[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Tidbids from the taping of SAS's show last night
Author Thread
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/13/2006  2:00 PM
Posted by fishmike:

last I checked
Marbury
Mo T
Jerome James
QRich
Crawford
Malik Rose
Antonio Davis
are all over 25 years old... pretty sure they were a big part of the core to start the season. Curry's been in the league 4 years to boot.

Maybe your speaking of a different team. Last I checked Frye, Lee, Nate and JAckie werent the problem with this team.

How about just answering the question for your guy Starbury? We can keep it simple for you. Lets see.. you will say Flip right?



The core is Marbs, Curry, and Frye...thats it....Marbs is gone.....So it's now Curry and Frye...23 yeas old....

AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/13/2006  2:05 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by fishmike:

Look at all the titles won since Daly's Pistons. Every title team except one had the best player in the league, or even 2 of the top 5 players in the league.
MJ/Pippen x6
Hakeem x2
Duncan x3
Shaq Kobe x3
Pistons 1

In 15 years of NBA titles Larry's the only guy to have won one playing team ball and not relying on a superstar, and he was 1 game away from winning 2.

Again... you dodge my orginal question...
what system has these guys played in thats resulted in winning basketball games?



Your question is stupid..the core players on this team are all under 25 years old...Just getting their start in the NBA...So they have not won or loss any meaningful games...That does not mean that running a slow down offense is the right thing to do with an athletic team...


offense was "slowed down" when they couldn't/wouldn't pass the ball around in october. offense was "slowed down" when they turnover the ball every 2-3 possessions. offsense was "slowed down" to accomodated the "slow" learning players we have.



They turn the ball over because they are trying to make the 6th and 7th pass on offense...They are passing up wide open shots to pass the ball to please Brown....

if that's what you think. 1/3rd the turnovers are guys trying to split a double team. another 1/3rd are from offensive fouls and the final 1/3rd are from our guards not being able to execute a simple entry pass into the post or our bigs not getting correct position for the post pass.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/13/2006  2:17 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by fishmike:

Holfresh, your like Johnnie Cochran using the Chewbacca defense. Riddle me this, what system has these guys played in thats resulted in winning basketball games?



These are young players, they haven't been in the game for 30 years like our beloved coach..Your guy winning one championship in 22 years doesn't not impress me as a person who know how to win in any situation....Big time coaches are able to adapt, why can't your guy do the same?


ok, which is it...is it the players that win or the coach? is it the players that win a coach a championship or is it the coach that guides the players to a championship? b/c if you think it has mostly to do with the players, then arguing that brown only won 1 title just means that he didn't have good enough players to win it for him, no? so doesn't that mean the indictment is not on brown?



It's the players that win a Championship not the coach...but not having the right coach will make a team lose a Championship...A coach can make a good team win....He can't make a bad team win...So Brown could have talent and not know how to use them properly is my basic agruement....
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/13/2006  2:21 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by fishmike:

Holfresh, your like Johnnie Cochran using the Chewbacca defense. Riddle me this, what system has these guys played in thats resulted in winning basketball games?



These are young players, they haven't been in the game for 30 years like our beloved coach..Your guy winning one championship in 22 years doesn't not impress me as a person who know how to win in any situation....Big time coaches are able to adapt, why can't your guy do the same?


How is it possible that this is the only team in the league where the players are not able to fit into a system...How is it that 29 other teams are able to have a playing style and the Knicks players are the only one who just don't get it.....

[Edited by - holfresh on 04-13-2006 1:23 PM]

I don't mean to be harsh, but this is such a crap arguement. Only won once? How about an NCAA championship? How about just about every team Brown has coached has gotten much better over the long haul.

And seriouly, how many coaches in the NBA have won the championship over the past 20 years? Is Hubie bad? The Czar? Nelson?



Because Larry has won one in the last 20 years doesn't mean he is using this roster to it's fullest potential...Larry did not build the team that won that title...Sheed was a bigger piece to that puzzle than Larry was and they are proving that so far this year....That team could win a title without Larry but they can't win it without Sheed....So this agruement that Larry knows it all is crap.....
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

4/13/2006  2:41 PM
Posted by holfresh:
They turn the ball over because they are trying to make the 6th and 7th pass on offense...They are passing up wide open shots to pass the ball to please Brown....


That's just poor execution, it doesn't mean the "system" is is flawed or unadapted to the players. Is your point that we should just roll the balls out there with no coaching and just let guys chuck, iso and freelance? Forget getting a different coach, lets just go with NO coach, eh?

I'd like to hear what this team's strength is and who possesses it? And please don't try to sell me on "athleticism" as a strength, that's simply another word for ill-defined low IQ "potential". I mean a team ball, 5 man, fundamental strength, like shooting, passing, rebounding, court awareness, man to man defense, etc. The best I can come up with is backcourt penetration, and 1) even that's been falling short and 2) I don't see LB limiting that in any sense.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/13/2006  8:12 PM
Why is it everytime I mention uptempo you guys always take it to he extremes...It mean no rules out there, it means no passing or sharing the ball as you guys like to say, It means playing no defense, it means AND1 highlights, it means school yard basketball...Many teams run an uptempo offense in the NBA that has structure and are successful, look at Dallas....

Now for the team's strength...The Knicks has 3 players that can be considered a core to any basketball team in Curry,Fyre and Marbs...At this some point this past season, they should have been getting 40 mins per night together...It was important for these guys get to know each other's game but Curry wasn't in shape for a good part of the season and when he got in shape, Larry thought otherwise....If Curry gets 4 fouls in a game, he is burried at the end of the bench for the rest of the game....What is that...Frye also needed more time this year, Malik and AD eating up minutes this year was just a total waste of time...It did nothing for the organization or for the growth of the rookies...

Also Marbs is a very good penetrator, he ran a nice pick and roll with KVH and Doleac....Can this not be done with Frye as well...How many pick and roll have you seen run with Marbs and Frye this season...Pick and roll was the staple of Stockton and Malone's offense...You are not going confuse our guys with that duo, but could we at least try...How is it possible that Curry and Butler are sharing time at the center position...How is it possible that Curry is shooting some insane percentage close to 70 percent and he not get the ball almost every time down on offense...Why is the coach not demanding he get the ball..The guy has hit fifty something shots in his last 70 attempts and he can barely get playing time on one of the worst team in the league...And how are you guys are able to measure IQs from your television sets..It's amazing you guys are able to do that...





[Edited by - holfresh on 04-13-2006 8:13 PM]
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/13/2006  10:07 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by fishmike:

last I checked
Marbury
Mo T
Jerome James
QRich
Crawford
Malik Rose
Antonio Davis
are all over 25 years old... pretty sure they were a big part of the core to start the season. Curry's been in the league 4 years to boot.

Maybe your speaking of a different team. Last I checked Frye, Lee, Nate and JAckie werent the problem with this team.

How about just answering the question for your guy Starbury? We can keep it simple for you. Lets see.. you will say Flip right?



The core is Marbs, Curry, and Frye...thats it....Marbs is gone.....So it's now Curry and Frye...23 yeas old....

Exactly (although I'd add guys like Lee, Q Woods, Jackie, Jamal, Nate).
Come on. Stop dodging the question! Surely you can list several NBA systems that Frye, Lee, Nate, and Jackie have won in over the past 15 years!

BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

4/14/2006  12:15 AM
Posted by holfresh:

Why is it everytime I mention uptempo you guys always take it to he extremes...It mean no rules out there, it means no passing or sharing the ball as you guys like to say, It means playing no defense, it means AND1 highlights, it means school yard basketball...Many teams run an uptempo offense in the NBA that has structure and are successful, look at Dallas....


I understand you're lumping me in with many guys but my comment came from your implying Brown needs to adapt his system because these guys aren't effectively executing his "share the ball for a good shot" concept. You wrote:

How can developing a style that fits your players skillset be a bad thing...How can trying to be creative on offense be bad for a team...Much of the Knicks turnover problems they have this year is trying to make the 5th and 6th pass on offense without any rhytmm or reason...Larry has these guys thinking too much...They are making to passes for the sake of passing and not to try and get the easy baskets on offense..

That suggest that because these guys, who aren't known for sharing the ball, haven't yet mastered it he should abandon the quest and cater to their weakness by letting them do what they know, which is to freelance, iso and ball dominate. It sounds like you're saying "If they can't strike the balance on sharing... don't make them share."

Now for the team's strength...The Knicks has 3 players that can be considered a core to any basketball team in Curry,Fyre and Marbs...At this some point this past season, they should have been getting 40 mins per night together...It was important for these guys get to know each other's game but Curry wasn't in shape for a good part of the season and when he got in shape, Larry thought otherwise....

I disagree that a rookie needs 40 mpg to develop. Richard Jefferson got 24. Bogut is getting 28. Joe Johnson got 21. Marion 25. Dirk 20. Nash 11. Redd 6.

If Curry gets 4 fouls in a game, he is burried at the end of the bench for the rest of the game....What is that...

Curry is still getting more MPG than his career average and not far off his career highs. He was just a big a core guy to Chi, why didn't they give him 40 mpg? Larry isn't Eddy's first coach to think he loses focus as the game wears on. he doesn't demand the ball, he stops posting, the guards don't find him. He might think additional time is counter productive.

What Eddy could do to increase his court time is to defend, rebound and get his own points via offensive rebounds, tips and putbacks. When Larry takes him out while he's doing that I'll back you up.

Meanwhile, maybe he wants to give Butler some time too - he usually earns precisely with garbage points like that. I guarantee you Butler is more productive in his 13 mpg than Eddy is with an extra 13 mpg.
Frye also needed more time this year, Malik and AD eating up minutes this year was just a total waste of time...It did nothing for the organization or for the growth of the rookies...


I disagree. Just goes to show how devalued defense and leadership has become around here. You need respected guys out there setting a tone and leading by example. And they need PT to have credibility in the locker room too.

Also Marbs is a very good penetrator, he ran a nice pick and roll with KVH and Doleac....Can this not be done with Frye as well...How many pick and roll have you seen run with Marbs and Frye this season...Pick and roll was the staple of Stockton and Malone's offense...You are not going confuse our guys with that duo, but could we at least try...

Frye can pick and pop, he's not yet ready to roll. Larry probably doesn't want Steph and Frye to get too comfortable working the perimeter, it was all we could do last year and it's not a high percentage option.

As I think back on Brown former teams he's really not a fan of the P&R. reggie and rip run cross court through multiple screens, Iverson freelances, Smits got fed in the post.

He's not really into the two man game, and when he wants to feed a big his preference is into the interior. I know Sheed takes a fair amount of perimeter shots but I'm having trouble to recall how they set him up out there. I suspect it's off of ball movement, just as we did Frye.

I do hear your point on that, Steph and frye could have run the pick and pop, but it's really not LB's game and he's done pretty well with good shooting bigmen utilizing his shared ball style. Meanwhile a lot of guys were sick of Steph and kurt doing it and wanted kurt gone ASAP. I hope those same people aren't now wishing Brown would set frye up for the same punishment.
How is it possible that Curry and Butler are sharing time at the center position...How is it possible that Curry is shooting some insane percentage close to 70 percent and he not get the ball almost every time down on offense...Why is the coach not demanding he get the ball..

Brown did! How many post-game interviews did we hear with LB complaining that the post wasn't being fed well and that Eddy wasn't getting enough attempts. And all the while some fans complained that force feeding curry was stagnating the offense and we needed to "set our guards free."

See because we're losing you're declaring Browns approach wrong, whatever it is. If we lose with uptempo and ball movement, than we should be feeding the post. If we're feeding the post, then we should be running. It's not acceptable that we run Brown's "share the ball" offense long enough for the guys to get it, it's better we change the system all the time to see if there's something out there that might possibly stick?
And how are you guys are able to measure IQs from your television sets..It's amazing you guys are able to do that...

It's not hard to gauge a bball IQ by watching a guy play bball for years.

Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/14/2006  1:22 PM
About Curry: My guess is when he gets so tired of going to the bench for committing dumb fouls that he stops committing them. That day his minutes will go up. Keep taking him out and hopefully he will get tired of committing them.
I just hope that people will like me
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/14/2006  2:24 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

About Curry: My guess is when he gets so tired of going to the bench for committing dumb fouls that he stops committing them. That day his minutes will go up. Keep taking him out and hopefully he will get tired of committing them.

When in doubt, defend Larry Brown...

Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/14/2006  3:04 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by Bippity10:

About Curry: My guess is when he gets so tired of going to the bench for committing dumb fouls that he stops committing them. That day his minutes will go up. Keep taking him out and hopefully he will get tired of committing them.

When in doubt, defend Larry Brown...


Actually when in doubt I just do what I would personally do as a coach. Nothing else. My opinion stands for itself. I don't care about LB, I don't care about Marbs, I don't have an autograph to my name, I have played against some these guys, met some others. I do not worship or blindly defend any of them. My opiniion is my opinion.

Number 2: Curry went through the exact same thing in Chicage where LB was not the coach. At some point he has to take personal responsibility or just continue to be the same player 5 years from now.
I just hope that people will like me
Tidbids from the taping of SAS's show last night

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy