Posted by martin:
Posted by McK1:
Posted by martin:
Posted by McK1:
if they sign sessions to a MLE contract, does this indicate a deviation from "the plan"
perhaps you should pay more attention to Walsh instead of just poo-pooing every little thing. Walsh has constantly said that he would deviate from his 2010 plan if he could sign the right player.
so giving up the dream of signing even one max player to pay Ramon Sessions is acceptable?
not what Walsh has said or what was intended.
You want to have a discussion about this or you want to throw stuff out there and see if it sticks? 
have you actually looked at the cap situation?
until lee and nate are off the team, I will count them as on the team. With that being the case because of the 16 mil cap hold they represent if they take the QO, NY will be at around 38 mil in the summer of 010. Don't know when they have to pick up the options on Chandler and Gallo but thats another approximate 6 mil. Thats a total of 44 mil.
If the cap goes up to 60 mil thats still only enough to sign one max FA.
[Edited by - McK1 on 07-20-2009 4:42 PM]
the stop underrating David Lee movement
1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!