Posted by fishmike:

I think its a big deal what happened. I dont know much about her, as I dont really watch TV. We do live in an age of people over exposing themselves and over exploiting themselves. It seems to be she is working the clean nice girl image? If thats the case she has every right to be furious and go after these guys. Its a direct attack on something she is working hard to not be a part of (sleazy image) no?

I mean it it was Lindsy Lohan who cares? She walks out of the house in clothes with all her junk pourin out.

Seems to me this Erin girl worked hard to have a nice clean image so this is pretty low.

LOL that's hilarious.

Posted by sebstar:

Posted by ramtour420:

Posted by martin:

Posted by nyk4ever:

Whatever man, I'll keep those comments to myself from now on then.

Tell you what man, go ask your mother, sister, girl-friend how violated they would feel if some 49-year-old perv took pics of them while they were in the bathroom naked and then had exposed those pictures to everyone. Then ask them if they mind you making jokes about it to your Internet buddies. Let us know how they react.

Man, is this what our civilization evolved into? Getting all bent out of shape because people have seen your tits? Whats the big deal? I am not saying that we should legalize peeping, but seriously is it that big of a deal?

Thats an interesting way of looking at it, I guess. You dont feel for someone that had their privacy violated? Its not just somebody seeing her tits, but some nasty ass fool taking pictures of her while she is in private, without her knowing. Thats creepy, foul, and illegal.

Its not like she posed for some sleezebag and now she has second thoughts, like a lot of hoes do.

Well, i do feel for her. Having your privacy violated has to suck. Thing is i don't see a difference between 1 pervert looking at her naked or 1 million perverts watching it on the net. Honestly i don't even know how much of a pervert does it make you if you watched it. Like none of us visited a porn site ever, i don't think it makes much of a difference. Not like she had sex against her will, its just some naked video of her. For all we know it coulda been done on purpose.

Posted by ramtour420:

Posted by martin:

Posted by nyk4ever:

Whatever man, I'll keep those comments to myself from now on then.

Tell you what man, go ask your mother, sister, girl-friend how violated they would feel if some 49-year-old perv took pics of them while they were in the bathroom naked and then had exposed those pictures to everyone. Then ask them if they mind you making jokes about it to your Internet buddies. Let us know how they react.

Man, is this what our civilization evolved into? Getting all bent out of shape because people have seen your tits? Whats the big deal? I am not saying that we should legalize peeping, but seriously is it that big of a deal?

What if someone took a picture of your penis and face. And this picture on the internet would you be ready for that kind of scrutiny? If she took the pictures willingly or went topless at the beach then not really a big deal. But someone sneaking a picture is major creepy., the type of thing that makes you kick a man in his balls if you catch him.



[Edited by - bitty41 on 07-23-2009 6:22 PM]

Posted by martin:

Posted by nyk4ever:

ESPN is a joke to me though.

On the one hand, they want to act all high and mighty and protect Andrews "best interests" yet ESPN has YET to even utter a single word about the Sexual Harrasment case that is being brought against Ben Roethlisberger. Why isn't ESPN reporting it when every other major news outlet is? ESPN put some stupid statement out saying they don't report "allegations" which is total BS and you can go down the list of all the allegations that they've jumped on in the past month alone, especially high profile ones in recent time, such as Pacman Jones, Alex Rodriguez, etc etc.

ESPN is protecting Big Ben because they have some deal for him to have a program on ESPN in the near future and thats why they are declining to report this. ESPN only does whats good for ESPN and right now and in the past 2 years Erin Andrews has been good for ESPN.

I give ESPN absolutely ZERO credit.


[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07-23-2009 12:51 PM]

I saw it on ESPN yesterday while working out.

Oh! While you we "working out". Well I saw it while I was teaching music at an orphanage.

And I donated the money to the Oxygen network.

Posted by TMS:

Posted by eViL:

In nyk4ever's defense. There is a certain amount irreverent humor on this board and, as well all know, that irreverence makes this a fun place to be. I can see how the line is difficult to find here. I doubt he intended to cross that line.

agreed, nyk4ever has always been a respectful poster on these forums & i'm sure martin wasn't trying to point a harsh finger at him for the off the cuff remarks.

now can we all squash this & get back to the bukkake?

[Edited by - TMS on 07-23-2009 11:31 PM]

lol thanks bro. probably more my fault for misinterpreting martin then anything else. hey, i guess it happens from time to time.

so wait, no pictures or links?

NYK4eva is a respectful poster???? Have we not paid attention to how many times he disagrees with the Bip? It is very disrespectful to disagree with the Bip. Actually not disrespectful........criminal is a better word for it.

Posted by TMS:

nyk, you got off way easy here, count ur blessings... if it had been me who'd made those remarks my moral fiber as a human being & my treatment of homeless people would have been put into question right off the bat, not to mention how many ghost screenname accounts i have floating on the internet.

LOL well cmon that was Briggs who said you had the ghost accounts..

Posted by nyk4ever:

Posted by TMS:

nyk, you got off way easy here, count ur blessings... if it had been me who'd made those remarks my moral fiber as a human being & my treatment of homeless people would have been put into question right off the bat, not to mention how many ghost screenname accounts i have floating on the internet.

LOL well cmon that was Briggs who said you had the ghost accounts..

judging from your lack of jumping to my defense i am assuming you were in full agreement... you sir, are a douche.

Posted by TMS:

Posted by nyk4ever:

Posted by TMS:

nyk, you got off way easy here, count ur blessings... if it had been me who'd made those remarks my moral fiber as a human being & my treatment of homeless people would have been put into question right off the bat, not to mention how many ghost screenname accounts i have floating on the internet.

LOL well cmon that was Briggs who said you had the ghost accounts..

judging from your lack of jumping to my defense i am assuming you were in full agreement... you sir, are a douche.

LOL get outta here! I'm pretty sure I said something to Briggs when he said that.