[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Official NBA Draft 2009 8th Pick thread - Jordan Hill talk
Author Thread
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/26/2009  8:06 AM
I like the pick. Hill was supposed to go higher and for once the Knicks took the best player available instead of locking in on a position or a name. Hill was the second best big in the draft and my guess is coming out of the draft he will be one of the top 5 players taken for at least the next 2-3 years when some of the other guys might develop. This was a good pick for the Knicks. They didn't get tricky. They got a very good player who fills a need for them. I was sure they were taking Holiday and McClinton. I am happy with the draft and the trade. I don't think Walsh is looking at Darko/Hill as the solution to Lee leaving. I think in both situations he tried to improve the team the best that he could.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AUTOADVERT
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
6/26/2009  8:37 AM
Hill blocks shots

I like that
once a knick always a knick
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
6/26/2009  9:27 AM
OK, we got good value wiht Hill... yay.

This team is so hard to be a fan of. We went into a draft with a dozen points and desperately needing a point.

The whole offseason I've been preaching that we need size at whatever position that we draft. That's all I wanted. There were huge players in this draft relative to their positions in this draft.

What do we get?

A 6'10" unspectacular dude that we're going to play at center, and an undersized shooting guard.

I mean... come on. Come the **** on already.

What's the plan now Walsh?

Duhon - Hughes
Douglas
Chandler
Gallo - Harrington - Jeffries
Hill - Darko

That is a god awful roster. You almost have to resign Nate with that roster which would be a disaster for the cap if its more than a 1 year deal.

Can we get Turkoglu to come in on a short contract? Sessions? Bibby?

Then Beaubois doesn't fall to us just to add insult to injury.

Just a terrible draft night in my eyes. I couldn't have imagined it going much worse.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/26/2009  10:01 AM
At the bottom line the draft was porous and we ended up with nice length 7-0 250 and 6-10 235 that we have not had in a long time. He's a good rebounder an active body who runs the floor and should be able to score in the uptempo. he was a better pick than reaching for Holiday who we couldve had if we moved back with Chicago. Do I think that Hill is much better than Taj Gibson or Pendergraph--a little bit--not much. Hopefully he will be good for us.
RIP Crushalot😞
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27685
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/26/2009  11:02 AM
I put Amare Stoudemire and Jordan Hill's combine athleticism test results side by side. Amare is slightly smaller in stature, but has longer arms. All of the other categories seem to favor Amare. I think the biggest difference between the two is the lane agility. Hill may have simply had a bad run on the lane agility test, it seems like such a wide aberration from his other stats. I am sure the Knicks checked this when they worked him out.

                      Amare      Hill 
Height w/o Shoes 6' 8.5" 6' 9.25"
Height w/shoes 6' 10" 6' 10.25"
Weight 233 232
Wingspan 7' 1.75" 7' 1.5"
Standing Reach 9' 0.5" 9' 0"
No Step Vert 32.0" 31.0"
Max Vert 35.5" 35.0"
Bench Press 12 11
Lane Agility 11.19 12.23
3/4 Court Sprint 3.25 3.30


You know I gonna spin wit it
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27685
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/26/2009  11:03 AM
grrr... It deleted the spaces I put in there...
You know I gonna spin wit it
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
6/26/2009  11:12 AM
Posted by EwingsGlass:

grrr... It deleted the spaces I put in there...

I edited it for you. Use the Code tags to get the formatting correct.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
6/26/2009  11:14 AM
Posted by EwingsGlass:

I put Amare Stoudemire and Jordan Hill's combine athleticism test results side by side. Amare is slightly smaller in stature, but has longer arms. All of the other categories seem to favor Amare. I think the biggest difference between the two is the lane agility. Hill may have simply had a bad run on the lane agility test, it seems like such a wide aberration from his other stats. I am sure the Knicks checked this when they worked him out.

                      Amare      Hill 
Height w/o Shoes 6' 8.5" 6' 9.25"
Height w/shoes 6' 10" 6' 10.25"
Weight 233 232
Wingspan 7' 1.75" 7' 1.5"
Standing Reach 9' 0.5" 9' 0"
No Step Vert 32.0" 31.0"
Max Vert 35.5" 35.0"
Bench Press 12 11
Lane Agility 11.19 12.23
3/4 Court Sprint 3.25 3.30


conclusion? jordan gotta get some of amare's shoes.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/26/2009  12:37 PM
Posted by Andrew:
Posted by crzymdups:

we do have to relinquish their cap hold in order to get max cap space if they take the QO. when we relinquish their cap hold, we lose their bird rights and can't go over the cap to re-sign them.

Yes if you relinquish their cap hold you lose their bird rights. I was disagreeing with TMS' statement that you cannot...

use the Bird Exception rule to go over the cap to sign your own FA's if you already have cap space

Whether or not the Knicks would have to release Lee and Nate if they were to have signed QOs depends on how much cap space is available and how much would be needed to sign the FAs they want.

what's the difference Andrew?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
6/26/2009  12:41 PM
What I'm saying is you can use the Bird Exception rule to go over the cap to sign your own FA's if you already have cap space
PURE KNICKS LOVE
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/26/2009  12:49 PM
but i thought the Cap hold prevents u from doing so?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/26/2009  12:59 PM
Posted by TMS:

but i thought the Cap hold prevents u from doing so?

Hard cap does not the soft cap.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/26/2009  1:05 PM
i still don't see the distinction here... can we go over the cap to sign Lee & Nate or can't we in 2010 after we use up our cap space to sign a max FA?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/26/2009  1:17 PM
Posted by TMS:

i still don't see the distinction here... can we go over the cap to sign Lee & Nate or can't we in 2010 after we use up our cap space to sign a max FA?

The team keeps the Bird Rights no matter what year. So you can go over the cap to sign them. A team only loses the Bird Rights if they are traded, unrestricted signs with another team, or a restricted free agent is signed by another team with the former team not matching or due to a penalty.


Section 6. Exceptions to the Salary Cap.
There shall be the following exceptions to the rule that a Team’s Team Salary may not exceed the Salary Cap:

(a) Existing Contracts.
A Team may exceed the Salary Cap to the extent of its current contractual commitments, provided that such contracts satisfied the provisions of this Agreement when entered into or were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement in accordance with the rules then in effect.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
6/26/2009  1:24 PM
TMS, this a hypothetical example to help explain.

Salary cap is 65M.

Team contracts is 40M.

Lee and Nate have cap holds that total 10M.

So, the cap space to sign a FA from another team would be 65 - 40 - 10 = 15M.

After signing a player or players for 15M I believe the Knicks would be able to resign Nate and Lee and exceed the 65M salary cap.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/26/2009  1:34 PM
Posted by EwingsGlass:

I put Amare Stoudemire and Jordan Hill's combine athleticism test results side by side. Amare is slightly smaller in stature, but has longer arms. All of the other categories seem to favor Amare. I think the biggest difference between the two is the lane agility. Hill may have simply had a bad run on the lane agility test, it seems like such a wide aberration from his other stats. I am sure the Knicks checked this when they worked him out.

                      Amare      Hill 
Height w/o Shoes 6' 8.5" 6' 9.25"
Height w/shoes 6' 10" 6' 10.25"
Weight 233 232
Wingspan 7' 1.75" 7' 1.5"
Standing Reach 9' 0.5" 9' 0"
No Step Vert 32.0" 31.0"
Max Vert 35.5" 35.0"
Bench Press 12 11
Lane Agility 11.19 12.23
3/4 Court Sprint 3.25 3.30


the lane agility thing is amare's other-worldly quickness and explosion. hill doesn't come close to that.
¿ △ ?
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
6/26/2009  1:50 PM
Posted by Andrew:

TMS, this a hypothetical example to help explain.

Salary cap is 65M.

Team contracts is 40M.

Lee and Nate have cap holds that total 10M.

So, the cap space to sign a FA from another team would be 65 - 40 - 10 = 15M.

After signing a player or players for 15M I believe the Knicks would be able to resign Nate and Lee and exceed the 65M salary cap.

29. Can a team sign all the free agents it wants (up to the cap limit) and THEN re-sign its own free agents using the Bird exception?

Yes, but there's a restriction. A team's free agents continue to count as team salary (against the salary cap). This charge is called the "free agent amount." So there may not be enough money under the cap to sign another team's free agent, because the team's own free agents are taking up all their cap room.

31. Why do free agents continue to count against a team's cap?

It closes another loophole. Teams otherwise would be able to sign other teams' free agents using their cap room, and then turn their attention to their own free agents using the Bird exceptions. This rule restricts their ability to do that. It doesn't close this loophole completely -- for example, in 2005 Michael Redd's free agent amount was $6 million, even though the Bucks intended to re-sign him for the maximum salary. By waiting to sign Redd last, the Bucks were able to take advantage of the difference by signing Bobby Simmons. Had they signed Redd first, they would have had no cap room to sign Simmons.

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/26/2009  2:13 PM
Posted by McK1:
Posted by Andrew:

TMS, this a hypothetical example to help explain.

Salary cap is 65M.

Team contracts is 40M.

Lee and Nate have cap holds that total 10M.

So, the cap space to sign a FA from another team would be 65 - 40 - 10 = 15M.

After signing a player or players for 15M I believe the Knicks would be able to resign Nate and Lee and exceed the 65M salary cap.

29. Can a team sign all the free agents it wants (up to the cap limit) and THEN re-sign its own free agents using the Bird exception?

Yes, but there's a restriction. A team's free agents continue to count as team salary (against the salary cap). This charge is called the "free agent amount." So there may not be enough money under the cap to sign another team's free agent, because the team's own free agents are taking up all their cap room.

31. Why do free agents continue to count against a team's cap?

It closes another loophole. Teams otherwise would be able to sign other teams' free agents using their cap room, and then turn their attention to their own free agents using the Bird exceptions. This rule restricts their ability to do that. It doesn't close this loophole completely -- for example, in 2005 Michael Redd's free agent amount was $6 million, even though the Bucks intended to re-sign him for the maximum salary. By waiting to sign Redd last, the Bucks were able to take advantage of the difference by signing Bobby Simmons. Had they signed Redd first, they would have had no cap room to sign Simmons.

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm

like McK1 just posted, that's what i said it's not possible & why i'm confused now that some are saying i'm wrong... i've read that salarycap faq before.

[Edited by - TMS on 06-26-2009 11:13 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
6/26/2009  2:17 PM
I think what McK1 just posted fully supports my example right?
PURE KNICKS LOVE
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
6/26/2009  2:41 PM
Andrew is 100% correct.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
Official NBA Draft 2009 8th Pick thread - Jordan Hill talk

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy