[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Wake up people.
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/11/2006  5:44 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by TMS:

i think the biggest mistake we can make when discussing Eddy Curry is to bring up names like Shaq & Duncan... he is never going to be the defensive players or even the passers that those guys were... we need to be comparing Eddy Curry to the young centers that are active right now... other than Yao Ming, Dwight Howard & Jermaine O'Neal, i think Eddy's progressing to the point where we can compare him pretty favorably to the other top young C's in the game right now... that has to be pretty encouraging to even the most pessimistic Knick fan i would think.

for all the tons of posts people have made on this forum over the past few years over "stud can't miss centers" coming into the draft like Bogut, Bynum & Milicic, i'd say Eddy Curry's a pretty damn good up & coming center himself.

If Curry was on the Bulls averaging 25ppg and 9rpg over a long stretch, there'd be people here killing Isiah for never being able to get a player like Eddy.
not if the Bulls are winning 25 games a year. I dont see anyone around here wishing we had a player like Zach Randolph or Baron Davis or Corey Maggette. All we have on our roster is stat guys. Notice the fan favorites are the guys that just play hard and try to WIN.

since when are DLee, Qrich, Balkman, Jefferies stats guys? let's at least wait until JJ2 plays for a few weeks before we condemn this group. man.
¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/11/2006  5:58 PM
We have stat guys because our players don't compliment each other. In order for Curry's inside presence(non shotblocking) to become a major asset we need to find complimentary players. We need a shotblocking rebounder to make up for Curry's lack of shotblocking and inconsistent rebounding. We need a rugged defender to protect Eddie from foul trouble. We need shooters to stop other teams from double teaming. We need a PG that can settle the offense down and make sure Eddie Curry gets the ball in the right spots instead of forgetting about him for stretches of games. We need complimentary players. Until then Curry will put up a lot of points and we will be mediocre and wondering why Eddie can't win.

A versatile line-up that eliminates weaknesses is the only way to win. Why Isiah has not done this to date is baffling.
I just hope that people will like me
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/11/2006  6:02 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

TMS no matter what Isiah does. To Islesfan it won't be good enough. He just hates the guy with a passion.

If he never traded for Curry and drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas was a superstar he would say well he did have the #2 pick and Ty Thomas fell to him. If he drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas sucked. He would bash Isiahs drafting skills.

If this team turns into a good team and goes to the playoffs and wins a playoff series. He would say well he owes us since he made us suck for so long or something to that nature. Or say well the east is weak and this team really only got lucky. He doesn't care about being credible or objective so you can't win. If you hit him with any logical answers he will just ignore it and find the one post to pick on.

Yeah because I've been really wrong about Isiah since the very beginning. How's that for logic?


isles, you were complaining that Isiah has failed to bring in a franchise player in the Curry trade... now i asked you who among the players that were drafted last season would you consider to be franchise calibre players... if you're going to complain about something at least have a valid reason.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

12/11/2006  6:03 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

We have stat guys because our players don't compliment each other. In order for Curry's inside presence(non shotblocking) to become a major asset we need to find complimentary players. We need a shotblocking rebounder to make up for Curry's lack of shotblocking and inconsistent rebounding. We need a rugged defender to protect Eddie from foul trouble. We need shooters to stop other teams from double teaming. We need a PG that can settle the offense down and make sure Eddie Curry gets the ball in the right spots instead of forgetting about him for stretches of games. We need complimentary players. Until then Curry will put up a lot of points and we will be mediocre and wondering why Eddie can't win.

A versatile line-up that eliminates weaknesses is the only way to win. Why Isiah has not done this to date is baffling.

We and about 28 other teams need that...

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/11/2006  6:05 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

In order for Curry's inside presence(non shotblocking) to become a major asset we need to find complimentary players. We need a shotblocking rebounder to make up for Curry's lack of shotblocking and inconsistent rebounding. We need a rugged defender to protect Eddie from foul trouble.

that's why i wanted to sign Alonzo Mourning last year, as old as he was... he could've really added some much needed toughness & interior defense to this roster... God forbid he teach Curry some of the tricks of the trade in the process... but of course the experts called that idea idiotic & Isiah went & signed Big Turd instead... what the Hell do i know... i'm just a Knick fan.



[Edited by - TMS on 12-11-2006 6:10 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/11/2006  6:08 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by Bippity10:

We have stat guys because our players don't compliment each other. In order for Curry's inside presence(non shotblocking) to become a major asset we need to find complimentary players. We need a shotblocking rebounder to make up for Curry's lack of shotblocking and inconsistent rebounding. We need a rugged defender to protect Eddie from foul trouble. We need shooters to stop other teams from double teaming. We need a PG that can settle the offense down and make sure Eddie Curry gets the ball in the right spots instead of forgetting about him for stretches of games. We need complimentary players. Until then Curry will put up a lot of points and we will be mediocre and wondering why Eddie can't win.

A versatile line-up that eliminates weaknesses is the only way to win. Why Isiah has not done this to date is baffling.

We and about 28 other teams need that...


Holfresh who cares about 28 other teams. Let's focus on what we need. Somehow every year a champion seems to figure it out. So instead of worrying about 28 other teams lets focus on us. Let's stop trading for "assets" and then cutting them and instead decide what type of team we are building and focus on getting players that fit that plan. No way anyone can tell me with the rosters we've had the past two years that we have had any type of plan. Now we have some young players that can play. Instead of saying it's too hard to build and that 28 other teams have a hard time building as well, let's focus on our current roster and what we can do to improve it.
I just hope that people will like me
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30353
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
12/11/2006  6:28 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

TMS no matter what Isiah does. To Islesfan it won't be good enough. He just hates the guy with a passion.

If he never traded for Curry and drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas was a superstar he would say well he did have the #2 pick and Ty Thomas fell to him. If he drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas sucked. He would bash Isiahs drafting skills.

If this team turns into a good team and goes to the playoffs and wins a playoff series. He would say well he owes us since he made us suck for so long or something to that nature. Or say well the east is weak and this team really only got lucky. He doesn't care about being credible or objective so you can't win. If you hit him with any logical answers he will just ignore it and find the one post to pick on.

Yeah because I've been really wrong about Isiah since the very beginning. How's that for logic?

Well let me give you an example. When Isiah drafted David Lee you bashed Isiah that whole draft day and the next for drafting David Lee with the #30 pick. Now that you were wrong about Lee you keep quiet about that. But if David was bad you would be all over Isiah about that.

There is no forsight in your hate for Isiah. You just bash him and use the negative route for everysingle thing he does. Since he has lost more games than won you look smart. If he won more games than he lost you just would not post. Instead of rooting for his team.

You see under Isiah Eddie Curry improve his game after 5yrs in the league of being the same player and its getting you nervice that Isiah might do something good so you come up with this thread. Trying to spin Curry's improve game in a negative way towards Isiah. Now if Curry was never improving then you would be ripping Isiah for moving Ty Thomas & Sweetney and swapping picks right now.

You say that Curry's #s are only improved because he is the focal point. But anyone who watches these games without a biased eye can see how Curry's shooting touch has improved. How he stays away from lowering his shoulder and running people over. How he gets way better positioning than in the past. So to say that he only is playing better because he is getting more touches is stupid. He is getting more touches becuase he is playing better not the other way around. If he was still running people over and committing TOs you think our guards would be focusing on getting him the ball as much as they have?? It would be the same thing as last yr with the guards reluctant to get him the ball after the first quarter. Same problem he had in Chi.

Now let me ask you a question. When Layden was the GM you didn't post at all on the MSG boards. As soon as Isiah became GM you came out of nohwere bashing Isiah like you had a personal beef with him. So my question is what did Isiah do in Toronto & Indy as the GM/Coach that made you not like him as our gm before he made any moves?? He didn't have the trend of trading draftpicks for superstars like he did for Marbury. All he did was draft Stoudemire, Tmac & Camby. And helped retool Indy by acquiring J'Oneal, Al Harrington, Brad Miller, Ron Artest, Jamal Tinsley. So other than lead by hate what was your reasoning on not giving Isiah a chance before he made any moves??

[Edited by - newyorknewyork on 12-11-2006 6:31 PM]
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

12/11/2006  6:30 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by Bippity10:

We have stat guys because our players don't compliment each other. In order for Curry's inside presence(non shotblocking) to become a major asset we need to find complimentary players. We need a shotblocking rebounder to make up for Curry's lack of shotblocking and inconsistent rebounding. We need a rugged defender to protect Eddie from foul trouble. We need shooters to stop other teams from double teaming. We need a PG that can settle the offense down and make sure Eddie Curry gets the ball in the right spots instead of forgetting about him for stretches of games. We need complimentary players. Until then Curry will put up a lot of points and we will be mediocre and wondering why Eddie can't win.

A versatile line-up that eliminates weaknesses is the only way to win. Why Isiah has not done this to date is baffling.

We and about 28 other teams need that...


Holfresh who cares about 28 other teams. Let's focus on what we need. Somehow every year a champion seems to figure it out. So instead of worrying about 28 other teams lets focus on us. Let's stop trading for "assets" and then cutting them and instead decide what type of team we are building and focus on getting players that fit that plan. No way anyone can tell me with the rosters we've had the past two years that we have had any type of plan. Now we have some young players that can play. Instead of saying it's too hard to build and that 28 other teams have a hard time building as well, let's focus on our current roster and what we can do to improve it.

My point is that these players that are on all our wish list are not readily available...They are not on some scrap heap waiting to be plucked...Let's work with what we have and fill the holes with what's available...Really, how many rugged shot, blocking, rebounding power forwards are out there to begin with anyway....We have Channing Frye at 6' 11" who has shown he can block a few shots on the weak side before going down...Why don't we start there...



[Edited by - holfresh on 12-11-2006 6:40 PM]
SugarRayRichardson
Posts: 21557
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/28/2006
Member: #1169

12/11/2006  6:49 PM
So if Curry doesnt have a big game it wont be because he had an off game it will be because Isiah suddenly cares about wins? Hmmm sure, lol. :)


By the way 4-5 in Currys streak sure beats 4-9 before Currys streak. :)
I LOVED how Curry just exploded in the 4th, speaking as a fan of the Raptors, Curry looked well, scary I think is the word. Or Shaq-like Curry: 19.1ppg-7.3rpg-58%fg
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
12/11/2006  7:09 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

TMS no matter what Isiah does. To Islesfan it won't be good enough. He just hates the guy with a passion.

If he never traded for Curry and drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas was a superstar he would say well he did have the #2 pick and Ty Thomas fell to him. If he drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas sucked. He would bash Isiahs drafting skills.

If this team turns into a good team and goes to the playoffs and wins a playoff series. He would say well he owes us since he made us suck for so long or something to that nature. Or say well the east is weak and this team really only got lucky. He doesn't care about being credible or objective so you can't win. If you hit him with any logical answers he will just ignore it and find the one post to pick on.

Yeah because I've been really wrong about Isiah since the very beginning. How's that for logic?

Well let me give you an example. When Isiah drafted David Lee you bashed Isiah that whole draft day and the next for drafting David Lee with the #30 pick. Now that you were wrong about Lee you keep quiet about that. But if David was bad you would be all over Isiah about that.

There is no forsight in your hate for Isiah. You just bash him and use the negative route for everysingle thing he does. Since he has lost more games than won you look smart. If he won more games than he lost you just would not post. Instead of rooting for his team.

You see under Isiah Eddie Curry improve his game after 5yrs in the league of being the same player and its getting you nervice that Isiah might do something good so you come up with this thread. Trying to spin Curry's improve game in a negative way towards Isiah. Now if Curry was never improving then you would be ripping Isiah for moving Ty Thomas & Sweetney and swapping picks right now.

You say that Curry's #s are only improved because he is the focal point. But anyone who watches these games without a biased eye can see how Curry's shooting touch has improved. How he stays away from lowering his shoulder and running people over. How he gets way better positioning than in the past. So to say that he only is playing better because he is getting more touches is stupid. He is getting more touches becuase he is playing better not the other way around. If he was still running people over and committing TOs you think our guards would be focusing on getting him the ball as much as they have?? It would be the same thing as last yr with the guards reluctant to get him the ball after the first quarter. Same problem he had in Chi.

Now let me ask you a question. When Layden was the GM you didn't post at all on the MSG boards. As soon as Isiah became GM you came out of nohwere bashing Isiah like you had a personal beef with him. So my question is what did Isiah do in Toronto & Indy as the GM/Coach that made you not like him as our gm before he made any moves?? He didn't have the trend of trading draftpicks for superstars like he did for Marbury. All he did was draft Stoudemire, Tmac & Camby. And helped retool Indy by acquiring J'Oneal, Al Harrington, Brad Miller, Ron Artest, Jamal Tinsley. So other than lead by hate what was your reasoning on not giving Isiah a chance before he made any moves??

[Edited by - newyorknewyork on 12-11-2006 6:31 PM]

I haven't kept quiet about David Lee. I've said that I was wrong about him and have called him my favorite Knick. I also think he's a nice role player, which is what he is.

Isiah hasn't just lost more games than he's won. He's lost a LOT more games than he's won since coming here. But yeah, I guess we should just ignore that.

Improved? He's basically the same player he was in Chicago the last 2 years and his numbers have improved just a little over last year solely based on having more minutes. Trust me, I'm not nervous about anything. Isiah is gone, it's just a matter of time. He's set this franchise back so far it would take nothing short of a miracle for him to stay much longer.

You say his shooting touch has improved. I say that his shooting pct is worse than last year. And it was even worse than what it is before his latest spurt. Curry is averaging 4 more shots a game with the greater minutes. You shoot more, you score a little more. It's not rocket science.

That's total BS that I didn't post at all on the MSG boards. I was just as notorious there as I am here. Until we all got banned that is. I hated Layden too. I hate Isiah more because of the type of person he is and because I knew he'd make a bad situation worse due to his massive ego. The Marbury trade just confirmed my worst fears. Guess who was right about Isiah?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30353
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
12/11/2006  7:09 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

I can see Isiah trying to use the development of Curry as his significant improvement rather than wins and losses.

But Curry is 24 with the most amount of upside on the team. With Curry playing as good as he is playing why wouldn't he want to force feed him and try and make him a stud big man. Eventually that will turn into wins.

How can you not see how much Curry has improved from last season. I know you want Isiah out of NY bad but still common be at least objective. Curry has been getting better position. His touch around the basket has been excellent. How many offensive fouls has he beend called for the last 9games?? He even passes out of the post once in a while. Am I wrong??? Has he not improved drasitcally in these areas.

If Larry Brown was doing the exact same thing there would be no complaints now would there. Larry Brown tried to force feed Curry the same exact way last season. Why didn't it work last season?? We have the same exact guards as last season.

With Curry playing at this high level is in the best intreset of the team in the long run to force feed him and turn him into a stud. If Isiah was only trying to save his job then he wouldn't have trusted Curry and tried to milk as many wins out of Marbury, Francis & Crawford and let them shoot shoot shoot. Last season with Curry not close to being ready is what I would have preferd. Even if we were mediocre since Curry only made us worse. This season is a different story.

Frye is a great shooter. So how is letting him shoot 15fters hurting him exactly?? Do you not see what the inside outside game Curry & Frye can present can do to teams. You double Curry down low with 2 biggs Frye now can nail open jumpers and make them pay. You keep a guy on Frye, Curry now gets single coverage. You use the SF to double on Curry now Jefferies, Balkman, Q have open lanes to cut to the paint or open jumpers if you position Curry correctly. I see that as a good plan.

Using Curry to pack in the paint opens up the outside for open 3s. How is that not a good game plan for present and future success as long as Curry is producing??

Last but not least what game plan would you rather have than this current one knowing that you aren't going to make any trades to weed out Marbury, Francis, James??

This thread just more exposes that fact that you are willing to bash or hate on anything that has to do with Isiah doing something good. Your more concerned with Isiah losing his job than the knicks becomeing a good team. But I can't hate on your since thats your way of believeing the knicks can eventually be good i guess.

I didn't even get a reply to this. Instead you went after Silvers post. Why was that??
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/11/2006  7:11 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by TMS:

i think the biggest mistake we can make when discussing Eddy Curry is to bring up names like Shaq & Duncan... he is never going to be the defensive players or even the passers that those guys were... we need to be comparing Eddy Curry to the young centers that are active right now... other than Yao Ming, Dwight Howard & Jermaine O'Neal, i think Eddy's progressing to the point where we can compare him pretty favorably to the other top young C's in the game right now... that has to be pretty encouraging to even the most pessimistic Knick fan i would think.

for all the tons of posts people have made on this forum over the past few years over "stud can't miss centers" coming into the draft like Bogut, Bynum & Milicic, i'd say Eddy Curry's a pretty damn good up & coming center himself.

If Curry was on the Bulls averaging 25ppg and 9rpg over a long stretch, there'd be people here killing Isiah for never being able to get a player like Eddy.

Player like Eddy? We kill Isiah for not being able to get a Franchise player. EDDY IS NOT A FRANCHISE PLAYER!!! God, get over it already.

He's had a nice stretch with the additional minutes. He's had nice strecthes before offensively. You really must be crazy to think that this is what you can expect from now on, if not more, from Curry.

And he still sucks defensively.

He sucks defensively, but so did Yao, Dirk and Gasol when they were 24. Players can improve in that area.

He's had nice stretches before, yeah, like the 04-05 season which he was starting to put it together and then he had to shut it down because of the heart thing. I still say that screwed up his season last year. Now we're seeing what it looks like when he can put the work in. He's a promising player - I don't know why you have a problem with that. The 06 draft was decent, it wasn't the best draft of all time like some were saying. It wasn't even as good as 2005 or 2003, for that matter. Like it or not, Curry would have gone number one overall in a heart beat at the 2006 draft. And he just embarassed the number one pick from the 2005 draft.

wasn't Bogut supposed to be a defensive stud? I wonder why Curry destroyed him so completely?

[Edited by - crzymdups on 11-12-2006 7:12 PM]
¿ △ ?
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30353
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
12/11/2006  7:31 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

TMS no matter what Isiah does. To Islesfan it won't be good enough. He just hates the guy with a passion.

If he never traded for Curry and drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas was a superstar he would say well he did have the #2 pick and Ty Thomas fell to him. If he drafted Ty Thomas and Ty Thomas sucked. He would bash Isiahs drafting skills.

If this team turns into a good team and goes to the playoffs and wins a playoff series. He would say well he owes us since he made us suck for so long or something to that nature. Or say well the east is weak and this team really only got lucky. He doesn't care about being credible or objective so you can't win. If you hit him with any logical answers he will just ignore it and find the one post to pick on.

Yeah because I've been really wrong about Isiah since the very beginning. How's that for logic?

Well let me give you an example. When Isiah drafted David Lee you bashed Isiah that whole draft day and the next for drafting David Lee with the #30 pick. Now that you were wrong about Lee you keep quiet about that. But if David was bad you would be all over Isiah about that.

There is no forsight in your hate for Isiah. You just bash him and use the negative route for everysingle thing he does. Since he has lost more games than won you look smart. If he won more games than he lost you just would not post. Instead of rooting for his team.

You see under Isiah Eddie Curry improve his game after 5yrs in the league of being the same player and its getting you nervice that Isiah might do something good so you come up with this thread. Trying to spin Curry's improve game in a negative way towards Isiah. Now if Curry was never improving then you would be ripping Isiah for moving Ty Thomas & Sweetney and swapping picks right now.

You say that Curry's #s are only improved because he is the focal point. But anyone who watches these games without a biased eye can see how Curry's shooting touch has improved. How he stays away from lowering his shoulder and running people over. How he gets way better positioning than in the past. So to say that he only is playing better because he is getting more touches is stupid. He is getting more touches becuase he is playing better not the other way around. If he was still running people over and committing TOs you think our guards would be focusing on getting him the ball as much as they have?? It would be the same thing as last yr with the guards reluctant to get him the ball after the first quarter. Same problem he had in Chi.

Now let me ask you a question. When Layden was the GM you didn't post at all on the MSG boards. As soon as Isiah became GM you came out of nohwere bashing Isiah like you had a personal beef with him. So my question is what did Isiah do in Toronto & Indy as the GM/Coach that made you not like him as our gm before he made any moves?? He didn't have the trend of trading draftpicks for superstars like he did for Marbury. All he did was draft Stoudemire, Tmac & Camby. And helped retool Indy by acquiring J'Oneal, Al Harrington, Brad Miller, Ron Artest, Jamal Tinsley. So other than lead by hate what was your reasoning on not giving Isiah a chance before he made any moves??

[Edited by - newyorknewyork on 12-11-2006 6:31 PM]

I haven't kept quiet about David Lee. I've said that I was wrong about him and have called him my favorite Knick. I also think he's a nice role player, which is what he is.

Isiah hasn't just lost more games than he's won. He's lost a LOT more games than he's won since coming here. But yeah, I guess we should just ignore that.

Improved? He's basically the same player he was in Chicago the last 2 years and his numbers have improved just a little over last year solely based on having more minutes. Trust me, I'm not nervous about anything. Isiah is gone, it's just a matter of time. He's set this franchise back so far it would take nothing short of a miracle for him to stay much longer.

You say his shooting touch has improved. I say that his shooting pct is worse than last year. And it was even worse than what it is before his latest spurt. Curry is averaging 4 more shots a game with the greater minutes. You shoot more, you score a little more. It's not rocket science.

That's total BS that I didn't post at all on the MSG boards. I was just as notorious there as I am here. Until we all got banned that is. I hated Layden too. I hate Isiah more because of the type of person he is and because I knew he'd make a bad situation worse due to his massive ego. The Marbury trade just confirmed my worst fears. Guess who was right about Isiah?

Damn I lost my post and I don't feel like repeating it.

Curry gets better positon, doesn't lower his shoulder, and doesn't commit offensive fouls anymore, and even cause Briggs to start a thread about how good his touch has looked. He had a higher % because his limited pts were all off of dunks. He is now shooting more jump hooks and showing great touch. So how is he the same player as he was in chi?? Did he not improve in those areas I named above??

You must have posted on islanders board because I don't remember you make one post pre Isiah. But if you did then I appologize.

What did Isiah do to show his ego as a GM of the Raptors or Indy to make you weary of it??

Talking about ego, your only purpose on these boards seem to be to right about Isiah. Do you even post about anything else Knicks related?/

And if you weren't nervous then you wouldn't have started a thread warning us on what you think Isiah is trying to do. And I didn't say anything about being nervous about keeping his job. I said being nervous about doing something good.

[Edited by - newyorknewyork on 12-11-2006 7:39 PM]
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
jaydh
Posts: 23171
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
12/11/2006  7:49 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

TMS no matter what Isiah does. To Islesfan it won't be good enough. He just hates the guy with a passion.

thats it right there, i'm surprised people still respond to his negativity.



Bobby
Posts: 22094
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/18/2003
Member: #408
USA
12/12/2006  7:33 AM
did isle say zeke's best move was getting curry
"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
Wake up people.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy