Posted by holfresh:
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by holfresh:
So tell me what getting guys that have bad contracts that Larry wants here mean...What does trying to get KMart,Ratliff and all the other "Larry Brown" type players mean fish?..You think I really need to look far to find guys who are advocate for this movement???
More importantly, what happens when Larry decides that Golden State is where he would rather be and we are saddled with the Ratliff and KMarts of the world, what then?
K-mart is actually younger than Marbury and I don't hear you demanding we dump steph. When you speak about the rookies do you support Nate or Jamal starting over Marbury? (I do)
All year long we hear about Kmart, Ratliff, Lynch, Snow, etc, but who did we end up with? Woods, Jalen and Francis.
Across his career brown has been known as a master motivator, his teams are considered to overachieve, just not here. it's not about bringing in Brown-type players, it's about bringing in players who'll play hard for him, or whoever the coach is, without conditions.
Marbs has not lost a step and has played with the same explosiveness he has had since entering theis league...You can hope that Nate and Craw start over Marbs, but Marbs outplays both of them even in 3rd gear....Ratliff and Kmart have huge contracts and are damaged goods that can no longer play 82 games, how can getting these guys can be good for the Knicks...I'm a proponent of putting the best players on the court, not those you have personal issues with...By the way, Larry wanted JRose and Francis.....Still...
first off, i've explained a zillion times that I believe jalen and francis were tactical moves for draft picks and later trades. for example, do you for a second think jalen will be here after the trade deadline? but even if larry did want them all on his own, doesn't that debunk your theory of him going for broken kneed defensive role players?
and as for marbury, when you stay stuff like this, in this very thread, it makes me think you are about developing youth for later vs going with veterans now. or do you consider a 30 yr old steph with tendonitis "youth?"
Do you really know what my way is?...I have been an advocate of breaking it down and building thru the draft and aquiring young players....If you notice, I'm the guy preaching play the youngsters and let them develop....I am against Larry Brown's way of bringing vets to win now and leave us in a deeper hole that we are already in...My opinion is not right, it just that, an opinion...You guys think the team should be built around the coach, I don't...Doesn't mean winner can't be built another way...just seems your argument becomes a bit selective. you use it against brown, as if it wasn't isiah who brought in Marbury, Mo, Malik, AD, Penny, and who isn't trying to win now.
just do me two small favors and tell me all the great youth Larry has traded for broken vets in his career. and tell me why the NBA GMs voted LB as the BEST coach at developing youth.
[Edited by - BlueSeats on 06-02-2006 10:45 PM]