What you're saying about changing the league's image vs. what was said earlier about it being a racist decision are vastly different, IMHO. The league changing its image after many embarassing incidents, not the least of which was the Artest brawl in the stands... is reasonable. It's not targetted at any specific racial group, however.
I guess it just boils down to us having a different history and different perspectives. We just interpret things differently when viewing things through racial prisms.
I dont think the dress code was overt racism, but it was certainly latent. The dress code had nothing to do with the incident in question, which, btw, was instigated by a fan who attacked a player who was and still is considered to be one of the more mentally imbalanced players in sports.
Stern, to me, was saying "look white America, I can scrub and clean up these negroes and keep them in check, by limiting the expression of their culture." Lets take back their rights, like the NFL which doesnt allow players to wear doo-rags...who do you think thats targeting? What does wearing a suit to a b-ball game accomplish? Do you wear a suit to watch b-ball? How did it solve fan vs. player violence?
As other posters have already noted, the NBA exploited the hell out of hip hop when there was money to be found in it...the minute something goes wrong, and its like they say: 'everybody wants to be black until the cops show up'. Instead of defending his players, I felt Stern bowed to racist sentiment.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets.
--Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia