[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Yeah so When is Wilcox gonna start?
Author Thread
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
3/24/2009  10:45 PM
Questions for the Answer Man:

I'd like to hear how David Lee is not a gifted offensive boarder but somehow is 7th in the league in offensive boards per game.

I'd also like to hear how we should expect Wilcox to snag only 2 fewer bounds per game when his career high is 4 below Lee's current production.

I wonder if Wilcox ever averaged almost 19ppg, as Lee did in January and February, while shooting .550, in a set offense while being one of the focal points of opposing defenses.

I'd like to know how anyone could be so sure that Wilcox would average 15 and 9 "no question" when both numbers are significantly higher than his career highs (when he put up points, by the way, primarily as a garbage man) four years ago.

I'd wonder how Wilcox (who passes the ball less than Zach Randolph did) would fit into D'Antoni's unselfish offense when replacing a gifted and willing passer.

Most of all, I wonder how we can evaluate a player who is essentially a journeyman and who may be on the downswing of his career (short as it has been) next to a guy who has improved his game every year and very likely will continue to do so.

Sorry, Earl. You know we are boys. But I can think of no clearer example of the continuing and totally inexplicable undervaluing of David Lee than anyone thinking he and Chris Wilcox are the same player. Thats foul, man.

Why do we do this in New York? Last night, with Bernard and Pat on the floor, both men run out of town when they were here and now getting awards and fan appreciation. Not comparing Lee to those guys obviously, but damn, it makes you wonder what the **** our deal is.

And yeah, we do need an enforcer down low. You think Wilcox is that guy?

Its not even close.

[Edited by - rembee76 on 03-24-2009 11:12 PM]
Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/24/2009  10:47 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

what belligerence? get the hell over yourself & stop being an annoying prick earl... i got my opinion, u got urs... leave it at that & stop trying to incite an argument... if i cared enough about your opinions i would take the time to explain why i think Lee is miles better than Wilcox... obviously i don't.

[Edited by - TMS on 03-24-2009 3:31 PM]

dude, seriously, I am getting to this thread late but your line if "u got a problem with that" is the instigator here. Chill man.

i'm getting a little tired of the onus being put on me everytime this crap w/earl comes around... read up a few posts & see if he's not trying to instigate me w/his cute mind games here martin... when i make a comment & he replies "I don't think so" how else u want me to respond? whatever, this is getting tiresome... i'll just ignore the guy from now on... i think that's best for everyone concerned.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
martin
Posts: 79877
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/24/2009  10:53 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

what belligerence? get the hell over yourself & stop being an annoying prick earl... i got my opinion, u got urs... leave it at that & stop trying to incite an argument... if i cared enough about your opinions i would take the time to explain why i think Lee is miles better than Wilcox... obviously i don't.

[Edited by - TMS on 03-24-2009 3:31 PM]

dude, seriously, I am getting to this thread late but your line if "u got a problem with that" is the instigator here. Chill man.

i'm getting a little tired of the onus being put on me everytime this crap w/earl comes around... read up a few posts & see if he's not trying to instigate me w/his cute mind games here martin... when i make a comment & he replies "I don't think so" how else u want me to respond? whatever, this is getting tiresome... i'll just ignore the guy from now on... i think that's best for everyone concerned.

you've said that in like 10 different threads but you keep responding.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/24/2009  10:58 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

what belligerence? get the hell over yourself & stop being an annoying prick earl... i got my opinion, u got urs... leave it at that & stop trying to incite an argument... if i cared enough about your opinions i would take the time to explain why i think Lee is miles better than Wilcox... obviously i don't.

[Edited by - TMS on 03-24-2009 3:31 PM]

dude, seriously, I am getting to this thread late but your line if "u got a problem with that" is the instigator here. Chill man.

i'm getting a little tired of the onus being put on me everytime this crap w/earl comes around... read up a few posts & see if he's not trying to instigate me w/his cute mind games here martin... when i make a comment & he replies "I don't think so" how else u want me to respond? whatever, this is getting tiresome... i'll just ignore the guy from now on... i think that's best for everyone concerned.

you've said that in like 10 different threads but you keep responding.

so it's fine for this guy to respond w/smart ass 1 liner comments & not OK for me to respond in kind... i see how it works... that's cool martin... ur board, ur rules... whatever, i'm done w/this thread.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
martin
Posts: 79877
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/24/2009  11:04 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

what belligerence? get the hell over yourself & stop being an annoying prick earl... i got my opinion, u got urs... leave it at that & stop trying to incite an argument... if i cared enough about your opinions i would take the time to explain why i think Lee is miles better than Wilcox... obviously i don't.

[Edited by - TMS on 03-24-2009 3:31 PM]

dude, seriously, I am getting to this thread late but your line if "u got a problem with that" is the instigator here. Chill man.

i'm getting a little tired of the onus being put on me everytime this crap w/earl comes around... read up a few posts & see if he's not trying to instigate me w/his cute mind games here martin... when i make a comment & he replies "I don't think so" how else u want me to respond? whatever, this is getting tiresome... i'll just ignore the guy from now on... i think that's best for everyone concerned.

you've said that in like 10 different threads but you keep responding.

so it's fine for this guy to respond w/smart ass 1 liner comments & not OK for me to respond in kind... i see how it works... that's cool martin... ur board, ur rules... whatever, i'm done w/this thread.

dude, within 2 back-and-forths you lay this on us:
what belligerence? get the hell over yourself & stop being an annoying prick earl... i got my opinion, u got urs... leave it at that & stop trying to incite an argument... if i cared enough about your opinions i would take the time to explain why i think Lee is miles better than Wilcox... obviously i don't.

How is that responding in kind?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
3/24/2009  11:34 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Lee is a nice sixth man and a championship team.

So is Wilcox.

David Lee is a 6th man on a Championship team.

Chris Wilcox was a 10th man on the Oklahoma City Thunder. Behind Nick Collison.


Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
martin
Posts: 79877
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/25/2009  12:03 AM
Posted by RemBee76:
Posted by misterearl:

Lee is a nice sixth man and a championship team.

So is Wilcox.

David Lee is a 6th man on a Championship team.

Chris Wilcox was a 10th man on the Oklahoma City Thunder. Behind Nick Collison.

who got traded for Malik Rose.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
3/25/2009  12:06 AM
Let's not completely trash Wilcox here. He's shown when given a good 25mpg he can post 13/7.

I'm not saying he's an insta-starter.. I'm just saying
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
3/25/2009  9:48 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Let's not completely trash Wilcox here. He's shown when given a good 25mpg he can post 13/7.

I think what some are saying, without "trashing" him, is that he hasn't shown that at all. Certainly, it makes one wonders if his defense was such a plus, why he was playing behind a guy who was putting up 9 and 7 in almost 25.

Mostly, I think this is indicative of the absurd New York Knick fan mentality that we give the benefit of the doubt to a player who has had two or three good games as a Knick after 20 in the uniform while undervaluing guys who have consistently produced and battled in the Orange and Blue for years. It’s that mentality that puts Larry Hughes and Chris Wilcox on a Keepers list while leaving off Nate Robinson and David Lee. It is a mentality that has manifested itself in an owner strategy that has hurt this team for the past years far worse than the array of incompetent GMs and Coaches that have passed through MSG.

And if you haven’t noticed, it kind of makes me angry.


Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/25/2009  9:51 AM
The Answer Man Never Shies Away From A Challenge, Especially A Challenge From One of His (Most Respected) Boys

rembee - You know we are boys. But I can think of no clearer example of the continuing and totally inexplicable undervaluing of David Lee than anyone thinking he and Chris Wilcox are the same player. Thats foul, man.

AM: The mention of Lee and Wilcox being essentially the same player was made in the context of skill sets the Knicks lack at the four. Lee has the advantage in versatility and rebounding numbers but Wilcox, in my opinion, was comparable in terms of being able to finish at the tin and defensive tenacity. I want my power forward to deliver a hard foul every once in while, just to send a message. That's not foul, that's just a way of letting an opponent know there is no clear path to the rack.

Q rembee: Why do we do this in New York?

A. I feel your rant on Ewing and King, but those are different issues. I am not an advocate of running Lee out of town. emann can verify i was jumping with joy the instant Lee was selected by Zeke on draft night. This has nothing to do with personal preference, it is more about a incredibly difficult decision that Donnie Walsh must make before draft night 2009. You either decide Lee is the forward of the future and find a center to play alongside him, or you determine that Lee can help you acquire a player at a position (center) of desperate need.

Q. rembee: And yeah, we do need an enforcer down low. You think Wilcox is that guy?

A. Actually i think DeJuan Blair is that guy

rembee: I'd like to hear how David Lee is not a gifted offensive boarder but somehow is 7th in the league in offensive boards per game.

AM: offensive boards are nice. Being able to hold your ground in the post, extend the defense or block a shot is even better.

rembee: I'd also like to hear how we should expect Wilcox to snag only 2 fewer bounds per game when his career high is 4 below Lee's current production.

AM: For comparison, I selected Wilcox's 3 years in Seattle with the thought of stability and comparable minutes. I am an optimist and see potential for Wilcox, if he can be inspired to "have fun" in this system (as one poster submitted) to hold the line at the 4 until frontcourt reinforcements arrive.

rembee: I wonder if Wilcox ever averaged almost 19ppg, as Lee did in January and February, while shooting .550, in a set offense while being one of the focal points of opposing defenses.

AM: Never. But you can't convince me that running the pick and roll with a lead guard who looks for Wilcox as much as he looks for lee would not produce comparable results. Jump shooting is a wash. Both have limited range. Neither player has ever made a three point shot in their NBA career.

rembee: I'd like to know how anyone could be so sure that Wilcox would average 15 and 9 "no question" when both numbers are significantly higher than his career highs (when he put up points, by the way, primarily as a garbage man) four years ago.

The Answer Man: see above

rembee: I'd wonder how Wilcox (who passes the ball less than Zach Randolph did) would fit into D'Antoni's unselfish offense when replacing a gifted and willing passer.

AM: hold up, nobody passes the pill less than ZBo. If you watch Wilcox, he is not selfish with the ball.

rembee: Most of all, I wonder how we can evaluate a player who is essentially a journeyman and who may be on the downswing of his career (short as it has been) next to a guy who has improved his game every year and very likely will continue to do so.

The Answer Man: I hope Lee continues to improve. Same with Wilcox. In terms of experience they are only 3 years apart. On offense, the D'Antoni system favors offensive numbers skewing a bit higher, still I will grant Lee his superior output. On the other hand, this frontcourt discussion is more about defense and toughness at the big forward position.

It is about protecting the rim and grabbing rebounds in heavy traffic in the fourth quarter.

They both have work to do.







once a knick always a knick
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
3/25/2009  10:30 AM
Posted by misterearl:
But you can't convince me that running the pick and roll with a lead guard who looks for Wilcox as much as he looks for lee would not produce comparable results.

That right there is the problem, Earl. I shouldn’t have to tell you that any PF/C with hops can’t necessarily do what Lee does, certainly one without the court vision, unselfishness, and passing ability of David Lee. It’s the same line that Lee isn’t that special a player, that his numbers are primarily the result of the system, or the myth that Lee doesn’t grab rebounds in the 4th quarter. It’s a line that I don’t buy.

I don’t love that we are starting a front-court guy who doesn’t play D. I also wouldn’t love starting a front-court guy who at the apex of his career managed only 8 rebounds in over 30 minutes (who, incidentally, isn’t that great a defensive player either). You say you’d take the later over the former.

That’s a view that doesn’t have much to support it, and its one that I find disappointing.



Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
3/25/2009  11:27 AM
We start 5 guys that dont play defense.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/25/2009  11:36 AM
"You say you’d take the later over the former."

rembee - let me be perfectly clear and rewind back to the go-down. I am not advocating Chris Wilcox OVER David Lee just to make a point about one players superiority over another. This hijacked thread is about the future of the Knicks and how the roster chess moves are constructed.

Think of it this way, if Chris Wilcox is not a significant skill-set drop off from David Lee, will Wilcox be under consideration to play the four (however temporary the role may be) for 30 minutes in 2009?

Let's change hats for a minute. Take your rembee hat off and put your Donnie Walsh hat on. This conversation isn't really about personal preference or even who has the more valid opinion.

The question is "what does Donnie Walsh see in Wilcox?"... that would make him do the deal... and does that directly affect David Lee's future in New York?

Just a question.

I love David Lee. Always have. And that dates back to his high school days. Always will. Just ask emann.



once a knick always a knick
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
3/25/2009  11:39 AM
Posted by King1:

We start 5 guys that dont play defense.

Too bad David Lee is the worst defender of all of them.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
3/25/2009  11:55 AM
Posted by misterearl:
Think of it this way, if Chris Wilcox is not a significant skill-set drop off from David Lee, will Wilcox be under consideration to play the four (however temporary the role may be) for 30 minutes in 2009?

Chris Wilcox is a significant skill-set drop off from David Lee.

The answer to your question doesn’t bear on that. It depends on our ability to sign Lee to a contract that won’t jeopardize the long-term plans of the team, and our ability to sign Wilcox to a cheap, short-term contract.

Long term, Lee is a starter/6th man next to a shot-blocking enforcer. Chris Wilcox is not a starter/6th man on a successful team. Who do we end up keeping? Its about the Benjamins.


Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
martin
Posts: 79877
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/25/2009  12:11 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by King1:

We start 5 guys that dont play defense.

Too bad David Lee is the worst defender of all of them.

Harrington is worse.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
3/25/2009  12:26 PM
Lee's been playing some mind-numbingly bad defense lately. Earlier in the season Lee was on the same low defensive level as Harrington.

They are both bad.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

3/25/2009  1:11 PM
Doesn't really matter, he sucks.
Yeah so When is Wilcox gonna start?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy