[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

It's the teams that play Great Defense that always win the titles
Author Thread
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/20/2008  7:24 PM
Posted by islesfan:

In the 1998 Finals, the Bulls held the Jazz to scores of:

88, 88, 54, 82, 83 and 86 for an average of 80 pts per game.

During the regular season, the Jazz averaged 101 pts per game.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

In the 1997 Finals, the Bulls held the Jazz to scores of:

82, 85, 104, 78, 88 and 86 for an average of 87 pts per game.

During the regular season, the Jazz averaged 103 pts per game.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

In the 1996 Finals, the Bulls held the Sonics to scores of:

90, 88, 86, 107, 89 and 75 for an average of 89 pts per game.

During the regular season, the Sonics averaged 104 pts per game.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Should I continue Fish or are you ready to admit that the championship Bulls were more than just "ok" defensively. In fact, they were a great defensive team.

[Edited by - islesfan on 20-05-2008 6:28 PM]


The statistics are killing them literally.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/20/2008  7:36 PM
Posted by ramtour420:

What are we even talking about here? Its pretty obvious that you gotta have a superstar to win a championship, as well as a 2-way style of basketball. Does D'Antoni being on the Knicks have something to do with this? No, he was brought here to perform some emergency CPR on this dying franchise. Once the Knicks are alive and breathing again, then we can think of what we need to do to create a championship contender.

a reasonable response.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Uptown
Posts: 31378
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/20/2008  8:53 PM
Posted by ramtour420:

What are we even talking about here? Its pretty obvious that you gotta have a superstar to win a championship, as well as a 2-way style of basketball. Does D'Antoni being on the Knicks have something to do with this? No, he was brought here to perform some emergency CPR on this dying franchise. Once the Knicks are alive and breathing again, then we can think of what we need to do to create a championship contender.


It pretty obvious that the undelying issue here is D'Antoni. These guys just dont like D'Antoni's style of play and thats the bottom line. Even if teh Knicks start churning out 60 plus wins in a couple of years, people will still complain because they dont approve of his style of ball.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/21/2008  2:26 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

They go hand and hand. You need superstar and a team that can get critical stops. But you must be able to get stops when you need it. Spurs,Heat,Lakers have all been able to get critical stops when they needed it. While Wade-Shaq, Parker-Ginobli-Duncan, Kobe-Shaq where able to put up big pts.

When Suns traded Joe Johnson they went after Raja Bell & took back Boris Diaw both were role playing defenders. They also signed or traded for Steven Hunter who is a rebounder shot blocker specialist. Also signed Marcus Banks who is a defensive specialist at the PG position behind Nash. The suns definatly tried to add some defensive role players to the team.

The problem is they had nobody that could own the glass like a Duncan or Shaq & even Wallace in Detroit could down the stretch of games. And they had nobody that would be the defensive presence in the paint they needed in critical times the way that Shaq & Duncan could & Wallace did. If Amare was cappable of doing so then they probably would have gotten some championships and Amare would be known as that elite championship superstar but his inability to do so is what holds him back from being that. That and the fact that he can't run an offense through the post, but Nash more then made up for that.

You say they had a rebounder/shot blocking specialist in Hunter but then you say that they never had a defensive presence in the paint or someone who could get that key rebound down the stretch. So D'Antoni had players who could do these things but never used them properly. Plus he never demanded more out of Amare to be that guy. Either way, that's a failing of the head coach.

Whos to say that he didn't demand more out of Amare but Amare didn't get it done defensively. Whats he going to do bench him for Diaw & Hunter down the stretch of games?

Hunter was a specialist because thats all he could do, not because he was a superstar at it. The point was they did try and add defensive guys to the roster. It doesn't mean that its going to work out as expected.

Should D'Antoni have benched Steve Nash in favor of Marcus Banks down the stretch of games as well? Maybe he should have closed games with Banks,Bell,Marion,Diaw,Hunter.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/21/2008  2:30 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

They go hand and hand. You need superstar and a team that can get critical stops. But you must be able to get stops when you need it. Spurs,Heat,Lakers have all been able to get critical stops when they needed it. While Wade-Shaq, Parker-Ginobli-Duncan, Kobe-Shaq where able to put up big pts.

When Suns traded Joe Johnson they went after Raja Bell & took back Boris Diaw both were role playing defenders. They also signed or traded for Steven Hunter who is a rebounder shot blocker specialist. Also signed Marcus Banks who is a defensive specialist at the PG position behind Nash. The suns definatly tried to add some defensive role players to the team.

The problem is they had nobody that could own the glass like a Duncan or Shaq & even Wallace in Detroit could down the stretch of games. And they had nobody that would be the defensive presence in the paint they needed in critical times the way that Shaq & Duncan could & Wallace did. If Amare was cappable of doing so then they probably would have gotten some championships and Amare would be known as that elite championship superstar but his inability to do so is what holds him back from being that. That and the fact that he can't run an offense through the post, but Nash more then made up for that.

You say they had a rebounder/shot blocking specialist in Hunter but then you say that they never had a defensive presence in the paint or someone who could get that key rebound down the stretch. So D'Antoni had players who could do these things but never used them properly. Plus he never demanded more out of Amare to be that guy. Either way, that's a failing of the head coach.

Whos to say that he didn't demand more out of Amare but Amare didn't get it done defensively. Whats he going to do bench him for Diaw & Hunter down the stretch of games?

Hunter was a specialist because thats all he could do, not because he was a superstar at it. The point was they did try and add defensive guys to the roster. It doesn't mean that its going to work out as expected.

Should D'Antoni have benched Steve Nash in favor of Marcus Banks down the stretch of games as well? Maybe he should have closed games with Banks,Bell,Marion,Diaw,Hunter.

If that's what he has to do to prove his point, then yes, absolutely bench him.

What's the point of adding guys if you don't use them? So D'Antonio the GM wanted these players but D'Antonio the coach refused to play them?? He sabotaged himself?

There is nothing to suggest that D'Antonio stressed defense with his Suns teams.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/21/2008  2:55 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:

Here are some gut wrenching Playoff Stats from the Suns during D'Antoni's tenure

2007-2008

Ranked 13th out of 16 team in PA at 102ppg http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=pts&league=nba&season=2008&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 12th out 16 teams in FG% allowed at practically 47% http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=fg%&league=nba&season=2008&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 7th out of 16 teams in 3pt% allowed at 37% http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=3p%&league=nba&season=2008&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=true&split=999

Ranked 5th out of 16 teams in Rebounds allowed http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&sort=totreb&league=nba&season=2008&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=true&split=999


2006-2007

Ranked 11th out 16 teams in PA at 99ppg(not bad but still 11th) http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=pts&league=nba&season=2007&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 10th out of 16 teams in FG% allowed at 45% (not bad but still 10th) http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=fg%&league=nba&season=2007&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 7th out of 16 teams in 3pt% allowed (not bad middle of the pack a safe spot) http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=3p%&league=nba&season=2007&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 13th out of 16 teams in Rebounds allowed http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&sort=totreb&league=nba&season=2007&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999


2006-2006

Ranked 13th out of 16 teams in PA at a whopping 106ppg http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=pts&league=nba&season=2006&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 13th out of 16 teams in FG% allowed at 47% http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=fg%&league=nba&season=2006&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 4rth out of 16 teams in 3pt% allowed(very good and shocking) http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=3p%&league=nba&season=2006&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 16th out of 16 teams in Rebounds allowed(HORRIFUL) http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&sort=totreb&league=nba&season=2006&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999


2004-2005

Ranked 14th out of 16 teams in PA at a staggering 108ppg http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=pts&league=nba&season=2005&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 12th out of 16 teams in FG% allowed at practically 47% http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=fg%&league=nba&season=2005&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 9th out of 16 teams in 3pt% allowed at 37%( mediocre and 37% is not good) http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&sort=3p%&league=nba&season=2005&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999

Ranked 12th out 16 teams in Rebounds allowed http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&sort=totreb=nba&season=2005&seasontype=3&avg=pg&order=false&split=999



Basically what we have is a coach who never made any defensive adjustments in the most important defensive statistical categories that heavily factor into a teams post-season success. Not to mention they had negative +/- in a few of these categories. But when a coach's philosophy is this...

"Most coaches believe defenses are more vulnerable late in the shot clock, that you can get them out of position with a lot of passing," he said. "I don't know why defenses wouldn't be more vulnerable before they set up. That's why we play fast.

"People say that when you play fast you'll be a high-turnover team. I think you'll be a low-turnover tam because you don't throw as many passes."


What do you expect?



[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-20-2008 3:59 PM]


So basically D'Antoni got better defensivly. he went from 108 to 106 to 99 to 102 in ppg.
He went for 9th in 3pt% allowed his first season to 4th then up to 7th.
He went from 12th to 16th to 5th in rebounds allowed last season.

In 2005-2006 Amare played 3 games. There lineup was Nash, House, Bell, Barbosa, Tim Thomas, James Jones, Marion, Diaw & Kurt Thomas.

If you were replace Amare with Duncan, Garnett or Howard then D'Antoni's defense would look pretty damn good.

or even swap Nash & Amare in 2004 with Kidd(won38games) & Garnett(won22games) and we wouldn't be having this discussion.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/21/2008  3:20 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

They go hand and hand. You need superstar and a team that can get critical stops. But you must be able to get stops when you need it. Spurs,Heat,Lakers have all been able to get critical stops when they needed it. While Wade-Shaq, Parker-Ginobli-Duncan, Kobe-Shaq where able to put up big pts.

When Suns traded Joe Johnson they went after Raja Bell & took back Boris Diaw both were role playing defenders. They also signed or traded for Steven Hunter who is a rebounder shot blocker specialist. Also signed Marcus Banks who is a defensive specialist at the PG position behind Nash. The suns definatly tried to add some defensive role players to the team.

The problem is they had nobody that could own the glass like a Duncan or Shaq & even Wallace in Detroit could down the stretch of games. And they had nobody that would be the defensive presence in the paint they needed in critical times the way that Shaq & Duncan could & Wallace did. If Amare was cappable of doing so then they probably would have gotten some championships and Amare would be known as that elite championship superstar but his inability to do so is what holds him back from being that. That and the fact that he can't run an offense through the post, but Nash more then made up for that.

You say they had a rebounder/shot blocking specialist in Hunter but then you say that they never had a defensive presence in the paint or someone who could get that key rebound down the stretch. So D'Antoni had players who could do these things but never used them properly. Plus he never demanded more out of Amare to be that guy. Either way, that's a failing of the head coach.

Whos to say that he didn't demand more out of Amare but Amare didn't get it done defensively. Whats he going to do bench him for Diaw & Hunter down the stretch of games?

Hunter was a specialist because thats all he could do, not because he was a superstar at it. The point was they did try and add defensive guys to the roster. It doesn't mean that its going to work out as expected.

Should D'Antoni have benched Steve Nash in favor of Marcus Banks down the stretch of games as well? Maybe he should have closed games with Banks,Bell,Marion,Diaw,Hunter.

If that's what he has to do to prove his point, then yes, absolutely bench him.

What's the point of adding guys if you don't use them? So D'Antonio the GM wanted these players but D'Antonio the coach refused to play them?? He sabotaged himself?

There is nothing to suggest that D'Antonio stressed defense with his Suns teams.

Adding a player doesn't automatically mean that they are going to workout or be what you expected or hoped they would be. Steven hunter played one yr for them played 76games averaged 13mins per game providing 3rebs & 1.3blks. He didn't do enough to warrant taking over for Amare down the stretch of critical games if Amare wasn't getting it down defensively. But the fact that they made a move to go after a guy like hunter with NO offensive skill who was strictly a defensive player shows you that D'Antoni did think about defense and he did try to add players who played defense.

Hunter played on yr for them and then was replace by Kurt Thomas who was known for defensive rebounding, post defense and 15-18ft jumpshots. KT played 56games(got injuried) and played 26mins a game providing 7.8rebs & 1blk per game.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
It's the teams that play Great Defense that always win the titles

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy