martin wrote:McK1 wrote:tkf wrote:McK1 wrote:Marv wrote:I think the 3's are holding back gallinari's development. he needs to keep developing his overall game, including figuring out how to use other skills to get closer shots and attack the rim.
not suprised noone has addressed this
Galinari is shooting 39% for the month of December. Wonder what that number would be if he stopped taking so many threes
don't know.. how could you ever tell that.. if they were bad threes, that would be one thing, but he is shooting wide open threes. shots he hit all year, and shots we expect him to hit again...
ummm look at the statistics for one.
he is shooting 45% on 2 pts (2.3/5.1 per game avg) and 35.7% on 3 pts shots (2.7/7.1 per game avg) for December.
seems to me the numbers support he should look to take more 2's.
all i Know is I am allenfanned.
=2.3/5.1 * 2 points per shot = (EXCEL HEKP ME) 0.901960784
=2.7/7.1 * 3 fucing poinst per jack daniels shots = 1.14084507
I don't know what that equates to but I do know what eFG means!
= 45% for 2a
= 38% for 3s
One is better than the other.
To put it in another, maybe non-allanfand way 
2.3 * 2 = 4.6 points on 5.1 shots for two-point field goals
2.7 * 3 = 8.1 points on 7.1 shots for three-point field goals
4.6/5.1 = 0.9 points per shot
8.1/7.1 = 1.1 points per shot
So even at 35%, he should keep shooting just as many or more threes than he has. like i pointed out some weeks ago, I think the cutoff to 'break even' on shooting threes is around 34%.
since we can expect his normal 3% to be around 40%, I say there is no issue here.
we can compare this to harrington's 29% on the season.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.