[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

New Yorkers please help me out.
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2008  1:01 PM
Posted by Andrew:

Briggs, I think nysportsfan11 is correct that the cap number is not 100% about the formula. See the 2005-06 season when the league and players associated agreed on a cap number that was different.

If revenues drop dramatically--you will see a much lower cap number--take it to the bank.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/8/2008  1:03 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Andrew:

Briggs, I think nysportsfan11 is correct that the cap number is not 100% about the formula. See the 2005-06 season when the league and players associated agreed on a cap number that was different.

If revenues drop dramatically--you will see a much lower cap number--take it to the bank.
only so much it can go down... its in the CBA for the players
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2008  1:06 PM

If you were David Lee's agent--what would you ask the Knicks for? I would ask for 72mm from the Knicks--they can only say no or come back with a number--then if I don't like the number I shop him in RFA--if we don't like the number we go to the qualifying offer. As an agent he will not let David leave 25- 30mm on the table--and David is not stupid.
RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/8/2008  1:06 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Andrew:

Briggs, I think nysportsfan11 is correct that the cap number is not 100% about the formula. See the 2005-06 season when the league and players associated agreed on a cap number that was different.

If revenues drop dramatically--you will see a much lower cap number--take it to the bank.

if revenues drop that dramatically you will see a lot less teams using cap space anyway. knicks are more financially sound than a lot of teams around the league if the economy starts hurting the league that badly.
¿ △ ?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
12/8/2008  1:06 PM
team looking to dump jeffries contract.
harrington a stop gap?
gallo is a question mark.
lee may or may not be back.

the knicks basically have to get at least 3 legit big men onto the team during the summer of 2010.

and they will have to draft a big this year.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/8/2008  1:10 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:


If you were David Lee's agent--what would you ask the Knicks for? I would ask for 72mm from the Knicks--they can only say no or come back with a number--then if I don't like the number I shop him in RFA--if we don't like the number we go to the qualifying offer. As an agent he will not let David leave 25- 30mm on the table--and David is not stupid.

Good luck competing in the 2010 FA market then, David. You're really gonna need it!
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/8/2008  1:10 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:


If you were David Lee's agent--what would you ask the Knicks for? I would ask for 72mm from the Knicks--they can only say no or come back with a number--then if I don't like the number I shop him in RFA--if we don't like the number we go to the qualifying offer. As an agent he will not let David leave 25- 30mm on the table--and David is not stupid.

so you're saying the economy drops the cap to $50 million and some team is going to use a fourth of their cap on david lee? i can't see that happening. who in the league has cap room this summer? not many.

detroit shipped off chauncey billups to get iverson's expiring deal so they could get cap room... for david lee in 2009 before the biggest free agent class ever??? i don't think so.

worst case scenario with lee is he takes the qualfying offer this year and he walks in the summer of 2010 and some team that loses out on the big prizes in 2010 signs lee as a consolation prize. but i think we can sign him to a reasonable deal this summer. like $54M, say.

¿ △ ?
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/8/2008  1:37 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:


If you were David Lee's agent--what would you ask the Knicks for? I would ask for 72mm from the Knicks--they can only say no or come back with a number--then if I don't like the number I shop him in RFA--if we don't like the number we go to the qualifying offer. As an agent he will not let David leave 25- 30mm on the table--and David is not stupid.
is that market value Briggs? what is your logic or reasoning in assuming Lee is a max player or going to become a max player during his next contract? If I am DW I ask his agent if he wants us to work on a sign and trade because Lee isnt a max player. If someone wants to give him $72mm fine. Tell them to call and we will work out a trade. However as I mentioned before the only team that can really offer him that is Detroit.

I would ask Lee's agent the same thing I ask you. Who is the buyer?

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/8/2008  1:50 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by BRIGGS:


If you were David Lee's agent--what would you ask the Knicks for? I would ask for 72mm from the Knicks--they can only say no or come back with a number--then if I don't like the number I shop him in RFA--if we don't like the number we go to the qualifying offer. As an agent he will not let David leave 25- 30mm on the table--and David is not stupid.
is that market value Briggs? what is your logic or reasoning in assuming Lee is a max player or going to become a max player during his next contract? If I am DW I ask his agent if he wants us to work on a sign and trade because Lee isnt a max player. If someone wants to give him $72mm fine. Tell them to call and we will work out a trade. However as I mentioned before the only team that can really offer him that is Detroit.

I would ask Lee's agent the same thing I ask you. Who is the buyer?

Some people will panic until there's a 0% chance of any components of the plan working out poorly. The more conditions (or the more "if"s) someone has to add to their scenario, the more desperate they're argument is becoming. I know you like replying to Briggs but if someone says what if "X, y, and z and a, b, and c all happen? Then we're screwed.", you should just tell them to start taking medication. It could not be more obvious to me that Briggs has made up his mind and will not change it or even consider others' views.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 12-08-2008 1:50 PM]
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2008  1:59 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by BRIGGS:


If you were David Lee's agent--what would you ask the Knicks for? I would ask for 72mm from the Knicks--they can only say no or come back with a number--then if I don't like the number I shop him in RFA--if we don't like the number we go to the qualifying offer. As an agent he will not let David leave 25- 30mm on the table--and David is not stupid.
is that market value Briggs? what is your logic or reasoning in assuming Lee is a max player or going to become a max player during his next contract? If I am DW I ask his agent if he wants us to work on a sign and trade because Lee isnt a max player. If someone wants to give him $72mm fine. Tell them to call and we will work out a trade. However as I mentioned before the only team that can really offer him that is Detroit.

I would ask Lee's agent the same thing I ask you. Who is the buyer?

Memphis 6 years 66mm frontloaded at 13 13 10 10 10 10
RIP Crushalot😞
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2008  2:03 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by BRIGGS:


If you were David Lee's agent--what would you ask the Knicks for? I would ask for 72mm from the Knicks--they can only say no or come back with a number--then if I don't like the number I shop him in RFA--if we don't like the number we go to the qualifying offer. As an agent he will not let David leave 25- 30mm on the table--and David is not stupid.
is that market value Briggs? what is your logic or reasoning in assuming Lee is a max player or going to become a max player during his next contract? If I am DW I ask his agent if he wants us to work on a sign and trade because Lee isnt a max player. If someone wants to give him $72mm fine. Tell them to call and we will work out a trade. However as I mentioned before the only team that can really offer him that is Detroit.

I would ask Lee's agent the same thing I ask you. Who is the buyer?

Some people will panic until there's a 0% chance of any components of the plan working out poorly. The more conditions (or the more "if"s) someone has to add to their scenario, the more desperate they're argument is becoming. I know you like replying to Briggs but if someone says what if "X, y, and z and a, b, and c all happen? Then we're screwed.", you should just tell them to start taking medication. It could not be more obvious to me that Briggs has made up his mind and will not change it or even consider others' views.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 12-08-2008 1:50 PM]

Very simple--we cannot keep Duhon Lee Nate Harrington etc.. and expect to be a free agent team--so sell high on a couple of players. If you believe we can--you'll find out in due time.
RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/8/2008  2:16 PM
sure.. same team Lee's agent tried to block a trade to? Not to mention the Knicks can offer him 6 years $63mm at 8 9 10 11 12 13 and still be under cap if it came down to that. What do you think will happen? And why would the only team in the NBA that can give that contract give it to Lee over Marion?

I'm sorry.. I am not panicking in Dec because Memphis can offer Lee $66mm. Has Memphis ever signed a big FA? Has any FA ever gone there? Tell me you honestly think Lee to Memphis for a frontloaded $66mm has a fart in the wind's chance of happeneing. Probably the same odds as the Knicks signing Lebron, Amare, Nash and a bunch of old all stars for the minimum to cling on and get a ring

Only way that contract gets offered is if Lee simply doesnt want to be here. You get that impression?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nysportsfan11
Posts: 20252
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/20/2007
Member: #1782

12/8/2008  2:16 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by nysportsfan11:

Maximums, mid levels and minimums are proportional to the cap anyway so the point in regards to this discussion is moot. See the '99 lockout and the end of "KG money" for reference. Regardless, the salary cap will not be $50 million. Both sides have to agree to the cap number and a $50 mil cap doesn't work for the owners or players. David Stern and Billy Hunter would kill someone before that happened. At worst, we'd have another long lockout if the cap drops dramatically.

Every player is different. There are a ton of guys around the League who would never in a million years want to play in NY. I don't see why that's so hard to believe. But others would kill to play here. There's no catch all formula that determines who's in what boat especially when you start factoring in wives, families, cost of living, schools, age, media, post playing career aspirations, surrounding talent, management, coaching staff, etc.

Salary cap will be driven and set by revenues--simple economics 101. Go look up the formula

Try a little NBA 101. Why do you think most players want to get their contracts grandfathered in before the CBA is allowed to lapse? Because the current pay scale will be sacrificed and changed for the sake of NOT having to dramatically decrease the cap. The salary cap will be driven by a compromise between small and large market owners. Owners will likely drastically increase profit sharing among teams (satisfying small markets) in order to keep the cap at a similar level (satisfying large markets) and the luxury tax system will be adjusted to account for the economy and serial over-spenders. At the end of the day (and probably after a camp-delaying lockout), players will likely get their BRI checks increased, guaranteed years will decrease incrementally depending on tenure (possibly not even existing for most rookies), RFA/qualifying offers will be abolished/changed, pay scales will be adjusted in favor of owners and vets, and the age limit will be 20 for Americans and Euros (21 an outside possibility).
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2008  2:33 PM
Posted by fishmike:

sure.. same team Lee's agent tried to block a trade to? Not to mention the Knicks can offer him 6 years $63mm at 8 9 10 11 12 13 and still be under cap if it came down to that. What do you think will happen? And why would the only team in the NBA that can give that contract give it to Lee over Marion?

I'm sorry.. I am not panicking in Dec because Memphis can offer Lee $66mm. Has Memphis ever signed a big FA? Has any FA ever gone there? Tell me you honestly think Lee to Memphis for a frontloaded $66mm has a fart in the wind's chance of happeneing. Probably the same odds as the Knicks signing Lebron, Amare, Nash and a bunch of old all stars for the minimum to cling on and get a ring

Only way that contract gets offered is if Lee simply doesnt want to be here. You get that impression?

I don't get what you are saying--first off do you have any factual evidence from a credible source that Lee blocked any trade to any team? Secondly why wouldn't a team like Memphis offer a fair market value contract to a big man they desperately need? Did Emeka Ok4 just get 70mm from the Bobcats? Then why cant Lee get 66? If you are an agent--how can you ask for less than 72mm if Ok4 got 70? You comp the players--that is how it is done in pro sports. Is David Lee as valuable to the New York Knicks as Emeka is to Charlotte--answer YES.
RIP Crushalot😞
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27731
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
12/8/2008  2:48 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by fishmike:

sure.. same team Lee's agent tried to block a trade to? Not to mention the Knicks can offer him 6 years $63mm at 8 9 10 11 12 13 and still be under cap if it came down to that. What do you think will happen? And why would the only team in the NBA that can give that contract give it to Lee over Marion?

I'm sorry.. I am not panicking in Dec because Memphis can offer Lee $66mm. Has Memphis ever signed a big FA? Has any FA ever gone there? Tell me you honestly think Lee to Memphis for a frontloaded $66mm has a fart in the wind's chance of happeneing. Probably the same odds as the Knicks signing Lebron, Amare, Nash and a bunch of old all stars for the minimum to cling on and get a ring

Only way that contract gets offered is if Lee simply doesnt want to be here. You get that impression?

I don't get what you are saying--first off do you have any factual evidence from a credible source that Lee blocked any trade to any team? Secondly why wouldn't a team like Memphis offer a fair market value contract to a big man they desperately need? Did Emeka Ok4 just get 70mm from the Bobcats? Then why cant Lee get 66? If you are an agent--how can you ask for less than 72mm if Ok4 got 70? You comp the players--that is how it is done in pro sports. Is David Lee as valuable to the New York Knicks as Emeka is to Charlotte--answer YES.

I disagree with you. I'll use your logic. Okafor and Lee both average double digit rebounds. Therefor they are comparable players. However Okafor gets far more blocks per game than Lee. You only get blocks by playing defense. Therefor, Okafor plays defense and Lee doesn't. Defense is 50% of the game, because if you aren't on offense, you are on defense. Therefor Lee should get 1/2 the salary that Okafor gets because he plays 50% less basketball than Okafor. Okafor = $70m // Lee = $35M...

Its such stupid logic that I used there, but you keep throwing the same stuff at the wall. Lee is more "comparable" to Drew Gooden than Emeka Okafor. That means he gets 3 years 24M. The love affair with Lee is endearing, but it is not worth overpaying for.

I'd rather lose Lee for nothing than overpay to keep him. 6 years 72M is phantasmagorical.
You know I gonna spin wit it
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2008  3:08 PM
David Lee is averaging 18.1 points 14.5 rebounds and shooting 62% in the 9 games since the trade

what are those numbers worth in the NBA? Certainly it's worth 11- 12mm a year. Unless he is injured--does anyone think his production will magically stop--the guy is very consistent tough and smart.
RIP Crushalot😞
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27731
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
12/8/2008  3:27 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

David Lee is averaging 18.1 points 14.5 rebounds and shooting 62% in the 9 games since the trade

what are those numbers worth in the NBA? Certainly it's worth 11- 12mm a year. Unless he is injured--does anyone think his production will magically stop--the guy is very consistent tough and smart.


He's doing it in this system. You're being bamboozled by the very system we used to convince other teams to take crawford and randolph. Al Harrington is averaging 22pts and 7.6rbs since becoming a Knick. The stats are overhyped. Don't overpay for stats...especially in this system.
You know I gonna spin wit it
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2008  3:31 PM
Posted by EwingsGlass:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:

David Lee is averaging 18.1 points 14.5 rebounds and shooting 62% in the 9 games since the trade

what are those numbers worth in the NBA? Certainly it's worth 11- 12mm a year. Unless he is injured--does anyone think his production will magically stop--the guy is very consistent tough and smart.

So the system is making him pull down 14.5 rebounds? What were Zach's stats before he left and what are they with the Clippers? Any change--perhaps Lee is just doing better with more minutes and more attention. If you play up tempo your stats should be a little higher but so what?
RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/8/2008  3:34 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

David Lee is averaging 18.1 points 14.5 rebounds and shooting 62% in the 9 games since the trade

what are those numbers worth in the NBA? Certainly it's worth 11- 12mm a year. Unless he is injured--does anyone think his production will magically stop--the guy is very consistent tough and smart.
its a great 9 game stretch. NBA GMs give $70mm contracts on 9 games? (Isiah aside).

Lee is OK4 now? Are you for real? Lee has no defensive pressense what so ever and anyone scouting the Knicks can see those numbers are inflated by minutes and the pace the Knicks play. Lee also has durability issues and is usually outplayed by opposing PFs which is why he was benched for Wilson Chandler before the trade.

I have yet to see anything to tell me the Knicks are not in the drivers seat.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27731
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
12/8/2008  3:43 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by EwingsGlass:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:

David Lee is averaging 18.1 points 14.5 rebounds and shooting 62% in the 9 games since the trade

what are those numbers worth in the NBA? Certainly it's worth 11- 12mm a year. Unless he is injured--does anyone think his production will magically stop--the guy is very consistent tough and smart.


So the system is making him pull down 14.5 rebounds? What were Zach's stats before he left and what are they with the Clippers? Any change--perhaps Lee is just doing better with more minutes and more attention. If you play up tempo your stats should be a little higher but so what?

Randolph is averaging 4 less rebounds while getting more minutes with the Clips. Small sample set, but it is clear the system gives a bump. And the only reason I care about the bump is that you are declaring his stats to be on star level deserving of $12m per year.

Lee is good at rebounding, but he is pretty one-dimensional. We should not be looking to pay him top dollar to collect rebounds and garbage points.

I don't want to spend any more time knocking David Lee, because I think he is a great player. I just think that the salary expectations you are predicting are unrealistic.
You know I gonna spin wit it
New Yorkers please help me out.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy