactly right. We could be a 50-win team whether we have Melo or not, but we are a much better playoff team if he is on the roster.

Too many people stress over the regular season instead of emphasizing what it takes to succeed in the poststeason. The defense automatically tightens up, shots are harder to get off, the play beomes a lot more physical.

These are ALL things that Carmelo Anthony would assist the Knicks with. He brings it.

Carmelo only helps if you can stay in the game until the last 5 minutes.

Are you serious dude? We're not talking about Robert Horry, Steve Kerr, and Derek Fisher here. Those are all guys who won't produce too much, but can nail that big 4th quarter shot when the game is on the line.

That was a terrible point.

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

12/16/2010  7:07 PM
OldFan wrote:
Knixkik wrote:If they can get him by only dealing one of the starters

I think very few people would disagree with this - as long as the starter was not Amare. My fear with acquiring Melo is we give up 3 starters. Then this team has lots of wholes and no assets or cap space to fill them. Some people believe Felton, Amare and Melo with anyone around them is enough. But we'd still have no defense and no depth.

Both Mark Jackson and Van Gundy thought if you have to give up three starters you still do it. I'm sure they know more about the game then I do but in this case I disagree.

I take exception with that. Felton has been playing solid defense and Amar'e isn't no slouch either.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
rp
Posts: 20756
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2009
Member: #2965
USA
12/16/2010  7:11 PM
loweyecue wrote:
OldFan wrote:
Knixkik wrote:If they can get him by only dealing one of the starters

I think very few people would disagree with this - as long as the starter was not Amare. My fear with acquiring Melo is we give up 3 starters. Then this team has lots of wholes and no assets or cap space to fill them. Some people believe Felton, Amare and Melo with anyone around them is enough. But we'd still have no defense and no depth.

Both Mark Jackson and Van Gundy thought if you have to give up three starters you still do it. I'm sure they know more about the game then I do but in this case I disagree.

I take exception with that. Felton has been playing solid defense and Amar'e isn't no slouch either.

The next argument when all is traded is STAT and Felton playing over 40 minutes :)

"Failure is only postponed success as long as courage coaches ambition. The habit of persistence is the habit of victory" -Herbert Kaufman
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

12/16/2010  7:14 PM
rp wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
OldFan wrote:
Knixkik wrote:If they can get him by only dealing one of the starters

I think very few people would disagree with this - as long as the starter was not Amare. My fear with acquiring Melo is we give up 3 starters. Then this team has lots of wholes and no assets or cap space to fill them. Some people believe Felton, Amare and Melo with anyone around them is enough. But we'd still have no defense and no depth.

Both Mark Jackson and Van Gundy thought if you have to give up three starters you still do it. I'm sure they know more about the game then I do but in this case I disagree.

I take exception with that. Felton has been playing solid defense and Amar'e isn't no slouch either.

The next argument when all is traded is STAT and Felton playing over 40 minutes :)

Easy, I don't for a second believe Donnie will trade 3 starters to get Melo. And its a bad argument cause they are already playing 40 minutes. :)

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
rp
Posts: 20756
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2009
Member: #2965
USA
12/16/2010  7:15 PM
loweyecue wrote:
rp wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
OldFan wrote:
Knixkik wrote:If they can get him by only dealing one of the starters

I think very few people would disagree with this - as long as the starter was not Amare. My fear with acquiring Melo is we give up 3 starters. Then this team has lots of wholes and no assets or cap space to fill them. Some people believe Felton, Amare and Melo with anyone around them is enough. But we'd still have no defense and no depth.

Both Mark Jackson and Van Gundy thought if you have to give up three starters you still do it. I'm sure they know more about the game then I do but in this case I disagree.

I take exception with that. Felton has been playing solid defense and Amar'e isn't no slouch either.

The next argument when all is traded is STAT and Felton playing over 40 minutes :)

Easy, I don't for a second believe Donnie will trade 3 starters to get Melo. And its a bad argument cause they are already playing 40 minutes. :)

My point is people already are complaining on board about it.

"Failure is only postponed success as long as courage coaches ambition. The habit of persistence is the habit of victory" -Herbert Kaufman
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

12/16/2010  7:17 PM
I also believe what someone else already posted, Felton can become the second scorer here. Gallo/Chandler makes it a very well rounded attack. The need was for a closer that Melo is, and Felton has shown some flashes (to my surprise) that he can finish things off. And he doesn't back down from no one. Do I still want Melo, of course I do, but his value add has gone down a little in my eyes.
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
rp
Posts: 20756
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2009
Member: #2965
USA
12/16/2010  7:18 PM
loweyecue wrote:I also believe what someone else already posted, Felton can become the second scorer here. Gallo/Chandler makes it a very well rounded attack. The need was for a closer that Melo is, and Felton has shown some flashes (to my surprise) that he can finish things off. And he doesn't back down from no one. Do I still want Melo, of course I do, but his value add has gone down a little in my eyes.

No arguments there, if we can get 2 for 1 I am all for it but I just doubt it.

"Failure is only postponed success as long as courage coaches ambition. The habit of persistence is the habit of victory" -Herbert Kaufman
Do the Knicks really need a 2nd banana

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy