[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Is Curry lost without Jamal or is he just having bad games?
Author Thread
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
3/8/2007  9:28 PM
Posted by BigC:

I don't know but this team has to find a way to get Curry the ball. It seems like without Jamal the rest of the team is having trouble feeding the ball in the post. Not only that, but it looks like Curry has to work harder to get a shot off.

Is Curry going through a slump or is it because Jamal is not on the court with him?

[Edited by - BigC on 03-07-2007 12:30 AM]

It's a good point. Curry does' seem to excel more with Crawford out there. Let's not forget also, Lee's good rebounding opens it up for Curry also. Looks like Curry can't do it all. He can score more with Crawford out there and doesn't have to be the dominating rebounder with Lee out there, but if he could only block a few more and play some D, then that would get him closer to being a more complete player.
I'll never trust this' team again.
AUTOADVERT
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/9/2007  8:43 AM
4949 - even Patrick needed Oakley

Wilt needed Luke Jackson

Kareem needed Worthy

Eddy Curry needs help
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/9/2007  8:48 AM
>>You can point to Eddy Curry's recent struggles against double-teams as a product of Lee's absence, because teams are sending two big men at Curry now that they don't have to be concerned with boxing out Lee. But that would suggest that teams aren't respecting Channing Frye, who has turned into a solid long-range shooter, or Rose, who knows how to rebound and pass as well as hit a mid-range jumper.

Rose says the double-teaming is something Curry needs to adjust to, especially if it frees up someone in the frontcourt to cut to the basket.

"Eddy will get better at it," Rose said.
once a knick always a knick
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/9/2007  11:33 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bippity10:

Anyone else see the importance of a PG that can run the offense and get the ball to the big man. Maybe a young PG that can grow with Eddie and learn his habits over the next few years and learn the best ways and times to get him involved? Sounds like a good idea to me. It is imperative that we start focusing on finding a PG that can grow with Eddie. Some saw it months ago and some will see it as time passes by. Kind of like when we needed a consistent jumpshooter for Pat.

No doubt that Eddie will rebound(meaning bounce back, because we know he doesn't rebound) once Nate and DAvid are back. David will punish teams that double off him by hitting the offensive boards. And Nate gives us another outside shooter to open up the floor. Yet another obvious thing we need to target next year.
I agree a better PG will help but I think the biggest problem is that teams know it's a free turnover if they double Eddy because he can't pass out of the double team. And in those occasions when he can pass out of the double team, we don't have enough versatile scorers to make the opponent pay for it. (And we don't have many draft picks or trade assets to get those players.) Also, I think no matter how good a passer your PG is, if the other team is collapsing on a player, you really can't get the ball to him. You need a supporting cast that punishes them for collapsing.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 03-07-2007 12:55 PM]

That's why you need a PG that understands the flow of the offense. Understands how the defense is playing his team. And understands how to get guys involved in the game at the right spots so they don't become turnovers. Playing PG is more than just passing the ball it's running an offense. It's a PG that will not miss opportunities to get the ball to Eddie on those rare occassions where he is able to get great position without a double team and can go into his shot before it arrives.

Now we are left praying that Marbs/Stevie can take over the game because we have nooone that understands how to get Eddie the ball while he is being focused upon. We have no shooters to make teams pay for double teaming in the backcourt.. Without Lee we have no one that can dominate the offensive boards to make teams pay for double teaming in the frontcourt. Not having compliments to your star player is the difference between being a good team with a chance to win a round or two in the playoffs, and a team wondering why they keep losing games they shouldn't.
I just hope that people will like me
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/9/2007  12:59 PM
bippity - outstanding piece of writing

If there were ever a stretch where Isiah Thomas will have to push all the available buttons to get the new shift lines to understand what is expected, this is it.

It is more than simply making free throws, although that would certainly reduce some of the late-game pressure to be perfect... the issues that you clearly define have to do with ball movement and sharing the scoring load.

Befoe Lee was injured there were five or six players in double figures. The assist totals were improving. Losing Quentin hurts because of the rebounding he brings, as well as his toughness.

Frye MUST be force fed the ball. Shoot until he drops or his shot drops. I would like to see him at center, just to provied a diversion from Curry's post-up game.

I miss Rick Brunson
once a knick always a knick
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
3/9/2007  2:32 PM
Posted by misterearl:



If there were ever a stretch where Isiah Thomas will have to push all the available buttons to get the new shift lines to understand what is expected, this is it.


Yes, these would the "make-or-break" games.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/9/2007  3:56 PM
Make it, break it

Code - 20 games to go. 12 more wins to reach 40.

Dancing Harry puts a hex on the Nets.

once a knick always a knick
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
3/9/2007  4:01 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Make it, break it

Code - 20 games to go. 12 more wins to reach 40.

Dancing Harry puts a hex on the Nets.

so we can only afford 8 more non-make-or-break games
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/9/2007  5:10 PM
Masterplan - They're ALL "make or break" games.

You break it, you own it
once a knick always a knick
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
3/9/2007  5:12 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Make it, break it

Code - 20 games to go. 12 more wins to reach 40.

Dancing Harry puts a hex on the Nets.

What's this fascination with 40? Even at 40 -- the Knicks would still have lost more than they won...
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
3/9/2007  5:23 PM
its that with out Craw or Nate there is always someone on the floor that can't shoot and his man is doubling down on Curry.

Collins - no outside shot
Balkman - no outside shot
Francis - bad enough to let him shoot
Jeff - no outside shot
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Is Curry lost without Jamal or is he just having bad games?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy