[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

No David Lee.... Curry With 4 Reb
Author Thread
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

2/27/2007  9:59 AM
Posted by NYKBocker:

What's the hubub bub?
CAREER AVERAGES

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 NYK 57 57 34.6 .593 .000 .619 2.5 4.6 7.1 0.8 0.4 0.5 3.40 3.40 19.6
Career 418 328 25.2 .546 1.000 .650 1.8 3.5 5.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 2.20 3.10 13.2

Eddy has show dramatic improvements this year.
He is +1.7 in total rpg from his career ave.
He is +1.1 in total def rpg from his career ave.
He is +0.7 in total off rpg from his career ave.
He is +6.4 in total ppg from his career ave.
He has a career high in FG% despite being the focal point of opposing defenses.

If you look at his numbers I don't think you can call him lazy. One thing that I have noticed about Eddy is just that he does not have the nose for the ball. Defensively or rebounding wise. Unfortunately, this is something you can't teach. Either you are an average rebounder or a great rebounder. As for blocking shots, I think he developed some bad habits in the past when he was continually in foul trouble early in the game. From there he just did not want to pick up anymore fouls hence he does not go after shots like. Also, he is just not built for blocking shots. He is in the mold of a Moses Malone(career 1.3 BPG), Willis Reed(career 1.1 BPG)...just a center with girth. Not the long skinnier type like Chamberlain, Russell, Motumbo, Ewing. Shaq is a diff monster all together.

I think people confuse his facial expressions to laziness. I see him trying to go for boards...he just goes to the wrong spot.

Eddy has shown significant improvement from years past.

very good points here.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
AUTOADVERT
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
2/27/2007  10:01 AM
Posted by TMS:

Eddie's also hitting his shots at an 80%+ clip over the last several weeks... that's sorta another reason why he's on the court.

That's nice, but in the past he was pulled because of stamina issues and foul problems. Eddy fixed those issues by not expending energy on defense. Bravo to our star!
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

2/27/2007  10:06 AM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by holfresh:

Skiles has his good and has his bads...Let's say developing players isn't his thing...Maybe Curry was a lazy bum that didn't want to work hard and Skiles had enough of his sheit...How do you explain Tyson Chandler stepping up his game this year..

Chicago does enough to get to the playoffs..But they are really no threat..Maybe thats all it takes to make some happy..After all I'm the nitwit...


[Edited by - holfresh on 02-27-2007 01:09 AM]

[Edited by - holfresh on 02-27-2007 01:10 AM]


Uhhhhh No worst or better than ISAYUGH right?

On second thought let's say better in the case of Skiles.

We can see so much progress in Nate, Frye, Balkman, and Mardy this yr under ISAYUGH. ISAYUGH can only hang his hat on Lee and Curry meanwhile Skiles can hang his hat on Gordon, Deng, Nocioni, and even Kirk Hinrich who are all having their best seasons as a pro under his watch. But don't let FACTS get in the way of your NITWITTED AGENDAS.


Word of Advice...... think real hard and long before you type.


[Edited by - TrueBlue on 02-27-2007 08:47 AM]

Sugarray already called you out so you need to chill with the namecalling.....BTW, I guess Isiah doesn't get any credit for developing J O'neal, Artest who both blossomed under his watch, in addition to Curry and Lee.

"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/27/2007  10:18 AM
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by NYKBocker:

What's the hubub bub?
CAREER AVERAGES

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 NYK 57 57 34.6 .593 .000 .619 2.5 4.6 7.1 0.8 0.4 0.5 3.40 3.40 19.6
Career 418 328 25.2 .546 1.000 .650 1.8 3.5 5.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 2.20 3.10 13.2

Eddy has show dramatic improvements this year.
He is +1.7 in total rpg from his career ave.
He is +1.1 in total def rpg from his career ave.
He is +0.7 in total off rpg from his career ave.
He is +6.4 in total ppg from his career ave.
He has a career high in FG% despite being the focal point of opposing defenses.

If you look at his numbers I don't think you can call him lazy. One thing that I have noticed about Eddy is just that he does not have the nose for the ball. Defensively or rebounding wise. Unfortunately, this is something you can't teach. Either you are an average rebounder or a great rebounder. As for blocking shots, I think he developed some bad habits in the past when he was continually in foul trouble early in the game. From there he just did not want to pick up anymore fouls hence he does not go after shots like. Also, he is just not built for blocking shots. He is in the mold of a Moses Malone(career 1.3 BPG), Willis Reed(career 1.1 BPG)...just a center with girth. Not the long skinnier type like Chamberlain, Russell, Motumbo, Ewing. Shaq is a diff monster all together.

I think people confuse his facial expressions to laziness. I see him trying to go for boards...he just goes to the wrong spot.

Eddy has shown significant improvement from years past.

very good points here.

If Curry was to average between 1.1 and 1.3 blocks per game I would be ecstatic.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
2/27/2007  10:31 AM
a question- i've gotten the impression from watching games that most of eddy's blocks come early in games, usually the first quarter. this leads me to suspect that his shotblocking is a conditioning issue- when he moves his butt, gets in the right spot and jumps, he makes some defensive plays. i don't think he'd ever be a dominating, full game shotblocker- that's not the best use of his energy- but if its true, it reflects better on skills he has although not so good on his conditioning level.

right, the question- anyone know of a way i could check up on this, a stats site that does quarter-by-quarter breakdowns? i haven't found one, i'd think it would be an interesting split although mostly used to check 4th quarter performance.

[Edited by - Masterplan on 02-27-2007 10:31 AM]
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

2/27/2007  10:40 AM
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by holfresh:

Skiles has his good and has his bads...Let's say developing players isn't his thing...Maybe Curry was a lazy bum that didn't want to work hard and Skiles had enough of his sheit...How do you explain Tyson Chandler stepping up his game this year..

Chicago does enough to get to the playoffs..But they are really no threat..Maybe thats all it takes to make some happy..After all I'm the nitwit...


[Edited by - holfresh on 02-27-2007 01:09 AM]

[Edited by - holfresh on 02-27-2007 01:10 AM]


Uhhhhh No worst or better than ISAYUGH right?

On second thought let's say better in the case of Skiles.

We can see so much progress in Nate, Frye, Balkman, and Mardy this yr under ISAYUGH. ISAYUGH can only hang his hat on Lee and Curry meanwhile Skiles can hang his hat on Gordon, Deng, Nocioni, and even Kirk Hinrich who are all having their best seasons as a pro under his watch. But don't let FACTS get in the way of your NITWITTED AGENDAS.


Word of Advice...... think real hard and long before you type.


[Edited by - TrueBlue on 02-27-2007 08:47 AM]

Sugarray already called you out so you need to chill with the namecalling.....BTW, I guess Isiah doesn't get any credit for developing J O'neal, Artest who both blossomed under his watch, in addition to Curry and Lee.


I never said ISAYUGH hasn't been able to develop players. I'm refuting the notion that the reason Curry didn't develop under Skiles was because he can't develop young players/poor coaching. In comparison to ISAYUGH he's proven he's just as good thus far.


GET IT, GOT IT, GOOD!



Oh and I'd also like to address your summation of the Bulls and their recent playoff results. Let's see they have no post scoring, no All-Star, no superstar, no real imtimidator in the paint defensively until this yr, average depth, and a ton of inexperience yet they've been to the playoffs 2yrs in a row and pushed both of their opponents, one of them being the Champion Miami Heat to their limits. Meanwhile our team has post presence, depth, a HOF player at the helm, experience(previous playoffs included) Top notch rebounding, a ton of athleticism and has yet to sniff a winning season the past couple of seasons yet alone the playoffs but it's the Bulls who'll scare nobody?



[Edited by - TrueBlue on 02-27-2007 10:41 AM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
NYKBocker
Posts: 38583
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
2/27/2007  10:59 AM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by NYKBocker:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 NYK 57 57 34.6 .593 .000 .619 2.5 4.6 7.1 0.8 0.4 0.5 3.40 3.40 19.6
Career 418 328 25.2 .546 1.000 .650 1.8 3.5 5.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 2.20 3.10 13.2

Eddy has show dramatic improvements this year.
He is +1.7 in total rpg from his career ave.
He is +1.1 in total def rpg from his career ave.
He is +0.7 in total off rpg from his career ave.
He is +6.4 in total ppg from his career ave.
He has a career high in FG% despite being the focal point of opposing defenses.

You left off the decrease in blocks, Eddy fouling at a lower rate, and Eddy showing ZERO improvement in the other areas you failed to mention. Could it just be that Eddy success is due to being on the court more? Eddy is one the court more for two reasons: 1) He's not playing hard on defense, so he's fouling at a lower rate than in the past. 2) Eddy's not expending energy on defense, to preserve his energy on offense.

Aren't those the REAL reasons Eddy is showing improved "success" this season? Aren't those the same reasons he DIDN'T get selected to the all-star team?

Now, despite his numerous flaws, Eddy thinks he's a star. Do you really think he's going to work on improving the areas that get no recognition from Isiah Thomas? Why would he? He's already a star!!!!!


So I can basically ask you the same question...Do you really think he is not going to work on improving the areas that get no recognition from Isiah Thomas? So you can predict that he won't work at it?

You site decrease in blocks from .8 to .5. Is that really a big diff in your eyes? You attribute his increased numbers due to his increased playing time. Well, doesn't that show work ethic in that he is now able to play more minutes?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
2/27/2007  11:04 AM
Posted by NYKBocker:

So I can basically ask you the same question...Do you really think he is not going to work on improving the areas that get no recognition from Isiah Thomas? So you can predict that he won't work at it?

You site decrease in blocks from .8 to .5. Is that really a big diff in your eyes? You attribute his increased numbers due to his increased playing time. Well, doesn't that show work ethic in that he is now able to play more minutes?

He's getting more minutes and has less blocks. His blocking has dropped to 50% of what it was, which wasn't that great to start with. That's significant, yes. I don't see why he would continue to improve his game, since nobody on the team is willing to admit any flaw with any of Eddy's game, Marbury continues to say how great Eddy is, Isiah focuses on offense, and the fans continue to settle. And no, I don't attribute increased minutes to work ethic. I think he's getting force-fed the ball, which has never happened to him before, and I think he's conserving energy and fouls on defense, in many cases, to detriment of the team. I can't argue with his post game, but he's not TRYING on defense. You can only go so far when your goalie leaves an open net so he doesn't tire or foul out. Yes, it's a huge issue and not likely to improve.

[Edited by - Solace on Feb 27 2007 11:05 AM]
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38583
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
2/27/2007  11:25 AM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by NYKBocker:

So I can basically ask you the same question...Do you really think he is not going to work on improving the areas that get no recognition from Isiah Thomas? So you can predict that he won't work at it?

You site decrease in blocks from .8 to .5. Is that really a big diff in your eyes? You attribute his increased numbers due to his increased playing time. Well, doesn't that show work ethic in that he is now able to play more minutes?

He's getting more minutes and has less blocks. His blocking has dropped to 50% of what it was, which wasn't that great to start with. That's significant, yes. I don't see why he would continue to improve his game, since nobody on the team is willing to admit any flaw with any of Eddy's game, Marbury continues to say how great Eddy is, Isiah focuses on offense, and the fans continue to settle. And no, I don't attribute increased minutes to work ethic. I think he's getting force-fed the ball, which has never happened to him before, and I think he's conserving energy and fouls on defense, in many cases, to detriment of the team. I can't argue with his post game, but he's not TRYING on defense. You can only go so far when your goalie leaves an open net so he doesn't tire or foul out. Yes, it's a huge issue and not likely to improve.

[Edited by - Solace on Feb 27 2007 11:05 AM]


Well, this is one of those I choose to look at it half-full than half-empty and you choose the opposite. This is what is great about forums, we get to post our views about a favorite topic.

On the topic of blocks, he never had a high BPG, 0.8 to 0.5. 50% of less than 1 is nothing. He was never a shot blocker so one can argue that he is on average this year.

How do you know they are not telling him or coaching him to try harder on defense or rebounds? Do you think the media is the only communication used by the coaching staff? Don't they have practice, film sessions and meetings for that? I am not sure if you noticed yet, but Zeke likes the art of positive reinforcement. Nothing wrong with that. Why would you lambast or humiliate a player when they have shown considerable improvements on the items he needs to work on? As long as he continues to improve next year I am happy.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/27/2007  11:37 AM
It's clear that Eddy has been putting in more effort to improve, but when it comes to Rebounding, Defense and Shotblocking, he's just not a natural. SO you're going to see up and down performances. Lot's of mistakes and at times no effort. If you're watching and paying attention tho you can see that he's recently been trying to go block more shots and trying to rebound better. The thing is that if he never becomes great in those areas he can still be a HUGE piece of this team being a contender one day. So we shouldn't be overly concerned if he's not THE best Center in every respect. I don't think he's gonna stop trying tho.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
2/27/2007  11:47 AM
Posted by NYKBocker:

On the topic of blocks, he never had a high BPG, 0.8 to 0.5. 50% of less than 1 is nothing. He was never a shot blocker so one can argue that he is on average this year.

How can you argue that??? That's like putting an entire pie and half a pie next to each other and saying they're the same. One who argued such would be... how you say, wrong.
Posted by NYKBocker:

How do you know they are not telling him or coaching him to try harder on defense or rebounds? Do you think the media is the only communication used by the coaching staff? Don't they have practice, film sessions and meetings for that? I am not sure if you noticed yet, but Zeke likes the art of positive reinforcement. Nothing wrong with that. Why would you lambast or humiliate a player when they have shown considerable improvements on the items he needs to work on? As long as he continues to improve next year I am happy.

Zeke likes the art of covering his ass. Again, repeatedly I've heard very little criticism (including POSITIVE criticism) of Eddy come about from inside the Knicks. It's one thing to stand behind your player. It's another to flat out lie (e.g.: Marbury -- Eddy has been rebounding, blocking shots, etc...). Why would he improve when it's become acceptable to get 7 rpg and 0.5 blks? The items he NEEDS to work on are the ones he's neglected. He would be a much better player if he played hard on BOTH ends of the court for 30 minutes (less minutes, playing hard, succumbing to his physical constraints).

I think it's pretty clear. If Eddy is our franchise player, we're f'n doomed.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
2/27/2007  11:54 AM
Posted by Rich:

Oh please, when he began his streak of 20 pt games, a lot of people here were saying it wouldn't last.

I'd trade Ty Thomas for Curry in a heartbeat. Who they give up this year will be determinative on the trade.

This is true. That's why people now just forget about Ty Thomas and just point to this year's deep draft. Ty Thomas and Ben Wallace have to be Chicago's biggest disappointments this year.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
2/27/2007  12:04 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by Rich:

Oh please, when he began his streak of 20 pt games, a lot of people here were saying it wouldn't last.

I'd trade Ty Thomas for Curry in a heartbeat. Who they give up this year will be determinative on the trade.

This is true. That's why people now just forget about Ty Thomas and just point to this year's deep draft. Ty Thomas and Ben Wallace have to be Chicago's biggest disappointments this year.
New York can never rebuild because every single person has their own idea of how to rebuild. We have a great offensive force in the middle, a great rebounder on the sider, an amazing swing defender and a good rebounder in Balkman but thats not enough because its not their way of rebuilding. Don't waste your time arguing, it will only aggravate you.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38583
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
2/27/2007  12:06 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by NYKBocker:

On the topic of blocks, he never had a high BPG, 0.8 to 0.5. 50% of less than 1 is nothing. He was never a shot blocker so one can argue that he is on average this year.

How can you argue that??? That's like putting an entire pie and half a pie next to each other and saying they're the same. One who argued such would be... how you say, wrong.

It's all relative. 50% of nothing is nothing.

Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
2/27/2007  12:07 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by TMS:

Eddie's also hitting his shots at an 80%+ clip over the last several weeks... that's sorta another reason why he's on the court.

That's nice, but in the past he was pulled because of stamina issues and foul problems. Eddy fixed those issues by not expending energy on defense. Bravo to our star!

Shaq has done that his entire career. For his size, he is probably in my opinion one of the NBA's history worst defensive centers. He has always said that he had to concentrate on the offensive end and control the paint to keep teams honest. But I know Jackson has always complain about his defense, as well as Brian Hill. Stamina is the only issue that I could point to. To me that is what Curry suffers from as well. From the stories I heard about Wilt's defensive game was not all that impressive. I wonder how much do offensive "Big" men really do on the defensive end. I notice Dwight Howard is not effective when he tries to post up down low because he gets exhausted so quick, so I think he stays out of those situations on purpose. Chris Bosh has learned like KG and J O'Neal when to post up and when to pull the jumper without exhausting that much energy. That's why Curry is more effective when Marbury is playing at a high level. Curry needs to focus on the 15 jumper and improving his release on his jumper.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/27/2007  12:16 PM
Posted by Silverfuel:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by Rich:

Oh please, when he began his streak of 20 pt games, a lot of people here were saying it wouldn't last.

I'd trade Ty Thomas for Curry in a heartbeat. Who they give up this year will be determinative on the trade.

This is true. That's why people now just forget about Ty Thomas and just point to this year's deep draft. Ty Thomas and Ben Wallace have to be Chicago's biggest disappointments this year.
New York can never rebuild because every single person has their own idea of how to rebuild. We have a great offensive force in the middle, a great rebounder on the sider, an amazing swing defender and a good rebounder in Balkman but thats not enough because its not their way of rebuilding. Don't waste your time arguing, it will only aggravate you.

everyone disagrees with philosphies, types of players, or style of play...but what is INTEGRAL in the rebuilding process is having a plan to get a superstar and that does not include trading unprotected picks or completely disregarding the cap (until you find that stud). but bringing in players every offseason that have years and years on their deals, well that's just something i don't agree with.

people arguing about eddy is one thing. that's fine that everybody has a different opinion. but isiah felt he was the franchise player we needed, hence he made that deal. now that's something where concern are legitimate b/c our other options of acquiring a stud, if eddy doesn't become one, are limited.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
2/27/2007  1:20 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:

It's all relative. 50% of nothing is nothing.

Clearly, it's not nothing. Now you argue that there is no pie when I see the half-pie in front of me.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
2/27/2007  1:26 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

Shaq has done that his entire career. For his size, he is probably in my opinion one of the NBA's history worst defensive centers. He has always said that he had to concentrate on the offensive end and control the paint to keep teams honest. But I know Jackson has always complain about his defense, as well as Brian Hill. Stamina is the only issue that I could point to. To me that is what Curry suffers from as well. From the stories I heard about Wilt's defensive game was not all that impressive. I wonder how much do offensive "Big" men really do on the defensive end. I notice Dwight Howard is not effective when he tries to post up down low because he gets exhausted so quick, so I think he stays out of those situations on purpose. Chris Bosh has learned like KG and J O'Neal when to post up and when to pull the jumper without exhausting that much energy. That's why Curry is more effective when Marbury is playing at a high level. Curry needs to focus on the 15 jumper and improving his release on his jumper.

I don't think the players you mention do it to the extent Eddy does. It's a known fact that the average NBA player is lax on defense. But I think Eddy brings that to a new level. He brings the combination of lack of effort, being in the wrong position, moving away on defense so he doesn't risk fouls, and not being able to jump more than 2 millimeters off the ground. There's definitely an agenda here with Eddy, now maybe it's Isiah Thomas pushing the agenda, but the agenda doesn't have Eddy's defense as a piece... and frankly, in most of the games we've lost, the other team had big men completely go off on us. This is not JUST Eddy's fault, but I think he's the majority of the problem. Ironically, I don't think Channing Frye and David Lee's defensive weaknesses would be so noticeable if we didn't have the worst (laziest?) defensive big man in the league.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
2/27/2007  2:12 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by TMS:

Eddie's also hitting his shots at an 80%+ clip over the last several weeks... that's sorta another reason why he's on the court.

That's nice, but in the past he was pulled because of stamina issues and foul problems. Eddy fixed those issues by not expending energy on defense. Bravo to our star!

Shaq has done that his entire career. For his size, he is probably in my opinion one of the NBA's history worst defensive centers. He has always said that he had to concentrate on the offensive end and control the paint to keep teams honest. But I know Jackson has always complain about his defense, as well as Brian Hill. Stamina is the only issue that I could point to. To me that is what Curry suffers from as well. From the stories I heard about Wilt's defensive game was not all that impressive. I wonder how much do offensive "Big" men really do on the defensive end. I notice Dwight Howard is not effective when he tries to post up down low because he gets exhausted so quick, so I think he stays out of those situations on purpose. Chris Bosh has learned like KG and J O'Neal when to post up and when to pull the jumper without exhausting that much energy. That's why Curry is more effective when Marbury is playing at a high level. Curry needs to focus on the 15 jumper and improving his release on his jumper.

I'm not saying that Shaq has been Bill Russell but he's averaged 2.5 blocks and 12 boards over his career.

Shaq has not been doing what Curry does his entire career. Not even close. Hell, defensively Curry isn't even like Benoit Benjamin or Michael Olowokandi.

If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/27/2007  2:25 PM
that's fair & no one ever suggested Curry was a defensive presence or that he ever will be... you can have a great career & find success in the NBA w/o being a strong defender... you just need to have the right players around you.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
No David Lee.... Curry With 4 Reb

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy