[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Jordan Hill not being utilized properly
Author Thread
Panos
Posts: 30387
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
10/25/2009  1:24 AM



ad nauseum
AUTOADVERT
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
10/25/2009  2:59 AM
Posted by Cosmic:

We can only go on what we have seen not what we feel Hill could be or may be or may not be. What we have seen so far is a poorly skilled player with a limited motor. This is indisputable. Given that and given our desire to develop much more talented young players in Lee, Gallo, and Chandler, and given a handful of veterans who also contribute more to the team in Harrington, and dare I even say it, Jeffries contributes more than Hill can ---- you couple this with Mike's desire to play a tight rotation - you can see why Jordan Hill will not get minutes, and should not get minutes, and may be a regrettable pick down the road.

There is no reason to coddle Jordan Hill or attack users who see him as a disappointment. What he has to do is work hard and play hard and if he does maybe he can play his way into a rotation. If not then it is a regrettable choice. It happens.

I have seen a player who is clearly not ready for the NBA. He has improved in a very short time and that is what gives me solice, he improved in the summer league and also in the pre-season. But, that said, he doesn't ooze with IQ though he seems to mostly be moving around, setting picks like crazy and trying in general. But, when he does get the ball he seems a bit mechanical, especially up close. Away from the hoop he is willing to drive but thus far he's been a poor finisher (when posting up). I'd like to see him be aggressive and drive and dunk.

I'll give him time but my gut feeling is not good. I seem to be rationalizing that he needs time and what not, but my gut and intuition tells me he is not going to be great. We'll see as the one thing that I do feel and see is that he has improved quickly over a short period of time, perhaps his IQ increases, but I see IQ as more something you have for the most part, not something you build on.

I wouldn't say he is poorly skilled though. He can clearly shoot and he can also defend. Those are two great things to have. He needs more size to defend properly but right now his quickness and good height are working for the most part. His hands have seemed bad on rebounds and that really has me concerned. It doesn't look like he has small hands though so I'll wait on this one. Oh, he does have some good moves around the basket, though they are a bit choreographed and not natural. (Defenders will adjust if he doesn't).

I see Hill as a future 5, otherwise it made little sense drafting him when Lee and eventually Gallo will be the 4.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
10/25/2009  9:34 AM
Posted by Panos:




ad nauseum

Ad nauseam is a Latin term used to describe an argument which has been continuing "to [the point of] nausea".[1] For example, the sentence "This topic has been discussed ad nauseam" signifies that the topic in question has been discussed extensively and everyone involved in the discussion is sick and tired of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseam
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
10/25/2009  9:36 AM
We all know players can and do improve yet that is never a given. Those that do improve have several things in common: A high motor and intensity, a good grasp of the game raw or not, a high desire to improve. Jordan Hill possesses neither at the moment. Couple that with the fact that he does not fill a need at all given the present roster and I think it was probably a poor pick. At least we snagged Douglas who already has shown that he has a very good chance to be a rotation player as the season wears on.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
10/25/2009  11:56 AM
Posted by Cosmic:

We all know players can and do improve yet that is never a given. Those that do improve have several things in common: A high motor and intensity, a good grasp of the game raw or not, a high desire to improve. Jordan Hill possesses neither at the moment. Couple that with the fact that he does not fill a need at all given the present roster and I think it was probably a poor pick. At least we snagged Douglas who already has shown that he has a very good chance to be a rotation player as the season wears on.

Wait, I think it's a bit much to say that Jordon lacks a motor and intensity. He clearly is active though has taken a little bit of time off ( I hear, but not in the last two games I saw.). The games I saw he was constantly setting picks and moving on D and O. Judging by his constant improvement in college and improvement from summer league to pre-season (which is great), how can you say he doesn't have a high desire to improve?

If he does not end up playing the 5 then yes, why did we draft him? Mind you, I wasn't happy with the pick, but I do see potential in the kid. What worries me most is his BBIQ. Time will tell though.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/25/2009  12:44 PM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

A big part of the problem with Hill to be fair is that we have no PG. Duhon is still playing at his 08-09 2nd half level. CP3 can make Tyson Chandler look great by running a great pick and roll and getting to the elbow. Duhon is not doing that.

That's about the only thing I can say in Hill's defense at this point.

The kid is what? 22? He's older than some of his peers in the league that are having an impact.

Here are some players that are younger...
Javale McGee
Anthony Randolph
Andrew Bynum

Guess what these players have in common? That's right. We could had chances to draft each of them. They play Hill's position. They're younger than him. They're more polished NBA players.

If your problem is that two of those guys could have been Knicks had the Knicks drafted better in 08 I agree. Unlike 08, the 09 draft was considered very weak. Hill is a big man prospect and was taken right around where he was supposed to be. D'Antoni does not play to his strengths at this point but either Hill or D'Antoni will have to change for Hill to be productive. I think Hill needs to be given at least 15-20 minutes a game. I don't see the Knicks as having much of a shot at getting into the playoffs so they might as well develop their young guys.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
technomaster
Posts: 23353
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
10/25/2009  10:36 PM
Interestingly, with all of the wishful comparisons to Amare Stoudemire, no one has accused Amare of having a high basketball IQ (or IQ in general). I remember the early reports around him had him forgetting plays left and right early on as a rookie. Now in his prime, he still isn't know to do the little things (boxing out, setting screens, etc).

I don't think Jordan Hill has the east-west agility of Amare (see Hill's poor agility drill performance). From the limited times I've seen him, he doesn't change direction well and hasn't show much explosion to his moves.

In a way, he's really not all that different from Wilcox at this point.

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/26/2009  12:25 AM
Marv, now that we're on 2.0, is Hill being utilized properly?
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
10/26/2009  12:40 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
Posted by JohnWallace44:

A big part of the problem with Hill to be fair is that we have no PG. Duhon is still playing at his 08-09 2nd half level. CP3 can make Tyson Chandler look great by running a great pick and roll and getting to the elbow. Duhon is not doing that.

That's about the only thing I can say in Hill's defense at this point.

The kid is what? 22? He's older than some of his peers in the league that are having an impact.

Here are some players that are younger...
Javale McGee
Anthony Randolph
Andrew Bynum

Guess what these players have in common? That's right. We could had chances to draft each of them. They play Hill's position. They're younger than him. They're more polished NBA players.


If your problem is that two of those guys could have been Knicks had the Knicks drafted better in 08 I agree. Unlike 08, the 09 draft was considered very weak. Hill is a big man prospect and was taken right around where he was supposed to be. D'Antoni does not play to his strengths at this point but either Hill or D'Antoni will have to change for Hill to be productive. I think Hill needs to be given at least 15-20 minutes a game. I don't see the Knicks as having much of a shot at getting into the playoffs so they might as well develop their young guys.

Panos is right. We've gone over this as much as we can. Didn't like the pick as much as I would have liked other guys for both of Donnie's drafts, and I've gotten to like the picks less as we've gone along. That's about all that needs to be said. I really hope they start to turn things around this year. Its just getting to be tough to take at this point. I'm half expecting to see a big inflated hand with a middle finger up on top of the MSG marquis on opening night.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/26/2009  2:03 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/26/2009  8:28 AM
JohnWallace44 wrote:
Look, Taj Gibson, and Pendergraph are not the type of guys he's going to go up against in the NBA. Daye plays an entirely different position.

I still don't get it. What's with the disrespect for the Pac-10??? Gibson was drafted 26th overall by the Bulls and is gonna be part of Chicago's rotation. Length, athleticism, great defender (this guy was the 2nd best shot-blocker in the draft behind Thabeet), solid rebounder and a better offensive player than people think. More than serviceable. He's gonna help that club. Pendergraph was taken high in the 2nd round (31st overall by Sactown) then was traded to Portland where it looks like he's made the team despite being hurt and on crutches - quite a feat for a 2nd round pick. Tells you how high the Blazers are on this guy - they did trade Sergio Rodriguez for him and are content to wait for him. I think Gibson's better myself but this kid should be a solid contributor when healthy...Austin Daye's 6'11" 200+ lbs. and while I agree he'll see a lot of time at the 3, there will be times when you'll see this guy playing the 4 in Motown. As for Josh Heytfelt, he went undrafted but many thought he was 2nd round talent. This guy's got size & did a nice job for the Zags on the inside. Nice little jumpshot on this guy too. I think he's on his way to play in Turkey but I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him resurface in the NBA somewhere within a few years.

Another Pac-10 guy I absolutely love is Ryan Anderson. I DVRed the Orlando/Atlanta game from the other night that was on TNT. Anderson's got game. At a mobile 6'10", he's very advanced in 3 key areas - rebounding, post offense & 3 pt. shooting. I really can't say enough about that trade Orlando made -- they made out like bandits. Not only did they get Vince but they also got this kid Anderson which basically gave them the leeway to let Turkoglu go. He might even be an upgrade over Turkoglu. This guy should be the starting PF on that team next to Howard even when Lewis gets back. If anything, Lewis should take Pietrus' spot or just come off the bench. They should keep this kid in the starting rotation. Very skilled & versatile with a very bright future...To me, Orlando's the team to beat in the East. They're better than Boston and the Cavs...Nelson looks healthy and ready to go, they went out and stole a star player away from Jersey in Carter (Howard's got his second banana now) and they have even more depth than they did last year with White Chocolate Williams, Brandon Bass & Matt Barnes. Right now, coming off a season where they just went to the finals, they're the team to beat in the East for my money.

----------------------------------------------

Why is it so hard to see Hill playing against these guys? He went up against them in college and should be matching up against them in the NBA for years to come -- that is if Mike ever gets around to treating him like he's part of the team and not some afterthought. They drafted the kid 8th because they presumably liked what they saw and liked what he brought to the table. OK so what's the problem? Give him a shot. How did he not get longer runs in these pre-season games? Because he made some mistakes trying to adapt to a brand new system that requires big men to do things he's not accustomed to doing?? WTF, I expect him to make mistakes. He's a rookie. This pre-season should've been all about Jordan Hill, building him up and building upon the encouraging body of work he put together this summer. As far as I'm concerned, the development process that began with Phil Weber out in Vegas basically came to a halt during the pre-season. The quicker Mike re-thinks this and begins to incorporate Hill into the scheme of things here, re-starts the development process once again and throws him some meaningful minutes the better off we'll be. The best frontcourt we can eventually put out there is Hill at the 5/4, Lee at the 4/5 and Harrington at the 3. You wanna sprinkle in a little Darko here, a little Jeffries there and a little Curry if and when he ever gets himself healthy, fine. But if D'Antoni's interested in winning 40 games and making the playoffs like he says, hopefully he'll realize that Jordan Hill can definitely help his cause..

earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
10/26/2009  3:33 AM
MOD - Why is my reply to Cosmic above quoted? Edit my reply, you can see I didn't put quotes around myself? Bug in new forum?
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

10/26/2009  4:30 AM
Marv wrote:in the new uk jordan hill will be utilized properly.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
martin
Posts: 78511
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/26/2009  9:49 AM
earthmansurfer wrote:MOD - Why is my reply to Cosmic above quoted? Edit my reply, you can see I didn't put quotes around myself? Bug in new forum?

you didn't have an EndQuote tag, just to BeginQuote tags. Thanks though.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
10/26/2009  12:34 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/26/2009  12:42 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:Look, Taj Gibson, and Pendergraph are not the type of guys he's going to go up against in the NBA. Daye plays an entirely different position.

Finestrg wrote:
I still don't get it. What's with the disrespect for the Pac-10??? Gibson was drafted 26th overall by the Bulls and is gonna be part of Chicago's rotation. Length, athleticism, great defender (this guy was the 2nd best shot-blocker in the draft behind Thabeet), solid rebounder and a better offensive player than people think. More than serviceable. He's gonna help that club. Pendergraph was taken high in the 2nd round (31st overall by Sactown) then was traded to Portland where it looks like he's made the team despite being hurt and on crutches - quite a feat for a 2nd round pick. Tells you how high the Blazers are on this guy - they did trade Sergio Rodriguez for him and are content to wait for him. I think Gibson's better myself but this kid should be a solid contributor when healthy...Austin Daye's 6'11" 200+ lbs. and while I agree he'll see a lot of time at the 3, there will be times when you'll see this guy playing the 4 in Motown. As for Josh Heytfelt, he went undrafted but many thought he was 2nd round talent. This guy's got size & did a nice job for the Zags on the inside. Nice little jumpshot on this guy too. I think he's on his way to play in Turkey but I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him resurface in the NBA somewhere within a few years.

Another Pac-10 guy I absolutely love is Ryan Anderson. I DVRed the Orlando/Atlanta game from the other night that was on TNT. Anderson's got game. At a mobile 6'10", he's very advanced in 3 key areas - rebounding, post offense & 3 pt. shooting. I really can't say enough about that trade Orlando made -- they made out like bandits. Not only did they get Vince but they also got this kid Anderson which basically gave them the leeway to let Turkoglu go. He might even be an upgrade over Turkoglu. This guy should be the starting PF on that team next to Howard even when Lewis gets back. If anything, Lewis should take Pietrus' spot or just come off the bench. They should keep this kid in the starting rotation. Very skilled & versatile with a very bright future...To me, Orlando's the team to beat in the East. They're better than Boston and the Cavs...Nelson looks healthy and ready to go, they went out and stole a star player away from Jersey in Carter (Howard's got his second banana now) and they have even more depth than they did last year with White Chocolate Williams, Brandon Bass & Matt Barnes. Right now, coming off a season where they just went to the finals, they're the team to beat in the East for my money.

----------------------------------------------

Why is it so hard to see Hill playing against these guys? He went up against them in college and should be matching up against them in the NBA for years to come -- that is if Mike ever gets around to treating him like he's part of the team and not some afterthought. They drafted the kid 8th because they presumably liked what they saw and liked what he brought to the table. OK so what's the problem? Give him a shot. How did he not get longer runs in these pre-season games? Because he made some mistakes trying to adapt to a brand new system that requires big men to do things he's not accustomed to doing?? WTF, I expect him to make mistakes. He's a rookie. This pre-season should've been all about Jordan Hill, building him up and building upon the encouraging body of work he put together this summer. As far as I'm concerned, the development process that began with Phil Weber out in Vegas basically came to a halt during the pre-season. The quicker Mike re-thinks this and begins to incorporate Hill into the scheme of things here, re-starts the development process once again and throws him some meaningful minutes the better off we'll be. The best frontcourt we can eventually put out there is Hill at the 5/4, Lee at the 4/5 and Harrington at the 3. You wanna sprinkle in a little Darko here, a little Jeffries there and a little Curry if and when he ever gets himself healthy, fine. But if D'Antoni's interested in winning 40 games and making the playoffs like he says, hopefully he'll realize that Jordan Hill can definitely help his cause..

There's nothing wrong with the Pac10. Give me Derozan, Holiday, or OJ Mayo any day.

McGee and Thabeet housed Hill in the Summer League from my vantage point. Taj Gibson and Pendergraph are nice players, but they are not freaks of nature. There are plenty o' freaks in the Association.

Clyde keeps saying in the broadcasts that Hill looks like he's trying to learn to face up, but to me he looks like he's not comfortable posting up NBA big men. The point guard issues are certainly a big part of the issue though. Duhon should be able to run a poor man's Nash/Amare pick and roll move, but he's not doing it for whatever reason.

The point of the this thread though is that he's being played out of position. I don't think that's it. I think part of it is that the PG's on the Knicks can't feed him well, an issue we've had continuously since Marb's started to break down shortly after his arrival in NY, and the other part is he's not nearly ready.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
10/27/2009  8:13 AM
earthmansurfer wrote:
Posted by Cosmic:

We all know players can and do improve yet that is never a given. Those that do improve have several things in common: A high motor and intensity, a good grasp of the game raw or not, a high desire to improve. Jordan Hill possesses neither at the moment. Couple that with the fact that he does not fill a need at all given the present roster and I think it was probably a poor pick. At least we snagged Douglas who already has shown that he has a very good chance to be a rotation player as the season wears on.

Wait, I think it's a bit much to say that Jordon lacks a motor and intensity. He clearly is active though has taken a little bit of time off ( I hear, but not in the last two games I saw.). The games I saw he was constantly setting picks and moving on D and O. Judging by his constant improvement in college and improvement from summer league to pre-season (which is great), how can you say he doesn't have a high desire to improve?

If he does not end up playing the 5 then yes, why did we draft him? Mind you, I wasn't happy with the pick, but I do see potential in the kid. What worries me most is his BBIQ. Time will tell though.

I think he moves slowly out there. Do you remember how Balkman ran around when he first came here? That was what, given all the positive press on Hill, I expected to see. Instead the guy moves slower than Jeffries. He is slow and sloppy with his moves and very indecisive. Can that change? Well, sure, anyone can improve. WILL it change? I'd bet against it given how disinterested he seems with life. See, the players that improve, are the ones who fight hard every night. Jordan Hill just goes through the motions and calls it a day. It's a bit unsettling.

Yes, his BBall IQ seems very poor. I don't want to call him "raw" because that word is reserved for players who have a chance to be special. Jordan Hill is nothing special and given that and given our roster and given our coaching staff and it's rotations - I really am wondering why on earth we selected Jordan Hill.

We should have maybe gambled on one of those talented-but-problematic guards. We probably should have used the pick to dump Jared Jeffries or even, if we were ever so lucky, Eddy Curry some how.

I think we shat the bed here and I don't like it.

As you said? Time will tell. But I can't speak on an unknown future I can only speak on what we have already seen. It's not good so far.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
10/27/2009  10:11 AM
nyk4ever wrote:Marv, now that we're on 2.0, is Hill being utilized properly?

SupremeCommander wrote:
Marv wrote:in the new uk jordan hill will be utilized properly.

now here's a couple of sharp cookies who pay attention.

since uk 2.0 launched we have not seen jordan hill improperly utilized a single time.

Things are working EXACTLY to plan.


Jordan Hill not being utilized properly

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy