oohah wrote:

holfresh wrote:
There are lots of player who make a living coming off the bench in the NBA...Ur are not winning a Championship without good bench players....It's really silly to say Nate isn't an impact player when you must have witnessed him win 3 games singlehandly this year as a Knick...What other Knick starter you can name has had a similiar impact, starters included...

Holfresh, some people need to delude themselves to sleep at night. If reality does not work, then they invent a new one.

oohah

Naw, no worries, this dude think he needs to be my antagonist, but comes up with lame arguments in the process...I'll play along...

Pharzeone wrote:Oh my goodness. That chick has a man face!!

Yeah that is one ugly looking mess. You could put a bag over her head and her face would probably burn right through it.

3rd Qtr 3:28
NYK 71 MEM 73

Pharzeone wrote:

To be fair, I saw Eddie do everything that you accuse Nate of doing. Now that House is older it may appear that he is wiser then he has those moments where he looks like the knucklehead he was when he entered the league. His penchant to fool around with opposing players during live game action is bothersome.

Well, sure, I'm not making House out to be this perfect player. But he is more stable than Nate and plays the game more properly than Nate. Maybe in four or five years Nate will be a calmer more savvy player. But he isn't today and he wasn't coming back next year.

So I don't see why some are upset with the trade. I like how House plays mostly, and I like Bill Walker.

It was a good trade by Donnie rather than keeping Nate which was leading towards more and more unrest on the team and then having him walk out the door at the end of the year.

Just got to move on.

I liked Nate BTW, a lot. Always in terrific shape. Always played 110%. Always loyal to his teammates. His attitude was his problem. But, it was a big one. His 1 vs 5 play was a problem. A big one.

Couldn't take much more of that.

oohah wrote:

Childs2Dudley wrote:My point is he's no more than a backup in the NBA. Not an impact player by any stretch of the imagination. For that reason, there is not much of a difference between Nate and Eddie House. Talent-wise, Nate wins. Too bad he doesn't usually utilize those talents to his strengths.

Yeah, Nate Robinson who comes off of a 14 game benching and score 40 to win a game all by himself is not an impact player...and the 10 games he did the similar thing last season, yeah, he had no impact then either.

Good observation.

oohah

Nate Robinson has had a big impact on this team in terms of wins and losses. I agree. Our record really shows it, especially when he gets heavy minutes.

Cosmic wrote:

T-Mac just chilling. Those new jumpsuits are ugly as hell. We have to be the only team celebrating a championship 40 years ago. smh. Lakers and Celtics have to find that a bit humorous.