Posted by Bonn1997:
Then word got out that Marbury lost his father Don during the game, but wasn't told about it until afterward because the Knicks didn't want the word getting to other family members second-hand, particularly on the 11 o'clock news.
That doesn't make sense. They could have told Steph and allowed Steph and the doctors to decide when/how to tell the rest of the family. It sounds more like poor post-hoc reasoning to justify their actions
I agree. It does not. If that's the reasoning it's not even a valid thought because family members would have been calling each other with the news well before the 11 O'clock news.
However, unless the family requested that MSG not tell Steph (which I would find very hard to believe or understand), the only reasoning I can come up with is MSG did not want a public display - disruption of the game - whathaveyou stemming from the news.
I don't know if we're ever going to get the exact full story but the chain of events is becoming painfully clear now.
*Father suffers heart attack at half time, gets escorted to an ambulance, gets rushed to the hospital, dies either en route or at the hospital.
*2nd half resumes, steph is not informed.
*game ends, steph is informed, throws a tirade in the lockerroom, gets escorted to a car, gets to the hospital.
*(potentially) Family member calls WFAN and blasts the Knicks for not informing Steph and other family members immediately.
IDK - again, who really knows what's fact and what's speculated. I just know that something wasn't handled properly and it's leaving a pretty nasty feeling in my stomach.