[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Vince Carter rumor
Author Thread
iyamwutiam
Posts: 20294
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 1/15/2008
Member: #1806
USA
2/20/2008  11:01 AM
Posted by McK1:

if isiah can move Curry and Q as filler and get back Carter its a win.

Carter's "problem" is he isn't selfish like you'd want your starplayer to be.

thats a problem on NJ where the only other guys who could make a shot were RJ and an injured Krstic.

won't be a problem here. its not a quick fix. you're adding a guy who you can actually run an offense thru. And unlike Crawful's 20 ppg it isn't strictly thru calling his own number and hitting lucky shots. you actually have to game plan for Vince and send a double his way.

I would agree with this - if Crawford + James + Jones could be moved for VC then fine. However- I don't thik it benfits the Knicks to move Curry and add more salary with VC while facilitating expiring's for NJ. I can see us moving some long term conta=racts like Craw + James/Jeffries for VC though. Crawford does hurt the team with his abysmal shooting percentage and his inability to drive into the lane. In fact other than Robinson - we have no player -who can drive the ball into the paint and facilitate a kick to an open shooter.

I know people would disagree about 'keeping' Curry - however - from what I see- he is on an extremely short leash these days. I saw a few things last nite- :
1. He jumped more in 15 minutes then I have ever seen him jump during an entire game- he had quite a few tip outs that turned out to be rebounds for the Knicks. In other words- he is learning he has to have more energy and is trying to infuse it into hi game.
2. He was humiliated by Brendan Haywood in the paint for scores - and prompty never saw playing time since then. This is a good thing - as the message is unmistakable - you can no longer just be an offensive option (as Randolph can take some of the slack in that)- so you better learn that when you are put in the game - you need to play D and rebound. If he can be motivated -like against Chicago- he would be a very useful (thogh overpaid) bench player or a necessary piece against certain teams that prefer half-court sets -i.e San Antonio/Detroit.
3. Also if Curry can learn to have patience in the post - it would really be the key to the Knicks success. I noticed that he almost always thros up a hurried shot- and does not force the arrival of te double team and then find the open man - as they did earlier in the 3 game win streak- but if he can do this - it really helps the team.

Crawford has had his chance - and I think that VC would definitely be an upgrade.
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/20/2008  11:07 AM
Posted by McK1:
Posted by nixluva:

THINK PORTLAND! THINK NEW ORLEANS! PG and Athletic shotblocking/rebounding Center!

Portland has a point guard?

as for NO: alomg with that great point guard is a great all-around power-forward and a swing in Peja who could hit 100 plus 3's shooting a beachball who both KNOW HOW TO PLAY. Chandler - as a shot-blocker, he is average. but he is hell on the boards and kudos to him for learning how to catch and make a basket-ball move in one motion.

It's not about Portland having a PG or not! It's about the Knicks looking to make the same kinds of smart moves that these other up and coming teams have. Adding a stud with winning qualities is actually more to the point. Someone with fire in his gut and a will to win that spreads to his teammates like Roy or Paul. We can't fix everything but we can get a big boost with the right moves. I can see a couple of players in this draft that can really help this team. PG and C in particular. Of course we still need to address other positions, but the players we already have would be even better with improvements at PG and C. I can imagine how adding a great defensive C could help to change the identity of this team. So to me we need picks more than we need a player like Vince.

At this point in his career Vince is a floater. He can at times raise his game and take over, but most of the time he just floats in games, cuz he can't push it for 48 night in and night out anymore. I don't want anymore hobbled players. How about a young dynamic player to secure our future?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/20/2008  11:09 AM
Posted by nixluva:

It's not about Portland having a PG or not! It's about the Knicks looking to make the same kinds of smart moves that these other up and coming teams have. Adding a stud with winning qualities is actually more to the point. Someone with fire in his gut and a will to win that spreads to his teammates like Roy or Paul. We can't fix everything but we can get a big boost with the right moves. I can see a couple of players in this draft that can really help this team. PG and C in particular. Of course we still need to address other positions, but the players we already have would be even better with improvements at PG and C. I can imagine how adding a great defensive C could help to change the identity of this team. So to me we need picks more than we need a player like Vince.

At this point in his career Vince is a floater. He can at times raise his game and take over, but most of the time he just floats in games, cuz he can't push it for 48 night in and night out anymore. I don't want anymore hobbled players. How about a young dynamic player to secure our future?

It's nice to finally say.. I agree with you Nix. 100%
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/20/2008  11:10 AM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:

The idea of getting Carter is intriguing, but to me it has to be preceded or followed by about 3 or 4 other trades.

The first is getting Ben Wallace from Chicago (Ford said there is a standing offer of Malik and Q-which Chicago doesn't want).

The second is trading for Mike Miller and Kyle Lowery(Crawford and Fred Jones?)

The Third is getting Zach Randolph out of here and opening up the PF spot for David Lee(Randolph to Denver for Najera, Smith(Both FA's at end of year), and Hunter).

Wallace
Lee
Carter
Miller
Lowry


What's that team going to do other than lose games?


Again...for the love of god people need to stop thinking this team is fixable.

Tear it entirely down. Then start adding pieces to a mix of kids and draft picks a few years from now.

Stop taking other people's garbage.


This trade should read Curry and Crawful for JWill and Davis. That's what this trade should be and nothing less.

Of course Isiah wants OKneel and Wince. I'm not surprised. I'm also not surprised that Isiah and his few remaining supporters think such trades are a ticket to success.

I don't know how much more I can take of this crap......I already can't stand more than half the players on this team and that's sad.

I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!
~You can't run from who you are.~
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/20/2008  11:17 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by nixluva:

It's not about Portland having a PG or not! It's about the Knicks looking to make the same kinds of smart moves that these other up and coming teams have. Adding a stud with winning qualities is actually more to the point. Someone with fire in his gut and a will to win that spreads to his teammates like Roy or Paul. We can't fix everything but we can get a big boost with the right moves. I can see a couple of players in this draft that can really help this team. PG and C in particular. Of course we still need to address other positions, but the players we already have would be even better with improvements at PG and C. I can imagine how adding a great defensive C could help to change the identity of this team. So to me we need picks more than we need a player like Vince.

At this point in his career Vince is a floater. He can at times raise his game and take over, but most of the time he just floats in games, cuz he can't push it for 48 night in and night out anymore. I don't want anymore hobbled players. How about a young dynamic player to secure our future?

It's nice to finally say.. I agree with you Nix. 100%

I agree with you also nix.

But, how do you propose we get the young, dynamic player, though? I always air on the side of caution. I would prefer trade as opposed to draft. Draft is too big of a question mark, just the way I feel. Plus I don't trust this group to make the correct pick.

Trust me my first choice is to trade for a dynamic player (I would've traded Frye and Curry for Amare before he even stepped on the court after that double micro fracture surgery 2 years ago). We aren't going to do that. The closest we can probably come to a young impact player-with the pieces we have minus the draft pick- is Artest and he is 29!
~You can't run from who you are.~
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/20/2008  11:20 AM
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.


http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

2/20/2008  11:28 AM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.



Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/20/2008  11:31 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by nixluva:

It's not about Portland having a PG or not! It's about the Knicks looking to make the same kinds of smart moves that these other up and coming teams have. Adding a stud with winning qualities is actually more to the point. Someone with fire in his gut and a will to win that spreads to his teammates like Roy or Paul. We can't fix everything but we can get a big boost with the right moves. I can see a couple of players in this draft that can really help this team. PG and C in particular. Of course we still need to address other positions, but the players we already have would be even better with improvements at PG and C. I can imagine how adding a great defensive C could help to change the identity of this team. So to me we need picks more than we need a player like Vince.

At this point in his career Vince is a floater. He can at times raise his game and take over, but most of the time he just floats in games, cuz he can't push it for 48 night in and night out anymore. I don't want anymore hobbled players. How about a young dynamic player to secure our future?

It's nice to finally say.. I agree with you Nix. 100%

I agree with you also nix.

But, how do you propose we get the young, dynamic player, though? I always air on the side of caution. I would prefer trade as opposed to draft. Draft is too big of a question mark, just the way I feel. Plus I don't trust this group to make the correct pick.

Trust me my first choice is to trade for a dynamic player (I would've traded Frye and Curry for Amare before he even stepped on the court after that double micro fracture surgery 2 years ago). We aren't going to do that. The closest we can probably come to a young impact player-with the pieces we have minus the draft pick- is Artest and he is 29!

You're actually making my point for me. There's no one in the league that we can add who will give us what we need. We have to DRAFT our own franchise player. It would also be a good thing to make deals that bring in another pick or 2 and so we can fill some other spots. Why not go young all the way? There's no other option at this point. We can sign vets to fix this team. We've tried that and it hasn't worked.

Now we actually have a good deal of young players so going with the draft a bit more makes sense to me. Look at this team and you see that all that happens when we trade for players from other teams is that we end up with guys like Zach, Q, Curry etc. I don't hate those guys, but let's face it, they haven't gotten it done. We've given away lotto picks and this time we actually have our own pick at a time when the team can take advantage of it.

We'll have a chance at a Beasley, Rose, Lopez, Bayless, Gordon, Jordan, Greene, Batum, Mayo or Thabeet. I think some of those guys have a chance to be studs in this league, don't you?
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/20/2008  11:40 AM
Posted by TrueBlue:




Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?

I think what some fail to understand is you cannot trade players who are stinking it up on a terrible team - for players who are at an all-star level on a winning team.

That is not how trading works in the NBA for the most part (there are exceptions but rare).

So if people believe that they can recycle Curry, Crawful, Zachass, QBrick, TruckBury, Malik, etc - INTO (lets just say for the emphasis on the point at hand) Shaq, Duncan, KG, Allen, Kidd. That's where the fault is in their logic.

In that, in order to improve, you must just flat out dump the bad players and create flexibility to acquire good players.

There is no other way with this team. None. The dream is over. The Kool-Aid should have run dry in December of 06 when it was apparent the team was never going to achieve success. We are a turd. Throwing salt on a turd....leaves you with a turd. Isiah keeps adding salt like he's going to turn that turd into a gourmet meal. Instead, the turd absorbs the salt, and remains a turd.


http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

2/20/2008  11:47 AM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by TrueBlue:




Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?

I think what some fail to understand is you cannot trade players who are stinking it up on a terrible team - for players who are at an all-star level on a winning team.

That is not how trading works in the NBA for the most part (there are exceptions but rare).

So if people believe that they can recycle Curry, Crawful, Zachass, QBrick, TruckBury, Malik, etc - INTO (lets just say for the emphasis on the point at hand) Shaq, Duncan, KG, Allen, Kidd. That's where the fault is in their logic.

In that, in order to improve, you must just flat out dump the bad players and create flexibility to acquire good players.

There is no other way with this team. None. The dream is over. The Kool-Aid should have run dry in December of 06 when it was apparent the team was never going to achieve success. We are a turd. Throwing salt on a turd....leaves you with a turd. Isiah keeps adding salt like he's going to turn that turd into a gourmet meal. Instead, the turd absorbs the salt, and remains a turd.


Carter is a BUM he's not even in those guys category and I get your drift when comparing a Curry/Carter swap. That's why rest assured we're giving up something else such as a pick(with mild Protection Top 5). We'd end up with probably the 8th or 9th worst record in the league. Lose the Lottery and hand over such pick to New Jersey while giving them cap sapce. The Dallas/Kidd trade should tell us all we need to know what Kiki and Thorn would try to achieve or what they would want.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/20/2008  11:54 AM
Posted by TrueBlue:




Carter is a BUM he's not even in those guys category and I get your drift when comparing a Curry/Carter swap. That's why rest assured we're giving up something else such as a pick(with mild Protection Top 5). We'd end up with probably the 8th or 9th worst record in the league. Lose the Lottery and hand over such pick to New Jersey while giving them cap sapce. The Dallas/Kidd trade should tell us all we need to know what Kiki and Thorn would try to achieve or what they would want.

Yep...and 27 hours and counting. Plenty of time for Isiah to **** us for years to come.

Even if it goes quietly.....there is still the dreaded draft day deal he'd be looking to make. Gilbert Arenass anyone?

Isiah would be in heaven, tell us Gilbert is better than anyone in the 08 draft, and we'd have to watch Crawful and Arenass jack up 50 shots a night.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/20/2008  11:55 AM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.

I understand where you are coming from. But I do think that this is some thing that does benefit us. Not ideal, but we aren't going to get ideal. Vince upgrades our talent level. Is he more expensive than Curry? Sure, but he is actually more dependable. Getting rid of Curry opens up a spot for Lee(moving Zach to C). I still think we need a wing player though(seriously, we can go to Seattle and get Damien Wilkins(a great defender-Bruce Bowen Type) or Wally(a lights out shooter) cheap enough to fill the holes.

I also feel our youth is really nothing "special". Maybe some solid players(I don't know about Chandler).

BTW, I am on the same page with you on O'Neal.
~You can't run from who you are.~
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/20/2008  11:57 AM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.



Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?

Who are you calling stupid? Stop being a condescending prick.
~You can't run from who you are.~
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/20/2008  12:01 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by nixluva:

It's not about Portland having a PG or not! It's about the Knicks looking to make the same kinds of smart moves that these other up and coming teams have. Adding a stud with winning qualities is actually more to the point. Someone with fire in his gut and a will to win that spreads to his teammates like Roy or Paul. We can't fix everything but we can get a big boost with the right moves. I can see a couple of players in this draft that can really help this team. PG and C in particular. Of course we still need to address other positions, but the players we already have would be even better with improvements at PG and C. I can imagine how adding a great defensive C could help to change the identity of this team. So to me we need picks more than we need a player like Vince.

At this point in his career Vince is a floater. He can at times raise his game and take over, but most of the time he just floats in games, cuz he can't push it for 48 night in and night out anymore. I don't want anymore hobbled players. How about a young dynamic player to secure our future?

It's nice to finally say.. I agree with you Nix. 100%

I agree with you also nix.

But, how do you propose we get the young, dynamic player, though? I always air on the side of caution. I would prefer trade as opposed to draft. Draft is too big of a question mark, just the way I feel. Plus I don't trust this group to make the correct pick.

Trust me my first choice is to trade for a dynamic player (I would've traded Frye and Curry for Amare before he even stepped on the court after that double micro fracture surgery 2 years ago). We aren't going to do that. The closest we can probably come to a young impact player-with the pieces we have minus the draft pick- is Artest and he is 29!

You're actually making my point for me. There's no one in the league that we can add who will give us what we need. We have to DRAFT our own franchise player. It would also be a good thing to make deals that bring in another pick or 2 and so we can fill some other spots. Why not go young all the way? There's no other option at this point. We can sign vets to fix this team. We've tried that and it hasn't worked.

Now we actually have a good deal of young players so going with the draft a bit more makes sense to me. Look at this team and you see that all that happens when we trade for players from other teams is that we end up with guys like Zach, Q, Curry etc. I don't hate those guys, but let's face it, they haven't gotten it done. We've given away lotto picks and this time we actually have our own pick at a time when the team can take advantage of it.

We'll have a chance at a Beasley, Rose, Lopez, Bayless, Gordon, Jordan, Greene, Batum, Mayo or Thabeet. I think some of those guys have a chance to be studs in this league, don't you?

Right now there are about 9 teams within 4 games of us. We could end up with the 9th pick. If you tell me we were guaranteed a top 3 pick if we tank, I'm all for salary dumps. I'm all for having a back up plan. This draft is fairly deep. If you can get an extra pick in this draft, go for it. But I can't bring myself to bank on getting a good draft pick. I'd rather let the draft settle and then trade for a top pick than roll the dice on having a chance at one.
~You can't run from who you are.~
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

2/20/2008  12:12 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.



Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?

Who are you calling stupid? Stop being a condescending prick.


I'm responding to Cosmic's post. I'm painting a broad stroke so-to-speak, although with a lot of truth mixed in the paint but didn't isolate you in the stroke.

Stop being so sensitive.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

2/20/2008  12:49 PM
Trueblue aka "The condesending prick"......

Lets make it stick!!!!
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/20/2008  12:52 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.



Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?

Who are you calling stupid? Stop being a condescending prick.


I'm responding to Cosmic's post. I'm painting a broad stroke so-to-speak, although with a lot of truth mixed in the paint but didn't isolate you in the stroke.

Stop being so sensitive.

I'll take you at your word, just take care. When you call people stupid especially when responding to someone's post. You responded to a post that included mine. Be more careful.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Klytus
Posts: 20276
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2007
Member: #1743

2/20/2008  12:55 PM
I will say it - anyone who supports this trade is STUPID.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
2/20/2008  12:55 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.



Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?

Who are you calling stupid? Stop being a condescending prick.


I'm responding to Cosmic's post. I'm painting a broad stroke so-to-speak, although with a lot of truth mixed in the paint but didn't isolate you in the stroke.

Stop being so sensitive.

I'll take you at your word, just take care. When you call people stupid especially when responding to someone's post. You responded to a post that included mine. Be more careful.

Generally I use "on drugs" or "drunk" to describe posters rather than saying stupid, because that's less offensive than insulting their intelligence. TrueBlue could learn something from me.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/20/2008  1:06 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by joec32033:




I'd be happy dumping contracts too. BUT, you have to look at what we have and where we are going. Not only is Isiah trying to surround himself with his players (Vince was an Isiah guy, right?) just building this team is a challenge. This team is not bad enough to get the #1 pick, and Isiah won't have it on his "record" that after all his moves he has a #1 pick to show for it. IMO, I think this team has no choice to be built but like the Pistons were. 2nd level talent that meshes well and clicks. I nor anyone else, is claiming that Vince is a savior. But he is a quality player, probably would be our 2nd best(Randolph may be our best, believe it or not) player. Vince is a great second option with a good midrange game. He also is big and strong and is at least an average defender.

Personally, I have a feeling that there is a real possibility we end up with BOTH O'Neal and Carter. Just Isiah surrounding himself with his own guys that will support him.

Now if we are going to trade for Vince we have to understand we are going to be switching plans again. BUT by doing this we are eliminating a lot of the clutter and upgrading our talent.

Now you refer to this as a "quick fix". I see it as no such thing. I said in the first line of my post, that getting Vince would only make sense to me if followed by a few OTHER moves. I am talking about clearing about half the team!


Do you believe that trading for Vince is a first step in a 3 or 4 step process to turn the roster over for the third time in 4+ years? Do you really trust Isiah Thomas to handle that task?

Personally, I don't. I doubt Vince helps us do anything more than we are doing right now. He has a penchant for playing strong for a while and then giving up. I doubt we'd be any different.

Also, Vince doesn't mix well with our core, because our core is so rotten right now. Vince won't lift the core up - the core will drag Vince down with them.

He's also of the mold of so many of our rotten core. He's a chucker. He is a terrible defender. He's me-first. He's soft. He's mentally soft. He's not a leader.

Jermaine ONeal: Just far too injury prone to ever trust. Besides, since the Palace Brawl, JO has been a nobody.

That's why I call these quick fixes because the thought is that the incoming player is the missing piece, the final piece, or a piece that can lead our team and get them all in line and playing up to their abilities.

The opposite has always happened in four years of Isiah's management and any prospective future deal will certainly follow that history.


So, despite knowing Isiah is going no where and would not seek to do what I want, I will continue to maintain the best way to do things is:

Fire Isiah.

Buy out Jerome, Marbury, Malik. Waive Jones.

Trade Curry and Crawford (and lee or balkman, etc, if you have to) for JWill and Davis.

Try to trade Zach for say Ratliff or something that ends in 09 or 10.

While those contracts are coming off the books you develop the young kids. You develop your draft picks.

By June 2010 we can add a top notch FA to our young feisty team of up-commers.




Isiah's plan? June 2010, we will still stink, we will be strapped with brand new contracts, and have no hope in sight.



Our fans are so stuck on stupid they want to throw the 5th pick or better out the window and add 10+mil more in cap 2010 for Vince Carter and hope we make the playoffs.

And let's not create trade scenarios that aren't rumored yet. We're talking giving Curry up for Carter and that's an absolute No No! Do fans realize the better we make Jersey's situation the better chance they have at landing Lebron in the future?

Who are you calling stupid? Stop being a condescending prick.


I'm responding to Cosmic's post. I'm painting a broad stroke so-to-speak, although with a lot of truth mixed in the paint but didn't isolate you in the stroke.

Stop being so sensitive.

I'll take you at your word, just take care. When you call people stupid especially when responding to someone's post. You responded to a post that included mine. Be more careful.

Generally I use "on drugs" or "drunk" to describe posters rather than saying stupid, because that's less offensive than insulting their intelligence. TrueBlue could learn something from me.

Now that you let the cat out of the bag, I am going back to find every time you thought I was drunk.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Vince Carter rumor

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy