BlueSeats wrote:I'd prefer the board be allowed to do a little more self-moderation. I hate always wondering if someone's been banned. For instance, oohah after challenging Martin, or Playa, Isles, etc. The only guy who ever really bugged me was seatsblue, but that was personal and I still didn't want him banned.We're a pretty vocal bunch, that's what where her for, to debate and ****. So what if it gets a little heated once in a while?
That said, I've never run a board and don't consider my opinion all that valuable, but I like having the opportunity to express it.
how about this. We have no problem with heated discussion. Don't think we have ever banned someone for that. Adult heated discussion is a very good thing. Not too many under 21 years old here (my guess) so there is some expectation.
We do ban posters who would deteriorate the overall effectiveness of the whole site. I gotta say, over a 10 year timeframe, we have about a list of maybe 10 users who have been banned (some of them have come back multiple times).
Here is an example of deteriorate: Playa constantly posting wildly off topic replies or new threads within the Knicks discussion area. We had publicly asked him and emailed him personally to just keep it to the OT forum but that didn't work out. We gave him multiple tries and that didn't work out. He was banned.
I think it goes without saying that we would like to grow the site and facilitate discussion at the same time; every once in a blue moon some users do not fit within that. I would have to say that Andrew and my time in moderating is shorter than it may once have been, for better or worse.