[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Danilo Gallinari vs. Anthony Randolph
Author Thread
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

4/15/2010  7:13 PM
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
AUTOADVERT
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/15/2010  7:35 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/15/2010  10:08 PM
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

1.) So your beef is with mgt and not with Gallinari which was the original point of the thread before it was taken everywhere. Taht's fair, you felt we needed something else so I have no problem with that. I think many feel the way that you do, but I think many of those people(not saying you did), as we always do(see Allan HOuston's contract) took out their frustration on Gallo instead of on mgt.

2.) I look at things differently then both of you guys. Over the past few years we have won 23,23,29, 30 something. I dont' remember all the numbers. When you are that bad you do not address specific needs. YOu need to upgrade your overall talent level and get guys with good heads on their shoulders.

3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

4.) Whether we preferred Lopez or someone else is moot. It's been almost 2 years. We don't have those guys so why not just enjoy what you do have instead of still coveting.

5.) For the past month the guy has gone to the line almost 6 times per game and averaged around 20 points a game. Yet again, he's developing right before our eyes but all we can focus upon are the threes.

6.) I guess I just don't get it. I don't know what type of player he's going to be. I do know that he's getting better. I do know he's 21. I do know right now he can be our SF for a long time. I do know that as his body matures he should be able to transition to the Pf spot and over time you will see him more and more in the paint. He is the least of our worries. Probably the last guy on this roster we should be worrying about.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.

I just hope that people will like me
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
4/15/2010  11:23 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/15/2010  11:28 PM
Bippity10 wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

1.) So your beef is with mgt and not with Gallinari which was the original point of the thread before it was taken everywhere. Taht's fair, you felt we needed something else so I have no problem with that. I think many feel the way that you do, but I think many of those people(not saying you did), as we always do(see Allan HOuston's contract) took out their frustration on Gallo instead of on mgt.

2.) I look at things differently then both of you guys. Over the past few years we have won 23,23,29, 30 something. I dont' remember all the numbers. When you are that bad you do not address specific needs. YOu need to upgrade your overall talent level and get guys with good heads on their shoulders.

3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

4.) Whether we preferred Lopez or someone else is moot. It's been almost 2 years. We don't have those guys so why not just enjoy what you do have instead of still coveting.

5.) For the past month the guy has gone to the line almost 6 times per game and averaged around 20 points a game. Yet again, he's developing right before our eyes but all we can focus upon are the threes.

6.) I guess I just don't get it. I don't know what type of player he's going to be. I do know that he's getting better. I do know he's 21. I do know right now he can be our SF for a long time. I do know that as his body matures he should be able to transition to the Pf spot and over time you will see him more and more in the paint. He is the least of our worries. Probably the last guy on this roster we should be worrying about.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.


excellent post.. Sad thing you had to waste it answering playa's nonsense... but you hit the nail on the head.. instead of enjoying one of our very own draft picks develop in front of our eyes, some people seem irritated.. then you have the likes of playa who spew senseless hatred for whatever reason... It is odd to me as well.

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

4/16/2010  1:48 AM
Bippity10 wrote:
3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.


...Never thought about #3- maybe folks thought Gallinari was only a sniper, while Gordon and Bayless had other skills. One would think that people would now realize this is not true, and that he has a fairly well rounded game.

...as for #7: What will it take for Gallinari to finally silence some people who continue to overlook his progress as a player and only go back to the draft and pine over the guys they wanted?

If you really look at his draft at this point, and the production of players taken before and after Gallo, his position as the # 6 pick is looking very legitimate, IMO.

I think it is easy to make a case that he may end up being as good or better than Love, Beasley and Mayo, and on the other hand, it is not impossible that Lopez, Gordon, or Randolph may prove to have been better choices, but I don't think there is anyone who can say that barring injury, Gallo was not a #4-8 lottery quality player.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

4/16/2010  2:00 AM
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"


...Ummm- perhaps the Knicks thought that Gallinari was simply the "best player available" when we picked at #6. I'm sure that this is what you would be saying if we had tried to "fill a need" with a player that you did not like.

I'm also not sure why you and Pharzeone think that Randolph is a post player- When I have seen him play he has seemed more like a guy who really wants to be a PG or SG.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

4/16/2010  8:12 PM
Bippity10 wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

1.) So your beef is with mgt and not with Gallinari which was the original point of the thread before it was taken everywhere. Taht's fair, you felt we needed something else so I have no problem with that. I think many feel the way that you do, but I think many of those people(not saying you did), as we always do(see Allan HOuston's contract) took out their frustration on Gallo instead of on mgt.

2.) I look at things differently then both of you guys. Over the past few years we have won 23,23,29, 30 something. I dont' remember all the numbers. When you are that bad you do not address specific needs. YOu need to upgrade your overall talent level and get guys with good heads on their shoulders.

3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

4.) Whether we preferred Lopez or someone else is moot. It's been almost 2 years. We don't have those guys so why not just enjoy what you do have instead of still coveting.

5.) For the past month the guy has gone to the line almost 6 times per game and averaged around 20 points a game. Yet again, he's developing right before our eyes but all we can focus upon are the threes.

6.) I guess I just don't get it. I don't know what type of player he's going to be. I do know that he's getting better. I do know he's 21. I do know right now he can be our SF for a long time. I do know that as his body matures he should be able to transition to the Pf spot and over time you will see him more and more in the paint. He is the least of our worries. Probably the last guy on this roster we should be worrying about.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.

The community pick is pretty accurate. This franchise wanted to stray as far away as possible from Isiah's non euro roster status.

So they grabbed the 1st one available even though we needed a legit pg and front court two-way player , not some 3 pt specialist.

Dantoni was a roomate with his dad, i'm sure they had conversations about the kid and how to look out for him..it's all personal, even though he has skillz. Danphoney even went on to say Gallup is the best shooter he has ever seen.

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

4/16/2010  8:20 PM
[YouTube][/YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E94gquG0q1o&NR=1

Nobody can deny he and wilson chandler would shore up our interior with a shotblocking center.

We would be a defensive team with multiple two-way players.

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/16/2010  8:26 PM
Didn't we go over this before? When compared with Dirk after the same amount of games, Gallo is on a similar track of progress. Instead of celebrating the fact that his back issue didn't stop him from playing until the last game of the season, which many predicted he'd never see, we have to diminish his progress and toughness. The kid didn't back down from the BEST players in the league and when pushed he pushed back. He never tried to run from a challenge either and overall he's said he wants to be the best. When was the last time we have a young player who talked like that?
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
4/17/2010  12:08 AM    LAST EDITED: 4/17/2010  12:10 AM
playa2 wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

1.) So your beef is with mgt and not with Gallinari which was the original point of the thread before it was taken everywhere. Taht's fair, you felt we needed something else so I have no problem with that. I think many feel the way that you do, but I think many of those people(not saying you did), as we always do(see Allan HOuston's contract) took out their frustration on Gallo instead of on mgt.

2.) I look at things differently then both of you guys. Over the past few years we have won 23,23,29, 30 something. I dont' remember all the numbers. When you are that bad you do not address specific needs. YOu need to upgrade your overall talent level and get guys with good heads on their shoulders.

3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

4.) Whether we preferred Lopez or someone else is moot. It's been almost 2 years. We don't have those guys so why not just enjoy what you do have instead of still coveting.

5.) For the past month the guy has gone to the line almost 6 times per game and averaged around 20 points a game. Yet again, he's developing right before our eyes but all we can focus upon are the threes.

6.) I guess I just don't get it. I don't know what type of player he's going to be. I do know that he's getting better. I do know he's 21. I do know right now he can be our SF for a long time. I do know that as his body matures he should be able to transition to the Pf spot and over time you will see him more and more in the paint. He is the least of our worries. Probably the last guy on this roster we should be worrying about.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.

The community pick is pretty accurate. This franchise wanted to stray as far away as possible from Isiah's non euro roster status.

So they grabbed the 1st one available even though we needed a legit pg and front court two-way player , not some 3 pt specialist.

Dantoni was a roomate with his dad, i'm sure they had conversations about the kid and how to look out for him..it's all personal, even though he has skillz. Danphoney even went on to say Gallup is the best shooter he has ever seen.


no wonder why Ice and prodson chewed your ass up without mercy until you caved in and never wanted to post again on the other forum so many years ago..... for real bro.. grow up.. that is all I am going to say...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/17/2010  10:51 AM    LAST EDITED: 4/17/2010  10:54 AM
playa2 wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

1.) So your beef is with mgt and not with Gallinari which was the original point of the thread before it was taken everywhere. Taht's fair, you felt we needed something else so I have no problem with that. I think many feel the way that you do, but I think many of those people(not saying you did), as we always do(see Allan HOuston's contract) took out their frustration on Gallo instead of on mgt.

2.) I look at things differently then both of you guys. Over the past few years we have won 23,23,29, 30 something. I dont' remember all the numbers. When you are that bad you do not address specific needs. YOu need to upgrade your overall talent level and get guys with good heads on their shoulders.

3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

4.) Whether we preferred Lopez or someone else is moot. It's been almost 2 years. We don't have those guys so why not just enjoy what you do have instead of still coveting.

5.) For the past month the guy has gone to the line almost 6 times per game and averaged around 20 points a game. Yet again, he's developing right before our eyes but all we can focus upon are the threes.

6.) I guess I just don't get it. I don't know what type of player he's going to be. I do know that he's getting better. I do know he's 21. I do know right now he can be our SF for a long time. I do know that as his body matures he should be able to transition to the Pf spot and over time you will see him more and more in the paint. He is the least of our worries. Probably the last guy on this roster we should be worrying about.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.

The community pick is pretty accurate. This franchise wanted to stray as far away as possible from Isiah's non euro roster status.

So they grabbed the 1st one available even though we needed a legit pg and front court two-way player , not some 3 pt specialist.

Dantoni was a roomate with his dad, i'm sure they had conversations about the kid and how to look out for him..it's all personal, even though he has skillz. Danphoney even went on to say Gallup is the best shooter he has ever seen.

Like I said, provacative but no substance.

Let's say they drafted him because he had brown hair, I could care less, the guy can play. As a Knick fan, that means more to me then why he was drafted, what color he is, what he looks like, what language he speaks, who he knew etc. That periphery stuff seems important to you.

As for the we needed a PG, Center etc. There is no one on this roster right now besides David Lee(if he is here) that is guaranteed a starting spot next year. Two years ago, there was no one. In a scenario like that you draft based on talent, not on need. Let'say at 39 a Lebron talent drops to us. Do we pass on him because we need a center. No of course not. When your team stinks you increase your talent level, you don't draft based on need. YOu don't build on top of crap, you build with a new core. That's the mistake we made for almost 10 years. Right now our core is Gallinari, Chandler, Douglas and possibly Lee and Walker. When I look at that core I think this is the one year where a SF/SG is not needed, and that's only because of the addition of Walker. Without him, I would still be okay with the drafting of a talented wing/shooter.

I just hope that people will like me
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

4/17/2010  12:06 PM
tkf wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

1.) So your beef is with mgt and not with Gallinari which was the original point of the thread before it was taken everywhere. Taht's fair, you felt we needed something else so I have no problem with that. I think many feel the way that you do, but I think many of those people(not saying you did), as we always do(see Allan HOuston's contract) took out their frustration on Gallo instead of on mgt.

2.) I look at things differently then both of you guys. Over the past few years we have won 23,23,29, 30 something. I dont' remember all the numbers. When you are that bad you do not address specific needs. YOu need to upgrade your overall talent level and get guys with good heads on their shoulders.

3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

4.) Whether we preferred Lopez or someone else is moot. It's been almost 2 years. We don't have those guys so why not just enjoy what you do have instead of still coveting.

5.) For the past month the guy has gone to the line almost 6 times per game and averaged around 20 points a game. Yet again, he's developing right before our eyes but all we can focus upon are the threes.

6.) I guess I just don't get it. I don't know what type of player he's going to be. I do know that he's getting better. I do know he's 21. I do know right now he can be our SF for a long time. I do know that as his body matures he should be able to transition to the Pf spot and over time you will see him more and more in the paint. He is the least of our worries. Probably the last guy on this roster we should be worrying about.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.

The community pick is pretty accurate. This franchise wanted to stray as far away as possible from Isiah's non euro roster status.

So they grabbed the 1st one available even though we needed a legit pg and front court two-way player , not some 3 pt specialist.

Dantoni was a roomate with his dad, i'm sure they had conversations about the kid and how to look out for him..it's all personal, even though he has skillz. Danphoney even went on to say Gallup is the best shooter he has ever seen.


no wonder why Ice and prodson chewed your ass up without mercy until you caved in and never wanted to post again on the other forum so many years ago..... for real bro.. grow up.. that is all I am going to say...

Listen to you Terry, we are talking what 10 yrs ago ? Prodson went to jail and Ice who knows he could have went their too.

The franchise judgment's has always been questioned. Until they produce consistently with the choices they make all we will get is entertainment with no substance . (Championships)

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/17/2010  1:48 PM
Well this is finally a chance to see if DW and MDA can put something together that will form the basis for a title contender. I'm not expecting everything to be resolved in one off season. It's not realistic. However we can really set this franchise up for future success if we can add to the core we have so far. Gallo is a worthy #6 pick and has shown that he can produce at a good level so far plus he's got a ton of upside. Every draft you have a shot to make a great pick or a bad one, but it's really hard to guarantee any of that. Randolph could very well implode and never reach his full potential as can any draft pick. We seem to have done well with our picks, so i'm not gonna bash the management for what they've done. I think they've done a pretty good job drafting overall.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
4/17/2010  6:47 PM
playa2 wrote:
tkf wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Pharezone this has been my beef all along, we didn't try and fill a need, but chose a guy who plays a position we already had.

This is why I called it "The community Pick"

One game scenarios at the end of the season "CLASSIC"

1.) So your beef is with mgt and not with Gallinari which was the original point of the thread before it was taken everywhere. Taht's fair, you felt we needed something else so I have no problem with that. I think many feel the way that you do, but I think many of those people(not saying you did), as we always do(see Allan HOuston's contract) took out their frustration on Gallo instead of on mgt.

2.) I look at things differently then both of you guys. Over the past few years we have won 23,23,29, 30 something. I dont' remember all the numbers. When you are that bad you do not address specific needs. YOu need to upgrade your overall talent level and get guys with good heads on their shoulders.

3.) Many of the same people who say we should not have drafted Gallo because he was a perimeter player are some of the same people that wish we had Eric Gordon or Bayless.

4.) Whether we preferred Lopez or someone else is moot. It's been almost 2 years. We don't have those guys so why not just enjoy what you do have instead of still coveting.

5.) For the past month the guy has gone to the line almost 6 times per game and averaged around 20 points a game. Yet again, he's developing right before our eyes but all we can focus upon are the threes.

6.) I guess I just don't get it. I don't know what type of player he's going to be. I do know that he's getting better. I do know he's 21. I do know right now he can be our SF for a long time. I do know that as his body matures he should be able to transition to the Pf spot and over time you will see him more and more in the paint. He is the least of our worries. Probably the last guy on this roster we should be worrying about.

7.) "One game scenario". Typical Playa nonsense, provocative with no substance. The game against Carmelo does not solidify Gallo as anything and that has been clearly stated by me. It does not mean he's going to be a star, a good player or anything. But what it does, is when added upon the development we have been seeing all season(that you are ignoring) it gives fans hope. Hope that at least one of our draft picks may be a good one. Not sure why this bothers so many people, and why so many go out of their way to silence that hope. It's odd to me.

The community pick is pretty accurate. This franchise wanted to stray as far away as possible from Isiah's non euro roster status.

So they grabbed the 1st one available even though we needed a legit pg and front court two-way player , not some 3 pt specialist.

Dantoni was a roomate with his dad, i'm sure they had conversations about the kid and how to look out for him..it's all personal, even though he has skillz. Danphoney even went on to say Gallup is the best shooter he has ever seen.


no wonder why Ice and prodson chewed your ass up without mercy until you caved in and never wanted to post again on the other forum so many years ago..... for real bro.. grow up.. that is all I am going to say...

Listen to you Terry, we are talking what 10 yrs ago ? Prodson went to jail and Ice who knows he could have went their too.

The franchise judgment's has always been questioned. Until they produce consistently with the choices they make all we will get is entertainment with no substance . (Championships)

Prodson and Ice, no matter where they are, were still on the money bro...

Anyway, this franchise is under new management, management that has outline a plan and stuck to it... you say they will always be questioned, but you are not questioning judgement, you are questioning motives... gallo has proven to be a good player and pick, but you question why he was picked, and not based on talent, but based on race, or favors. come on.. if the knicks had taken the player"you" wanted, would they still be "judged" in this manner by you? I doubt it..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

4/17/2010  8:50 PM
Pharzeone wrote:
fishmike wrote:one of my big knocks on AR has been his frame. Who else in the league is built like him? Tayshaun Prince. Who else? I dont see that body having a long fruitful career unless he stays out on the perimeter. His muscle mass makes Jared Jeffries look like Shaq.

I think it was a great year for Gallo. I think he grew as a player. He played 80 games after off season back surgery, and as the season dragged on he played more and played better. I think he averaged like 20+ ppg over the last 10 games. He's shown he will be a good defensive player and he's got cojones

He showed up 20 lbs heavier during the 2009 SL vs. 2008. Notice his arms and forearms from his rookie card to the 2009 SL picture. Reportedly, he has added about 15 pounds of pure muscle this season and has been working out a lot since he was injured. Throw in the Garnett rookie picture and see how a player can add to a skinny frame if they are serious about weight gain. Never understood why some players don't train as hard in the weight as others. Crawford comes to mind.



Thank You man for telling these cats wassup !

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

4/17/2010  8:52 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/17/2010  8:52 PM
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Notice how no one questioned what you said, they just came at me WITH FALSE ACCUSATIONS. LOL

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

4/17/2010  9:21 PM
What I routinely here from people who criticize Gallo is their incessant griping against how he got picked at 8 in a strong draft. for some reason these people have made up their minds to hold that against Gallo like it was his fault he got picked where he did. No matter how well Gallo plays people are more interested in comparing n number of other players availble at the time. This in a league where Kobe Bryant was picked at 22.

If you all you can do is compare him with your own fantasy pick and hold it against him go ahead and knock yourself out. Gallo has proved to be a two way player who is developing very nicely. These same people that bitch about him and by extension MDA and Walsh can never stop wanting to build through the draft. But they can't find it in them to even post a single sentence in support of the draft pick that is trying his best to make an impact on the team. Sad, very sad.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
ramtour420
Posts: 26572
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
4/17/2010  9:51 PM
loweyecue wrote:What I routinely here from people who criticize Gallo is their incessant griping against how he got picked at 8 in a strong draft. for some reason these people have made up their minds to hold that against Gallo like it was his fault he got picked where he did. No matter how well Gallo plays people are more interested in comparing n number of other players availble at the time. This in a league where Kobe Bryant was picked at 22.

If you all you can do is compare him with your own fantasy pick and hold it against him go ahead and knock yourself out. Gallo has proved to be a two way player who is developing very nicely. These same people that bitch about him and by extension MDA and Walsh can never stop wanting to build through the draft. But they can't find it in them to even post a single sentence in support of the draft pick that is trying his best to make an impact on the team. Sad, very sad.

+1

Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

4/18/2010  8:12 PM
loweyecue wrote:What I routinely here from people who criticize Gallo is their incessant griping against how he got picked at 8 in a strong draft. for some reason these people have made up their minds to hold that against Gallo like it was his fault he got picked where he did. No matter how well Gallo plays people are more interested in comparing n number of other players availble at the time. This in a league where Kobe Bryant was picked at 22.

If you all you can do is compare him with your own fantasy pick and hold it against him go ahead and knock yourself out. Gallo has proved to be a two way player who is developing very nicely. These same people that bitch about him and by extension MDA and Walsh can never stop wanting to build through the draft. But they can't find it in them to even post a single sentence in support of the draft pick that is trying his best to make an impact on the team. Sad, very sad.


Kobe was picked I believe 13 by Charlotte and was traded to LA. Gallo was picked #6 in the draft. You don't even do research on what you are talking about.

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
markvmc
Posts: 22004
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2008
Member: #1797

4/18/2010  9:36 PM
OK. What Loweyecue said with #13 subbed in for #22.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/19/2010  10:55 AM
playa2 wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:I understand what you are saying but this is where I think you missed the point about the front office. We are still in need of a center or the very least a player that is capable of post defense or basically post play which what Lopez and Randolph brings. Now if we are talking about Gallo playing the PF or C spot then I say right on. But if we are still talking about Gallo guarding point guards and taking a lot of three pointers then what's the point. The front office added a wing player on a team full of wing players that needed help on the other side of the ball and in the paint. Now we hope to add another wing player in addition to Gallo this off season. Maybe we get a Bosh also or maybe we don't. My take on it is that front office fail to add talent to necessary positions. Maybe there is something wrong with me because I'm tired of the one game scenarios with my players especially at the end of the season. And down the road talk of maybe, perhaps... when I'm looking at other teams not having to wait that long. Just my take.

Notice how no one questioned what you said, they just came at me WITH FALSE ACCUSATIONS. LOL

So once again, your beef is with management and not with the player. But like we did with Allan Houston we hold a grudge against hte player because we didn't get what we want.

When we take the front office out of the equation. When we forget about all the guys we wish we had and cry about daily and just focus on the player and his skills, you can see the guy developing right in front of our eyes.

I just hope that people will like me
Danilo Gallinari vs. Anthony Randolph

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy