[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Report: Knicks Are Melo's First Choice!! Get the Champaine ready!! Will he be here before the start of the season?
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/31/2010  2:41 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
TMS wrote:
knickstorrents wrote:Why are people so in love with Melo?

speaking for myself, i'm not in love w/Melo... in fact i don't even really like his style of play... but you're a sucker if you think Gallo or AR will grow into as good a player as he is IMO.

Im pretty sure that Denver wants more than just one player--would that makes any sense? I don't care if someone is better than the other guy--and no one knows what talent level Gallo or Randolph will be in their prime. I think their collective talents--their size their diversity of skills for the team give the Knicks a tough match up. We honestly do not have draft picks that are attractive--so what is left. I will tell you--Randolph Gallo Chandler in lieu of no picks. If you were Denvers GM what would you ask for--what is acceptable--really I dont care about a draft pick in 2014--this is my job today right? So either the Knicks pay a very high price ON TOP of which they lose ALL flexibility and we accept the team that will be here---OR we stay patient and haev it all. If Carmelo Anthony wants to be a Knick--than he will do what LBJ and Bosh did--stay patient for a year. We cannot have 2 guys making over 20mm(unless Shaq Hakeem etc.. in their prime)--wont work how we are set up.

if u are able to hold onto at least 1 of Gallo or AR to go along w/Melo, Amare & Felton, that's a very strong core to build around... you no longer need to look at acquiring star players in that scenario, only role players to play around them... that to me is how you build a winning team... you get the stars to build around & then work from there, not the other way around... whoever we are able to keep can be extended using their Bird Rights & we'd also have the MLE to use as well going forward... i am sick of waiting around for players to realize their potential... we just signed up Amare to a huge contract & he's not the most durable players in the world... we can't afford to fuk around anymore wasting his prime years while we wait & see if guys will ever reach their potential... if there's a real opportunity to trade for a superstar player like CP3 or Melo, you do it, case closed... no more of this wishing on a star bullcrap we've been doing for the past several years... real winners go out & MAKE themselves into winners while dreamers & wannabes sit around & dream about becoming one.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/31/2010  2:47 AM
tkf wrote:you really think westbrook is that much better? wow..... as they say, the grass is always
greener....


Melo is not a superstar....

dude, Westbrook plays the point & put up 16 / 8 / 5 last year... he's got way more value than Gallo or AR at this point, that is not a knock on Gallo or AR either, that's just reality... if we offered up David Lee to OKC in exchange for Westbrook they would have laughed in our faces, believe it.

as for Melo not being a superstar, i dunno what standards you're judging players by, but to me he is easily a superstar player... dude has averaged 24 & 6 over his NBA career, he easily warrants that status... Kevin Durant is 25 & 6 over his career & there's not many people who would argue he's not a superstar either.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/31/2010  2:49 AM
tkf wrote:
TMS wrote:
knickstorrents wrote:Why are people so in love with Melo?

speaking for myself, i'm not in love w/Melo... in fact i don't even really like his style of play... but you're a sucker if you think Gallo or AR will grow into as good a player as he is IMO.

then why bother with melo... if you don't like his style of play, why give up that kind of potential? you don't know what kind of player these two kids will grow into.. what we do know now that gallo is a pretty good player and Ar has shown flashes.... these are not 4th year players who are struggling to find their way.. they are guys who basically played parts of two seasons , and during which time have shown the type of game that got GM's high on them in the first place... melo is not the final piece to a championship here... sorry man... if we need him that much..we sign him as a FA...

because i have no idea how good AR will turn out to be, & while i really like Gallinari & always have, i don't think he'll ever be as good as Melo either... so in the end, the question comes down to who i think will improve this team more, & IMO i think Melo would, although i would much prefer if we could trade for CP3 as i've said many times before, but that bus seems to have left the station.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/31/2010  2:52 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/31/2010  3:21 AM
tkf wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
TMS wrote:
knickstorrents wrote:Why are people so in love with Melo?

speaking for myself, i'm not in love w/Melo... in fact i don't even really like his style of play... but you're a sucker if you think Gallo or AR will grow into as good a player as he is IMO.

Im pretty sure that Denver wants more than just one player--would that makes any sense? I don't care if someone is better than the other guy--and no one knows what talent level Gallo or Randolph will be in their prime. I think their collective talents--their size their diversity of skills for the team give the Knicks a tough match up. We honestly do not have draft picks that are attractive--so what is left. I will tell you--Randolph Gallo Chandler in lieu of no picks. If you were Denvers GM what would you ask for--what is acceptable--really I dont care about a draft pick in 2014--this is my job today right? So either the Knicks pay a very high price ON TOP of which they lose ALL flexibility and we accept the team that will be here---OR we stay patient and haev it all. If Carmelo Anthony wants to be a Knick--than he will do what LBJ and Bosh did--stay patient for a year. We cannot have 2 guys making over 20mm(unless Shaq Hakeem etc.. in their prime)--wont work how we are set up.

you know what I don't get briggs.. most here will easily say.. melo is better than both gallo and AR will ever be... ok, fine..

yet they think the knicks will get melo for just one of them and spare parts.. Not both, but one.. rofl... I mean don't you think denver feels that melo is better than everyone on the knicks? why would they settle for less.. If I were denver, I would ask for AR, gallo, chandler and a future pick just for kicks...

I really hate the speculation because unless you are talking about giving away all of of our young talent, we just need to drop the melo thing.. denver will not settle for one player, especially when most knicks fans themselves openly say, he is better than both AR and gallo will ever be... if we get melo, it will be via Free agency.. even then, I would like to see what is available next year, according to our team needs..

& yet you have other fans who openly say that a kid like AR is an untouchable before he's proven anything in the NBA... that to me is worthy of a ROFL moment... just like people didn't wanna give up D Lee in exchange for KG a few years back, they don't wanna give up AR for Melo... before we ever had AR there were guys proposing trades of Gallo to go after AR, but they wouldn't give up Gallo to get Carmelo Anthony... guys bust a nut over super raw talent like Hassan Whiteside & clearing cap space around here & yet have no desire to go out & acquire proven star players in their prime in trades... it's some serious craziness going on up in here... we are NOT talking about Zach Randolph here fellas... this is Carmelo, the same dude who went toe to toe with Kobe Bryant in the WCF a couple years back & almost carried his team to beating them... if any of you forgot that, here's something to refresh your memory:

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
8/31/2010  12:45 PM
TMS wrote:
tkf wrote:you really think westbrook is that much better? wow..... as they say, the grass is always
greener....


Melo is not a superstar....

dude, Westbrook plays the point & put up 16 / 8 / 5 last year... he's got way more value than Gallo or AR at this point, that is not a knock on Gallo or AR either, that's just reality... if we offered up David Lee to OKC in exchange for Westbrook they would have laughed in our faces, believe it.

as for Melo not being a superstar, i dunno what standards you're judging players by, but to me he is easily a superstar player... dude has averaged 24 & 6 over his NBA career, he easily warrants that status... Kevin Durant is 25 & 6 over his career & there's not many people who would argue he's not a superstar either.

interesting you mention this... OKC would not do lee for westbrook because they have options at lee's position... decent enough options.. but if OKC had a hole at PF and another PG option, would they trade westbrook for lee? maybe.. heck lee's numbers were nohting to sneeze at, plus he is an allstar... value is relative here.. remember walsh said he had other offers for lee, some even better offers.. but ultimately lee held most of the cards as to where he wanted to go...

You say westbrook is a PG so he has more value than gallo... well gallo is a big and I would not trade gallo for westbrook ,especially considering we have a PG in felton who is more than adequate.. again, value is relative..

We are tall talking about pretty good players here, so to argue who is better, westbrook, AR/ gallo is useless.. and this is what brings me back to the melo talks.. melo is a great scorer, but not a superstar IMO.. you mention durant, whO I don't think is there yet, but one thing I will say, is that durant is also establishing himself on the defensive end.. that will make the difference..

So instead of looking at melo's value in terms of comparing him to gallo and AR, lets look at his value in terms of knicks need, and cost of obtaining his services.. for me, it is just too much considering what I am getting back, and that he will be a FA next year...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
8/31/2010  12:48 PM
TMS wrote:
tkf wrote:
TMS wrote:
knickstorrents wrote:Why are people so in love with Melo?

speaking for myself, i'm not in love w/Melo... in fact i don't even really like his style of play... but you're a sucker if you think Gallo or AR will grow into as good a player as he is IMO.

then why bother with melo... if you don't like his style of play, why give up that kind of potential? you don't know what kind of player these two kids will grow into.. what we do know now that gallo is a pretty good player and Ar has shown flashes.... these are not 4th year players who are struggling to find their way.. they are guys who basically played parts of two seasons , and during which time have shown the type of game that got GM's high on them in the first place... melo is not the final piece to a championship here... sorry man... if we need him that much..we sign him as a FA...

because i have no idea how good AR will turn out to be, & while i really like Gallinari & always have, i don't think he'll ever be as good as Melo either... so in the end, the question comes down to who i think will improve this team more, & IMO i think Melo would, although i would much prefer if we could trade for CP3 as i've said many times before, but that bus seems to have left the station.

why does gallo have to be as good as melo? he and randolph both can bring us things that melo doesn't.. isn't there value in that? this is not about a head for head exchange here...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
8/31/2010  12:54 PM
TMS wrote:
tkf wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
TMS wrote:
knickstorrents wrote:Why are people so in love with Melo?

speaking for myself, i'm not in love w/Melo... in fact i don't even really like his style of play... but you're a sucker if you think Gallo or AR will grow into as good a player as he is IMO.

Im pretty sure that Denver wants more than just one player--would that makes any sense? I don't care if someone is better than the other guy--and no one knows what talent level Gallo or Randolph will be in their prime. I think their collective talents--their size their diversity of skills for the team give the Knicks a tough match up. We honestly do not have draft picks that are attractive--so what is left. I will tell you--Randolph Gallo Chandler in lieu of no picks. If you were Denvers GM what would you ask for--what is acceptable--really I dont care about a draft pick in 2014--this is my job today right? So either the Knicks pay a very high price ON TOP of which they lose ALL flexibility and we accept the team that will be here---OR we stay patient and haev it all. If Carmelo Anthony wants to be a Knick--than he will do what LBJ and Bosh did--stay patient for a year. We cannot have 2 guys making over 20mm(unless Shaq Hakeem etc.. in their prime)--wont work how we are set up.

you know what I don't get briggs.. most here will easily say.. melo is better than both gallo and AR will ever be... ok, fine..

yet they think the knicks will get melo for just one of them and spare parts.. Not both, but one.. rofl... I mean don't you think denver feels that melo is better than everyone on the knicks? why would they settle for less.. If I were denver, I would ask for AR, gallo, chandler and a future pick just for kicks...

I really hate the speculation because unless you are talking about giving away all of of our young talent, we just need to drop the melo thing.. denver will not settle for one player, especially when most knicks fans themselves openly say, he is better than both AR and gallo will ever be... if we get melo, it will be via Free agency.. even then, I would like to see what is available next year, according to our team needs..

& yet you have other fans who openly say that a kid like AR is an untouchable before he's proven anything in the NBA... that to me is worthy of a ROFL moment... just like people didn't wanna give up D Lee in exchange for KG a few years back, they don't wanna give up AR for Melo... before we ever had AR there were guys proposing trades of Gallo to go after AR, but they wouldn't give up Gallo to get Carmelo Anthony... guys bust a nut over super raw talent like Hassan Whiteside & clearing cap space around here & yet have no desire to go out & acquire proven star players in their prime in trades... it's some serious craziness going on up in here... we are NOT talking about Zach Randolph here fellas... this is Carmelo, the same dude who went toe to toe with Kobe Bryant in the WCF a couple years back & almost carried his team to beating them... if any of you forgot that, here's something to refresh your memory:

I think you are talking about the minority here.. I am not sure who here didn't want to move lee for KG had that been a real option... I also was not one of those who wanted to trade gallo for AR.. but again, what are we talking about here.. this is not a Gallo for melo trade.. this is gallo, AR, chandler and a pick for melo.. if anyone thinks it will be anything less is fooling themselves!


this is Carmelo, the same dude who went toe to toe with Kobe Bryant in the WCF a couple years back & almost carried his team to beating them... if any of you forgot that, here's something to refresh your memory:


that is admirable.. we also have a guy in amare who outplayed duncan, a duncan in his prime... what does all that mean? you still need 5 good players and a bench to win... isn't that our ultimate goal...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
8/31/2010  1:32 PM
knickstorrents wrote:Why are people so in love with Melo? IF this team needs scoring, he MIGHT fill a need (though on a net basis he doesn't give you that much. Check his true shooting percentage vs. other max players). What this team needs right now is a stable, defensive Center. Let this team play. If it becomes apparent that we lack scoring punch (which is highly doubtful) then I can see why we might want to trade for Melo.

Here's a good post on TS% http://basketbloggers.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/true-shooting-percentage-and-its-usefulness/. TS% takes into account Free Throws and 3 pointers.

According to the above post, he's this (I agree):

Mid TS%, high FGA, high FTA- This guy is most likely a volume scorer. He can be used as a #1 option, however, he does not possess the talent to single-handedly do it night in and night out.


Here's a good analysis of Carmelo's efficiency: http://www.magicbasketball.net/2010/08/19/additional-commentary-on-carmelo-anthony/. Check his net +/- and his TS% vs Lebron. And for fans of basketball who feel Durant is a much better player than Melo - guess what, you're right.

Carmelo isnt standing around taking wide open shots either. He is blowing players faces off with a hand in face almost all the time.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/31/2010  1:49 PM
Thing is we DON'T need scoring. I think this team can score plenty. Not that we couldn't use a closer like Melo, but more than anything we need the length and defensive ability of the guys we have now. We lose that length and defense sending a bunch of guys away for Melo's scoring, which will likely only matter late in games.

Last year MDA admitted that he slowed things down and we still scored a lot of points. The problem was how many we gave up. Melo doesn't effect our defense ONE BIT. Does anyone think our problem is likely to be scoring? I think being able to have superior length, mobility and shotblocking out there in crunchtime is gonna mean more to our win totally than adding a great scorer. Without Melo I expect this team will avg 107 ppg or so. What would that be with him 120? I don't think so. I think it avg's out about the same. It's the D that i'm worried about.

NYKBocker
Posts: 38414
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
8/31/2010  1:55 PM
nixluva wrote:Thing is we DON'T need scoring. I think this team can score plenty. Not that we couldn't use a closer like Melo, but more than anything we need the length and defensive ability of the guys we have now. We lose that length and defense sending a bunch of guys away for Melo's scoring, which will likely only matter late in games.

Last year MDA admitted that he slowed things down and we still scored a lot of points. The problem was how many we gave up. Melo doesn't effect our defense ONE BIT. Does anyone think our problem is likely to be scoring? I think being able to have superior length, mobility and shotblocking out there in crunchtime is gonna mean more to our win totally than adding a great scorer. Without Melo I expect this team will avg 107 ppg or so. What would that be with him 120? I don't think so. I think it avg's out about the same. It's the D that i'm worried about.

The thing with Melo is that he had a stacked team the past couple of years in Denver. He had AI, Billups, KMart, Nene, Camby, JR Smith and yet he could not carry the team past the third round.

AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
8/31/2010  2:19 PM
nixluva wrote:Thing is we DON'T need scoring. I think this team can score plenty. Not that we couldn't use a closer like Melo, but more than anything we need the length and defensive ability of the guys we have now. We lose that length and defense sending a bunch of guys away for Melo's scoring, which will likely only matter late in games.

Last year MDA admitted that he slowed things down and we still scored a lot of points. The problem was how many we gave up. Melo doesn't effect our defense ONE BIT. Does anyone think our problem is likely to be scoring? I think being able to have superior length, mobility and shotblocking out there in crunchtime is gonna mean more to our win totally than adding a great scorer. Without Melo I expect this team will avg 107 ppg or so. What would that be with him 120? I don't think so. I think it avg's out about the same. It's the D that i'm worried about.

I disagree. We dont have CONSISTENT scoring.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39923
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

8/31/2010  2:28 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
knickstorrents wrote:Why are people so in love with Melo? IF this team needs scoring, he MIGHT fill a need (though on a net basis he doesn't give you that much. Check his true shooting percentage vs. other max players). What this team needs right now is a stable, defensive Center. Let this team play. If it becomes apparent that we lack scoring punch (which is highly doubtful) then I can see why we might want to trade for Melo.

Here's a good post on TS% http://basketbloggers.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/true-shooting-percentage-and-its-usefulness/. TS% takes into account Free Throws and 3 pointers.

According to the above post, he's this (I agree):

Mid TS%, high FGA, high FTA- This guy is most likely a volume scorer. He can be used as a #1 option, however, he does not possess the talent to single-handedly do it night in and night out.


Here's a good analysis of Carmelo's efficiency: http://www.magicbasketball.net/2010/08/19/additional-commentary-on-carmelo-anthony/. Check his net +/- and his TS% vs Lebron. And for fans of basketball who feel Durant is a much better player than Melo - guess what, you're right.

Carmelo isnt standing around taking wide open shots either. He is blowing players faces off with a hand in face almost all the time.

For what it's worth, Melo's TS% is comparable to Kobe Bryant's - not only this past season but for their careers. I think Melo's shooting is solid considering how many shots he takes.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 76310
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/31/2010  2:31 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
nixluva wrote:Thing is we DON'T need scoring. I think this team can score plenty. Not that we couldn't use a closer like Melo, but more than anything we need the length and defensive ability of the guys we have now. We lose that length and defense sending a bunch of guys away for Melo's scoring, which will likely only matter late in games.

Last year MDA admitted that he slowed things down and we still scored a lot of points. The problem was how many we gave up. Melo doesn't effect our defense ONE BIT. Does anyone think our problem is likely to be scoring? I think being able to have superior length, mobility and shotblocking out there in crunchtime is gonna mean more to our win totally than adding a great scorer. Without Melo I expect this team will avg 107 ppg or so. What would that be with him 120? I don't think so. I think it avg's out about the same. It's the D that i'm worried about.

I disagree. We dont have CONSISTENT scoring.

Amare?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
8/31/2010  2:45 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/31/2010  3:08 PM
TMS wrote:
tkf wrote:you really think westbrook is that much better? wow..... as they say, the grass is always
greener....


Melo is not a superstar....

dude, Westbrook plays the point & put up 16 / 8 / 5 last year... he's got way more value than Gallo or AR at this point, that is not a knock on Gallo or AR either, that's just reality... if we offered up David Lee to OKC in exchange for Westbrook they would have laughed in our faces, believe it.

as for Melo not being a superstar, i dunno what standards you're judging players by, but to me he is easily a superstar player... dude has averaged 24 & 6 over his NBA career, he easily warrants that status... Kevin Durant is 25 & 6 over his career & there's not many people who would argue he's not a superstar either.

Zach Randolph = superstar?

Stephon in his prime = superstar?

Do we have a tendency to just say 20/10 = superstar or 20 pts 6 assists = superstar without considering

- does the guy give a **** about defense?
- does he care about making his teammates better vs just being Al Harrington/Corey Maggette?

Not saying Melo = Zach or Steph but I think we've advanced beyond simply saying the guy puts up X pts X rebounds he has to be worth max money for max years no?

I think Franchise Player + Young cheap talent = winning formula.

Unless u get Pau Gasol gift wrapped or KG.

Boston drafted Al Jefferson..let him blossom and traded him for KG.

We drafted David Lee...he developed..we traded him for Randolph/Azubuike/Turiaf.

Imagine if we kept Camby and traded him..or kept Nene and either kept him or traded him or kept Trevor Ariza until his trade value was high.

Right now just Gallo or Randolph plus an expiring like Curry doesn't seem to be enough to land Melo/Chris Paul types. But Gallo or Randolph as promising young stars instead of just promising players plus an expiring would be a much better asset.

I think we can all agree this is the ideal scenario:

We play the season out, Gallo becomes Detlef Schrempf, Randolph becomes a Camby-Odom hybrid. We sign Melo as a FA and trade one of our budding young stars (Randolph or Gallo) for Chris Paul.

Chris Paul
X
Melo
Amare
X


and we all live happily ever after. The end.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
8/31/2010  3:08 PM
I'd give up anyone not named Amare and build a team around those two guys.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
8/31/2010  3:48 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/31/2010  3:55 PM
Ok..so we trade Randolph or Gallo or both in some package for Melo

PG:
SG:
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C:

$35-$40 Million on 2 starters.

How much does that leave to fill out the rest of the roster?

Is that roster just doomed to losing in the ECF to Miami every season or...

does the remaining money which Miami is paying to Bosh allow us to fill out the roster in a more balanced way?

this kind of all goes back to the horrible mismanagement of the past decade.

Normally when teams suck as much as we do you come out of it with a

Derrick Rose
John Wall
Stephen Curry
Tyreke Evans
Brandon Jennings
Russel Westbrook
Brook Lopez
Kevin Durant


This discussion should really be about how Melo + Amare + one of those guys can challenge for a championship over the next 5 seasons.

Instead we somehow came out of a decade of being the laughingstock of the league without a single young superstar potential player on the roster.

Which means

a) we have to keep Gallo or Randolph in a Melo trade

b) whoever we keep has to be as good as Lamar Odom/Ray Allen/Manu (3rd best player on a championship squad) or it looks like, realistically, we'll just be the Patrick Ewing to someone else's Michael Jordan.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
8/31/2010  3:59 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:Ok..so we trade Randolph or Gallo or both in some package for Melo

PG:
SG:
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C:

$35-$40 Million on 2 starters.

How much does that leave to fill out the rest of the roster?

Is that roster just doomed to losing in the ECF to Miami every season or...

does the remaining money which Miami is paying to Bosh allow us to fill out the roster in a more balanced way?

PG: Felton
SG: Scrub
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C: Scrub

We use the MLE and spend on buying picks to help fill out the roster year after year.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
8/31/2010  4:03 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:Ok..so we trade Randolph or Gallo or both in some package for Melo

PG:
SG:
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C:

$35-$40 Million on 2 starters.

How much does that leave to fill out the rest of the roster?

Is that roster just doomed to losing in the ECF to Miami every season or...

does the remaining money which Miami is paying to Bosh allow us to fill out the roster in a more balanced way?

PG: Felton
SG: Scrub
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C: Scrub

We use the MLE and spend on buying picks to help fill out the roster year after year.

PG: Felton $7-8 M (he got a 2 year deal for $15.8) M

so $42.8- 47.8 M for Felton, Amare, Melo.

I think this is close to what Miami is paying for their big 3..around $48 M per season...

our extra $6 M better be WISELY spent and I guess we could get some guys to sign for a discount..?

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
rp
Posts: 20756
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2009
Member: #2965
USA
8/31/2010  4:04 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:Ok..so we trade Randolph or Gallo or both in some package for Melo

PG:
SG:
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C:

$35-$40 Million on 2 starters.

How much does that leave to fill out the rest of the roster?

Is that roster just doomed to losing in the ECF to Miami every season or...

does the remaining money which Miami is paying to Bosh allow us to fill out the roster in a more balanced way?

this kind of all goes back to the horrible mismanagement of the past decade.

Normally when teams suck as much as we do you come out of it with a

Derrick Rose
John Wall
Stephen Curry
Tyreke Evans
Brandon Jennings
Russel Westbrook
Brook Lopez
Kevin Durant


This discussion should really be about how Melo + Amare + one of those guys can challenge for a championship over the next 5 seasons.

Instead we somehow came out of a decade of being the laughingstock of the league without a single young superstar potential player on the roster.

Which means

a) we have to keep Gallo or Randolph in a Melo trade

b) whoever we keep has to be as good as Lamar Odom/Ray Allen/Manu (3rd best player on a championship squad) or it looks like, realistically, we'll just be the Patrick Ewing to someone else's Michael Jordan.

I recall an article or board discussion but the discussion was about Boston having one home grown star (Paul) to go with two others (KG/Ray). If we can keep one to get Melo great but again if what NJ is offering is true we don't have enough draft choices to trade to compete. What Miami did to get three stars is ridiculous and hard to compete. Then again we are one of the top teams as far as high salary not enough stars. It would be interesting to have a big three of melo/amare/cpaul but have so so other players like Miami. The scary part of that three to compete with Miami is injury history :).

"Failure is only postponed success as long as courage coaches ambition. The habit of persistence is the habit of victory" -Herbert Kaufman
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
8/31/2010  4:18 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:Ok..so we trade Randolph or Gallo or both in some package for Melo

PG:
SG:
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C:

$35-$40 Million on 2 starters.

How much does that leave to fill out the rest of the roster?

Is that roster just doomed to losing in the ECF to Miami every season or...

does the remaining money which Miami is paying to Bosh allow us to fill out the roster in a more balanced way?

PG: Felton
SG: Scrub
SF: Melo $15-$20M
PF: Amare $20 M
C: Scrub

We use the MLE and spend on buying picks to help fill out the roster year after year.

PG: Felton $7-8 M (he got a 2 year deal for $15.8) M

so $42.8- 47.8 M for Felton, Amare, Melo.

I think this is close to what Miami is paying for their big 3..around $48 M per season...

our extra $6 M better be WISELY spent and I guess we could get some guys to sign for a discount..?

Ideally we would take back JR Smith or Nene to give us more salary to trade for future assets.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
Report: Knicks Are Melo's First Choice!! Get the Champaine ready!! Will he be here before the start of the season?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy