[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

NBA Draft 09
Author Thread
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/20/2008  11:39 AM
Posted by Nalod:

Stephan Curry COULD be a Nick Van Excel type if he gets quicker.

He is like a 6-2 H20. Great fundamentals and stroke. The talent is there, and he works hard but he might not be quick or strong enough to be an effective NBA player.

He is no lotto pick.

Nick Van Exel had ridiculous moves and could get a shot off against anyone and he played for one of the best programs.

A 6'2" Houston equals an Eddie House type of player.

oohah


Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
AUTOADVERT
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/20/2008  12:50 PM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by Nalod:

Stephan Curry COULD be a Nick Van Excel type if he gets quicker.

He is like a 6-2 H20. Great fundamentals and stroke. The talent is there, and he works hard but he might not be quick or strong enough to be an effective NBA player.

He is no lotto pick.

Nick Van Exel had ridiculous moves and could get a shot off against anyone and he played for one of the best programs.

A 6'2" Houston equals an Eddie House type of player.

oohah

just wait and see how he does against elite teams... if he takes care of the ball and get some assists, he'd be the perfect PG for D'Antoni... but I agree with you that that's a rather large "if" at this point.

I think some people are assuming he'll turn into that or remember his tournament performance. Everyone should be skeptical. But he was the team's SG last year and now he's the team's PG... so let's see how he does with it. If he does that well, I'd want him over Rubio and Jennings. But like I said, it is a HUGE if at this point.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/20/2008  12:58 PM
just wait and see how he does against elite teams...

Wait and See? Over my dead body! I have knee jerk reactions to express! You're not the boss of me...Supreme Commander!

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/20/2008  1:15 PM
Posted by oohah:
just wait and see how he does against elite teams...

Wait and See? Over my dead body! I have knee jerk reactions to express! You're not the boss of me...Supreme Commander!

oohah

Sorry... will you be my fried???
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Knicksfan
Posts: 33594
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
11/20/2008  2:59 PM
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by oohah:
just wait and see how he does against elite teams...

Wait and See? Over my dead body! I have knee jerk reactions to express! You're not the boss of me...Supreme Commander!

oohah

Sorry... will you be my fried???

Fried potato?
Knicks_Fan
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
11/20/2008  3:10 PM
Originally posted by Nalod:

Stephan Curry COULD be a Nick Van Excel type if he gets quicker.
He is like a 6-2 H20. Great fundamentals and stroke. The talent is there, and he works hard but he might not be quick or strong enough to be an effective NBA player.

He is no lotto pick.

Nick Van Exel had ridiculous moves and could get a shot off against anyone and he played for one of the best programs.

A 6'2" Houston equals an Eddie House type of player.

oohah


Not sure what games you guys have been watching, but Curry can get his shot off against anybody. He plays with a bunch of scrubs and is the focus of the D every game, and he stills puts up 30-40.

nalod, how in the world can you say curry isn't a LOTTO pick. i understand maybe top 5 with some of the bigs coming out (griffin, thabeet, mullens), but this is a weak draft class. who else is better than curry? there's no way you can name me 15 better pro prospects. curry is a lock for the lotto, if he goes 5-10 whoever takes him is going to get a world class scorer and a PG prospect, for sure.

if you want an eddie house or NVE type player, watch tyrese rice on BC. i think he'll go end of the first round, early 2nd. good 4 year player, hung 44 on NC last year at home, but not well-rounded and not automatic from downtown, and is probably only 5'11".

curry has definite and obvious NBA range, has great court vision (he's avg. 7 APG this year, we'll see if it stays that high, but he can pass), and like i said, you don't carry a team of nobodies to the elite 8, or avg over 30/game and not be able to score on anybody. watch 2 minutes of curry and anybody can see he can get his shot off regardless of who's on him.


[Edited by - bigsm00th on 11-20-2008 12:14 PM]
#Knickstaps
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/20/2008  3:32 PM
Not sure what games you guys have been watching, but Curry can get his shot off against anybody. He plays with a bunch of scrubs and is the focus of the D every game, and he stills puts up 30-40.

nalod, how in the world can you say curry isn't a LOTTO pick. i understand maybe top 5 with some of the bigs coming out (griffin, thabeet, mullens), but this is a weak draft class. who else is better than curry? there's no way you can name me 15 better pro prospects. curry is a lock for the lotto, if he goes 5-10 whoever takes him is going to get a world class scorer and a PG prospect, for sure.

if you want an eddie house or NVE type player, watch tyrese rice on BC. i think he'll go end of the first round, early 2nd. good 4 year player, hung 44 on NC last year at home, but not well-rounded and not automatic from downtown, and is probably only 5'11".

curry has definite and obvious NBA range, has great court vision (he's avg. 7 APG this year, we'll see if it stays that high, but he can pass), and like i said, you don't carry a team of nobodies to the elite 8, or avg over 30/game and not be able to score on anybody. watch 2 minutes of curry and anybody can see he can get his shot off regardless of who's on him.

I think you're overrating him. The reason Curry scores so much is because he is a bg fish in a small pond. Put him on a good ACC or Big East team and he scores a lot less. In regard to getting his shot off against anybody, I saw him forcing a ton of bad shots.

There have been so many guys like Stephen Curry that score big in college and jst can't be the man the same way in the Pros.

College and the pros are entirely different animals. Curry is no Johnny Newman, a guy who scored big in a small school who could do the same against the big boys. Wally Szcerbaik is another one. The difference was those guys had pro bodies. Curry does not have a pro body considering his game. Look at Rodney Stuckey. Great college player, decent to good pro. And he has the physique to go with the skill.

But we'll see bigSmooth. You're hanging your ass on this one!

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 20-11-2008 3:34 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
NumberTwoPencil
Posts: 20936
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2003
Member: #481
USA
11/20/2008  5:26 PM
I'm seeing the same player that bigsmooth and briggs see. Curry is, hands down, the best college player right now. He plays brilliant D against the best, drops 30 on double/triple teams, picks up a few assists and steals, runs his team, and he consistently plays some of the smartest ball I've seen. He's made a group of second and third string HS players a competitive top 25 team. (The kids on the Davidson team are book smart and a very tight unit but none of them stand a chance of going pro, most of them rode the bench in HS until their Jr. or Sr. season and then they averaged, oh, 10/5 on okay A and AA teams. Davidson doesn't attract half the talent of, say, Gonzaga. I don't they have ever recruited a HS all American. They don't even get the talent that, say, the University of South Alabama or Mississippi State gets.) Curry's a special player not because he can shoot, he's special because he elevates what are essentially second string HS players into a competitive top 25 college team.

Will Curry be an NBA star? Dunno. Probably not. The odds aren't great, regardless of injury/luck/coach. Will someone give him a chance, perhaps even a lottery ticket? I think so. In the meantime, if you only saw him take out Mario Chambers in the Kansas game last year, check him out again. There's no better show in college ball right now.

Here's a nice comparison of Curry to Chris Paul that discusses some of the good and bad aspects of trying to evaluate a great player on a bad team and juggles the Griffin v. Curry draft balls, coming down more or less in briggs territory:

...I think he is better than Paul was in college in terms of creating his own shot along with his range combined with accuracy. The thing is Paul had a solid center at Wake... but didn't set him up much at all.

...Curry has no supporting cast to create with...This was what amazed me aside from the 44 points: Curry only had three assists, but he made at least three passes that would have ended up as top ten plays on ESPN had his teammates finished.

...If Curry is a better scorer in college than Paul was, and Paul was a damn good one, and doesn't have the same supporting cast Paul did, who is to say that Curry can't reach Paul's level? He is similar in size, probably less quick, but still has a great ability to drive to the basket, and is better at creating his own shot off of screens and the dribble, let alone spot up shooting...

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/83700-stephen-curry-the-next-chris-paul


BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/20/2008  6:42 PM
Posted by NumberTwoPencil:

I'm seeing the same player that bigsmooth and briggs see. Curry is, hands down, the best college player right now. He plays brilliant D against the best, drops 30 on double/triple teams, picks up a few assists and steals, runs his team, and he consistently plays some of the smartest ball I've seen. He's made a group of second and third string HS players a competitive top 25 team. (The kids on the Davidson team are book smart and a very tight unit but none of them stand a chance of going pro, most of them rode the bench in HS until their Jr. or Sr. season and then they averaged, oh, 10/5 on okay A and AA teams. Davidson doesn't attract half the talent of, say, Gonzaga. I don't they have ever recruited a HS all American. They don't even get the talent that, say, the University of South Alabama or Mississippi State gets.) Curry's a special player not because he can shoot, he's special because he elevates what are essentially second string HS players into a competitive top 25 college team.

Will Curry be an NBA star? Dunno. Probably not. The odds aren't great, regardless of injury/luck/coach. Will someone give him a chance, perhaps even a lottery ticket? I think so. In the meantime, if you only saw him take out Mario Chambers in the Kansas game last year, check him out again. There's no better show in college ball right now.

Here's a nice comparison of Curry to Chris Paul that discusses some of the good and bad aspects of trying to evaluate a great player on a bad team and juggles the Griffin v. Curry draft balls, coming down more or less in briggs territory:

...I think he is better than Paul was in college in terms of creating his own shot along with his range combined with accuracy. The thing is Paul had a solid center at Wake... but didn't set him up much at all.

...Curry has no supporting cast to create with...This was what amazed me aside from the 44 points: Curry only had three assists, but he made at least three passes that would have ended up as top ten plays on ESPN had his teammates finished.

...If Curry is a better scorer in college than Paul was, and Paul was a damn good one, and doesn't have the same supporting cast Paul did, who is to say that Curry can't reach Paul's level? He is similar in size, probably less quick, but still has a great ability to drive to the basket, and is better at creating his own shot off of screens and the dribble, let alone spot up shooting...

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/83700-stephen-curry-the-next-chris-paul

One thing he kind of did in that article that I disagree with is talk down Griffin. I also dont agree with Amare type comparisons but rather a more agile MORE skilled Carlos Boozer. How could anyone miss his ball handling during the game? He took it end to end 4-5 times. As good as Michael Beasley looked last year with somewhat similar numbers--he is NOT Griffin's size--actually Griffin for our style of play would be the ultimate big man acquisition. He hasnt played against anyone but he is going to be a consistent 22 points 15 rebounds 60++% all year imho. Clearly Griffin is pick 1 IMHO and I dont think second pick is too close. I agree with Curry ending up a much higher lottery pick than is being mentioned now--too special and you can see how he could make a great NBA point guard. I would NOT even draft him unless the plan was putting him at the 1. People dont understand that he NEEDS to take those shots for this team to be competitive when they face tier 1 colleges. If he had similar talent where he could pick and choose pass shoot--I think you really haev a star in the making with his intelligence vision and skills/
RIP Crushalot😞
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
11/20/2008  7:10 PM
Put him on a good ACC or Big East team and he scores a lot less. In regard to getting his shot off against anybody, I saw him forcing a ton of bad shots.

put him on a good ACC or Big East team and he averages less points, true, but he also averages a lot more assists.

he forced a ton of bad shots against OU, he also dropped 44 on the road against a big 12 school. last year in the NCAAs he dropped 25 points in the last 14 minutes against georgetown, arguably the best defensive team in the big east, dropped 33 on wisconsin, a big 10 team known for its tough defense and slow pace, and he scored 25 against kansas, who had the best guard defenders in the country in chalmers and russ robinson (d-rose had 27 and CDR had 25 in the championship, curry by himself scored 25).

i guess i am "putting my ass out there," in the face of many nonbelievers last year who thought derrick rose was an undersized 2, i said he was a natural and explosive #1, and he's looking like a leading candidate for ROY. i think curry can definitely play 1 in the nba, and if he can, he'll make whoever drafts him very happy. that being said, griffin is for sure the #1 pick IMO, and i wouldn't be surprised if curry didn't go top 5 b/c ppl are going to be questioning his height and whether he can play 1 ad nauseum until nov of 2009 when the league starts and he proves what he is. as warren buffet says, believe with your eyes, not your ears. davidson plays against west virginia, at purdue, and at duke this year, so he'll have plenty of chances to prove himself more against legit competition.
#Knickstaps
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/20/2008  7:34 PM
Curry will put up big numbers, no question.
i guess i am "putting my ass out there," in the face of many nonbelievers last year who thought derrick rose was an undersized 2,

Comparing Derrick Rose to Curry is so off base, they are incomparable. Rose was the best physical talents in the country last year, Curry is a real good shooter. Night and day. Chris Paul? You gotta be kidding me. Steve Burtt Jr. is a better comparison.

Brent Price scored 60 something points in a college game. Kenny Anderson Averaged nearly 30 points per game in college and he had only an okay NBA career. Curry is no Kenny Anderson.

Bo Kimble averaged over 30 points per game.

Steve Logan was first team all-america.
Marcus Hatten, First 5 all Big East with over 20 PPG tons of steal, clutch plays everything. He is in Europe.
Troy Bell, Big East player of the year. Europe.
Brandin Knight, Big East player of the year. Assistant coach at Pitt.

The list goes on of guards who scored a lot in college but did not have the goods at the pro level. It is easy to be blown away by big numbers from guys who are much better than the rest of the guys on their college teams, who get to take all the shots, who have an entire offense designed around them. The pros are a different game. You have to look at whether they can do the same thing at the pro level. Nobody is designing an offense around Stephen Curry on an NBA team.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/20/2008  7:39 PM
Best case scenario for Stephen Curry is Jason Terry, and that is very optimistic.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
11/20/2008  7:46 PM
oohah, i agree nobody is designing an offense around curry in the nba. i do think he can play point and stretch defenses with his other worldly range.

here is an interesting post from the blog nyismecca.com about "tweeners".

http://nyismecca.blogspot.com/2008/04/brief-history-of-tweeners.html

As the 2008 draft nears the horizon line, speculation, projection, opinion, conjecture, John Hollinger, draftexpress.com, nbadraft.net, Briggs, upside potential, the search for the next Maciej Lampe, and Darko Milicic are sure to increase in cultural significance. In accordance with the imminent momentum of the aforementioned, I decided to conduct an Elementary School level study which considered the history of the tweener shooting guard, the hybrid, the undersized 2-guard, ENTER OTHER LIMITED SYNONYM, etc, for these kinds of players who probably should not be pigeonholed (whatever I am going to try anyway). I think this is relevant with Eric Gordon and Jerryd Bayless poised to enter the El, and so with reference to them, I tried to find players who somewhat matched up to their style of play. As is characteristic of each prospect, I searched for players that were not specifically spot-up shooters, but for those who tended to need and dominate the ball for large portions of possessions. These players differ from Point Guard in that their primary ambition with the ball is generally to create and score for themselves (although many are capable of setting up teammates). I recognize that defining and typecasting players (as a scorer, or a creator, or a rebounder, etc) through such established criteria risks oversimplification and a misrepresentation of the truth. Nonetheless, I think the study has some value, as I believe the essence of both Gordon and Bayless is most fully realized when scoring (and so are the players I point to as historical precedents). I went through each draft since 1996 and to the best of my ability and memory listed all players underneath 6’4 who’s most prominent and effective capacity on the basketball court was creating and breaking down the defense so to get buckets. The following is a list that might help anticipate the performance of the two young bucks in the Association.

Note: Some liberties were taken with heights if I felt including a particular player would better help understand Gordon and Bayless' future. The number next to each dude was the overall pick he was in the Draft.

1996
1- Allen Iverson
1997
4- Antonio Daniels
23- Bobby Jackson
1998
34- Shammond Williams
42- Miles Simon
1999
2- Steve Francis
26- Vonteego Cummings
42- Louis Bullock
2000
13- Courtney Alexander (6'5 but reminds me a bit of Gordon)
37- Eddie House
2001
21- Joe Forte
31- Gilbert Arenas
33- Will Solomon
2002
6- Dajuan Wagner
17- Juan Dixon
42- Ronald Murray
2003
16- Troy Bell
2004
3- Ben Gordon
24- Delonte West
33- Lionel Chalmers
54- Ricky Paulding
55- Luis Flores
2005
21- Nate Robinson
24- Luther Head
31- Salim Stoudamire
32- Daniel Ewing
40- Monta Ellis
45- Louis Williams
47- Bracey Wright
2006
7- Randy Foye
52- Guillermo Diaz
2007
15- Rodney Stuckey
32- Gabe Pruitt

* I debated adding Jason Terry and Cuttino Mobley to this list but decided against it. I could definitely be forgetting a bunch of guys (especially from the earlier years) so lemme know if you see anyone I overlooked.

There has clearly been a wide range of achievement in the El from the players listed above. There is one icon of the game (AI), 2 legitimate All-Stars during their respective primes (Franchise + Gilbert), one fledgling star (Monta), one ambiguous star who’s starting to retreat from that territory (Ben Gordon), a couple youthful, promising guys still incomplete (Foye, Stuckey, Louis Williams), a decent number of legitimate role players (West, Nate, Luther, Juan Dixon, Bobby Jax), one guy it would be unfair to judge (Dajuan Wagner), and a lot of guys who found no place in the NBA.

Importantly, no team that has been constructed with a player from this list as it’s Alpha Dog (or even as its number 2) has won a championship. Many of these guys are still quite early in their careers, however.

Regarding Eric Gordon and Jerryd Bayless, I think they are both significantly more talented than the majority of the players above. How they will sort themselves out amongst the role players, the gamechangers, the stars, and the superstars remains to be seen. The history of players of similar stature and skills indicates how difficult it has been for this character-type to succeed. The summit is lonely for hybrid guards.
That said, players can certainly blend roles and positions to different extents and in the subtlety of that variation realize unique futures. There is no way to definitively define how Gordon or Bayless will develop as a Pro. I suppose this study may help give some perspective to the challenge they will face (as well as the challenge a team will face that chooses to hand over the team to a player like the two frosh), though. At the end of the day, 4 real good players in 11 years isn’t a whole lot.


(and no, i didnt write that).
#Knickstaps
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/20/2008  8:41 PM
Big Smooth, that is an interesting article. Tweeners have a tough time adjusting unless they are incredible, like Joe Dumars.

Looking at that list I think it shows that short shooters/scorers have a tough time adapting in the NBA unless they can add to their game or are out of this world athletes like Iverson, who is one of the most skilled players ever to go along with his athletic ability.

2 tweeners that I thought would make it are Terry Dehere and Lawrence Moten. They were both all-Americans who led big-time teams deep into the tourney. They didn't make it.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/20/2008  11:57 PM
No one is arguing that Curry isn't a great college player. He certainly is. But Adam Morrison was a great college scorer without a college body.

I was a Derrick Rose champion too. I was pretty firm on him being the number one overall. So what does that mean? My guess is nothing.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/21/2008  1:23 AM
I was a Derrick Rose champion too. I was pretty firm on him being the number one overall. So what does that mean?

it means the world my friend.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
11/21/2008  5:34 AM
Posted by oohah:

Big Smooth, that is an interesting article. Tweeners have a tough time adjusting unless they are incredible, like Joe Dumars.

Looking at that list I think it shows that short shooters/scorers have a tough time adapting in the NBA unless they can add to their game or are out of this world athletes like Iverson, who is one of the most skilled players ever to go along with his athletic ability.

2 tweeners that I thought would make it are Terry Dehere and Lawrence Moten. They were both all-Americans who led big-time teams deep into the tourney. They didn't make it.

oohah

Ah yes, the immortal Terry Dehere who backed up the even bigger immortal Lee Mayberry in Vancouver. Good times.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Armondaone
Posts: 20184
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/28/2003
Member: #379
11/21/2008  8:51 AM
I know it is early but for the past 2 years im putting all my eggs in a basket in the center from UCONN ( Thabeet) the guy can run, block shots, and is an impossing presence in the middle. I know his offense is still raw for right know but the guy wants to play the center role unlike the guys we have now who just want a check. (Thabeet = ALL IN). My vote for the season unless a big trade goes down. If you can lock a tread with picks now i strongly suggest thabeet.
Armondaone
Posts: 20184
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/28/2003
Member: #379
11/21/2008  9:02 AM
I know it is early but for the past 2 years im putting all my eggs in a basket in the center from UCONN ( Thabeet) the guy can run, block shots, and is an impossing presence in the middle. I know his offense is still raw for right know but the guy wants to play the center role unlike the guys we have now who just want a check. (Thabeet = ALL IN). My vote for the season unless a big trade goes down. If you can lock a tread with picks now i strongly suggest thabeet.
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
11/21/2008  7:28 PM
Blake Griffin we need you now more than ever.
NBA Draft 09

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy