[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Steph finally trying some better drugs...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 4 of 6 « First‹ Previous 2  3  4  5  6 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
4/15/2009  1:09 PM
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/15/2009  1:19 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one
I just hope that people will like me
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/15/2009  1:35 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
4/15/2009  1:41 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/15/2009  1:44 PM
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.

Can't disagree with you there.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
NYKBocker
Posts: 38511
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
4/15/2009  1:53 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.

Can't disagree with you there.

I can't agree to disagree in this agreement due to my lack of knowledge in this disagreement. Agreed?
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
4/15/2009  3:43 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.

Can't disagree with you there.

I can't agree to disagree in this agreement due to my lack of knowledge in this disagreement. Agreed?

I still agree that at the very least we disagree about disagreeing.
~You can't run from who you are.~
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
4/15/2009  3:56 PM
Can't we all just get along?

BTW, while we can't know with certainty how Steph's teammates felt about him, I think for him it's easier to predict than others. We know his NJ teammates hated him, we know KT, TT and Q hated him and/or wanted to fight him. We know Larry and Isiah hated him. We know after he fled the team his teammates voted not to let him play upon his return. And we know that when 190 NBA players were asked who they'd least like to have on their team Marbury was at the top of the list:

http://www.fannation.com/si_blogs/staff/posts/54741-si-players-nba-poll-which-player-would-you-least-like-to-have-on-your-team

If ever there was a player of his generation you could sensibly predict was not liked, it's Marbury.

Anyone agree?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
4/15/2009  3:58 PM
I disagree Blue, because you definitely didn't quote the agreement of the quote that everyone has agreed to be quoting. I agree and I hope others agree with me that you've ruined the agreement theme of this very agreeable thread.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
4/15/2009  4:07 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

I disagree Blue, because you definitely didn't quote the agreement of the quote that everyone has agreed to be quoting. I agree and I hope others agree with me that you've ruined the agreement theme of this very agreeable thread.

I shudder to think what an angry mob of agreeable people might do to me.
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
4/15/2009  4:09 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by nyk4ever:

I disagree Blue, because you definitely didn't quote the agreement of the quote that everyone has agreed to be quoting. I agree and I hope others agree with me that you've ruined the agreement theme of this very agreeable thread.

I shudder to think what an angry mob of agreeable people might do to me.

You took our mojo. You should be banned.

Agree?
~You can't run from who you are.~
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
4/15/2009  4:12 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by nyk4ever:

I disagree Blue, because you definitely didn't quote the agreement of the quote that everyone has agreed to be quoting. I agree and I hope others agree with me that you've ruined the agreement theme of this very agreeable thread.

I shudder to think what an angry mob of agreeable people might do to me.

Thats what I thought...
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
4/15/2009  4:17 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.

Can't disagree with you there.

I can't agree to disagree in this agreement due to my lack of knowledge in this disagreement. Agreed?

I still agree that at the very least we disagree about disagreeing.

I disagree with Allanfan. That's a dumb idea. I guess I'm an a-hole.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
4/15/2009  4:26 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.

Can't disagree with you there.

I can't agree to disagree in this agreement due to my lack of knowledge in this disagreement. Agreed?

I still agree that at the very least we disagree about disagreeing.

I disagree with Allanfan. That's a dumb idea. I guess I'm an a-hole.

GKF, you should never sell yourself short. You are definitely an a-hole.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/15/2009  4:54 PM
good God, we've created a monster.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
4/15/2009  7:23 PM
Posted by TMS:

good God, we've created a monster.

I agree.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
4/15/2009  7:26 PM
Yummy yummy yummy
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/15/2009  7:33 PM
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:

good God, we've created a monster.

I agree.

Good to see you are so agreeable.

here we go again.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
4/15/2009  8:02 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Nobody on this site has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.

Can't disagree with you there.

I can't agree to disagree in this agreement due to my lack of knowledge in this disagreement. Agreed?

I still agree that at the very least we disagree about disagreeing.

I disagree with Allanfan. That's a dumb idea. I guess I'm an a-hole.

GKF, you should never sell yourself short. You are definitely an a-hole.

oh yeah i definitely agree.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/15/2009  8:10 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by NYKBocker:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by sidsanders:

snip -- "player from all over the league think that Marbs got a raw deal in New York" ???? no offense, he did that all on his own, just like his shoes said in jersey. he got almost all his money for very little results, how is that getting worked over??? if anything, dolan will pay any clown silly $$$, what lazy over the hill star wouldnt love that.

Bonn1997 is the sexiest man in the world

NobodyEverybody on this site planet agrees has any idea how players feel about marbs treatment.

i'd venture to guess that not many sports news journalists do either for that matter.

I agree as well

I also agree

good... then we are in agreement.

fellas i think i'm gonna agree with you on this one.

I agree with all those guys that are agreeing on this thread. And I'm not just doing that to be agreeable.

It's rate that everyone agrees in such harmony like this.

I agree (again)

I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you here. That is, if you agree as well?

These petty disagreements are what's ruining ultimateknicks

i couldn't agree more.

I concur

If I was drunk, I would pull reasons out of my ars to disagree with every single one of you. I will break this chain of insanity.

no doubt.

We are 100% in agreement. If we could be more than 100% in agreement, then I would say we are at least 534% in agreement here.

who's in agreement with the 534% figure?

that figure would go up to at least 1648% agreement if you calculate all the agreements we've had on this forum ever since we started posting here... but that figure might be skewed by the total % of disagreements over that same time frame... so overall i'd say an even 1000% agreement ratio is accurate.


Which is why I said that we were at least 534% in agreement. So essentially, we are all in agreement here.

word.

This looks like send closk. Isn't it?

[Edited by - arkrud on 04-14-2009 6:31 PM]

I agree this definitely looks like send closk

If this isn't send closk, I don't know what is.

Send closk = sand clock = hourglass?

Yes. Send closk is just the illiterate way of saying it.

i'll have to disagree, send closk is imho a closk that was simply sent, and i don't feel like any1 could prove me wrong, so lets just agree to disagree on that 1

So send me the sand clock and we will agree to disagree that Steph found the right drug for himself..

Can we agree that this thread is both sublime in its absurdity and an excellent way to up one's post count?

Can we agree to agree or even agree to disagree, just as long as we are agreeing that Bip should be agreeing more often in this thead to raise his post count.

agree+1

Nothing to disagree with here, therefore I will agree. By the way I saw Inside man the other night. Whoever said that was a good movie, I have to say we are in agreement

I said it. So we agree.

What are we agreeing about?

We are agreeing about all our agreements dummy.

I agree with Bip's explanation.

I am in partial agreement with the agreement that Bip claims to be agreeing with. If Bip had agreed with that (and other) agreements earlier in this thread, I would be in full agreement.

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one

The bottom half of each post is turning into a pyramid of crackhead posts now. Perfect forum to start a "Who said it post." Maybe Martin can steal back those cufflinks and give it to a winner. Anyone who disagrees is an arshole.

I can't find any flaw in your logic.

Can't disagree with you there.

I can't agree to disagree in this agreement due to my lack of knowledge in this disagreement. Agreed?

I still agree that at the very least we disagree about disagreeing.

I disagree with Allanfan. That's a dumb idea. I guess I'm an a-hole.

GKF, you should never sell yourself short. You are definitely an a-hole.
I have corrected this thread
Page 4 of 6 « First‹ Previous 2  3  4  5  6 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Steph finally trying some better drugs...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy