Posted by PresIke:

Then you add to this maddening logic (and I'm being kind in calling this a logical argument) by saying that Larry Brown "deserves no credit" for Detroit's championship because you suggest he outcoached Phil Jackson (which is a very strange argument). So, you mean to suggest that Larry Brown is a worse coach than Jackson, and therefore in that Finals matchup Jackson deserved the title, but since Brown has that Championship, instead of Jackson, Larry's deserves an asterix next to it??