Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by TMS:
everyone agreed that this team lacked a perimeter shooter all last season at the wing position... now that Walsh just drafted one all of a sudden it's no longer a need for us... i don't get that at all.
[Edited by - TMS on 06-26-2008 6:02 PM]
His shooting/mechanics are definitely impressive but they're an advantage only if he can guard 4s. If he's guarding on the perimiter you're accepting that you'll have to zone it up every night.
bottomline i think everyone pretty much knew there were alotta holes that needed to be filled on this team... getting a guy who can shoot the J & bring a little passing, ballhandling & shotcreating ability from the wing position is a good thing in my view... let's say he grows into a capable point forward for us, that opens up a lot of options for Mike D to run different offensive sets.
i agree that having him guarding speedier smaller G's is not really an option for us, but if u have someone like Balkman let's say playing at the SF u can afford to have DG at the 2 in some rotations & have him guard the slower SF's while Balk checks the 2.
Knicks needed to take the best player no matter what.
Not necessarily. Teams with all of the best talent don't always win. Of course you need talent, but Galinari isn't exactly a stiff, talent wise.
Accumulating talent has not worked for us because we never had a system. With Walsh we have a plan and D'Antoni a system.
Almost all teams that succeed have a system. That is possibly the most poignant critique of Isiah was that we never really had any kind of system. It was random drafting of players that had talent or fit some "need."
Teams win games, not individual players, except in the NBA you need at least one superstar to match with that team. We were not getting a guy with a real good shot at being a star, other than Bayless, but he's undersized, we have other guys at his position, and maybe he is not best for the system they want to employ.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...