[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Taylor, Knicks Negotiating Buyout
Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
9/24/2006  7:46 PM
Posted by bigbeast:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by wsdm:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by wsdm:

Joe, that's just garbage media speculation. In contrast, Brown's has been directly quoted saying he asked Isiah to get Francis. (I'm not sure if he has been quoted about Rose too, though.)

Wsdm, have you ever heard of plausible deniability? This is the exact opposite.

For example.

I'm in a union and we are in the middle of elections. One of the guys says, "Well, the president of the union told me to run."
What he doesn't say is that he called the president of the union and actually asked "President X, I am thinking of running for the union rep job, but I am not sure.". To which president X says "Sure you should run, everyone who wants to try to be a union rep whould run.".

Two totally different scenarios in the context of what is said. The guys isn't lying. But he also isn't telling the truth.

If Isiah said to Larry "Look, this is the best I can do now, but these guys will not be here next year becauzse I am planning a big move. But I need you to endorse this trade, because Dolan is looking at me sideways because of all this money I added. I promise they won't be here next year and I will use them to get you players you want. Just please endorse this trade". Larry says, "Ok...I'll endorse it to the media, but you gotta promise me that they won't be here."

Technically they can say Larry endorsed it and it isn't a lie. It also isn't the whole truth.

And the last thing I am gonna believe is ANYTHING coming out of Dolan's or Isiah's mouth in an interview, given by, edited by, and aired by a company that Dolan owns and everyone associated with the interview works for him.
No, it wasn't any of that stuff. Larry said directly to the media that as soon as Francis was available, he went running to Isiah to ask him to get Francis.

Can you please tell me how this disproves or even offers any iota of an argument to the post you quoted? That is exactly the type of thing I was talking about?

[Edited by - joec32033 on 09-24-2006 3:42 PM]

I have already proven Brown wanted Jalen and Francis with direct quotes. I started about three thread about this back in May. I'm not about to dig them up right now.

All you have proven is the comapny line is that Francis was wanted in NY. You haven't proven anything about Jalen. I posted articles from 2 YEARS BEFORE BROWN GOT HERE that Isiah was chasing Jalen (first with Vince then with Donyell).

So now it is just a coincidence that he chased him for 2 years and now all of a sudden he gets him because "Larry wanted him"? It is just media rumour from like 4 different sources?

Look, it is fully logical he may have wanted Francis(maybe he thought if Francis was here it would facilitate a Marbury trade if Francis blew up)...I don't agree with it, I don't apply myself to this theory, but it is fully plausible and possible.

Isiah chased Jalen for 2 years before Brown.

Much like it is possible that LB did want Francis for whatever reason, it also falls under a totally believeable scenario that Isiah thought or was told tat Dolan is not going to approve any more high cost moves after all the money he added unless Brown directly said he wanted certain guys.

Isiah has shown that he has two faces the little innocent but sly looking face he shows to the media, and the conniving manipulitive guy he is.

I seriously believe that Isiah may have led Dolan (seriously can it be that hard to mislead the guy?) to believe LB wanted these guys.

I just choose to believe in Larry's 30 years of past precident that he doesn't like players like Francis and Jalen and that a GM on the hot seat asked a friend for a favor and possibly misled him by saying that tese guys wouldn't be here next year, then told him they are his players.
~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
9/24/2006  7:49 PM
that's an interesting viewpoint...my concern with moT is that he has already said statements to the press that are sure to undermind what we are looking to do here in New York.

"we are pieces of meat" (referring to how isiah sees expiring contracts)

also, he made statements when fLB was coaching about playing time.

Forget about his discontent in Houston.

If we are looking to put the tabloids behind us, I'd prefer the defensive minded Rose over the "me, I, me, me, I" of MoT.

Can he change his tune? Ofcourse, I'm trumpenting the hated marbury and francis can change theirs...why not moT.

But, he is an expiring contract and with the youth we have in the front court, a piece of meat.

JMHO.
all kool aid all the time.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/24/2006  8:30 PM
Posted by joec32033:


Isiah chased Jalen for 2 years before Brown.

Much like it is possible that LB did want Francis for whatever reason, it also falls under a totally believeable scenario that Isiah thought or was told tat Dolan is not going to approve any more high cost moves after all the money he added unless Brown directly said he wanted certain guys.

Isiah has shown that he has two faces the little innocent but sly looking face he shows to the media, and the conniving manipulitive guy he is.

I seriously believe that Isiah may have led Dolan (seriously can it be that hard to mislead the guy?) to believe LB wanted these guys.

I just choose to believe in Larry's 30 years of past precident that he doesn't like players like Francis and Jalen and that a GM on the hot seat asked a friend for a favor and possibly misled him by saying that tese guys wouldn't be here next year, then told him they are his players.

The only problem with your argument is that if Isiah REALLY wanted Jalen, he could've gotten him a long time ago. He didn't have to "chase" Jalen. Toronto has been wanting to get rid of him for a while now.

The other thing is that at that point in the season, LB and IT weren't friends anymore. LB had been basically embarrassing him in the papers all season. Not to mention all the other behind the seens stuff.

The undertone of what you're saying is to suggest that Isiah has no clue what he's doing. I disagree with that popular premise. Obviously most of those looking at what he's done with the team just can't grasp that coming from where we started it would be impossible to make direct deals for the EXACT kind of player you may want. He initially had to make moves to rid the team of the awful players we had, then he made deals to get the kind of players he really wants, thru the draft, FA or trade. His draft picks say more about what he's trying to do than most of his trades. In the end I think he's getting this team to the point he set out to achieve and he's done it inside of 3 full seasons. That's not bad. All that remains is for him to have a successful season this year and to build from there and all this talk about how bad he's been will be gone.


[Edited by - NIXLUVA on 09-24-2006 8:32 PM]
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

9/24/2006  9:08 PM
You gotta love how a bad move is looked at as a good move, because if the bad move isn't made, then an even worse move is bound to take place. Seriously this is a retarded move. The team is paying luxury tax money on his full salary not what his buyout will be. It's an expiring contract he's buying out which almost never happens and once completed the player can sign to a team for beans more than likely in same conference if not the same division. If he can trade for Jalen and acquire a draft pick who's to say what could have developed with Mo or Mo plus fodder?

LOL @ what happened to Jackie Butler when you consider what the Knicks are willing to swallow in Mo's buyout and possibly Rose.

Zeke and Dolan have rotten cabbage in their cranium.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
9/24/2006  9:44 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Interestingly, former coach Larry Brown last season tried to persuade management to cut players because he felt it would improve team chemistry.
LOL

maybe the upside to the LB stuff is that despite the fact that while he screwed up and did a bad job, Isiah realized that LB was right, and that they did need defenders, role players and veterans cut.

the thing about Larry is - if he wanted to cut Mo Taylor, why did he continue to play him? most coaches create a thing called a rotation.


[Edited by - crzymdups on 24-09-2006 9:45 PM]
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/24/2006  9:52 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by fishmike:
Interestingly, former coach Larry Brown last season tried to persuade management to cut players because he felt it would improve team chemistry.
LOL

maybe the upside to the LB stuff is that despite the fact that while he screwed up and did a bad job, Isiah realized that LB was right, and that they did need defenders, role players and veterans cut.

the thing about Larry is - if he wanted to cut Mo Taylor, why did he continue to play him? most coaches create a thing called a rotation.


[Edited by - crzymdups on 24-09-2006 9:45 PM]

How do we know Isiah wasn't telling Larry to play Mo T?
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
wsdm
Posts: 20803
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2006
Member: #1167

9/24/2006  9:54 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by fishmike:
Interestingly, former coach Larry Brown last season tried to persuade management to cut players because he felt it would improve team chemistry.
LOL

maybe the upside to the LB stuff is that despite the fact that while he screwed up and did a bad job, Isiah realized that LB was right, and that they did need defenders, role players and veterans cut.

the thing about Larry is - if he wanted to cut Mo Taylor, why did he continue to play him? most coaches create a thing called a rotation.


[Edited by - crzymdups on 24-09-2006 9:45 PM]

How do we know Isiah wasn't telling Larry to play Mo T?
Larry didn't seem to concerned about pleasing Isiah. Eventually the buck has to stop with the coach with regard to playing time, no?
www.selltheknicks.com----No more DOLANOMICS!
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
9/24/2006  9:55 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by fishmike:
Interestingly, former coach Larry Brown last season tried to persuade management to cut players because he felt it would improve team chemistry.
LOL

maybe the upside to the LB stuff is that despite the fact that while he screwed up and did a bad job, Isiah realized that LB was right, and that they did need defenders, role players and veterans cut.

the thing about Larry is - if he wanted to cut Mo Taylor, why did he continue to play him? most coaches create a thing called a rotation.


[Edited by - crzymdups on 24-09-2006 9:45 PM]

How do we know Isiah wasn't telling Larry to play Mo T?


we don't know, but actions speak louder than words.
all kool aid all the time.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/24/2006  9:55 PM
Posted by wsdm:


Larry didn't seem to concerned about pleasing Isiah. Eventually the buck has to stop with the coach with regard to playing time, no?

You would think so but lets remember this is a team run by Cablevision, nothing is done right.


[Edited by - nyk4ever on 09-24-2006 9:56 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
wsdm
Posts: 20803
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2006
Member: #1167

9/24/2006  10:09 PM
I don't know if anyone posted this part about the possibility of buying out Jalen too.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/story/455337p-383202c.html
Jalen Rose also is entering the last year of his contract and is a prime candidate to be traded by the deadline. There also is a possibility that the Knicks would look to buy out Rose's contract if Quentin Richardson cannot be traded.
www.selltheknicks.com----No more DOLANOMICS!
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
9/24/2006  10:56 PM
bottom line, if Mo T or Jalen is waived, Dolan has basically told Isiah he can't add any more big deals.
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/24/2006  11:01 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

bottom line, if Mo T or Jalen is waived, Dolan has basically told Isiah he can't add any more big deals.

Which would be great news. 7 years too late, but still, great news.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
9/24/2006  11:02 PM
moving into the 3rd year of the Zeke regime, and we have what we need.

Let's let them come off the cap and hope they don't disrupt the locker room.
all kool aid all the time.
Nalod
Posts: 72133
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/24/2006  11:03 PM
Im thinking we got to let deals expire and we ain't trading anymore for longer deals!

We have done the league a favor for years as the depository of unwanted deals.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
9/25/2006  5:31 AM
The only problem with your argument is that if Isiah REALLY wanted Jalen, he could've gotten him a long time ago. He didn't have to "chase" Jalen. Toronto has been wanting to get rid of him for a while now.

And how is that a problem? Isiah wanted Crawford since he got here too, and it took him a while to get him here too. It takes two to tango if you want to trade, and Isiah kept thinking that acquiring contracts could get him just about anyone he wanted(he traded all those contracts for Craw, he traded contracts for Steph....). Toronto wanted Anfernee and he expected to make another blockbuster and get a "true"(in his mind, anyway) star. Isiah traded a smaller expiring (Davis) for him and then used the bigger contract to acquire "star" Steve Francis.
The other thing is that at that point in the season, LB and IT weren't friends anymore. LB had been basically embarrassing him in the papers all season. Not to mention all the other behind the seens stuff.
No, we are talking pre-deadline here. Early February. They were fine, if they weren't why would Isiah trade a kid he loved (Ariza) but Larry hated for a guy that Larry supposedly begged for??
The undertone of what you're saying is to suggest that Isiah has no clue what he's doing. I disagree with that popular premise. Obviously most of those looking at what he's done with the team just can't grasp that coming from where we started it would be impossible to make direct deals for the EXACT kind of player you may want. He initially had to make moves to rid the team of the awful players we had, then he made deals to get the kind of players he really wants, thru the draft, FA or trade. His draft picks say more about what he's trying to do than most of his trades. In the end I think he's getting this team to the point he set out to achieve and he's done it inside of 3 full seasons. That's not bad. All that remains is for him to have a successful season this year and to build from there and all this talk about how bad he's been will be gone.
No. My premise is that Isiah has a plan on what he's doing and he just changes it constantly depending on many many factors that he really can't foresee.

He comes here and decides to go young we do better than expected. Decides to get Steph, we do ok. Decides all we need is a coach, fires Chaney, gets Lenny. Lenny does ok (with more of a half court approach), Isiah wants to run. Lenny didn't play fast enough, Lenny made some mistakes(health problems?), goes with Herb who does ok in a half court system. Decides to trade complimentary players and go young and runafter we did decent in the halfcourt). Now we have alot of young players who have serious flaws in their game for one reason or another. He decides to hire the best teaching coach in the game, instill a winning attitude. Whiney young players cry that LB is too hard on them. Isiah and LB have issues with the flawed roster he put together(Isiah said it best when he got Steph-He is a flawed player right now but that is why we were able to get him-Steph, Rose, Francis, Curry, Q are all flawed players, problem is they all have the same flaw, all are known as prima donnas that only play one side of the ball).

Isiah chooses players over Larry, now he HAS to win now because he obviously has an expectation of Larry to win now. Now Isiah has to win now, and after telling Larry these are your guys, and fully standing behind the uptempo offense routine and telling Larry he has enough guys to play D, he goes out and gets Collins(who Larry loved), Mardy(who Larry loved), Jefferies(who Larry loved) and is going to cut Mo(who Larry hated), possibly Jalen(who Larry wanted cut). Did I mention that he lifted the Marbury trade straight off of Scott Layden's desk?

It just seems that unless Isiah is following someone else's advice his moves are questionable(Taylor, Rose, Curry trade, Q trade...).
~You can't run from who you are.~
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
9/25/2006  6:17 AM
You know, the more I think about it the more I don't like buying out MT. As I stated above, Malik Rose is a far worse player at this point, and I believe his contract runs out next year as opposed to MT's which I believe runs out this year.

The only real point of ever picking up Taylor was to have a tradeable asset, so why not jettison Rose now, and pick up something for Taylor, even if it is just a second round pick?

Meanwhile Taylor can actually play if he has to!

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
9/25/2006  7:26 AM
I remember Isiah sitting down with Al Trawtwig after that deadline where he picked up Mo and Malik. He was gushing about adding picks for taking on Malik, and although he gave up a #2 (turned out to be a valuable pick) for Mo T his exact quote was that this year Mo Taylor's contract would be a valuable asset.

In another 3 months the plan will change again

stay tuned
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/25/2006  8:30 AM
Isiah has no idea what his plan is. He just plays it by ear and hopes for the best. Imagine the young players we could have on this roster if we stopped d*cking around and actually stick to a plan.

I'm all for buying out MoT. Who cares if he is better than Rose. Have we not learned yet that it isn't about talent it's about chemistry? How can we not have learned this lesson? Let the man go, bring in a young hungry player and let's move on.
I just hope that people will like me
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
9/25/2006  9:12 AM
I don't disagree that Taylor has more value on the open market, as compared to Rose, but Rose is not as bad a player as his play last year suggested. He is a undersized PF that can play defense, rebound, and make hustle plays. When used in that capacity, he is a solid player. LB often used him as a SF and made him try to score. We all saw the results. I think this team needs defense at the 4 spot more than offense, so IMHO I think for this team, Rose might be the player to keep as opposed to Taylor. But I cannot argue that both probably need to go in order to aid in the development of Frye, Lee, and JJ2, who may also play some PF. Whatever we do, we need to buy out someone b/c I agree that we don't need to add more long-term salary.
Trust the Process
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
9/25/2006  9:21 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by wsdm:

Joe, that's just garbage media speculation. In contrast, Brown's has been directly quoted saying he asked Isiah to get Francis. (I'm not sure if he has been quoted about Rose too, though.)

Wsdm, have you ever heard of plausible deniability? This is the exact opposite.

For example.

I'm in a union and we are in the middle of elections. One of the guys says, "Well, the president of the union told me to run."
What he doesn't say is that he called the president of the union and actually asked "President X, I am thinking of running for the union rep job, but I am not sure.". To which president X says "Sure you should run, everyone who wants to try to be a union rep whould run.".

Two totally different scenarios in the context of what is said. The guys isn't lying. But he also isn't telling the truth.

If Isiah said to Larry "Look, this is the best I can do now, but these guys will not be here next year becauzse I am planning a big move. But I need you to endorse this trade, because Dolan is looking at me sideways because of all this money I added. I promise they won't be here next year and I will use them to get you players you want. Just please endorse this trade". Larry says, "Ok...I'll endorse it to the media, but you gotta promise me that they won't be here."

Technically they can say Larry endorsed it and it isn't a lie. It also isn't the whole truth.

And the last thing I am gonna believe is ANYTHING coming out of Dolan's or Isiah's mouth in an interview, given by, edited by, and aired by a company that Dolan owns and everyone associated with the interview works for him.

Oh my god. The lengths people willl go to, to protect Larry Brown are unbelievable. You have invented a wholly unsupported scenario, that has LB saying things he doesn't mean, so that you can absolve him from responsibility.
Taylor, Knicks Negotiating Buyout

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy