[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Put Chandler at SG and just keep him there
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 4 of 4 « First‹ Previous 2  3  4 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/11/2008  7:51 PM
Wait how do we absolve Q Rich of his deficiencies but get on others like Curry, Marbury and James for theirs. He was indeed hurt but he was also overweight which didn't help his injury. He did no better defending his man than say Marbury defending the point or Curry defending the middle. Curry or Marbury held their own defensively on more than one occassion but we still give them the bad rap.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 80001
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/11/2008  8:42 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

Wait how do we absolve Q Rich of his deficiencies but get on others like Curry, Marbury and James for theirs. He was indeed hurt but he was also overweight which didn't help his injury. He did no better defending his man than say Marbury defending the point or Curry defending the middle. Curry or Marbury held their own defensively on more than one occassion but we still give them the bad rap.

To each his own. If you think Curry and Marbury played as good as D as Q, more to you
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/11/2008  10:31 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by Pharzeone:

Wait how do we absolve Q Rich of his deficiencies but get on others like Curry, Marbury and James for theirs. He was indeed hurt but he was also overweight which didn't help his injury. He did no better defending his man than say Marbury defending the point or Curry defending the middle. Curry or Marbury held their own defensively on more than one occassion but we still give them the bad rap.

To each his own. If you think Curry and Marbury played as good as D as Q, more to you

Martin, come on, you know my point is that they all played bad D at their respective position including Crawford at the 2 guard. I just think Q is given a free ride in the blame department.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
martin
Posts: 80001
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/12/2008  11:14 AM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by martin:
Posted by Pharzeone:

Wait how do we absolve Q Rich of his deficiencies but get on others like Curry, Marbury and James for theirs. He was indeed hurt but he was also overweight which didn't help his injury. He did no better defending his man than say Marbury defending the point or Curry defending the middle. Curry or Marbury held their own defensively on more than one occassion but we still give them the bad rap.

To each his own. If you think Curry and Marbury played as good as D as Q, more to you

Martin, come on, you know my point is that they all played bad D at their respective position including Crawford at the 2 guard. I just think Q is given a free ride in the blame department.

I am not giving Q a free ride. He was playing hurt. I thought that even with his back condition he played OK D.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
12/12/2008  12:13 PM
Lemme Upgrade You (on defense)

Marbury > Duhon = improvement on defense

Crawford > Richardson = see above, with a bigger butt to post-up

Richardson > The Mayor = inexperienced but with better size and better quickness, when the knee is 100% healthy, watch out below

Randolph > Harrington = "there's no place like home... there's no place like home..."

Lee > Jeffries = you can never have too many of those glue guys

Marbury > Nate = enjoy California Steph

Curry > Tim Thomas = see "Harrington" above

once a knick always a knick
LivingLegend
Posts: 26568
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645
12/12/2008  12:41 PM
Posted by misterearl:

LivingLegend - we're talking about The Mayor here.

I find it difficult to be disappointed in a virtual rookie seeing consistent minutes for the first time in his NBA career. Don't hate the 2-12, hate all the family members and homeboys begging for free tickets.

I can't be disappointed in Gallinari not playing if it means he corrects the problem and returns without causing more damage to his psyche.

Seeing them on the floor together will be a beautiful thing. I can wait.

I hear you on Wilson -- but NOTE I never mentioned Wilson's shooting as a dissapointment. I mentioned his defense lacking on occasion and that sometimes he doesn't attack the boards like he can. I love Wilson (really a favorite of mine because the guy just looks like a stud muffin). I expect him to really improve over time and I'm excited that he's doing as well as he is at such a young age. Thanks to Zeke for reaching on this pick.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
12/12/2008  1:13 PM
Vote Early and Often

LivingLegend - great summry of your stance on the issues. You must understand that as The Mayors former Campaign Manager, and Press Secretary since 2007, that we take these matters of public information seriously.

Let me also add that Mr. Chandler is thankful for the recent outpouring of support from his constituents and intends to follow up on the promises he made during the campaign. The Mayor is commited to representing the people, fixing the economy and getting back on defense.

That Mayor thanks your for your support.
once a knick always a knick
Page 4 of 4 « First‹ Previous 2  3  4 
« Reply To Topic
Put Chandler at SG and just keep him there
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy