[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Roger Mason? A Knick? Who the hell is this guy?
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/5/2010  8:59 PM
egelband wrote:what i was trying to say was, i don't see chandler as part of the two guard mix in an ideal situation. i think the knicks also see this and will try to fill out the backcourt with 'buike, mason, and, maybe one of the second rounders. douglas and felton will handle the point. my two cents obviously...

i don't think the Knicks do either, which is why i think he's going to be traded any day now... but give me a choice between playing Wilson out of position at the 2 or a guy like Roger Mason or Kelenna Azabuike, i'd take Wilson every time... he's simply a better player than either of those guys, he defends, blocks shots, can post up smaller defenders, finish with the best of them & excel on the fastbreak, all things we are looking for in any player... i don't see the need for a guy like Mason unless, like i said, a trade is made... i think Donnie must have something in the works cuz otherwise i don't see the point.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
8/5/2010  9:06 PM
TMS wrote:
egelband wrote:what i was trying to say was, i don't see chandler as part of the two guard mix in an ideal situation. i think the knicks also see this and will try to fill out the backcourt with 'buike, mason, and, maybe one of the second rounders. douglas and felton will handle the point. my two cents obviously...

i don't think the Knicks do either, which is why i think he's going to be traded any day now... but give me a choice between playing Wilson out of position at the 2 or a guy like Roger Mason or Kelenna Azabuike, i'd take Wilson every time... he's simply a better player than either of those guys, he defends, blocks shots, can post up smaller defenders, finish with the best of them & excel on the fastbreak, all things we are looking for in any player... i don't see the need for a guy like Mason unless, like i said, a trade is made... i think Donnie must have something in the works cuz otherwise i don't see the point.

Mason is a shooter and a pure SG. Chandler is none of those things.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/5/2010  9:17 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
TMS wrote:
egelband wrote:what i was trying to say was, i don't see chandler as part of the two guard mix in an ideal situation. i think the knicks also see this and will try to fill out the backcourt with 'buike, mason, and, maybe one of the second rounders. douglas and felton will handle the point. my two cents obviously...

i don't think the Knicks do either, which is why i think he's going to be traded any day now... but give me a choice between playing Wilson out of position at the 2 or a guy like Roger Mason or Kelenna Azabuike, i'd take Wilson every time... he's simply a better player than either of those guys, he defends, blocks shots, can post up smaller defenders, finish with the best of them & excel on the fastbreak, all things we are looking for in any player... i don't see the need for a guy like Mason unless, like i said, a trade is made... i think Donnie must have something in the works cuz otherwise i don't see the point.

Mason is a shooter and a pure SG. Chandler is none of those things.

Anthony Roberson is a shooter too... what's that got to do with anything? i'd rather play the guy who will score more points & be the better player on the floor.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
8/5/2010  9:46 PM
No chance Roger Mason starts. He'll be a 15-18 mpg bench player at best.
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
8/5/2010  9:49 PM
TMS wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
TMS wrote:
egelband wrote:what i was trying to say was, i don't see chandler as part of the two guard mix in an ideal situation. i think the knicks also see this and will try to fill out the backcourt with 'buike, mason, and, maybe one of the second rounders. douglas and felton will handle the point. my two cents obviously...

i don't think the Knicks do either, which is why i think he's going to be traded any day now... but give me a choice between playing Wilson out of position at the 2 or a guy like Roger Mason or Kelenna Azabuike, i'd take Wilson every time... he's simply a better player than either of those guys, he defends, blocks shots, can post up smaller defenders, finish with the best of them & excel on the fastbreak, all things we are looking for in any player... i don't see the need for a guy like Mason unless, like i said, a trade is made... i think Donnie must have something in the works cuz otherwise i don't see the point.

Mason is a shooter and a pure SG. Chandler is none of those things.

Anthony Roberson is a shooter too... what's that got to do with anything? i'd rather play the guy who will score more points & be the better player on the floor.

You're comparing Anthony Roberson to Roger Mason?

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/5/2010  9:50 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
TMS wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
TMS wrote:
egelband wrote:what i was trying to say was, i don't see chandler as part of the two guard mix in an ideal situation. i think the knicks also see this and will try to fill out the backcourt with 'buike, mason, and, maybe one of the second rounders. douglas and felton will handle the point. my two cents obviously...

i don't think the Knicks do either, which is why i think he's going to be traded any day now... but give me a choice between playing Wilson out of position at the 2 or a guy like Roger Mason or Kelenna Azabuike, i'd take Wilson every time... he's simply a better player than either of those guys, he defends, blocks shots, can post up smaller defenders, finish with the best of them & excel on the fastbreak, all things we are looking for in any player... i don't see the need for a guy like Mason unless, like i said, a trade is made... i think Donnie must have something in the works cuz otherwise i don't see the point.

Mason is a shooter and a pure SG. Chandler is none of those things.

Anthony Roberson is a shooter too... what's that got to do with anything? i'd rather play the guy who will score more points & be the better player on the floor.

You're comparing Anthony Roberson to Roger Mason?

no... i'm debating your faulty logic of choosing 1 player over a superior one just because he's a "pure shooter" as you labelled him.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
egelband
Posts: 20155
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2005
Member: #1026

8/5/2010  10:11 PM
i think the knicks have a little money to spend this year so are trying to catch lightning in a bottle at the sg position. little risk and possibly high reward for a guy with a chip on his shoulder...if it doesn't work out, no worries.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/5/2010  11:33 PM
egelband wrote:i think the knicks have a little money to spend this year so are trying to catch lightning in a bottle at the sg position. little risk and possibly high reward for a guy with a chip on his shoulder...if it doesn't work out, no worries.

we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

RIP Crushalot😞
egelband
Posts: 20155
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2005
Member: #1026

8/5/2010  11:37 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
egelband wrote:i think the knicks have a little money to spend this year so are trying to catch lightning in a bottle at the sg position. little risk and possibly high reward for a guy with a chip on his shoulder...if it doesn't work out, no worries.

we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

i am hoping donnie and his scouts are correct here...that's a lot of bread to throw at a gamble. fingers crossed.

Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
8/5/2010  11:38 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
egelband wrote:i think the knicks have a little money to spend this year so are trying to catch lightning in a bottle at the sg position. little risk and possibly high reward for a guy with a chip on his shoulder...if it doesn't work out, no worries.

we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

Yes, because Mozgov needed a big deal to buy out his contract with his team. Anyway, his deal is un-guaranteed the next 2 years so who cares? We haven't even seen what he's about so why complain? He could be good. We don't know.

And Roger Mason for that contract is a really good signing.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/5/2010  11:43 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
egelband wrote:i think the knicks have a little money to spend this year so are trying to catch lightning in a bottle at the sg position. little risk and possibly high reward for a guy with a chip on his shoulder...if it doesn't work out, no worries.

we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

Yes, because Mozgov needed a big deal to buy out his contract with his team. Anyway, his deal is un-guaranteed the next 2 years so who cares? We haven't even seen what he's about so why complain? He could be good. We don't know.

And Roger Mason for that contract is a really good signing.

I wouldve rather not spent the 5mm to be honest. I couldve been opportunitstic with it

RIP Crushalot😞
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

8/6/2010  12:00 AM
The Knicks created some huge competition in training camp. Its only gonna benefit the team. The cream will rise and the dogs will be hungry.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/6/2010  12:17 AM
BRIGGS wrote:we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

didn't you want us to sign up Kyrylo Fesenko to a longterm deal at similar money? (or was that Kostas Koufos?) what has Fesenko or Koufos done to warrant that type of money that Mozgov hasn't?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/6/2010  12:33 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
egelband wrote:i think the knicks have a little money to spend this year so are trying to catch lightning in a bottle at the sg position. little risk and possibly high reward for a guy with a chip on his shoulder...if it doesn't work out, no worries.

we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

Yes, because Mozgov needed a big deal to buy out his contract with his team. Anyway, his deal is un-guaranteed the next 2 years so who cares? We haven't even seen what he's about so why complain? He could be good. We don't know.

And Roger Mason for that contract is a really good signing.

I wouldve rather not spent the 5mm to be honest. I couldve been opportunitstic with it

i would have chased Anthony Morrow with that $5M. ah well.

¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/6/2010  12:34 AM
TMS wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

didn't you want us to sign up Kyrylo Fesenko to a longterm deal at similar money? (or was that Kostas Koufos?) what has Fesenko or Koufos done to warrant that type of money that Mozgov hasn't?


no i said 3 years 4mm not 3 years 10.7mm
RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/6/2010  12:36 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
TMS wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

didn't you want us to sign up Kyrylo Fesenko to a longterm deal at similar money? (or was that Kostas Koufos?) what has Fesenko or Koufos done to warrant that type of money that Mozgov hasn't?


no i said 3 years 4mm not 3 years 10.7mm

to be fair, it's only one year guaranteed. it's basically 1yr $3M with options to retain him. the second and third year are not guaranteed.

¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/6/2010  12:40 AM
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
TMS wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

didn't you want us to sign up Kyrylo Fesenko to a longterm deal at similar money? (or was that Kostas Koufos?) what has Fesenko or Koufos done to warrant that type of money that Mozgov hasn't?


no i said 3 years 4mm not 3 years 10.7mm

to be fair, it's only one year guaranteed. it's basically 1yr $3M with options to retain him. the second and third year are not guaranteed.

so then it was waste

RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/6/2010  12:42 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
TMS wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

didn't you want us to sign up Kyrylo Fesenko to a longterm deal at similar money? (or was that Kostas Koufos?) what has Fesenko or Koufos done to warrant that type of money that Mozgov hasn't?


no i said 3 years 4mm not 3 years 10.7mm

to be fair, it's only one year guaranteed. it's basically 1yr $3M with options to retain him. the second and third year are not guaranteed.

so then it was waste

it was a risk that could pay off. how can you call it a waste before he plays? he's the number one rated center in europe and the second or third highest ranked prospect overall. rik smits, sabonis, divac were all pretty decent. not like there haven't been good centers from europe before.

¿ △ ?
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/6/2010  1:11 AM
There are two issues here. For one you need role players that can produce with limited minutes and be happy. Also you need to load up on talent in a year where there's a high possibility of a trade that could leave the roster trimmed. You can't look at this from a pure talent perspective like a rotation player you expect to keep for years. That's not what they were looking for in this case. Once they missed on Brown and Fernandez I guess they had no one left on their list of players they felt had a chance to fight for the starting spot, so why not get a cheap backup?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/6/2010  1:12 AM
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
TMS wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:we wasted way too much money on Masgov--what the heck has he done to be paid that much? I think we couldve got a nice player that was proven for the 5+mm instead we got Mosgov and Mason Jr--was that good money spent?

didn't you want us to sign up Kyrylo Fesenko to a longterm deal at similar money? (or was that Kostas Koufos?) what has Fesenko or Koufos done to warrant that type of money that Mozgov hasn't?


no i said 3 years 4mm not 3 years 10.7mm

to be fair, it's only one year guaranteed. it's basically 1yr $3M with options to retain him. the second and third year are not guaranteed.

so then it was waste

it was a risk that could pay off. how can you call it a waste before he plays? he's the number one rated center in europe and the second or third highest ranked prospect overall. rik smits, sabonis, divac were all pretty decent. not like there haven't been good centers from europe before.

Livingston 2 years 10mm 1st year locked.

RIP Crushalot😞
Roger Mason? A Knick? Who the hell is this guy?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy