Posted by oohah:

Posted by joec32033:

I actually see where oohah is coming from. I wouldn't go as far as in saying the game was over but I also didn't see the Knicks winning this game because of the energy expanded on coming back and no player was stepping to the forefront except for Jamal who couldn't hit the Ocean from Jones Beach.

They all know the game was over Joe, but you see, when you have a chance to bash Isiah, they just can't pass it up, you know what I mean?

oohah

So you're going to make this personal now?

What does the Miami game have to do with this? I thought we were specifically talking about this game?

In that 4th quarter the Knicks were executing and making shots which contradicts your claim that they weren't.

It's hardly a stretch to think that it was still a game and wasn't "over" the way you think it was. Not sure why you don't see that.

Posted by oohah:

They are

That's why you have the starting small forward getting benched regularly in the second half, why teammates are saying other teammates are shaken, why some players are more concerned about the crowd vs BB execution, why some players hustle and others don't at all. Why the starting center has to be stroked to develop a mean side. Why the starting point gaurd is hocking shoes to the public right before tip-off.

I don't know what you are talking about. You are off topic. Are you really are bi-polar? The Knicks suck so bad but Isiah cost them the game with his techs! Make up your mind, would you?

Check Mate? Stick to checkers.

oohah

No you are the one taking random statements and then trying to disect to divert attention away from what you said. First of all I never said his tech's cost the team the game. I said what he did was inexcuseable, there was no justification for it and it didn't send any kind of message to his team.


Oohah who said in this thread that his tech's cost the team the game?

Posted by SeatsBlue:

Posted by oohah:

They are

That's why you have the starting small forward getting benched regularly in the second half, why teammates are saying other teammates are shaken, why some players are more concerned about the crowd vs BB execution, why some players hustle and others don't at all. Why the starting center has to be stroked to develop a mean side. Why the starting point gaurd is hocking shoes to the public right before tip-off.

I don't know what you are talking about. You are off topic. Are you really are bi-polar? The Knicks suck so bad but Isiah cost them the game with his techs! Make up your mind, would you?

Check Mate? Stick to checkers.

oohah

No you are the one taking random statements and then trying to disect to divert attention away from what you said. First of all I never said his tech's cost the team the game. I said what he did was inexcuseable, there was no justification for it and it didn't send any kind of message to his team.


Oohah who said in this thread that his tech's cost the team the game?

You proceeded to bring up the Miller's etc of the NBA.

See while I conceded that the technicals were dumb, you still have not conceded the obvious fact that they did not mean much.

See the difference? Me: balanced view. You: Anti-Isiah all the way, no matter what.

oohah

Posted by oohah:

Posted by SeatsBlue:

Posted by oohah:

They are

That's why you have the starting small forward getting benched regularly in the second half, why teammates are saying other teammates are shaken, why some players are more concerned about the crowd vs BB execution, why some players hustle and others don't at all. Why the starting center has to be stroked to develop a mean side. Why the starting point gaurd is hocking shoes to the public right before tip-off.

I don't know what you are talking about. You are off topic. Are you really are bi-polar? The Knicks suck so bad but Isiah cost them the game with his techs! Make up your mind, would you?

Check Mate? Stick to checkers.

oohah

No you are the one taking random statements and then trying to disect to divert attention away from what you said. First of all I never said his tech's cost the team the game. I said what he did was inexcuseable, there was no justification for it and it didn't send any kind of message to his team.


Oohah who said in this thread that his tech's cost the team the game?

You proceeded to bring up the Miller's etc of the NBA.

I've never heard a fan of their team wholeheartedly stand by the fact that a game is over with more than 2min left and down by 2 possessions. You have faith in the team for the season but not in a 2 possession game with more than 2min left.

You commence to state if the team had T-Mac even throughout their expensed comeback, then maybe they had a shot. Wouldn't T-Mac have been expensed? Remember you also said the Knicks had no hope of stopping the Celtics at that point. So if T-Mac was on this team would he have stopped Gomes and Pierce defensively, while still having enough energy to eliminate the defecit offensively?


[Edited by - SeatsBlue on 11-19-2006 11:22 PM]

Posted by SeatsBlue:

Oohah I'm still waiting for you to point out where I said that Zeke's tech's cost the game. I really would appreciate if you could do that for me.

Yu're gonna be waiting becuase I really don't care to argue with you. You only have one note and you don't play it very well.

oohah

Posted by oohah:

Posted by SeatsBlue:

Oohah I'm still waiting for you to point out where I said that Zeke's tech's cost the game. I really would appreciate if you could do that for me.

Yu're gonna be waiting becuase I really don't care to argue with you. You only have one note and you don't play it very well.

oohah

In other words you have Nada

"I looked back and no one here stated Zeke cost his team the game. They were just upset at him for adding to the defecit and I'm mad at them for being mad at him."

THE END!