Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by fishmike:
sure.. same team Lee's agent tried to block a trade to? Not to mention the Knicks can offer him 6 years $63mm at 8 9 10 11 12 13 and still be under cap if it came down to that. What do you think will happen? And why would the only team in the NBA that can give that contract give it to Lee over Marion?
I'm sorry.. I am not panicking in Dec because Memphis can offer Lee $66mm. Has Memphis ever signed a big FA? Has any FA ever gone there? Tell me you honestly think Lee to Memphis for a frontloaded $66mm has a fart in the wind's chance of happeneing. Probably the same odds as the Knicks signing Lebron, Amare, Nash and a bunch of old all stars for the minimum to cling on and get a ring
Only way that contract gets offered is if Lee simply doesnt want to be here. You get that impression?
I don't get what you are saying--first off do you have any factual evidence from a credible source that Lee blocked any trade to any team? Secondly why wouldn't a team like Memphis offer a fair market value contract to a big man they desperately need? Did Emeka Ok4 just get 70mm from the Bobcats? Then why cant Lee get 66? If you are an agent--how can you ask for less than 72mm if Ok4 got 70? You comp the players--that is how it is done in pro sports. Is David Lee as valuable to the New York Knicks as Emeka is to Charlotte--answer YES.
I disagree with you. I'll use your logic. Okafor and Lee both average double digit rebounds. Therefor they are comparable players. However Okafor gets far more blocks per game than Lee. You only get blocks by playing defense. Therefor, Okafor plays defense and Lee doesn't. Defense is 50% of the game, because if you aren't on offense, you are on defense. Therefor Lee should get 1/2 the salary that Okafor gets because he plays 50% less basketball than Okafor. Okafor = $70m // Lee = $35M...
Its such stupid logic that I used there, but you keep throwing the same stuff at the wall. Lee is more "comparable" to Drew Gooden than Emeka Okafor. That means he gets 3 years 24M. The love affair with Lee is endearing, but it is not worth overpaying for.
I'd rather lose Lee for nothing than overpay to keep him. 6 years 72M is phantasmagorical.