I just saw this post now...better late than never.

Yes, I agree totally. When Crawford went down, I could not believe how everyone reacted. You would have thought we just lost Kobe. I mean, c'mon...Crawford has talent, obviously, but he kills us time and again with his moronic decisions, and is so ridiculously inconsistent. Simply put, he does not seem like the kind of player a winning team would want.

And as far as him being our second-leading scorer...Half the posters on this forum could average 17 ppg if they took as many shots as Crawford.

Someone in this thread was wondering if we could get a low first-rounder for him. First of all, not likely Isiah would trade away Crawford, but yes, I do think we could get a low first-rounder for him.

I would love for us to somehow get a solid shooter this offseason and get something in return for Crawford.

I think its quite obvious, that the best thing that ever happend to this team, is the coach got a lucky break when jamal went down, he helps you lose half of your games every year and what he does is just not that important, however isiah will never move him and its been a mistake since he has been here, you think its by accident we won 33games 23games whatever we would have won this season.

Crawford has never been on a good team and you don't win with players like him, thats why its important when you have a player like balkman out there or someone else that doesn't kill the offense and the defense every game.....

actually if you like him you like losing its that simple, hopefully francis keeps it up and a gm decides to bite.....

Fact of the matter is that we are a much better team without him

and we are 4-1 if dlee plays in the sonics game and much more competitive against the celts, so you never know